Advertisement

Ethical Decision-Making in Educational Leadership

  • Eileen S. JohnsonEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Ethical decision-making is an inherent and daily part of a school leader’s experience. Often times, however, university-based leadership preparation programs are lacking in the ability to prepare school leaders to effectively grapple with ethical decision-making. Furthermore, day-to-day ethical decision-making may be guided by but are ultimately removed from professional codes of ethics that are articulated and codified by various professional organizations. This chapter considers ethical decision-making from three broad categories: deontological or duty-based, teleological or consequences-based, and axiological or virtue ethics perspectives. In addition, several forms of justice are considered that range from a basic understanding of procedural justice that focuses on the implementation of rules and laws to the broadest sense of the word that grapples with institutionalized and societal forms of oppression and privilege that perpetuate inequities and advantage through often unquestioned norms and conventions. Finally, ethical checkpoints are presented as a way of structuring ethical decision-making with which school leaders are often faced. Ethical decision-making is a complex, ongoing process that must be navigated, on a daily basis, by school leaders. Having a good understanding of various ethical theories, as well as different forms of justice, allows school leaders to appropriately examine and defend decisions that are made to foster and maintain a sense of justice, compassion, and care within the environment over which they lead. This chapter presents an overview of ethical decision-making paradigms and processes that are a necessary consideration for school leaders.

Keywords

Act deontology Act utilitarianism Axiology Categorial imperative Character Constitutional rights Deontological ethics Ethics of care Ethics of consequences Eudaimonia Justice Moral objectivism Realism Rule deontology Rule utilitarianism Situational ethics Social justice Teleological ethics Utilitarianism VIrtue ethics Zero tolerance policies 

References

  1. ABC News (2013). Boy, 6, suspended for kissing girl on hand. Retrieved from: https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/boy-suspended-kissing-girl-hand-21174282
  2. American Association of School Administrators (2007). Statement of ethics for educational leaders. Retrieved from: http://ethics.iit.edu/ecodes/node/5216
  3. American Civil Liberties Union (n.d.). Tinker v. Des Moines – Landmark Supreme Court ruling on behalf of student expression. Retrieved from: https://www.aclu.org/other/tinker-v-des-moines-landmark-supreme-court-ruling-behalf-student-expression
  4. Association of American Educators (n.d.). Code of ethics for educators. Retrieved from: https://www.aaeteachers.org/index.php/about-us/aae-code-of-ethics
  5. Beckner, W. (2004). Ethics for educational leaders. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  6. Bonde, S., & Firenze, P. (2013). A framework for making ethical decisions. Retrieved from: https://www.brown.edu/academics/science-and-technology-studies/framework-making-ethical-decisions
  7. Caron, C. (2018). 19 states, it is still legal to spank children in public schools. New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/13/us/corporal-punishment-school-tennessee.html
  8. DeMitchell, T.A. (n.d.). In loco parentis. Education Law. Retrieved from: http://usedulaw.com/345-in-loco-parentis.html
  9. Dunnaville, C. M. (2000). Unequal justice under the law: Racial inequalities in the justice system. Virginia Lawyer, 48(1), 20–25.Google Scholar
  10. Farberman, R. (2006). Zero tolerance policies can have unintended effects, APA report finds. American Psychological Association, 37(9). Retrieved from: https://www.apa.org/monitor/oct06/tolerance.aspx
  11. Gabardi, W. (2000). Negotiating postmodernism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gilligan, C. (1986). Reply. Signs, 11(2), 324–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilligan, C., Ward, J. V., Taylor, J. M., & Bardige, B. (Eds.). (1988). Mapping the moral domain: A contribution of women’s thinking to psychological theory and education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gjaja, M., Puckett, J., & Ryder, M. (2014). Equity is the key to better school funding. Education Week. Retrieved from: https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/02/19/21puckett.h33.html
  16. Greenhouse, S. (2018). Making teachers’ strikes illegal won’t stop them. New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/09/opinion/teacher-strikes-illegal-arizona-carolina.html
  17. Held, V. (2005). The ethics of care: Personal, political, global. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, R., & Cureton, A. (2016). Kant’s moral philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/
  19. Kidder, R. M. (1995). How good people make tough choices. New York, NY: William Morrow & Co.Google Scholar
  20. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development (The philosophy of moral development) (Vol. Vol. 1). San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  21. LawTeacher. (2018). The social contract theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Retrieved from https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/contract-law/the-social-contract-theories-of-thomas-hobbes-and-john-locke.php?vref=1
  22. National Education Association (1975). Code of ethics. Retrieved from: http://www.nea.org/home/30442.htm
  23. NDSN News Briefs (1996). Students suspended for carrying Midol, Advil. Retrieved from: https://ndsn.org/nov96/midol.html
  24. Noddings, N. (1982). Caring: A feminist approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Pojman, L. (2002). Ethics: Discovering right and wrong (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  26. Porter, A.J. (2007). Restorative practices in schools: Research reveals power of restorative approach, part I. International Institute for Restorative Practices. Retrieved from: https://www.iirp.edu/news-from-iirp/restorative-practices-in-schools-research-reveals-power-of-restorative-approach-part-i
  27. Rebore, R. (2014). The ethics of educational leadership. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  28. Restorative Justice Council (2016). Restorative practice in school. Retrieved from: https://restorativejustice.org.uk/restorative-practice-schools
  29. Texas Monthly (2016). The problem with zero tolerance policies. Retrieved from: https://www.texasmonthly.com/the-daily-post/zero-tolerance-policies-asthma-attack/
  30. Thomas & Missner. (2000). On Aristotle. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  31. Wallace, J. M., Goodkind, S., Wallace, C., & Bachman, J. G. (2008). Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in school discipline among U.S. high school students: 1991-2005. Negro. Educational Review, 59, 47–62.Google Scholar
  32. Weinstein, B. (2018). Is there a difference between ethics and morality in business? Forbes. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bruceweinstein/2018/02/27/is-there-a-difference-between-ethics-and-morality-in-business/#56fdec3a2088
  33. Zollers, N. J., Albert, L. R., & Cochran-Smith, M. (2000). In pursuit of social justice: Collaborative research and practice in teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 22(2), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Organizational LeadershipOakland UniversityRochesterUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Aletha M. Harven
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Child DevelopmentCalifornia State University, StanislausTurlockUSA

Personalised recommendations