Climate Change Literacy to Combat Climate Change and Its Impacts
- 215 Downloads
UNESCO (2004) defines literacy as “the ability to identify, understand, interpret, create, communicate, compute and use printed and written materials associated with varying contexts […] enabling individuals to achieve their goals to develop their knowledge and potential and to participate fully in their community and wider society” (p. 13). Literacy can also be defined as competence or knowledge in a specific area.
Climate Change Literacy
that the learner has an understanding of the basic science of climate and climate change; that people and organizations can make informed decisions; and that our behavior changes to a degree that we are not causing the climate to change from our actions, but instead we become stewards of the Earth and its climate so as to ensure the sustainability of humanity and all other species on which we depend. (Compass Education 2014, p. 9)
Climate change literacy is a vital element in strategies for meeting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13: “Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts.” Developing climate change literacy – individually, institutionally, and societally – entails understanding why it is important, who must be involved, what it includes, where and when it takes place, how to deal with challenges that arise, and what the end result, a climate change-literate citizen, will look like.
Why Is Climate Change Literacy Important?
Achieving Sustainable Development Goal 13
With the global average temperature still rising, greenhouse gas emissions still increasing, and extreme weather events and wildfires still intensifying, the climate change emergency (Carter 2018) calls for “urgent and accelerated action by countries as they implement their commitments to the Paris Agreement on Climate Change” (UN 2016). Achieving commitments to the Paris Agreement and meeting Sustainable Development Goal 13 will not be possible without widespread climate change literacy.
Knowledge of climate change science is necessary for developing policies and making decisions that will effectively combat climate change and its impacts. Miléř and Sládek (2011) see climate change literacy as essential to both mitigation and adaptation. “Climate literacy is crucial for future low-carbon living” (p. 150). “Without climate education, climate disruption is unavoidable. Even if humanity fails to stabilize climate, climate literacy will be urgently needed for adaptation” (p. 153).
SDG Target 13.3 is “to build knowledge and capacity to meet climate change.” This means “improving education, awareness-raising and human and institutional capacity on climate change mitigation, adaptation, impact reduction and early warning” (UN 2016). Climate change literacy is that knowledge, and the knowledge is, in turn, part of human and institutional capacity.
Meeting Other SDGs
Climate change literacy is also necessary for understanding how to minimize the disruptions caused by a changing climate that could hamper the successful implementation of other SDGs. For example, the effects of global warming on heat waves and soil moisture will impact SDG 2 – Zero Hunger. “Adverse climate events” already share the blame for a rise in world hunger that started in 2015 (FAO 2018); ocean acidification will impact SDG 14 – Life Below Water by making it more difficult for calcifying organisms (such as mollusks, corals, some plankton, etc.) to build shell or skeleton due to their dependence on abundant carbonate (Tanhua et al. 2015). Furthermore, because the goals are interconnected, the key to success for one goal might involve meeting the targets for another goal (e.g., SDG 7 – Affordable and Clean Energy will lead to lower carbon emissions from energy production; SDG 16 – Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions will lead to fewer carbon-intensive conflicts). Climate change literacy plays a role in understanding how each of these SDGs can be met.
Filling Knowledge Gaps and Fixing Misconceptions
The study says that education is the “single strongest predictor” of public awareness of climate change. Improving basic education and public understanding of climate change are vital to garner support for climate action, the researchers add. (McSweeney 2015)
Building Sustainable Societies
According to Climate Literacy: The Essential Principles of Climate Science (the climate change literacy “bible”), a climate-literate citizenry is essential for protecting fragile ecosystems and building sustainable communities that are resilient to climate change. “Such understanding improves our ability to make decisions about activities that increase vulnerability to the impacts of climate change and to take precautionary steps in our lives and livelihoods that would reduce those vulnerabilities” (U.S. Global Change Research Program 2009a).
Who Is Climate Change Literacy For?
Will it be possible to achieve SDG 13 without a climate change-literate populace? “The focus [of this goal] is on establishing an enabling environment for climate change adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable development to occur, through national policies that promote the participation of all citizens, especially marginalised communities, in adapting to climate change” (Open Development Cambodia 2018).
