Advertisement

Educational Reform in the USA: Superintendents’ Role in Promoting Social Justice through Organizational Justice

  • Lars G. BjörkEmail author
  • Tricia Browne-Ferrigno
  • Amanda U. Potterton
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Since its inception, the role of the school district superintendent in the USA has reflected changes in society, shifting from managerial oversight to more complex responsibilities. The introduction of the school district superintendent position during the middle of the nineteenth century and myriad social, economic, political, and technological changes have had a profound effect on the nature of schooling and on the refinement of superintendents’ work. In retrospect, public education has served as a crucible of change and facilitated the nation’s shift from an agricultural and industrial economy to an information-based economy. Over time, schools served an increasingly urbanized and complex society, assimilated unprecedented waves of immigrants, meliorated the effects of poverty on leaners, and prepared successive generations of children to enter the workforce successfully. Further, as society changed, the purpose of schooling was redefined. During the last half of the twentieth century, education policy shifted from simply ensuring that students were literate and numerate to addressing more challenging issues of broadening their access to schooling and ensuring that all children learn. Public education in the USA is thus situated at the confluence of two policy streams that are decidedly different yet complimentary: Neoliberal educational reform mandates the focus on ensuring that the nation is completive in the global economy and that the press for accomplishing social justice in public schools is achieved. A discursive analysis of superintendents’ work suggests that it was and continues to be defined by changing circumstances and may be described by several role characteristics (i.e., teacher-scholar, organizational manager, democratic leader, applied social scientist, communicator). As school district chief executive officers (CEOs), superintendents have the position and considerable authority to make changes. Consequently, they need acuity not only for recognizing societal changes but also for interpreting how these shifts may influence their administrative roles, district organizational structures, and work focus and culture. In this regard, the role of superintendent is central to accomplishing social justice in public schools. Thus, an examination of educational reform initiatives, demographic shifts, and superintendents’ role characteristics provides a framework for understanding how social justice, organizational justice, and organizational learning are intricately entwined and for understanding how superintendents may contribute to accomplishing a more socially just and democratic society. In the long term, successful efforts at changing the organizational and social architecture of school districts are a powerful way to improve the lives of children specifically and society generally.

Keywords

USA Education reform Superintendent Social justice Organizational justice 

References

  1. Anyon, J. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Axley, S. R. (1996). Communication at work: Management and the communication-intensive organization. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berliner, D. C. (2006). Our impoverished view of educational research. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 949–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Björk, L. G. (2001a). Preparing the next generation of superintendents: Integrating formal and experiential knowledge. In C. C. Brunner & L. G. Björk (Eds.), The new superintendency: Advances in research and theories of school management and educational (pp. 19–54). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  7. Björk, L. G. (2001b). The role of the central office in decentralization. In T. J. Kowalski & G. Perreault (Eds.), 21st century challenges for school administrators (pp. 286–309). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  8. Björk, L. G. (2005). Superintendent-board relations: An historical overview of the dynamics of change and sources of conflict and collaboration. In G. J. Petersen & L. D. Fusarelli (Eds.), The district superintendent and school board relations: Trends in policy development and implementation (pp. 1–22). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  9. Björk, L. G., & Blase, J. (2009). The micropolitics of school district decentralization. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Björk, L. G., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (Eds.). (2014). Introduction: International perspectives on educational reform and superintendent leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 351–357.Google Scholar
  11. Björk, L. G., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (Eds.). (2018). Introduction to special issue: International perspectives on team leadership. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 3(2), 128–137.Google Scholar
  12. Björk, L. G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Kowalski, T. J. (2014). The superintendent and educational reform in the United States of America. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 444–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Björk, L. G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Kowalski, T. J. (2018). Superintendent roles as CEO and team leader. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 3(2), 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Björk, L. G., & Gurley, D. K. (2005). Superintendent as educational statesman and political strategist. In L. G. Björk & T. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 163–185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  15. Björk, L. G., & Keedy, J. L. (2001). Changing social context of education in the United States: Social justice and the superintendency. Journal of In-Service Education, 27(3), 405–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Björk, L. G., Kowalski, T. J., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2014). The school district superintendent in the United States of America. In A. E. Nir (Ed.), The educational superintendent: Between trust and regulation. An international perspective (pp. 17–38). Hauppauge, NY: Nova.Google Scholar
  17. Björk, L. G., Kowalski, T. J., & Young, M. D. (2005). National reports and implications for professional preparation and development. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice and development (pp. 45–70). Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Glass, T. E. (2005). Superintendent as organizational manager. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice and development (pp. 137–161). Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  20. Brunner, C. C., Grogan, M., & Björk, L. G. (2002). Shifts in the discourse defining the superintendency: Historical and current foundations of the position. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 211–238). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A course resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of public schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Callahan, R. E. (1966). The superintendent of schools: A historical analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Graduate Institute of Education, Washington University, St. Louis, Mo. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 0104 410).Google Scholar
  24. Chingos, M. (2016). School choice as an antipoverty strategy [Web blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.educationnext.org/school-choice-as-an-antipoverty-strategy/
  25. Choo, C. W. (2006). The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Clark, D. L., & Astuto, T. A. (1994). Redirecting reform: Challenges to popular assumptions about teachers and students. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(7), 512–520.Google Scholar
  27. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Collinson, V., & Cook, T. F. (2007). Organizational learning: Improving learning, teaching, and leading in school systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, F., & Zapota-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 3–58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  31. Conrad, C. (1994). Strategic organizational communication: Toward the twenty-first century (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.Google Scholar
  32. Cosner, S. (2009). Building organizational capacity through trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 248–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Counts, G. S. (1927/2018). The social composition of boards of education: A study of the social contract of public education. London, England: Forgotten Books.Google Scholar
  34. Cronin, J. M. (1973). The control of urban schools: Perspective on the power of educational reformers. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Cropanzano, R., Bryne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. E. (2001). Self-enhancement biases, laboratory experiences, George Wilhelm Friendrich Hegel and increasingly crowded world of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 260–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Cuban, L. (1976). The urban school superintendent: A century and a half of change. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.Google Scholar
  37. Dantley, M. E., & Green, T. L. (2015). Problematizing notions of leadership for social justice: Reclaiming social justice through a discourse of accountability and a radical, prophetic, and historical imagination. Journal of School Leadership, 25(5), 825–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Datnow, A. (2002). Can we transplant educational reform, and does it last? Journal of Educational Change, 3, 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. DeMatthews, D., Izquierdo, E., & Knight, D. S. (2017). Righting past wrongs: A superintendent’s social justice leadership for dual language education along the U.S.-Mexico border. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(1), 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Edmondson, A. C. (2004). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. In R. Kramer & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 239–272). New York, NY: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Field, J. (2003). Social capital. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10, 803–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fix, M., & Passel, J. S. (2003). U.S. immigration: Trends and implications for schools. Presentation at the National Association for Bilingual Education NCLB Implementation Institute, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  44. Frey, W. H. (2018). Diversity explosion: How new racial demographics are remaking America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  45. Fullan, M. (1983). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London, England: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  46. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a vengeance. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world, change the world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  49. Furman, G. (2012). Social justice leadership as praxis: Developing capacities through preparation programs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(2), 191–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Fusarelli, B. C., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2005). Reconceptualizing the superintendency: Superintendents as social scientists and social activists. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 187–206). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  51. Glass, G. V. (2008). Fertilizers, pills, and magnetic strips: The fate of public education in America. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  52. Glass, T. E., Björk, L. G., & Brunner, C. C. (2000). The study of the American superintendency 2000: A look at the superintendent in the new millennium. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.Google Scholar
  53. Goldin, C. (2003). The human capital century. Education Next, 3(1), 73–78.Google Scholar
  54. Goldring, E., & Greenfield, W. (2002). Understanding the evolving concept of leadership in education: Roles, expectations, and dilemmas. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 1–19). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Gough, I., & Olofsson, G. (Eds.). (1999). Capitalism and social cohesion: Essays on exclusion and integration. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  56. Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hedberg, B. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (Vol. 1, pp. 8–27). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Helgesen, S. (1995). The web of inclusion: A new architecture for building great organizations. New York, NY: Currency/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  60. Hixon, L., Hepler, B. B., & Kim, M. O. (2011). The white population: 2010. Washington, DC: Census Bureau, U. S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
  61. Hoy, W. K., & DiPaola, M. E. (Eds.). (2007). Essential ideas for the reform of American schools. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  62. Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, J. C. (2004). Organizational justice in school: No justice without trust. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(4), 250–259.Google Scholar
  63. Jones, D. A., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2013). How perceptions of fairness can change: A dynamic model of organizational justice. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(2), 136–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kirst, M. W., & Wirt, F. M. (2009). The political dynamics of American education (4th ed.). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kowalski, T. J. (2005a). Evolution of the school superintendent as communicator. Communication Education, 54(2), 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kowalski, T. J. (2005b). Evolution of the school district superintendent position. In L. G. Björk & T. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  67. Kowalski, T. J. (2013). The school superintendent: Theory, practices, and cases (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kowalski, T. J., & Björk, L. G. (2005). Role expectations of district superintendents: Implications for deregulating preparation and licensing. Journal of Thought, 40(2), 73–96.Google Scholar
  69. Kowalski, T. J., McCord, R. S., Petersen, G. J., Young, I. P., & Ellerson, N. M. (2011). The American school superintendent: 2010 decennial study. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  70. Kowalski, T. J., Peterson, G. J., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2007). Effective communication for school administrators: A necessity in an information age. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  71. Lacireno-Paquet, N., Holyoke, T., Moser, M., & Henig, J. (2002). Creaming versus cropping: Charter school enrollment practices in response to market incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lambkin, M. L. (2006). Challenges and changes faced by rural superintendents. The Rural Educator, 28(2), 17–24.Google Scholar
  73. Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. McFarland, J., Hussar, B., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Wang, K., Rathbun, A., et al. (2018). The condition of education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  75. Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structure in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organizational design. Management Science, 26(3), 322–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Murphy, J. (1990). The reform of American public education in the 1980s: Perspectives and cases. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  78. Nieto, S. (2017). On reconciling divergent ideas: A life-long quest. In S. Tobias, J. D. Fletcher, & D. C. Berliner (Eds.), Acquired wisdom series (Education review) (Vol. 24). Retrieved from http://edrev.asu.edu/index.php/ER/article/view/2285Google Scholar
  79. Pine, B. J., II, & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  80. Poole, W. L. (2007). Organizational justice as a framework for understanding union-management relations in education. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(3), 725–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Popova-Nowak, I. V., & Cseh, M. (2015). The meaning of organizational learning: A meta-paradigm perspective. Human Resource Development Review, 14(3), 299–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Potterton, A. U. (2018). Different choices: A public school community’s responses to school choice reforms. The Qualitative Report, 23(8), 1908–1931.Google Scholar
  83. Powers, J. M., & Potterton, A. U. (2018). The rich get richer: Inequalities in the distribution of tax credit donations to charter schools in Arizona. In Policy futures in education. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1478210318790602Google Scholar
  84. Pulliam, J. D., & Van Patten, J. D. (2007). History of education in America (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  85. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  87. Rana, G., Rostogi, R., & Garg, P. (2013). Organizational justice as predictor of activity of the position, achieving results, and developing further potential. Jindal Journal of Business Research, 2(2), 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  89. Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (2nd ed.). Harvard, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  90. Scanlan, M. (2011). Organizational learning in schools pursuing social justice: Fostering educational entrepreneurship and boundary spanning. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 5(4), 328–346.Google Scholar
  91. Schlechty, P. C. (1997). Inventing better schools: An action plan for educational reform. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  92. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 1(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
  93. Sergiovanni, T. J., Burlingame, M., Coombs, F. S., & Thurston, P. W. (1987). Educational governance and administration. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  94. Smylie, M. A., & Hart, A. W. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning and challenge: A human and social capital development perspective. In J. Murphy & K. Seashore-Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  95. Thayer, L. O. (1961). Administrative communication. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  96. Thompson, F. J. (2013). The rise of executive federalism: Implications for the picket fences and IGM [intergovernment management]. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Travis Burns, W. R., & DiPaola, M. F. (2013). A study of organizational justice, organizational citizenship behavior, and student achievement in high schools. American Secondary Education, 42(2), 4–23.Google Scholar
  98. U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). American FactFinder. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_DP_DPDP1&prodType=table. Retrieved: 14 April 2013Google Scholar
  99. W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (1961). Toward improved school administration: A decade of professional effort to heighten administrative understanding and skills. Battle Creek, MI: Author.Google Scholar
  100. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. West, A., Ingram, D., & Hind, A. (2006). “Skimming the cream:” admissions to charter schools in the United States and to autonomous schools in England. Educational Policy, 20(4), 615–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Xu, A. J., Loi, R., & Ngo, H. (2016). Ethical leadership behavior and employee justice perceptions: The mediating role of trust in organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars G. Björk
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tricia Browne-Ferrigno
    • 1
  • Amanda U. Potterton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational Leadership Studies, College of Education,University of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Khalid Arar
    • 1
  • Kadir Beycioglu
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationAl-Qasemi Academic College of EducationBaqa ElgarbiaIsrael
  2. 2.Faculty of Education at Buca, Department of Division of Educational AdministrationDokuz Eylul UniversityIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations