Advertisement

Geographies of Nonhuman Animal Communication and Language

  • Julie Urbanik
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Language has historically been claimed as one of the greatest markers of difference between humans and other animals, a marker that has allowed humans to see themselves as better than, superior to, or more than other animals. For people who actually interact with other species, this may have always seemed like a strange claim, and now their experiences are being validated by an increasing amount of scientific data showing that nonhuman animals actively use a variety of communication methods. This chapter maps current understandings of nonhuman animal communication and language through the framework of animal geography by exploring how animal communication is defined, where and how this work is being undertaken, and provides findings about specific species. The chapter ends with a discussion about the contribution of geography to animal communication studies and what this means for humans.

Keywords

Animals Animal geography Human-animal Nonhumans Species 

References

  1. Anderson, B., & Harrison, P. (Eds.). (2010). Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geography. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  2. Anich, N., Benson, T., & Bednarz, J. (2009). Estimating territory and home-range sizes: Do singing locations alone provide an accurate estimate of space use? The Auk, 126(3), 626–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barua, M. (2014). Bio-geo-graphy: Landscape, dwelling, and the political ecology of human-elephant relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 915–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bear, C. (2011). Being Angelica? Exploring individual animal geographies. Area, 43(3), 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bear, C., & Eden, S. (2011). Thinking like a fish? Engaging with nonhuman difference through recreational angling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 336–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradbury, J., & Vehrencamp, S. (2011). Principles of animal communication (2nd ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Bradshaw, J. (2013). Cat sense: How the new feline science can make you a better friend to your pet. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Brunn, S., & Wilson, M. (2012). Cape Town’s million plus black township of Khayelitsha: Terrae incognitae and the geographies and cartographies of silence. Habitat International, 39, 284–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buller, H. (2014). Animal geographies I. Progress in Human Geography, 28(2), 308–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buller, H. (2015b). Animal geographies II: Methods. Progress in Human Geography, 39(3), 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buller, H. (2015a). Animal geographies III: Ethics. Progress in Human Geography, 40(3), 422.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515580489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buller, H., & Morris, C. (2003). Farm animal welfare: A new repertoire of nature-society relations or modernism re-embedded? Sociologia Ruralis, 43(3), 216–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cantor, M., Shoemaker, L.G., Cabral, R.B., Flores, C.O., Varga, M., & Whitehead, H. (2015). Multilevel animal societies can emerge from cultural transmission. Retrieved April 1, 2016, from http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/150908/ncomms9091/full/ncomms9091.html.
  14. Castree, N., Nash, C., Badmington, N., Braun, B., Murdoch, J., & Whatmore, S. (2004). Mapping posthumanism: an exchange. Environment and Planning A, 36, 1341–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clucas, B., Freeberg, T., & Lucas, J. (2004). Chick-a-dee call syntax, social context, and season affect vocal responses of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species. London/New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  17. Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London/New York: Penguin Classics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Waal, F. (2016). Are we smart enough to know how smart animals are? New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  19. DOSITS. (2016). What sounds can animals hear? Retrieved June 15, 2016, from http://www.dosits.org/science/soundmeasurement/soundsanimalshear/.
  20. Fox, R. (2006). Animal behaviors, post-human lives: Everyday negotiations of the animal-human divide in pet-keeping. Social and Cultural Geography, 7(4), 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gillespie, K., & Collard, R. (2015). Critical animal geographies: Politics, intersections and hierarchies in a multi-species world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Griffin, D. (1976). The question of animal awareness: Evolutionary continuity of mental experience. New York: Rockefeller University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hailman, J., Ficken, M., & Ficken, R. (1985). The ‘chick-a-dee’ calls of Parus atricapillus: A recombinant system of animal communication compared with written English. Semiotica, 56, 191–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henri. (2007). Henri, Le Chat Noir. Retrieved March 18, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0M7ibPk37_U.
  26. Hinchliffe, S., Kearnes, M., Degen, M., & Whatmore, S. (2005). Urban wild things: A cosmopolitical experiment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, 643–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hodgetts, T., & Lorimer, J. (2015). Methodologies for animals’ geographies: Cultures, communication and genomics. Cultural Geographies, 22(2), 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holloway, L. (2007). Subjecting cows to robots: Farming technologies and the making of animal subjects. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 1041–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hug, L., Baker, B.J., Anantharaman, K. Brown, C.T., Probst, A.J., Castelle, C.J., Butterfield, C.N., Hernsdorf, A.W., Amano, Y., Ise, K., Suzuki, Y., Dudek, N., Relman, D.A., Finstad, K.M., Amundson, R., Thomas, B.C., & Banfield, J.F. (2016). A New View of the Tree of Life. Retrieved May 5, 2016, from http://www.nature.com/articles/nmicrobiol201648.
  30. Johnston, C. (2008). Beyond the clearing: Towards a dwelt animal geography. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 633–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leaver, S., & Reimchen, T. (2008). Behavioral responses of Canis familiaris to different tail lengths of a remotely-controlled life-sized dog replica. Behavior, 145, 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lorimer, H. (2006). Herding memories of humans and animals. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lorimer, J. (2007). Nonhuman charisma. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 911–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lorimer, J. (2010). Elephants as companion species: The lively biogeographies of Asian elephant conservation in Sri Lanka. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35, 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Low, P. (2012). The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness. Retrieved May 5, 2016, from http://fcmconference.org/img/CambridgeDeclarationOnConsciousness.pdf.
  36. Lulka, D. (2004). Stabilizing the herd: Fixing the identity of nonhumans. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 439–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marshall, J. (1971). Can humans talk? In J. Morton (Ed.), Biological and social factors in linguistics (pp. 24–52). London: Logos.Google Scholar
  38. McKiernan, S., & Instone, L. (2015). From pest to partner: Rethinking the Australian white Ibis in the more-than-human city. Cultural Geographies, 23(3), 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Michelson, A., Andersen, B. B., Storm, J., Kirchner, W. H., & Lindauer, M. (1992). How honeybees perceive communication dances, studies by means of a mechanical model. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 30, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morell, V. (2013). Animal wise: How we know animals think and feel. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  41. Morgan, C. (1894). An introduction to comparative psychology (2nd ed.). London: W. Scott.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moynihan, M. (1985). Communications and noncommunications by cephalopods. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Murdoch, J. (1997). Inhuman/nonhuman/human: Actor-network theory and the prospects for a non-dualistic and symmetrical perspective on nature and society. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15, 731–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nadasdy, P. (2007). The gift in the animal: The ontology of hunting and human-animal sociality. American Ethnologist, 32, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Patterson, F., & Linden, E. (1981). The education of Koko. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  46. Pepperberg, I. (1999). The Alex studies: Cognitive and communicative abilities of Grey parrots. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Philo, C., & Wilbert, C. (Eds.). (2000). Animal spaces, beastly places: New geographies of human-animal relations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Power, E. (2008). Furry families: Making a human-dog family through home. Social and Cultural Geography, 9(5), 535–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roitblat, H., Herman, L., & Nachtigall, C. (Eds.). (1993). Language and communication: Comparative perspectives. Hillsdale/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  50. Sauer, C. (1952). Seeds, spades, hearths, and herds. New York: American Geographical Society.Google Scholar
  51. Shwartz, M. (2005). Looking for Earth-shaking Clues to Elephant Communication. Retrieved on March 22, 2016, from http://news.stanford.edu/news/2005/june1/elephant-052505.html.
  52. Simoons, F., & Simoons, E. (1968). A ceremonial ox of India: The Mithan in nature, culture and history. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  53. Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  54. Slobodchikoff, C. (2012). Chasing doctor Dolittle: Learning the language of animals. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  55. Slobodchikoff, C., & Placer, J. (2006). Acoustic structures in the alarm calls of Gunnison’s prairie dogs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(5), 3153–3160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Urbanik, J. (2012). Placing animals: An introduction to the geography of human-animal relations. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  57. Urbanik, J., & Johnston, C. (Eds.). (2017). Humans and animals: A geography of co-existence. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO Press.Google Scholar
  58. Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Whatmore, S. (2006). Materialist returns: Practicing cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cultural Geographies, 13, 600–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Williams, W. (2011). So you think you’re smarter than a cephalopod? Retrieved April 1, 2016, from http://ocean.si.edu/blog/so-you-think-youre-smarter-cephalopod.
  61. Wolch, J., & Emel, J. (Eds.). (1995). Bringing the animals back in. Special issue. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13, 735–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wolch, J., & Emel, J. (Eds.). (1998). Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  63. Wolch, J., Emel, J., & Wilbert, C. (2003). Reanimating cultural geography. In K. Anderson, M. Domosh, S. Pile, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Handbook of cultural geography (pp. 184–206). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wright, C., & Wilkinson, G. (2001). Population genetic structure and vocal dialects in an amazon parrot. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268(1467), 609–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wright, C., Dahlin, R., & Salinas-Melgoza, A. (2008). Stability and change in vocal dialects of the yellow-napped amazon. Animal Behaviour, 76(3), 1017–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Coordinates SocietyKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations