Advertisement

EU-Russia Energy Relations

Living reference work entry
First Online:

Abstract

Energy trade is a long-standing pillar of European Union (EU)-Russia relations. Russia is the main provider of oil, gas, and solid fuels to the EU. The EU’s demand for reliable energy supplies from abroad and Russia’s desire to capitalize on its vast fossil fuels resources have led to strong interdependence in the energy sector. However, within the EU, assessments of the energy relationship with Russia have become more controversial since the late 2000s, and particularly after the Ukraine crisis. The chapter explores the main scholarly debates concerning the EU-Russia energy relationship. It puts the relationship in a historical context and discusses the consequences of the Ukraine crisis, including the measures taken by each side to diversify their partners. The chapter argues that the existing path dependencies in the EU-Russia energy relationship, together with market forces, continue to drive bilateral trade. While the focus is mostly on gas trade and geopolitics, the growing relevance of nuclear power and of renewable energy sources is also analyzed.

Keywords

Russia European Union Energy Gas Oil Nuclear Renewable energy Ukraine Nord Stream 2 Energy Union 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dr. Jack Sharples for his comments on an earlier draft of this chapter.

References

  1. Aalto, P., Nyyssönen, H., Kojo, M., & Pal, P. (2017). Russian nuclear energy diplomacy in Finland and Hungary. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 58(4), 386–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belyi, A. (2015). Transnational gas markets and Euro-Russian energy relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blank, S., & Kim, Y. (2016). Economic warfare à la Russe: The energy weapon and Russian National Security Strategy. The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 30(1), 1–39.Google Scholar
  4. Boersma, T., & Goldthau, A. (2017). Wither the EU’s market making project in energy: From liberalization to securitization? In S. S. Andersen et al. (Eds.), Energy union: Europe’s new liberal mercantilism? (pp. 99–113). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boute, A., & Willems, P. (2012). RUSTEC: Greening Europe’s energy supply by developing Russia’s renewable energy potential. Energy Policy, 51, 618–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casier, T. (2011). The rise of energy to the top of the EU-Russia agenda: From interdependence to dependence? Geopolitics, 16(3), 536–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casier, T. (2016). Great game or great confusion: The geopolitical understanding of EU-Russia energy relations. Geopolitics, 21(4), 763–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Digges, C. (2019a, September 6). Russia to sign Paris Accord as ministry forecasts climate change calamities. Bellona. https://bellona.org/news/climate-change/2019-09-russia-to-sign-paris-accord-as-ministry-forecasts-climate-change-calamities. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  9. Digges, C. (2019b, October 14). Russia’s largest wind park opens near Murmansk. Bellona. https://bellona.org/news/renewable-energy/2019-10-russias-largest-wind-park-opens-near-murmansk. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  10. European Commission. (2015, February 15). A framework strategy for a resilient energy union, COM(2015) 80 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2015%3A80%3AFIN. Accessed 11 March 2020.
  11. European Commission. (2018, May 24). Antitrust: Commission imposes binding obligations on Gazprom to enable free flow of gas at competitive prices in Central and Eastern European gas markets. Press Release. https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-3921_en.htm. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  12. European Commission. (2019a). Quarterly Report Energy on European Gas Markets 4/2018. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/quarterly_report_on_european_gas_markets_q4_2018.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  13. European Commission. (2019b). 2030 climate & energy framework. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2030_en. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  14. European Parliament. (2020, February 4). Written answer of the European Commission to European Parliament enquiry. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2019-002880-ASW_EN.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.
  16. Eyl-Mazzega, M. (2018). The Gazprom-Naftogaz Stockholm arbitration awards: Time for settlements and responsible behaviour. Paris: IFRI.Google Scholar
  17. FAZ (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung). (2019, March 25). Altmaier opfert Start-ups im Urheberrecht. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/mehr-wirtschaft/wie-peter-altmaier-start-ups-im-urheberrecht-opfert-16107784.html. Accessed 11 March 2020.
  18. Forsberg, T., & Haukkala, H. (2016). The European Union and Russia relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gazprom. (2019). Delivery statistics, http://www.gazpromexport.ru/en/statistics/. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  20. General Court of the EU. (2019, September 10). Judgment in Case T-883/16 Poland v Commission, Luxembourg. Press Release no. 107/19. https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2019-09/cp190107en.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  21. German Foreign Office. (2017, June 15). Press Release. https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/en/newsroom/news/170615-kern-russland/290666. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  22. Godzimirski, J. (Ed.). (2019). New political economy of energy in Europe: Power to project, power to adapt. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  23. Goldthau, A. (2016). Assessing Nord Stream 2: Regulation, geopolitics and energy security in the EU, Central Eastern Europe and the UK (EUCERS strategy paper 10). London: King’s College.Google Scholar
