Advertisement

Learning the Pedagogy of Potential: Social Inclusion and Teacher Education

  • Ian ThompsonEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Potential in education suggests the possibilities for learning and development for every child and young person. Yet the overwhelming evidence in England is that the potential of many young people is not currently met by school systems. The strong link between social disadvantage and poor educational outcomes is well documented in the research literature as have been the effects of poverty on young people’s health and well-being. Evidence from empirical research studies and statistical analyses has repeatedly shown that the most economically disadvantaged students with a special educational need have the poorest educational outcomes in England in terms of educational achievement and emotional well-being. England is the only jurisdiction in the United Kingdom (UK) where education is directly controlled by the education department of the central UK government. It is also, arguably, the jurisdiction where neoliberal rhetoric and neoconservative practice is most entrenched and where social inclusion is most threatened. For these reasons, England is an interesting context in which to explore the challenges for initial teacher education (ITE) programs to respond to rapidly changing and increasingly exclusionary policy and practice in the schools that preservice teachers may encounter in their teaching practice and future employment. This chapter argues that it is the responsibility of schools, teachers, and ITE programs to help reduce inequalities and promote social inclusion. A broad definition of social inclusion is adopted within the context of school education. The chapter sets the context of social inclusion and practices of social exclusion in the English education system. It examines approaches to social inclusion and social exclusion in ITE programs and considers questions of performativity within a dual stated commitment to accountability and inclusion. The chapter then considers the pedagogy of social learning in inclusive schools.

Keywords

Social inclusion Initial teacher education Pedagogy Potential Performativity Disadvantage School exclusion Social situation of development Sociocultural Vygotsky 

References

  1. Andrews, J., Hutchinson, J., & Johnes, R. (2016). Grammar schools and social mobility. London: Education Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J Ball. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, S. J. (2016). Education, justice and democracy: The struggle over ignorance and opportunity. In A. Montgomery & I. Kehoe (Eds.), Reimagining the purpose of schools and educational organisations (pp. 189–205). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z. (2004). Wasted lives: Modernity and its outcasts. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). A theory for assessment for learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81–100). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  8. Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Buras, K. L. (2014). There really is a culture of poverty: Notes on Black working-class struggles for equity and education. In P. C. Gorski & J. Landsman (Eds.), The poverty and education reader: A call for equity in many voices (pp. 60–75). Sterling: Stylus Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
  10. Burn, K., & Childs, A. (2016). Responding to poverty through education and teacher education initiatives: A critical evaluation of key trends in government policy in England 1997–2015. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(4), 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burn, K., Hagger, K., & Mutton, T. (2015). Beginning teachers’ learning: Making experience count. Northwich: Critical Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Burn, K., Mutton, T., Thompson, I., Ingram, J., McNicholl, J., & Firth, R. (2016). The impact of adopting a research orientation towards use of the pupil premium Grant in preparing beginning teachers in England to understand and work effectively with young people living in poverty. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(4), 434–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carpenter, H., Papps, I., Bragg, J., Dyson, A., Harris, D., Kerr, K., … Laing, K. (2013). Evaluation of pupil premium: Research report. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  14. Child Poverty Action Group (2017). www.cpag.org.uk/content/impact-poverty. Downloaded 01.03.2018.
  15. Claxton, G. (2007). Expanding young People’s capacity to learn. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(2), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cochran-Smith, M. (2009). Toward a theory of teacher education for social justice. In Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 445–467). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Cochran-Smith, M. (2010). Towards a theory of teacher education for social justice. In M. Fullan, A. Hargreaves, D. Hopkins, & A. Lieberman (Eds.), International handbook of education change (2nd ed., pp. 445–467). New York: Springer Press.Google Scholar
  18. Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: Towards a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crawford, C., Dearden, L., Micklewright, J., & Vignoles, A. (2016). Family background and university success: Differences in higher education access and outcomes in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cummings, C., Laing, K., Law, J., McLaughlin, J., Papps, I., Todd, L., & Woolner, P. (2012). Can changing aspirations and attitudes impact on educational attainment? A review of interventions. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Daniels, H., Thompson, I., & Tawell, A. (2017). Patterns and processes of school exclusions in England. Paper presented at SERA conference. Ayr.Google Scholar
  22. Daniels, H., Thompson, I., & Tawell, A. (2019). After Warnock: The Effects of Perverse Incentives in Policies in England for Students With Special Educational Needs. Frontiers in Education 4.Google Scholar
  23. Department for Education (DfE). (2017). Exclusion from maintained schools, academies and student referral unites in England: Statutory guidance for those with legal responsibilities in relation to exclusion. London: DfE.Google Scholar
  24. DfE. (2018). Permanent and fixed period exclusions in England: 2016–2017. London: DfE.Google Scholar
  25. Derry, J. (2013). Vygotsky philosophy and education. London: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dickerson, A., & Popli, G. (2012). Persistent poverty and children’s cognitive development. In Evidence from the UK Millennium Cohort study. London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies.Google Scholar
  27. Dorling, D., Shildrick, T. (2011). Injustice: Why Social Inequality Persists. Sociological Research Online, 16(4), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Doyle, W., & Carter, K. (1984). Academic tasks in classrooms. Curriculum Inquiry, 14, 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dudley-Marling, C., & Lucas, K. (2009). Pathologizing the language and culture of poor children. Language Arts, 86(5), 362–370.Google Scholar
  30. Dweck, C. S. (2007). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  31. Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert professional practitioner: The relational turn in expertise. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Elliott, V., Baird, J., Hopfenbeck, T., Ingram, J., Thompson, I., Usher, N., … Coleman, R. (2016). Approaches to written marking in English primary and secondary schools: A review. London: Education Endowment Fund.Google Scholar
  33. Elliott, V., & Dingwall, N. (2017). Roles as a route to being ‘other’: Drama-based interventions with at-risk students. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 22(1), 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ellis, S., Thompson, I., McNicholl, J. & Thomson, J. (2016). Student teachers’ perceptions of the effects of poverty on learners’ educational attainment and well-being: Perspectives from England and Scotland. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(4), 483–499.Google Scholar
  35. Fleer, M., & Hammer, M. (2013). Emotions in imaginative situations: The valued place of fairytales for supporting emotion regulation. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20(3), 240–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Florian, L., & Linklater, H. (2010). Preparing teachers for inclusive education: Using inclusive pedagogy to enhance teaching and learning for all. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(4), 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Furlong, J., & Lunt, I. (2014). Inequality and education: Continuing the debate. Oxford Review of Education, 40(6), 667–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gillborn, D. (2008). Racism and education: Coincidence or conspiracy? London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). Theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 877–896.Google Scholar
  40. González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Gorski, P. C. (2012). Perceiving the problem of poverty and schooling: Deconstructing the class stereotypes that Mis-shape education practice and policy. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(2), 302–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(4), 290–294.Google Scholar
  43. Hagger, H., & McIntyre, D. (2006). Learning teaching from teachers: Realizing the potential of school based teacher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hatcher, R. (2011). The conservative-Liberal democrat coalition government’s “free schools” in England. Educational Review, 4, 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Horgan, G. (2007). The impact of poverty on young children’s experience of school. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  46. Hughes, J., & Wilson, K. (2004). Playing a part: The impact of youth theatre on young People’s personal and social development. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 9(1), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ivinson, G., Thompson, I., Beckett, L., Egan, D., Leitch, R., & McKinney, S. (2018). Learning the price of poverty across the UK. Policy Futures in Education, 16(2), 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kauffman, J. M., Gerber, M. M., & Semmel, M. I. (1988). Arguable assumptions underlying the regular education initiative. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(1), 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Leckie, G., & Goldstein, H. (2017). The evolution of league tables in England 1992–2016: “Contextual value-added”, “expected progress” and “progress 8”. BERJ, 43(2), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). It’s not the culture of poverty, it’s the poverty of culture: The problem with teacher education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 37(2), 104–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lister, R. (2004). Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  52. Lloyd, C. (2008). Removing barriers to achievement: A strategy for inclusion or exclusion? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(2), 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lupton, R., & Thrupp, M. (2013). Headteachers’ readings of and responses to disadvantaged contexts: Evidence from English primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 769–788.Google Scholar
  54. McIntyre, D. (2009). The difficulties of inclusive pedagogy for initial teacher education and some thoughts on the way forward. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(4), 602–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Machin, S. (2006). Social disadvantage and education experience. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  56. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Mills, M., Riddell, S., & Hjörne, E. (2014). After exclusion what? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(6), 561–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nye, P. (2017). Who’s left: The main findings. [Online]. Available at: https://ffteducationdatalab.org.uk/2017/01/whos-left-the-main-findings/. Accessed: 11 July 18.
  59. Office of the Children’s Commissioner. (2013). “Always someone else’s problem”: Office of the Children’s Commissioner’s Report on illegal exclusions. London: Children’s Commissioner for England.Google Scholar
  60. Perryman, J., Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2011). Life in the pressure cooker – School league tables and English and mathematics teachers’ responses to accountability in a results-driven era. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rank, M. R., Yoon, H.-S., & Hirschl, T. A. (2003). American poverty as a structural failing: Evidence and arguments. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 30(4), 3–29.Google Scholar
  62. Ridge, T. (2009). Living with poverty: A review of the literature on children’s and families’ experiences of poverty, RR 594, Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
  63. Russell, A. E., Ford, T., & Russell, G. (2015). Socioeconomic associations with ADHD: Findings from a mediation analysis. PLoS One, 10(6), e0128248.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shaw, B., Baars, S., Menzies, L., Parameshwaren, M., & Allen, R. (2017). Low income pupils’ Progress at secondary school. London: Social Mobility Commission.Google Scholar
  65. Shildrick, T., & Rucell, J. (2015). Sociological perspectives on poverty. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  66. Slee, R. (2012). How do we make inclusive education happen when exclusion is a political predisposition? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 895–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smyth, J., & Wrigley, T. (2013). Living on the edge: Rethinking poverty, class and schooling. New York: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stamou, E., Edwards, A., Daniels, H., & Ferguson, L. (2014). Young people at-risk of drop-out from education: Recognising and responding to their needs. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  69. Strand, S. (2014). Ethnicity, gender, social class and achievement gaps at age 16: Intersectionality and ‘getting it’ for the white working class. Research Papers in Education, 29(2), 131–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sullivan, A., Ketende, S., & Joshi, H. (2013). Social class and inequalities in early cognitive scores. Sociology, 47(6), 1187–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sutton Trust. (2008). Wasted talent? Attrition rates of high-achieving pupils between school and university. London: The Sutton Trust.Google Scholar
  72. Symeonidou, S. (2017). Initial teacher education for inclusion: A review of the literature. Disability & Society, 32(3), 401–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tatto, M., Burn, K., Menter, I., Mutton, T., & Thompson, I. (2018). Learning to teach in England and the United States: The evolution of policy and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Thompson, I. (2015). Designing tasks in secondary education: Enhancing subject understanding and student engagement. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Thompson, I. (2017). Tackling social disadvantage through teacher education. St Albans: Critical Publishing.Google Scholar
  76. Thompson, I., McNicholl, J. & Menter, I. (2016). Student teachers’ perceptions of poverty and educational achievement. Oxford Review of Education, 42(2), 214–229.Google Scholar
  77. Thompson, I., & Tawell, A. (2017). Becoming other: Social and emotional development through the creative arts for young people with Behavioural difficulties. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 22(1), 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Thrupp, M., Mansell, H., Hawksworth, L., & Harold, B. (2003). ‘Schools can make a difference’ – but do teachers, heads and governors really agree? Oxford Review of Education, 29(4), 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tomlinson, S. (2012). The irresistible rise of the SEN industry. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ullucci, K., & Howard, T. (2015). Pathologizing the poor: Implications for preparing teachers to work in high-poverty schools. Urban Education, 50(2), 170–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. United Nations. (2016). Leaving no-one behind: The imperative of inclusive development. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  82. Valdebenito, S., Eisner, M., Farrington, D. P., Ttofi, M. M., & Sutherland, A. (2018). School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: A systematic review. Oslo: Campbell Collaboration.Google Scholar
  83. Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (2017). Vygotsky and the promise of public education. New York: Peter L; Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In L. S. Vygotsky (Ed.), Collected works (Vol. 1, pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  84. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected work of LS Vygotsky (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  85. Vygotsky, L. S. (1993). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  86. Zeichner, K. (2009). Teacher education and the struggle for social justice. New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • David John Matheson
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Health, Education and Well-beingUniversity of WolverhamptonWalsallUK

Personalised recommendations