Skip to main content

Issues and Challenges Related to Digital Equity: An Overview

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

Abstract

The chapter addresses two main concerns: Digital equity for social inclusion and digital equity in education. Five dimensions of digital equity are identified: (1) access to hardware, software, and connectivity to the Internet; (2) access to meaningful, high quality, and culturally relevant content in local languages; (3) access to creating, sharing, and exchanging digital content; (4) access to educators who know how to use digital tools and resources; and (5) access to high-quality research on the application of digital technologies to enhance learning. Issues, challenges, and informed strategies are pinpointed on the basis of what digital-divide and digital-equity research says.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archer, K., Savage, R., Sanghera-Sidhu, S., Wood, E. E., Gottardo, A., & Chen, V. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of technology use in classrooms: A tertiary meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 78, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attewell, P. (2001). The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banoğlu, K., Vanderlinde, R., & Çetin, M. (2016). Investigation of principals’ technology leadership profiles in the context of schools’ learning organization culture and ICT infrastructure: F@tih project schools vs. the others. Education & Science/Egitim Ve Bilim, 41(188), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadband Commission for Digital Development ITU & UNESCO. (2013). Technology, broadband, and education (report by the broadband commission working group on education). Paris: UNESCO. Availablee at http://www.broadbandcommission.org/documents/publications/bd_bbcomm-education_2013.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, E., & Fieseler, C. (2016). The flow of digital labour. New Media & Society, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816644566.

  • Campbell, D. (2001). Can the digital divide be contained? International Labour Review, 140(2), 119–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charania, A., & Davis, N. E. (2016). A smart partnership: Integrating educational technology for underserved children in India. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, P. F., Pierce, G., & Trauth, E. M. (2006). Closing the digital divide: Understanding racial, ethnic, social class, gender and geographic disparities in internet use among school age children in the United States. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4, 345–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Pea, R. (2011). The advantages of alternative certifications for students. Education Week, 31(8), 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Learning & UNESCO. (2015). A basic guide to open educational resources (OER). Paris: Commonwealth of Learning and UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002158/215804e.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Neve, D., & Devos, G. (2017). How do professional learning communities aid and hamper professional learning of beginning teachers related to differentiated instruction? Teachers & Teaching, 23(3), 262–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1206524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter, S. (2008). Leadership for IT in schools. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 543–554). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • EducationSuperHighway. (2017). 2016 State of the States (EducationSuperHighway’s second annual report on the state of broadband connectivity in America’s public schools). Available at https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/esh-sots-pdfs/2016_national_report_K12_broadband.pdf

  • Gonzales-Perez, A. (2014). Characterization of inclusive practices in schools with education technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 132, 357–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorski, P. C. (2005). Education equity and the digital divide. AACE Journal, 13(1), 3–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorski, P. C. (2009). Insisting on digital equity: Reframing the dominant discourse on multicultural education and technology. Urban Education, 44(3), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085908318712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2015). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, V. J. (2017). Exploring teacher–student interactions: Communities of practice, ecological learning systems – Or something else? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1070395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). Available at http://firstmonday.org/article/view/942/864

  • International Telecommunications Union (ITU). (2003). World telecommunication development report: Access indicators for the information society. Geneva, Switzerland: World Summit on the Information Society. Available at http://www.itu.int/pub/D-IND-WTDR-2003/e

    Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2009). National Educational Technology Standards (NETS•A) and Performance Indicators for Administrators. Available at https://www.kelloggllc.com/tpc/netsy15.pdf

  • Johal, S., & Thirgood, J. (2016). Working without a net: Rethinking Canada’s social policy in the age of work. Toronto: Mowat Center, School of Public Policy & Governance, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, V. S., & Levine, M. H. (2015). Connecting to learn: Promoting digital equity among America’s Hispanic families, The Joan Ganz Cooney center at sesame workshop. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Street. Available at http://www.joanganzcooneycenter.org/publication/connecting-to-learn-promoting-digital-equity-for-americas-hispanic-families/

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, D., & Mishra, R. (2015). Deep web performance enhance on search engine. In 2015 international conference on soft computing techniques and implementations (ICSCTI) (pp. 137–140). Faridabad: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCTI.2015.7489619

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laferrière, T., Breuleux, A., Allaire, S., Hamel, C., Law, N., Montané, M., et al. (2015). The knowledge building international project (KBIP): Scaling up professional development for effective uses of collaborative technologies. In C.-K. Looi & L. W. Teh (Eds.), Scaling educational innovations, Springer, education innovation series (pp. 255–276). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-537-2_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lating, P. O. (2006). Hybrid e-learning for rural secondary schools in Uganda. Karlskrona: Blekinge Institute of Technology. Available at: http://www.bth.se/tks/teknovet.nsf/(WebFiles)/A6622DE57A0668A5C1257225004AAE33/$FILE/lating_lic.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, J. (2001). Rethinking the digital divide. Harvard Educational Review, 71(4), 709–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C.-K., Lim, W.-Y., & Chen, W. (2008). Communities of practice for continuing professional development in the 21st century. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 489–506). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Looker, E. D. (2008). Gender and information technology. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 779–788). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection, Programme for international student assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at http://www.oecd.org/publications/students-computers-and-learning-9789264239555-en.htm

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 volume 5: Collaborative problem solving. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/9817051e.pdf?expires=1513205823&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=CA56EE8C495656AE3CE4D87647C4204E

    Google Scholar 

  • Passey, D., Laferrière, T., Ahmad, M., Bhowmik, M., Gross, D., Price, J., et al. (2016). Educational digital technologies in developing countries challenge third party providers. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 121–133. Available at http://www.ifets.info/journals/19_3/12.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirkkalainen, H., Pawlowski, J. M., & Pappa, D. (2017). Educators’ open educational collaboration online: The dilemma of emotional ownership. Computers & Education, 106, 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, J., McLaughlin, R. T., & Bracey-Sutton, B. (2008). Critical success factors in moving towards digital equity. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 803–818). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Resta, P., Christal, M., & Roy, L. (2004). Digital technology to empower indigenous culture and education. In N. E. Davis & A. Brown (Eds.), The world yearbook of education 2004: Digital technology, communities and education (pp. 179–195). London: Kogan Page.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robles Morales, J. M., Mirko, A., De Marco, S., & Lobera, J. A. (2016). The new frontier of digital inequality. The participatory divide. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 156, 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronchi, A. M. (2009). eCulture: Cultural content in the digital age. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2013). Education in a digital world. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G., Allen, N., & Resta, P. (2003). Toward digital equity: Bridging the divide in education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. (2000). Social inclusion: An introduction. In P. Askonas & A. Stewart (Eds.), Social inclusion: Possibilities and tensions (pp. 1–16). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, C. A., Mishra, P., & Roseth, C. J. (2016). Preference for multitasking, technological dependency, student metacognition, & pervasive technology use: An experimental intervention. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviranus, J., & Roberts, V. (2008). Disability, special education and IT. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 789–802). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Túrcsányi-Szábo, M. (2008). Online professional development for teachers. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 747–762). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2001). The Geneva declaration of principles and plan of action. Geneva, Switzerland: World Summit on the Information Society. Available at http://www.itu.int/wsis/documents/doc_multi.asp?lang=fr&id=1532|1191

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2011). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers. Paris, France: UNESCO. Available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002134/213475e.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Cited in https://www.itu.int/net4/wsis/forum/2016/Content/documents/outcomes/WSISForum2016—HighLevelTrack-Outcomes.pdf

  • United States Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology (2016, 2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: National education technology plan update. Available at https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf

  • Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third–level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, J. Schulz, T. M. Hale, & A. Williams (Eds.), Communication and information technologies annual, Studies in media and communications (Vol. 10, pp. 29–52). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2017). Collateral benefits of internet use: Explaining the diverse outcomes of engaging with the internet. New Media & Society, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817715282.

  • Vuorikari, R., Kampylis, P., Scimeca, S., & Punie, Y. (2015). Scaling up teacher networks across and within European schools: The case of eTwinning. In C.-K. Looi & L. W. Teh (Eds.), Scaling educational innovation (pp. 227–254). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WSIS. (2003). Declaration of principles. World summit on the information society, Geneva 2003. Available at http://www.itu.int/wsis/docs/geneva/official/dop.html

  • WSIS. (2005). Tunis commitment. World summit on the information society, Tunisia 2005. Available at http://www.itu.int/wsis/docs2/tunis/off/7.html

  • Yuen, A. H. K., Lau, W. W. F., Park, J. H., Lau, G. K. K., & Chan, A. K. M. (2016). Digital equity and students’ home computing: A Hong Kong study. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 509–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0276-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thérèse Laferrière .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Resta, P., Laferrière, T., McLaughlin, R., Kouraogo, A. (2018). Issues and Challenges Related to Digital Equity: An Overview. In: Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Lai, KW. (eds) Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education . Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_67

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics