American Principals of Color: Leading from the Collective We

  • Pamela S. AngelleEmail author
  • Ashton R. Cooper
Living reference work entry


This qualitative study was part of a larger research project investigating the ways in which principals articulate embedding socially just decision-making and values in their daily practice. Framed in the multicultural leadership work of Bordas and the conceptual model of collective leadership, this study examines the articulations of two US African American (African American and Black are used interchangeably throughout the text) urban school principals, one at the elementary level and one at the secondary level, as they describe the intersection of their commitment to socially just practices in multicultural schools and the behaviors they enact while doing so. For purposes of this chapter, the initial construct in Bordas’ frame, A New Social Covenant, was examined. This construct includes three principles, specifically, Sankofa, I to We, and Mi Casa Es Su Casa. Findings from the study evidenced that both principals practiced collective leadership as framed by Bordas. In the Sankofa spirit, both principals honored the tradition of leadership that came before them. Leading from the collective We became a foundational perspective of their leadership. As principals who demonstrated the idea of empowerment and equity, they daily practiced the spirit of generosity through listening, respect, and empowering.


Collective leadership Multicultural leadership Socially just practice Qualitative 


  1. Banks, J. A. (1993). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. Review of Research in Education, 19(1), 3–49. Scholar
  2. Bordas, J. (2001). Latino leadership: Building a humanistic and diverse society. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 112–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bordas, J. (2007). How salsa, soul, and spirit strengthen leadership. Leader to Leader, 2007(46), 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bordas, J. (2012). Salsa, soul, and spirit. Leadership for a multicultural age. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Bordas, J. (2016). Leadership lessons from communities of color: Stewardship and collective action. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2016(152), 61–74. Scholar
  6. Contractor, N. S., DeChurch, L. A., Carson, J., Carter, D. R., & Keegan, B. (2012). The topology of collective leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 994–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dugan, J. P., Turman, N. T., & Torrez, M. A. (2015). Beyond individual leader development: Cultivating collective capacities. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2015(148), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedrich, T. L., Vessey, W. B., Schuelke, M. J., Ruark, G. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). A framework for understanding collective leadership: The selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(6), 933–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrell, A., & Simpson, B. (2015). The dynamics of prosocial leadership: Power and influence in collective action groups. Social Forces, 94(3), 1283–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hiller, N. J., Day, D. V., & Vance, R. J. (2006). Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: A field study. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hitzler, R., & Eberle, T. S. (2004). 3.1 Phenomenological life-world analysis. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 67–71). London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Khalifa, M. A., Gooden, M. A., & Davis, J. E. (2016). Cultural responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272–1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 529–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lichtenstein, B. B., Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., Seers, A., Orton, J. D., & Schreiber, C. (2006). Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(4), 2–12.Google Scholar
  15. Lumby, J. (2009). Collective leadership of local school systems: Power, autonomy and ethics. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(3), 310–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ospina, S., & Foldy, E. (2009). A critical review of race and ethnicity in the leadership literature: Surfacing context, power and the collective dimensions of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 876–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of educational research, 70(3), 323–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Scott, C. P., Jiang, H., Wildman, J. L., & Griffith, R. (2016). The impact of implicit collective leadership theories on the emergence and effectiveness of leadership networks in teams. Human Resource Management Review, 28, 464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Senge, P., Hamilton, H., & Kania, J. (2015). The dawn of system leadership. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 13(1), 27–33.Google Scholar
  21. Wasser, J. D., & Bresler, L. (1996). Working in the interpretive zone: Conceptualizing collaboration in qualitative research teams. Educational Researcher, 25(5), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Education, Health, and Human SciencesThe University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Khalid Arar
    • 1
  • Kadir Beycioglu
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationAl-Qasemi Academic College of EducationBaqa ElgarbiaIsrael
  2. 2.Faculty of Education at Buca, Department of Division of Educational AdministrationDokuz Eylul UniversityIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations