Skip to main content
Book cover

Handbook of the Changing World Language Map pp 1–18Cite as

Graffiti as Communication and Language

Abstract

This chapter examines graffiti as a means of communication and a vehicle for creating and contesting meanings in discrete places. Using city walls as a canvas is a phenomenon thousands of years old. Reflecting its ancient roots, the word graffiti roughly translated from Latin means “to scribble.” What appear to be scribbles to most people is a rich language encoded in urban landscapes worldwide. Modern graffiti emerged in late 1960s to early 1970s, with spray paint and ink the preferred writing implements. The reaction to graffiti at the time and since must be seen in the context of urban politics, global economics and efforts to control the city. Those who make graffiti today are called many things including vandals, artists, and (most importantly here) writers. This chapter considers how the aesthetics and meanings associated with graffiti differ from place to place and the role the media plays in how we understand it. This chapter examines how graffiti has been and continues to be used to articulate resistance to dominant powers. A typology for studying and understanding graffiti in its many forms is suggested. The most common contemporary forms of graffiti (and street art) are considered, including tags, throw-ups, pieces, stencils, characters, wheatpaste, stickers, messages and etchings. Graffiti is a language that many are trying to eradicate, thus graffiti abatement is likewise examined. Regardless of one’s aesthetic view of graffiti, the ability to better understand the language of graffiti allows us to better understand places and the people who live there.

Keywords

  • Graffiti
  • Street art
  • Writing
  • Landscape
  • Place

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

References

  • Ahearn, C. (1983). Wild style, Film. New York: First Run Features.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderman, D., & Ward, H. (2008). Writing on the plywood: Toward an analysis of hurricane graffiti. Coastal Management, 35, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. (2001). Taking the train: How graffiti art became an urban crisis in New York City. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, D. M., & Sanders, C. (2007). Graffiti and perceptions of safety: A pilot study using photographs and survey data. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 14(4), 292–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. A., & Taylor, C. (2011). Ancient graffiti in context: Introduction. In J. A. Baird & C. Taylor (Eds.), Ancient graffiti in context (pp. 1–17). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhart, R. K. (Ed.). (1995). The Barnhart concise dictionary of etymology (p. 326). New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, S. (2012). The illegal face of wall space. Radical History Review, 113, 111–126.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • C100. (2003). The art of rebellion: World of streetart. Corte Madera: Ginko Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castleman, C. (1982). Getting up: Subway graffiti in New York. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewska, E. (2007). Framing [con]text: Graffiti and place. Space and Culture, 10(2), 145–169.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, T. (2012). Street art, ideology, and public space. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Portland State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, T., & Peters, D. B. (2014). Graffiti and activism: Unmediated access & communication in space. Portland Street Art Alliance [online]. Retrieved on 29 Aug 2016 from https://pdxstreetart.wordpress.com/2014/11/21/graffiti-and-activism-unmediated-access-communication-in-space/

  • Cooper, M., & Chalfant, H. (1984). Subway art. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, T. (1996). In place/out of place: Geography, ideology and transgression. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, B. (2012). Mostly true (2nd ed.). 19 (10). Portland: Microcosm Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, L. (2008). Placing post-graffiti: The journey of the Peckham Rock. Cultural Geographies, 15(4), 71–496.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, M. (2008). The making of space, race and place: New York City’s War on graffiti, 1970 – present. Critique of Anthropology 28 (1), 27–45.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, B. J., & Lees, B. G. (2005). Investigating the spatiotemporal links between disorder, crime, and the fear of crime. The Professional Geographer, 57(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esbensen, F. A., Winfree, L. T., He, N., & Taylor, T. J. (2001). Youth gangs and definitional issues: When is a gang a gang, and why does it matter? Crime and Delinquency, 47(1), 105–130.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, J. (1996). Crimes of style: Urban graffiti and the politics of criminality. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, J. (2001). Tearing down the streets: Adventures in urban anarchy. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, M., & Young, A. (2006). ‘Our desires are ungovernable’: Writing graffiti in urban space. Theoretical Criminology, 10(3), 275–306.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, B. (2001). Illusion of order: The false promise of broken windows policing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iveson, K. (2010). The wars on graffiti and the new military urbanism. City, 14(1–2), 115–134.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Labonté, P. (2003). All city: The book about taking space. Toronto: ECW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D., & Cybriwsky, R. (1974). Urban graffiti as territorial markers. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 64(4), 491–505.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, N. (2001). The graffiti subculture: Youth, masculinity and identity in London and New York. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • MacPhee, J. (2007). Stencil pirates. Brooklyn: Soft Skull Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manco, T. (2002). Stencil graffiti. New York: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manco, T. (2004). Street logos. New York: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe, C. (2012). Graffiti of street art? Negotiating the moral geographies of the creative city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), 189–206.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe, C., & Iveson, K. (2011). Art and crime (and other things besides…): Conceptualizing graffiti in the city. Geography Compass, 5(3), 128–143.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, M. (2001). The subconscious art of graffiti removal, 16mm film. Portland: Rodeo Film Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreau, T., & Alderman, D. H. (2011). Graffiti hurts and the eradication of alternative landscape expression. The Geographical Review, 101(1), 106–124.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, D. B. (2012). The spatial and temporal life of Manchester graffiti: Towards an assemblage approach. Unpublished Master’s dissertation, University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S. A. (1999). Wallbangin’: Graffiti and gangs in L.A. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahn, J. (2002). Painting without permission: Hip-hop graffiti subculture. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. I. (Ed.). (2016). Routledge handbook of graffiti and street art. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotman, S., & Brennan, C. (2008). Bay area graffiti. New York: Mark Batty Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 603–651.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shobe, H., & Banis, D. (2014). Zero graffiti for a beautiful city: The cultural politics of urban space in San Francisco. Urban Geography, 35(4), 586–607.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shobe, H., & Conklin, T. (2018). Geographies of graffiti abatement: Zero tolerance in Portland, San Francisco, and Seattle. The Professional Geographer, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, T. (1983). Style wars, Film. Los Angeles: Public Art Films.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, G. J. (2009). Graffiti lives: Beyond the tag in New York’s urban underground. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. (2001). Breaking away from broken windows: Baltimore neighborhoods and the nationwide fight against crime, grime, fear, and decline. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisel, D. L. (2009). Graffiti, problem-oriented guides for police, problem-specific guides series, guide no. 9. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows. The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved: 1 Dec 2012 from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/

  • Young, A. (2010). Negotiated consent or zero tolerance? Responding to graffiti and street art in Melbourne. City, 14(1–2), 99–114.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA

    Hunter Shobe

Authors
  1. Hunter Shobe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hunter Shobe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Kentucky Department of Geography, Lexington, Kentucky, USA

    Stanley D Brunn

  2. Deutscher Sprachatlas, Marburg University, Marburg, Hessen, Germany

    Roland Kehrein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Shobe, H. (2018). Graffiti as Communication and Language. In: Brunn, S., Kehrein, R. (eds) Handbook of the Changing World Language Map. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73400-2_81-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73400-2_81-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73400-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73400-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth & Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials Science