The world needs climate literate leaders to make correct decisions and implement tough measures. It is a duty of politicians to set the rules which can guide the world to a healthy, pleasant and earth-friendly low-carbon future…. We suggest that effective climate education should be selective. It is better for the society to have one climate literate politician than one climate literate carpenter. Of course every individual has a human right of climate literacy. But in the limited time we have, it is not a realistic goal to achieve climate literacy for all. (Miléř and Sládek 2011, pp. 151–152)
Three populations must be climate change literate in the short term if society-wide literacy is to follow. “If the society had climate literate leaders, journalists and teachers, the public would receive relevant information from them” (Miléř and Sládek 2011, p. 153).
Students at all levels
Parents and other community-minded citizens
Elected leaders and decision-makers
Civil servants, especially those in charge of policymaking
Educators at all levels
Doctors and others working in health care
Farmers and others working in the food system
Faith leaders and others working in social justice
What Are the Vital Components of Climate Change Literacy?
In practice, climate change literacy is a combination of competencies that can include (1) knowledge of climate system science, (2) understanding of the impacts and threats of climate change, and (3) motivation to make informed decisions to implement mitigative and adaptive solutions to the climate crisis (in short, what causes climate change, what climate change causes, and what can be done about it).
The ultimate goal then, is that we have positive impacts on the climate with regards to stabilizing and mitigating emissions of greenhouse gases, along with the capacity to adapt to the consequences of climate change. What is obvious to many now, is that knowledge about climate change alone will certainly be insufficient to motivate the necessary change in behavior that is required to achieve the above stated goals. (Compass Education 2014)
Knowledge of Climate System Science
“Climate science literacy is an understanding of the climate’s influence on you and society and your influence on climate,” as defined in Climate Literacy – The Essential Principles of Climate Science: A Guide for Individuals and Communities (USGCRP 2009a).
Facet 1: Scientific Literacy
Global warming theories are based on a wide range of research and knowledge, from the physics of the greenhouse effect to science regarding ocean currents, the carbon cycle, wind patterns and feedback loops. There may be some uncertainty about warming rates and consequences, but there’s no doubt the world is heating because of human activity—mostly through burning fossil fuels and damaging or destroying carbon sinks like forests and wetlands—and that the consequences are already severe and will worsen if we fail to act decisively. (Suzuki and Hanington 2018)
The scientific community uses a highly formalized version of peer review to validate research results and our understanding of their significance. [P]eer review does not guarantee that any particular published result is valid, [but] it does provide a high assurance that the work has been carefully vetted for accuracy by informed experts prior to publication. (United States Global Change Research Program 2009a)
Facet 2: Climate as a System
[C]limate literacy draws on climate science (i.e., the dynamics of the earth–atmosphere–ocean–biosphere across spatio-temporal scales), the quantitative and geospatial technologies by which it is understood, and the interconnectedness of human beings with their environment. The appreciation of the complexity of climate literacy is firmly grounded in the systems approach that is central to the earth sciences and geosciences. (Dupigny-Giroux and Cole 2018)
Facet 3: Fundamental Terms, Concepts, and Principles of Climate Science to Be Understood
Weather and weather forecast
Climate and climate forecast
Likely, very likely, extremely likely, virtually certain
Abrupt climate change
Irreversible climate change
Reasons for concern
Triple ocean degradation (heating, acidification, oxygen depletion)
Climate change commitment
Carbon cycles (short and long term)
Extreme weather events
El Niño/La Niña
Runaway [not runaway greenhouse]
Global warming potential
Carbon sources/carbon sinks
MOC (meridional overturning circulation)
The sun is the primary source of energy for Earth’s climate system.
Climate is regulated by complex interactions among components of the Earth system.
Life on Earth depends on, is shaped by, and affects climate.
Climate varies over space and time through both natural and man-made processes.
Our understanding of the climate systems is improved through observations, theoretical studies, and modeling.
Human activities are impacting the climate system.
Climate change will have consequences for the Earth system and human lives.
While it is not expected that any one person will ever completely understand every fundamental climate science concept, “[f]ull comprehension of these interconnected concepts will require a systems-thinking approach, meaning the ability to understand complex interconnections among all of the components of the climate system” (United States Global Change Research Program 2009a).
Understanding of the Impacts and Threats of Climate Change
In the coming decades, scientists expect climate change to have an increasing impact on human and natural systems. In a warmer world, accessibility to food, water, raw materials, and energy [is] likely to change. Human health, biodiversity, economic stability, and national security are also expected to be affected by climate change. Climate model projections suggest that negative effects of climate change will significantly outweigh positive ones. The nation’s ability to prepare for and adapt to new conditions may be exceeded as the rate of climate change increases. […] The impacts of climate change may affect the security of nations. Reduced availability of water, food, and land can lead to competition and conflict among humans, potentially resulting in large groups of climate refugees. (USGCRP 2009a)
Teaching the science and policy of climate change is necessary but insufficient for helping students to develop a robust climate literacy. Climate change educators must also teach students how to evaluate historical trends, to unpack the assumptions in shared cultural narratives, to grapple with ethical dilemmas, and more generally to traverse the turbulence of feeling that is a hallmark of living in a time of global climate chaos. In short, climate literacy must include the skills and strategies of the humanities, and specifically literary and cultural studies. (Siperstein 2015)
Motivation to Make Informed Decisions to Implement Mitigative and Adaptive Solutions to the Climate Crisis
According to Azevedo and Marques (2017), climate literacy includes “attitudes, beliefs, motivational orientations, self-efficacy, and values” (p. 9). They found that in the literature, the most valued attitude is making informed and responsible decisions, suggesting that the goal of climate change literacy is “the possibility of acting upon that knowledge, in the personal, professional and communal lives” (p. 9). Climate change literacy, therefore, should include the learning necessary to make informed decisions about climate change solutions.
Informed climate decisions require an integrated approach. Reducing our vulnerability to these impacts depends not only upon our ability to understand climate science and the implications of climate change, but also upon our ability to integrate and use that knowledge effectively. (USGCRP 2009a)
According to the US Global Change Research Program (2009a), mitigating and adapting to climate change “will bring economic and environmental challenges as well as opportunities, and citizens who have an understanding of climate science will be better prepared to respond to both.” For example, according to Jacobson and Delucchi (2010), the main barriers to getting to 100% clean energy are social and political, not technical or economic. Climate change literacy can assist in overcoming such barriers to the achievement of effective mitigation.
Actions taken by individuals, communities, states, and countries all influence climate. Practices and policies followed in homes, schools, businesses, and governments can affect climate. Climate-related decisions made by one generation can provide opportunities as well as limit the range of possibilities open to the next generation. Steps toward reducing the impact of climate change may influence the present generation by providing other benefits such as improved public health infrastructure and sustainable built environments. (United States Global Change Research Program 2009a)
Communicating About Climate Change
Unfortunately both the politicians and the public have been manipulated by powerful lobbying by the oil and coal industry. Widespread denial of anthropogenic climate change competes with the data reported by climate scientists. Peer-reviewed articles are written in scientific language which is not easy to understand. The media tends toward sensationalism and often misrepresents scientific results. (Miléř and Sládek 2011, p. 152)
Providing local, unbiased climate resources and monitoring their use by the intended audience
Dispensing science information within the context of a story (thereby increasing the chances of its being understood and recalled)
Using sophisticated, networked visualization tools
Collaborating closely with several stakeholders (“to provide scientific information compatible with the public’s cognitive processes”) (p. 10)
It turns out the language you use and how you frame the discussion can make a big difference. The problem isn’t that people haven’t been given enough facts. It’s that they haven’t been given facts in the right ways. Researchers often refer to this packaging as framing. Just as picture frames enhance and draw attention to parts of an image inside, linguistic frames can do the same with ideas.
Metaphors are an effective way to provide frames when communicating about climate change. For example, in one study, reading about the “war” against global warming led to greater agreement with scientific evidence showing that it is real and human-caused than reading about the “race” against global warming (Hendricks 2017). “This group of participants indicated more urgency for reducing emissions, believed global warming poses a greater risk and responded that they were more willing to change their behaviors to reduce their carbon footprint.”
Where and When to Educate for Climate Change Literacy
There is a growing gap between what is known about climate change by the scientific community and what is understood by the public. There is an urgent need to enhance climate literacy, which is currently critically low as proved by several surveys. We assume that efforts towards climate literacy should be intensified. (Miléř and Sládek 2011, p. 155)
Opportunities to learn about climate change and to develop climate change literacy exist in and out of school, in three arenas: (1) formal education, (2) nonformal education, and (3) informal education. “Climate education can be formal (schools) and informal (media, museums, libraries, zoos)” (Miléř and Sládek 2011), with nonformal education situated in between.
Climate Change Literacy Through Formal Education
Formal education is a mandatory, continuous process, with an official structure and curriculum and leaving certificate (Palumbo et al. n.d.). Otto (2018) finds that “the classical educational system is the first important lever for climate literacy” (p. 132), as borne out by Indicator 13.3.1 (Education on climate change) of Sustainable Development Goal 13, which relates to the number of countries that have integrated mitigation, adaptation, impact reduction, and early warning into primary, secondary, and tertiary curricula, the goal being to improve education, awareness-raising, and human and institutional capacity on climate change mitigation, adaptation, impact reduction, and early warning by 2030.
There are three levels of formal education where learning for climate change literacy can take place (note: these levels might have different names in different jurisdictions): (1) preschool and primary (early elementary), (2) late elementary (middle) and secondary, and (3) tertiary or postsecondary (colleges and universities).
Level 1: Climate Literacy for Preschool and Primary School (Early Elementary)
Level 2: Late Elementary School (Middle School) and Secondary (or High) School
More complex climate terms and concepts
Ecological principles involved in the climate system and climate change (Johnston 2010)
Energy literacy (USGCRP 2009b)
Real-world problem-solving through sustainable development principles
Integrated and holistic learning across subject areas (science, history, geography, language/communications, mathematics, art, health)
Level 3: Postsecondary Institutions (Universities and Colleges)
Innovative teaching approaches (UNESCO 2010)
Interdisciplinary whenever possible (to cross the divide between humanities and sciences) (Siperstein 2015)
Multidisciplinary action research
Simulations (such as the World Climate Project simulation)
Team-based learning using the principles of sustainable development
Critical discourse analysis in climate change communication
Climate science is a highly interdisciplinary, pedagogically challenging subject that does not fit easily into discipline-based science curricula or assessments. Curricula and the teaching of climate change therefore need to promote pedagogical approaches that take the challenges of interdisciplinarity into account. (UNESCO Climate Change Initiative 2010, p. 11)
Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET)
“Green” economies skills training in renewable energy and other technologies
Incorporation of elements of climate change adaptation and mitigation to contribute to reductions in energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions
Skills needed in and by communities affected by climate change (i.e., climate change refugees)
(UNESCO Climate Change Initiative 2010, p. 12)
One way to deepen or intensify education for climate change literacy at any level or in any arena is through integration. “It is increasingly relevant to reflect and value an interdisciplinary approach to teaching and learning, because it is a key factor in climate change education and awareness” (Alves and Azeiteiro 2018).
According to Azevedo and Marques (2017), climate change literacy now needs an “integrative, inter/transdisciplinary and epistemological model” (p. 3) and a “re-thinking […] to encompass the multiplicity of perspectives we face when trying to understand and participate in discussions about the complex issues posed by our contemporary post-industrial society” (p. 10).
Climate Change Literacy Through Nonformal Education
Nonformal learning is structured and organized learning that is intentional, planned and offered by an educational provider, and deliberately chosen by the learner, but it does not lead to formal certification or qualification. People of all age groups can participate in nonformal education, which can be offered through courses, workshops, seminars, etc. (Palumbo et al. n.d.).
Much nonformal education for climate change literacy is done through distance learning, a strategy that provides a high level of accessibility for learners. Alves and Azeiteiro (2018) point out that online learning has the “capacity to reach an extensive number of people, scattered around the world and with diversified cultural backgrounds.”
One objective of the UNESCO Climate Change Initiative: Climate Change Education for Sustainable Development (CCESD) (2010) is “to raise awareness about climate change and enhance non-formal education programmes through the media, networking, and partnerships” (p. 14).
Climate Change Literacy Through Informal Education
Informal education is defined as non-institutionalized learning realized through activities in everyday situations and interactions within the context of work, family, and leisure (Palumbo et al. n.d.).
While formal education engages mostly the youngest generations, which is important for the future development of society, “informal education has the power to engage people of all ages and can achieve quick response” (Miléř and Sládek 2011, p. 153) – an important advantage given the urgency of the climate crisis.
Many climate change literacy initiatives in informal settings such as museums, libraries, zoos, and outdoor recreation venues now focus on lifelong learners and their participation in activities such as citizen science (research collaborations between scientists and the general public) (Dupigny-Giroux and Cole 2018).
It is reasonable to assume that it [understanding of climate change] will be at least partly shaped by access to media, and the quality of media coverage in each respective country. If the news sources you pay attention to don’t report the issue at all, or don’t explain the causes, it’s unlikely most people will get the information from other sources. (Tien Ming Lee and Anthony Leiserowitz in McSweeney 2015)
On one hand the politicians usually follow public opinion, thus the public has the power to force the politicians to take action. On the other hand the public is confused by media spin and climate education is a slow process and not very effective. (p. 152)
Two strategies are needed to solve this twofold problem. First, the UNESCO Climate Change Initiative (2010) calls for “increasing media literacy through training for journalists on facts and myths around climate change [to provide] another means to deliver and reinforce relevant and accurate messages.” Next are calls for media literacy for the public. “To be climate change literate, the public must first be media literate, since print, TV and radio reports and opinion pieces are the main ways that the public gets its information about climate change science” (Cooper, in Ramanujan 2011).
How to Deal with Challenges to Climate Change Literacy
Is Denial the Opposite of Climate Change Literacy?
Ordinary members of the public credit or dismiss scientific information on disputed issues based on whether the information strengthens or weakens their ties to others who share their values. At least among ordinary [people], individuals with higher science comprehension are even better at fitting the evidence to their group commitments. (Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy 2012)
According to Kahan, the study suggests the need for science communication strategies that reflect a more sophisticated understanding of cultural values. “More information can help solve the climate change conflict,” Kahan said, “but that information has to do more than communicate the scientific evidence. It also has to create a climate of deliberations in which no group perceives that accepting any piece of evidence is akin to betrayal of their cultural group.” (Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy 2012)
According to Braman, a co-researcher, the solution won’t be found in trying to increase trust in scientists or awareness of what scientists believe. He concluded that “[t]o make sure people form unbiased perceptions of what scientists are discovering, it is necessary to use communication strategies that reduce the likelihood that citizens of diverse values will find scientific findings threatening to their cultural commitments” (Why “scientific consensus” fails to persuade 2010).
Some of the Terms and Metaphors We Use Are Inaccurate or Misleading
According to John P. Holdren (2007), former senior science and technology advisor to US President Barack Obama, the term “global warming” is a misnomer. “It implies something gradual, uniform, and benign. What we’re experiencing is none of these.” Holdren uses “global climate disruption” instead.
Another problem arises when a term has both a colloquial meaning and a (different) scientific meaning. For example, Rebich and Gautier (2005) discovered that the term “aerosol” was often used incorrectly to describe a type of greenhouse gas, “which we considered to be evidence that many students were making colloquial use of the word aerosol (to mean CFC [chlorofluorocarbon]) and hadn't learned the scientific meaning of the term [a tiny solid or liquid particle suspended in air or gas]” (p. 361).
understood the greenhouse effect as the trapping of this extra (reflected) solar energy by greenhouse gases or clouds. Other students thought it was the greenhouse gases themselves being trapped. This misunderstanding of the greenhouse effect may result in part from the direct analogy to a greenhouse maintaining heat by trapping warm air inside. In many cases, it seemed that longwave radiative processes did not play any part in students’ models of the greenhouse effect, which indicates that they probably do not conceive of the earth (let alone greenhouse gases and aerosol particles) as radiating bodies. (pp. 360–361)
One solution to this challenge is to help those learning about climate change to examine and reflect on their prior knowledge, metaphors, and mental models and schema relating to climate science concepts and terminology.
Misconceptions or Faulty Prior Knowledge
Rebich and Gautier (2005) gleaned from various researchers that the prior knowledge which learners bring to their learning – the “scaffold” for their future learning – “is a very strong determinant in what information they attend to, how that information is perceived, what learners judge to be important or relevant, and what they are able to understand and remember” (p. 356).
Presumably higher levels of affective entrenchment would correspond with greater difficulty in achieving conceptual change. Revision of misconceptions may also prove costly at the level of cognitive processing if revision of a particular mental model will require revision of a number of related models. (p. 356)
At the heart of this misconception is the idea that if something happens naturally, then it can only happen naturally. But of course that's not true. Here are some examples. Forest fires occur naturally. Does that mean that arson is a hoax? People die of natural causes. But sadly, people are sometimes murdered. But if people can die on their own does that mean that murder does not happen? It rains, which makes my lawn wet. But sometimes, a sprinkler is used to make the lawn wet. So the lawn can become wet for either natural or human-caused reasons. Rivers have always flooded. But some floods are either caused by or made worse by human actions. If a dam ruptures, the resulting flood is because of humans—not because floods happen on their own. Many processes on Earth have more than one cause. The presence of a natural cause does not negate the reality of a human trigger. (CLEAN Question 11)
Because a principal factor in whether respondents in a global survey (Lee et al. 2015) consider climate change a threat was whether they consider climate change to be human-caused, education to correct misconceptions and faulty prior knowledge can be vital to their climate change literacy.
Gaps in Knowledge
Awareness of thermal expansion as a cause of sea level rise
Appreciation for feedbacks in the climate system
Understanding of the connection between the greenhouse effect and the hydrological cycle via water vapor
Knowledge of the historical context of climate change
Understanding of the mechanisms of global climate change
Appreciation of the role of computational models in climate change research (pp. 362–363)
“Our efforts to modify the course curriculum to facilitate meaningful learning will be based in part on knowledge of these misconceptions [and gaps in knowledge], and modifications to our instructional approach will depend on our interpretation of their likely causes” (Rebich and Gautier 2005, p. 360). Any gaps still present at the summative evaluation can be addressed in future offerings of a course or program on climate change.
Science, mathematics, and technology have a profound impact on our individual lives and our culture. They play a role in almost all human endeavors, and they affect how we relate to one another and the world around us…. Science literacy enables us to make sense of real-world phenomena, informs our personal and social decisions, and serves as a foundation for a lifetime of learning. (American Association for the Advancement of Science 2007)
Scientific illiteracy can, therefore, pose a significant barrier to teaching or learning about climate change, its impacts, and the mitigation and adaptation measures necessary for dealing with it. Effective science teaching in educational institutions is a societal policy choice – one that takes years to produce its effect in a scientifically literate generation of graduates.
However, in the meantime, people who know that they are not scientifically literate can learn how knowledge is created in science. For example, an understanding of scientific concepts and practices such as weight of evidence, peer review, shifting baselines, different timescales, the precautionary principle, and ecological limits to science (Johnston 2007) can give these individuals the confidence to accept and act on what they don’t actually understand.
Leaders, Educators, and Journalists Can Be Climate Change Illiterate
People in positions of power and influence might not have the level of climate change literacy needed for them to avoid passing on misconceptions and faulty knowledge. For teachers and others, there are web-based and other resources that are designed to help them become prepared to teach climate science or pass on climate change knowledge, deepening their own knowledge as they go. (See, e.g., CLEAN’s Climate Literacy Quiz.)
When those who have learned about the urgency of the climate crisis see no evidence of urgent action around them, especially from their leaders, cognitive dissonance can be the result. The evidence (what they’re witnessing) does not match (indeed, it contradicts) their new understanding, belief, idea, or values about climate change, causing mental conflict or discomfort, even feelings of helplessness and immobilization. It is important to note that these feelings are not caused by climate change or learning about it, but by the lack of urgent response to climate change on the part of leaders that were trusted (Olofsgård 2018).
A Climate Change-Literate Citizen …
Has a basic understanding of the climate system (including “the essential principles of all aspects of Earth’s system that govern climate patterns,”) as well as the natural and human-caused factors that affect it
Is aware of the fundamental relationship between climate and human life and the many ways in which climate has always played a role in human health
Understands how climate observations and records, as well as computer modeling, contribute to scientific knowledge about climate
Knows that climate science can inform our decisions that improve quality of life
Learns how to gather information about climate and weather, accesses scientifically credible information about climate, and has the ability to assess the validity of scientific arguments about climate and to use that information to support their decisions
Communicates about climate and climate change in a meaningful way
Makes scientifically informed and responsible decisions with regard to actions that might affect climate (p. 4)
Understands how our climate works
Knows how to distinguish fact from fiction
Talks about climate in a meaningful way
Makes informed and responsible decisions
(Climate Literacy (2016), an e-learning program in Europe)
In short, the climate change-literate citizen understands the science of climate change, as well as the importance of employing it as the basis for decisions on mitigation and adaptation measures in the face of its impacts.
As Chad Kauffman (2014) explains in Our Changing Climate: Introduction to Climate Science, an e-textbook on climate change, “We have choices. We can fatalistically accept climate change and do nothing about it or, based on scientific understandings of Earth’s climate system, we can reduce, and even prevent, negative impacts through mitigation and adaptation.”
- Abrahams I (2015) In pursuit of the unachievable: the fallacy of meaningful widespread scientific literacy. University of Nottingham. https://exchange.nottingham.ac.uk/events/in-pursuit-of-the-unachievable-the-fallacy-of-meaningful-widespread-scientific-literacy/. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Alves F, Azeiteiro UM (2018) Climate change and e-learning: interdisciplinarity and interculturality challenges. In: Azeiteiro U, Leal Filho W, Aires L (eds) Climate literacy and innovations in climate change education: distance learning for sustainable development, Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham, pp 229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (2007) Science and Society Map 9. Atlas of Science Literacy, vol 2, Project 2061Google Scholar
- Carter P (2018) Global climate change is an existential threat and global humanitarian climate emergency. Climate Emergency Institute. https://www.climateemergencyinstitute.com. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Climate Literacy (2016) https://climate-literacy.eu/en/project. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Climate Literacy & Energy Awareness Network (CLEAN) (n.d.) Climate literacy quiz. https://cleanet.org/clean/literacy/climate/quiz.html. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Compass Education (2014) Handbook: systems thinking and climate change education games and activities: activity guidebook on systems thinking and climate change education for teachers and non-formal education activists. CompassEducation.orgGoogle Scholar
- DARA (2012) Climate vulnerability monitor, 2nd edn. https://daraint.org/climate-vulnerability-monitor/climate-vulnerability-monitor-2012/. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Dupigny-Giroux L-A, Cole A (2018) Climate literacy and education. Oxford Bibliographies. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199874002-0191
- Fake news threatens a climate literate world (Editorial) (2017) Nature Communications 8 (15460). https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15460. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- FAO (UN Food and Agriculture Organization) (2018) The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2018. http://www.fao.org/state-of-food-security-nutrition/en/. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Hendricks R (2017) Communicating climate change: focus on the framing, not just the facts. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/communicating-climate-change-focus-on-the-framing-not-just-the-facts-73028. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Holdren JP (2007) Global climate disruption: what do we know? What should we do? Presentation at Harvard University (6 November 2007). https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/global-climate-disruption-what-do-we-know-what-should-we-do. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- IPCC (2014) AR5 Climate change 2014, working group 2 Annex II: glossary. https://www.ipcc.ch/reports/. Accessed 17 Dec 2018
- IPCC (2018) Summary for policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. https://www.ipcc.ch/reports/. Accessed 17 Dec 2018
- Johnston J (2007) Ecologically inclusive scientific literacy: A transformative tool in sustainability education. GreenHeart Education. https://www.greenhearted.org/scientific-literacy.html. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Johnston J (2010) Climate change primer for educators: An introduction to atmospheric greenhouse gas pollution. GreenHeart Education. https://www.greenhearted.org/climate-change-primer.html. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Kauffman CM (2014) Earth’s climate as a dynamic system. In: Our changing climate: introduction to climate science. American Meteorological Society. © American Meteorological Society. Used with permission. https://www.ametsoc.org/ams/index.cfm/education-careers/education-program/undergraduate-faculty/climate-studies/course-components/textbook/. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Marcinkowski T, Noh K, Erdogan M, Sagy G (2011) Glimpses of climate literacy: climate literacy as assessed partially by a limited set of items from four recent national assessments of environmental literacy. Paper prepared for the workshop on climate change education in formal settings, K-14. Climate Change Education Roundtable, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- McSweeney R (2015) Global survey: where in the world is most and least aware of climate change? Carbon Brief (27 July 2015). https://www.carbonbrief.org/global-survey-where-in-the-world-is-most-and-least-aware-of-climate-change. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Olofsgård J (2018) It’s all in your head: dissonance. We don’t have time. https://medium.com/wedonthavetime/dissonance-4db396aad1bc. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Open Development Cambodia (2018) SDG 13 Climate action. https://opendevelopmentcambodia.net/topics/sdg13-climate-action/. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Otto D (2018) MOOCs – a powerful tool for imparting climate literacy? Insights from parleys with students. In: Azeiteiro U, Leal Filho W, Aires L (eds) Climate literacy and innovations in climate change education: distance learning for sustainable development, Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham, pp 131–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Palumbo M, Startari S, Domović V, Boillet D (n.d.) Education (formal, non-formal, informal). Young Adulllt [sic]. http://www.young-adulllt.eu/glossary/listview.php?we_objectID=193. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Ramanujan K (2011) Public distrusts climate science partly due to lack of media literacy, says researcher. Cornell Chronicle (21 March 2011). http://news.cornell.edu/stories/2011/03/distrust-climate-science-due-lack-media-literacy. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Rebich S, Gautier C (2005) Concept mapping to reveal prior knowledge and conceptual change in a mock summit course on global climate change. J Geosci Educ 53(4):355–365. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.355. Accessed 30 Nov 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sharma R (2017) Experiential learning and climate change education: effect of predict-observe-explain strategy on pre-service teachers’ understanding of sea level rise. Dir J Educ Stud 13(1):93–112Google Scholar
- Siperstein S (2015) Developing climate change literacy with the humanities: a narrative approach. American Geophysical Union, Fall meeting 2015, abstract ID: ED11F-06. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AGUFMED11F..06S. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Suzuki D, Hanington I (2018) Ocean study criticism shows benefits of scientific method. David Suzuki Foundation. https://davidsuzuki.org/story/ocean-study-criticism-shows-benefits-of-scientific-method/. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Tanhua T, Orr JC, Lorenzoni L, Hansson L (2015) Monitoring ocean carbon and ocean acidification. World Meteorol Organ Bull 64(1). https://public.wmo.int/en/resources/bulletin/monitoring-ocean-carbon-and-ocean-acidification-0. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- U.S. Global Change Research Program (2009a) Climate literacy: the essential principles of climate science: a guide for individuals and communities. https://www.climate.gov/teaching/essential-principles-climate-literacy/essential-principles-climate-literacy. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- U.S. Global Change Research Program (2009b) Energy literacy: essential principles and fundamental concepts for energy education. https://www.energy.gov/eere/education/energy-literacy-essential-principles-and-fundamental-concepts-energy-education. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- UN (2016) Sustainable development goal 13. Sustainable Development Goals Knowledge Platform. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg13. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- UNESCO (2004) The plurality of literacy and its implications for policies and programmes. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001362/136246e.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- UNESCO (2010) Climate change education for sustainable development. The UNESCO Climate Change Initiative http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001901/190101E.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Union of Concerned Scientists (n.d.) Global warming impacts: the consequences of climate change are already here. https://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/global-warming/science-and-impacts/global-warming-impacts. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Why “scientific consensus” fails to persuade (13 September 2010) National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=117697. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
- Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy (27 May 2012) Phys.org. https://phys.org/news/2012-05-yale-apathy-climate-unrelated-science.html. Accessed 30 Nov 2018