  24. Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2019). Regulatory or market power Europe? EU leadership models for international energy governance. In J. Godzimirski (Ed.), New political economy of energy in Europe: Power to project, power to adapt (pp. 27–47). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gorska, J. A. (2010). Dealing with a Juggernaut: Analyzing Poland’s policy toward Russia, 1989–2009. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  26. Gromov, A., & Kurichev, N. (2014). The energy strategy up to 2030. In S. Oxenstierna & V. P. Tynkkynen (Eds.), Russian energy and security up to 2030 (pp. 16–40). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Gurzu, A. (2019, February 13). Nord Stream 2: Who fared best. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/the-winners-and-losers/. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  28. Hecking, H., & Weiser, F. (2017). Impacts of Nord Stream 2 on the EU natural gas market. Cologne: Institute of Energy Economics. https://www.ewi.research-scenarios.de/cms/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/EWI-1163-17-Studie-Impacts-of-Nord-Stream-2-web.compressed.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2018.
  29. Henderson, J., & Sharples, J. (2018). Gazprom in Europe – Two “Anni Mirabiles”, but can it continue? Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
  30. Högselius, P. (2013). Red gas: Russia and the origins of European energy dependence. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Honoré, A. (2018). Natural gas demand in Europe in 2017 and short term expectations. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
  32. Interfax Ukraine. (2018, January 2). Ukraine sees 13.7% rise in gas transit in 2017. https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/economic/474366.html. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  33. IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency). (2017). Renewable energy prospects for the Russian Federation. Working Paper. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2017/Apr/IRENA_REmap_Russia_paper_2017.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  34. Isachenkov, A. (2019, December 31). Russia, Ukraine finalize deals for gas transit to Europe. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/4615057928c343afb421a24cdd0bedf1. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.
  35. Judge, A., Maltby, T., & Sharples, J. (2016). Challenging reductionism in analyses of EU-Russia energy relations. Geopolitics, 21(4), 751–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Khrushcheva, O., & Maltby, T. (2016). The future of EU-Russia energy relations in the context of decarbonisation. Geopolitics, 21(4), 799–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Krickovic, A. (2015). When interdependence produces conflict: EU–Russia energy relations as a security dilemma. Contemporary Security Policy, 36(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuzemko, C. (2014). Ideas, power and change: Explaining EU–Russia energy relations. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(1), 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lang, K., & Westphal, K. (2017). Nord Stream 2 – A political and economic contextualization (SWP research paper 3). Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar
  40. Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation. (2010). Energy Strategy of Russia for the Period up to 2030. http://www.energystrategy.ru/projects/docs/ES-2030_(Eng).pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  41. Neumann, A., Göke, L., Holz, F., Kemfert, C., & Von Hirschhausen, C. (2018). Natural gas supply: No need for another Baltic Sea pipeline. DIW Weekly Report 27/2018. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.593663.de/dwr-18-27-1.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2018.
  42. Oxenstierna, S. (2014). Nuclear power in Russia’s energy policies. In S. Oxenstierna & V. P. Tynkkynen (Eds.), Russian energy and security up to 2030 (pp. 150–168). Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oxenstierna, S., & Tynkkynen, V. P. (2014). Russian energy and security up to 2030. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pirani, S. (2018). Russian gas transit through Ukraine after 2019: The options (Oxford energy insight 41). Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
  45. Pirani, S., Stern, J., & Yafimava, K. (2009). The Russo-Ukrainian gas dispute of January 2009: A comprehensive assessment. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Platts. (2019a). Russia expects to delay Nord Stream 2 launch to mid-2020: Report. https://www.spglobal.com/platts/en/market-insights/latest-news/natural-gas/112119-russia-expects-to-delay-nord-stream-2-launch-to-mid-2020-report. Accessed 28 Nov 2019.
  47. Platts. (2019b, 21 December). Nord Stream 2 pipelayer Allseas suspends operations on US sanctions. https://www.spglobal.com/platts/en/market-insights/latest-news/natural-gas/122119-nord-stream-2-pipelayer-allseas-suspends-operations-on-us-sanctions. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.
  48. Prontera, A. (2019). Beyond the EU regulatory state: Energy security and the Eurasian gas market. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  49. Romanova, T. (2016). Is Russian energy policy towards the EU only about geopolitics? The case of the third liberalisation package. Geopolitics, 21(4), 857–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schubert, S., Pollak, J., & Kreutler, M. (2016). Energy policy of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sharples, J. (2016). The shifting geopolitics of Russia’s natural gas exports and their impact on EU-Russia gas relations. Geopolitics, 21(4), 880–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sharples, J. (2019). European geopolitical forum – Gazprom Monitor 95, April.Google Scholar
  53. Siddi, M. (2016). The EU’s energy union: A sustainable path to energy security? The International Spectator, 51(1), 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Siddi, M. (2017). National Identities and foreign policy in the European Union: The Russia policy of Germany, Poland and Finland. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  55. Siddi, M. (2018a). The role of power in EU–Russia energy relations: The interplay between markets and geopolitics. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(10), 1552–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Siddi, M. (2018b). Identities and vulnerabilities: The Ukraine crisis and the securitization of the EU-Russia gas trade. In K. Szulecki (Ed.), Energy security in Europe: Divergent perceptions and policy challenges (pp. 251–273). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Siddi, M. (2018c, May 9). The Arctic route for Russian LNG opens. WE – World Energy. https://www.aboutenergy.com/en_IT/topics/arctic-route-for-russian-lng-opens.shtml. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  58. Siddi, M. (2018d). Russia’s evolving gas relationship with the European Union: Trade surges despite political crises (Briefing paper 246). Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  59. Siddi, M. (2019). The EU’s botched geopolitical approach to external energy policy: The case of the southern gas corridor. Geopolitics, 24(1), 124–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smeets, N. (2018). The green menace: Unraveling Russia’s elite discourse on enabling and constraining factors of renewable energy policies. Energy Research and Social Science, 40, 244–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stern, J., & Yafimava, K. (2017). The EU competition investigation of Gazprom’s sales in central and eastern Europe: A detailed analysis of the commitments and the way forward (OIES paper NG 121). Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
  62. Strachota, A. L. (2015, November 23). The case against Nord Stream 2. Energy Post. https://energypost.eu/case-nord-stream-2/. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  63. Stulberg, A. (2015). Out of gas?: Russia, Ukraine, Europe, and the changing geopolitics of natural gas. Problems of Post-Communism, 62(2), 112–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Szulecki, K. (Ed.). (2018). Energy security in Europe: Divergent perceptions and policy challenges. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  65. Tichý, L. (2019). EU-Russia energy relations. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tynkkynen, V. P. (2014). Russian bioenergy and the EU’s renewable energy goals: Perspectives of security. In S. Oxenstierna & V. P. Tynkkynen (Eds.), Russian energy and security up to 2030 (pp. 95–113). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. US Congress. (2017). Countering America’s adversaries through Sanctions Act. https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Pages/caatsa.aspx. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  68. Van de Graaf, T., & Colgan, J. D. (2017). Russian gas games or well-oiled conflict? Energy security and the 2014 Ukraine crisis. Energy Research & Social Science, 24, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wigell, M., & Vihma, A. (2016). Geopolitics versus geoeconomics: The case of Russia’s geostrategy and its effects on the EU. International Affairs, 92(3), 605–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. WNA (World Nuclear Association). (2018). Nuclear power in the European Union. https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/others/european-union.aspx. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  71. WNA (World Nuclear Association). (2019). Nuclear power in Russia. https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-o-s/russia-nuclear-power.aspx. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  72. WTO (World Trade Organization). (2018). European Union and its member states – Certain measures relating to the energy sector. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds476_e.htm. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.
  73. Yafimava, K. (2017). The council legal service’s assessment of the European Commission’s negotiating mandate and what it means for Nord Stream 2. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
  74. Yafimava, K. (2019). Gas directive amendment: Implications for Nord Stream 2 (Energy insight 49). Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Union Research ProgrammeFinnish Institute of International AffairsHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations

Cite entry