The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies

Living Edition
| Editors: Scott Romaniuk, Manish Thapa, Péter Marton

Balance of Power

  • Glen M. E. DuerrEmail author
  • Michael WiltEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_4-1
  • 125 Downloads

Introduction

Balance of power theory has been the focal point of international relations (IR) political theory, especially concerning the various generations of realism – one of the main theories in this field of academic study. Under realism – classical realism, structural realism, and neoclassical realism – the three “generations” of the theory, power remains a major consideration in any calculation. For any scholar seeking to oppose the arguments of realists, balance of power is an important point of rebuttal or repurposing in order to undercut a power-centric position.

Thus, balance of power has been used in a variety of ways with a range of different definitions. Most revolve around the idea of balancing the amount and accumulation of power among great powers in world politics. Past events – such as World War II between 1939 and 1945 – have pointed to the importance of understanding balance of power as a consistently fluid process that affects systems drastically through...

Keywords

Power Realism Liberalism International Relations Buck-passing USA China World War II 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Claude, I. L. (1962). Power and international relations. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Ikenberry, G. J. (2009). After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2012). Power and interdependence (4th ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  4. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  5. Morgenthau, H. (1948). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
  6. Schweller, R. L. (1998). Deadly imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s strategy of world conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Spykman, N. J. (1942). America’s strategy in world politics: The United States and the balance of power. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
  8. Tucker, S. C. (2004). The second world war. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Fearon, J. D. (1994). Signaling versus the balance of power and interests: An empirical test of a crisis bargaining model. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38(2), 236–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Schweller, R. L. (1998). Deadly imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s strategy of world conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cedarville UniversityCedarvilleUSA