Advertisement

Accrediting Prior Learning: Tensions Between Its Social Inclusion and Widening Participation Intentions and Current Practice

  • Sean McCreadyEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

There is an extensive range of positive rhetoric concerning the Accreditation of Prior Experiential Learning (APEL) and its many benefits for awarding credit in recognition of one’s experience. However, it still remains very much a marginal activity within many institutions. This study investigates the nature of existing barriers to the greater take-up of APEL and explores whether technology could play some part in overcoming them.

The existence and nature of barriers to wider APEL take-up is under-represented in the literature. This action research study uses qualitative methods to develop a case study within a single UK college of further and higher education. The research design included a focus group for student feedback, semistructured interviews for staff feedback, and the development and testing of a technology solution comprising a website and software application.

The study found clear evidence of the existence of a range of barriers affecting the wider uptake of APEL and established several ways in which the technology used did help or could help overcome these barriers. The role of the tutor within the APEL process is of great importance, whether the system used is paper based or technology based, and further training and support were found to be necessary to ensure that all staff were consistent in the application of the APEL process.

Although this is a small-scale study in a single institution, it is typical of other institutions. Further research into the wider range of barriers identified and further development of appropriate technology solutions could help a larger proportion of people in employment to gain credit for the skills and knowledge they have developed through their work, as they seek to complement their practical experience with formal education and gain recognition for this experience though an institution’s APEL process.

Keywords

APEL RPL Experiential learning Recognition of prior learning Barriers to APEL Widening participation Social inclusion 

References

  1. Allen, M. (2008). E-learning annual 2008. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, P., & Fejes, A. (2005). Recognition of prior learning as a technique for fabricating the adult learner: A genealogical analysis of Swedish adult education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, P., & Fejes, A. (2011). Sweden: The developing field of validation research. In J. Harris, M. Breier. & C. Wihak (Eds.), Researching the recognition of prior learning (pp. 228–247). Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  4. Andersson, P., Fejes, A., & Hult, Å. (2003). Validering av invandrade akademikers yrkeskompetens: Erfarenheter från Nätverk Sörmland. [Validation of immigrant academics’ professional competence: Experiences from Network Sörmland],Integrationsverkets rapportserie 2003:04. Norrköping: Integrationsverket.Google Scholar
  5. Andersson, P., & Guo, S. (2009). Governing through non/recognition: The missing ‘R’ in the PLAR for immigrant professionals in Canada and Sweden. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 28(4), 423–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andersson, P., Hult, Å., & Osman, A. (2006). Validering som sortering – hur värderasutländsk kompetens? [validation as sorting – How is foreign competence valued?]. Norrköping: Integrationsverket och Valideringsdelegationen.Google Scholar
  7. Bateman, A., & Knight, B. (2003). Giving credit: A review of RPL and credit transfer in the vocational education and training sector, 1995 to 2001. Adelaide: National Centre for Vocational and Educational Research (NCVER).Google Scholar
  8. Bates, M., Manuel, S., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Models of early adoption of ICT innovations in higher education. Ariadne, 50.Google Scholar
  9. Boud, D., & Solomon, N. (Eds.). (2001). Work-based learning: A new higher education. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bowman, K., Clayton, B., Bateman, A., Knight, B., Thompson, P., Hargreaves, J., et al. (2003). Recognition of prior learning in the vocational education and training sector. Adelaide: National Centre for Vocational and Educational Research (NCVER).Google Scholar
  11. Cameron, R. (2006). RPL and the disengaged learner: The need for new starting points. In P. Andersson & J. Harris (Eds.), Re-theorising the recognition of prior learning (pp. 117–139). Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  12. Cameron, R. (2011). Australia: An overview of 20 years of research into the recognition of prior learning (RPL). In J. Harris, M. Breier, & C. Wihak (Eds.), Researching the recognition of prior learning. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  13. Christiansen, E. (1996). Tamed by a rose: Computers as tools in human activity. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human/computer interaction (pp. 175–198). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Colley, H., Hodkinson, P., & Malcolm, J. (2003). Informality and formality in LEARNING: A REPORT for the learning and skills research centre. Learning and Skills Development Agency, London.Google Scholar
  15. Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts, CHI conference (7–11 May 2011), extended abstracts, 2425–2428, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  16. Dismore, H., McDermott, A., Witt, N., Stillwell, R., Neville, S., & Stone, M. (2011). Tension of APEL: Perceptions of higher education in further education lecturers. Research In Post-Compulsory Education, 16(3), 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  18. Fogg, B. J. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, 26–29 Apr 2009, Claremont.Google Scholar
  19. Fraser, W. (1995). Learning from experience: Empowerment or incorporation? Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (NIACE).Google Scholar
  20. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford: Oxford Martin School. Available at http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/view/1314Google Scholar
  21. Fried, V., & Goldberg, D. E. (1978). Can modern educational technology replace the teacher in the classroom? Journal of Chemical Education, 55(1), 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garvin, D. A. (2003). Making the case: Professional education for the world of practice. Harvard Magazine, 106(1), 56–107.Google Scholar
  23. Gibbs, P., & Armsby, P. (2011). Recognition is deserved, qualifications are merited. Where does that leave fairness in accreditation? European Journal of Education, 46(3), 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gravett, S., & Henning, E. (1998). Teaching as dialogic mediation: A learning centred view of higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 12(2), 60–67.Google Scholar
  25. Hager, P. (1998). Recognition of prior learning: Challenges and issues. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 50(4), 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haigh, C. (1994). APL/APEL: Are we achieving Equity? Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 10(4), 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haldane, A., & Wallace, J. (2010). Using technology to facilitate the accreditation of prior and experiential learning in developing personalised work-based learning programmes. A case study involving the University of Derby, UK. European Journal of Education, 44(3), 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamer, J. (2010). Recognition of prior learning: Normative assessment or co-construction of preferred identities? Australian Journal of Learning, 50(1), 100–115.Google Scholar
  29. Hargreaves, J. (2006). Recognition of prior learning: At a glance. Adelaide: National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER).Google Scholar
  30. Harris, J. (2011). European Union: Research and system building in the validation of non-formal and informal learning (VNFIL). In J. Harris, M. Breier, & C. Wihak (Eds.), Researching the recognition of prior learning. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  31. Harris, J., Breier, M., & Wihak, C. (2011). Researching the recognition of prior learning: International perspectives. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  32. Hasan, H., & Kazlauskas, A. (2014). Activity theory: Who is doing what, why and how. In H. Hasan (Ed.), Being practical with theory: A window into business research (pp. 9–14). Wollongong: THEORI.Google Scholar
  33. Hashim, N., & Jones, M.L. (2007). Activity theory: A framework for qualitative analysis. In 4th International Qualitative Research Convention (QRC), 3–5 Sept 2007. Malaysia: PJ Hilton.Google Scholar
  34. Hiemstra, R. (1994). Self-directed learning. The sourcebook for self-directed learning (pp. 9–20).Google Scholar
  35. Jobber, D., & Ellis Chadwick, F. (2013). Principles and practice of marketing (7th ed.). McGraw Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
  36. Johnson, B. (2002). Models of APEL and quality assurance. Brentwood: Southern English Consortium for Credit Accumulation and Transfer (SEEC).Google Scholar
  37. Johnsson, M. C., & Hager, P. (2008). Navigating the wilderness of becoming professional. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20(7/8), 526–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Livesey, C. (2006). The relationship between positivism, Interpretivism and sociological research methods. AS Sociology. http://www.sociology.org.uk
  40. Maher, K., Davies, L., Harris, R., Cameron, R., & Short, T. (2010). Scoping the potential of skills recognition in the rail industry, CRC for Rail Innovation (p. 109).Google Scholar
  41. Mauthe, A., & Thomas, P. (2004). Professional content management systems: Handling digital media assets. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 10.Google Scholar
  43. Meyer, E. T. (2015). The expert and the machine. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 21, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Misko, J., Beddie, F., & Smith, L. (2007). The recognition of non-formal and informal learning in Australia: Country background Report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  45. Peters, H. (2004). Cracking the code: Accreditation of prior experiential learning and the discourses of higher education doctoral thesis, Open Univeristy.Google Scholar
  46. Peters, H. (2005). Contested discourses: Assessing the outcomes of learning from experience for the award of credit in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peters, H. (2006). Using critical discourse analysis to illuminate power and knowledge in RPL. In P. Andersson & J. Harris (Eds.), Re-theorising the recognition of prior learning. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  48. Pokorny, H. (2011). England: Accreditation of prior experiential learning (APEL) research in higher education. In J. Harris, M. Breier, & C. Wihak (Eds.), Researching the recognition of prior learning. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  49. Pokorny, H. (2012). Assessing prior experiential learning: Issues of authority, authorship and identity. Journal of Workplace Learning, 24(2), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Quality Assurance Agency (QAA). (2014). Recognition of prior learning, national framework for Scottish higher education. Available at www.qaa.ac.uk
  52. Quality Assurance Agency(QAA). (2012). Streamlining recognition of prior learning guidelines. Streamlining and enhancing recognition of prior learning support and assessment. Available at www.qaa.ac.uk
  53. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations–study and teaching (5th ed.). New York/London: Free Press.Google Scholar
  54. Schultz, D., Barnes, B., Schultz, H., & Azzaro, M. (2009). Building customer brand relationships. Communicative Business, Issue 1, 123–126.Google Scholar
  55. Scott, I. (2010). But I know that already: Rhetoric or reality the accreditation of prior experiential learning in the context of work-based learning. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 15(1), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher., 27(3), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, K, Moriarty S, Barbatsis, G, & Kenney, K. (2004). Handbook of visual communication (theory, methods and media) (Routledge Communication Series). Mahwah: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  58. Smith, L. (2004). Valuing recognition of prior learning: Selected case studies of Australina private providers of training. Adelaide: National Centre for Vocational and Educational Research (NCVER).Google Scholar
  59. Stephenson, J., & Saxton J. (2004). An initial evaluation of participant experiences of UFI/learndirect’s online Learning through work programme leading to Full University Qualifications American Education Research Association.Google Scholar
  60. Viola, F. (2011). Gamification I videogiochi nella vita quotidiana, published by Arduino Viola.Google Scholar
  61. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wheelahan, L., Dennis, N., Firth, J., Miller, P., Newton, D., Pascoe, S., & Veenker, P. (2003). A Report on recognition of prior learning (RPL) policy and practice in Australia in 2002, including National Principles and operational guidelines for RPL in post-compulsory education and training. Brisbane: Queensland Department of Employment and Training.Google Scholar
  63. White, M. (2005). The content management handbook. London: Facet Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICS LearnGlasgowUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • David John Matheson
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Health, Education and Well-beingUniversity of WolverhamptonWalsallUK

Personalised recommendations