Information and Communication Technology and Education: Meaningful Change Through Teacher Agency

  • Peter R. AlbionEmail author
  • Jo Tondeur
Reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)


The quality of teachers is a very strong influence on the quality of education. In an era when societies and technologies are changing rapidly, both the nature of the education that is appropriate and the means available for its delivery are also changing rapidly. Hence, if teachers are to contribute to the ongoing transformation of societies by transforming education through the use of technologies, they will need to engage in personal transformation through ongoing learning. The wide variety of contexts in which teachers work with differing resources, the variability in their prior learning and in the needs of learners, the rapid changes in technologies, and the shifting expectations of society make it impossible for central authorities to prescribe educational experiences that will be suitable for all circumstances. Teachers must be empowered to practice their profession by orchestrating resources and activities to match educational provision to learners’ needs. Recognizing the agency of teachers as professionals is essential to enlisting them as contributors to the ongoing transformation of education through application of ICT. This chapter addresses the essential role of teacher agency in the transformation of teachers and the education systems in which they work.


Teacher agency Professional development Professional learning community Educational transformation 


  1. ACARA. (2015a). Australian curriculum: Technologies. Canberra: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from Scholar
  2. ACARA. (2015b). National Assessment Program – ICT Literacy Years 6 & 10 Report 2014. Canberra: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from Scholar
  3. Aesaert, K., Vanderlinde, R., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). The content of educational technology curricula: A cross-curricular state of the art. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(1), 131–151. Scholar
  4. Aesaert, K., Van Nijlen, D., Vanderlinde, R., Tondeur, J., Devlieger, I., & van Braak, J. (2015). The contribution of pupil, classroom and school level characteristics to primary school pupils’ ICT competences: A performance-based approach. Computers & Education, 87, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bahia, S., Freire, I. P., Estrela, M. T., Amaral, A., & Espírito Santo, J. A. (2017). The bologna process and the search for excellence: Between rhetoric and reality, the emotional reactions of teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(4), 467–482. Scholar
  6. Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51).
  7. Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640. Scholar
  8. Buchanan, R. (2015). Teacher identity and agency in an era of accountability. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 700–719. Scholar
  9. Charteris, J., & Smith, J. (2017). Sacred and secret stories in professional knowledge landscapes: Learner agency in teacher professional learning. Reflective Practice, 1–13.
  10. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. DEEWR. (2008). Success through partnership: Achieving a national vision for ICT in schools. Retrieved from
  12. Dexter, S., Richardson, J. W., & Nash, J. B. (2016). Leadership for technology use, integration, and innovation. In M. D. Young and G. M. Crow (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (2nd ed.) (pp. 202–228). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. Scholar
  14. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175–182. Scholar
  15. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. Scholar
  16. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & Tondeur, J. (2014). Teachers’ beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st-century teaching and learning. International handbook of research on teacher beliefs, 403.Google Scholar
  17. Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Angeli, C., Malyn-Smith, J., Voogt, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). Arguing for computer science in the school curriculum. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 38–46.Google Scholar
  18. Friedman, T. L. (2006). The world is flat: The globalized world in the twenty-first century. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. (4th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching, 6(2), 151–182. Scholar
  21. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hatzigianni, M., Gregoriadis, A., & Fleer, M. (2016). Computer use at schools and associations with social-emotional outcomes – A holistic approach. Findings from the longitudinal study of Australian children. Computers & Education, 95, 134–150. Scholar
  24. Hawkridge, D. (1990). Who needs computers in schools, and why? Computers & Education, 15, 1), 1–1), 6. Scholar
  25. Heikonen, L., Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., & Soini, T. (2016). Early career teachers’ sense of professional agency in the classroom: Associations with turnover intentions and perceived inadequacy in teacher–student interaction. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 1–17.
  26. Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343–367. Scholar
  28. Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., Pieters, J., & Voogt, J. (2015). ICT use in science and mathematics teacher education in Tanzan: Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ketelaar, E., Beijaard, D., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Den Brok, P. J. (2012). Teachers’ positioning towards an educational innovation in the light of ownership, sense-making and agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 273–282. Scholar
  30. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.Google Scholar
  31. Lim, C.-P., Zhao, Y., Tondeur, J., Chai, C.-S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Bridging the gap: Technology trends and use of Technology in Schools. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 59–68.Google Scholar
  32. Lim, C. P., Tondeur, J., Nastiti, H., & Pagram, J. E. (2014). Educational innovations and pedagogical beliefs: The case of a professional development program for Indonesian teachers.Google Scholar
  33. Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016). Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 79–91. Scholar
  34. Livingston, S. (2016, August 23). Classroom technologies narrow education gap in developing countries. Retrieved from
  35. Martin, J. (2004). Self-regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency. Educational Psychologist, 39, 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Milanovic, B. (2014). Winners of globalization: The rich and the Chinese middle class. Losers: The American middle class. New Perspectives Quarterly, 31(2), 78–81. Scholar
  37. Mouza, C., Karchmer-Klein, R., Nandakumar, R., Ozden, S. Y., & Hu, L. (2014). Investigating the impact of an integrated approach to the development of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 71, 206–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nolan, A., & Molla, T. (2017). Teacher confidence and professional capital. Teaching and Teacher Education, 62, 10–18. Scholar
  39. Peters, M. A. (2017). Technological unemployment: Educating for the fourth industrial revolution. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(1), 1–6. Scholar
  40. Philpott, C., & Oates, C. (2016). Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can learning rounds in Scotland teach us? Professional Development in Education, 1–16.
  41. Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., & Soini, T. (2016). Teacher’s professional agency – A relational approach to teacher learning. Learning: Research and Practice, 2(2), 112–129. Scholar
  42. Prestridge, S., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Exploring elements that support teachers’ engagement in online professional development. Education Sciences, 5(3), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Priestley, M., Biesta, G., Philippou, S., & Robinson, S. (2015). The teacher and the curriculum: Exploring teacher agency. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward, & J. Pandya (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (pp. 187–201). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  44. Rebora, A. (2016). Teachers still struggling to use tech to transform instruction, survey finds. Education Week, 35(35), 4–5.Google Scholar
  45. Reynolds, D., Teddlie, C., Hopkins, D., & Stringfield, S. (2000). Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching, 22(4), 413–425. Scholar
  47. Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sentance, S., & Csizmadia, A. (2017). Computing in the curriculum: Challenges and strategies from a teacher’s perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 469–495. Scholar
  49. Shonfeld, M., Passey, D., Appleby, L., Kablan, S., Saito, T., Smits, A., & Starkey, S. (2017). Digital agency to empower education. Discussion paper EdusummIT 2017. Retrieved from
  50. Spector, J. M. (2010). Learning and instruction in the digital age. In J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, P. Isaias, Kinshuk, & D. Sampson (Eds.), Learning and instruction in the digital age (pp. 375–379). Boston: Springer US.Google Scholar
  51. Starkey, L. (2017). Three dimensions of student-centred education: A framework for policy and practice. Critical Studies in Education, 1–16.Google Scholar
  52. Tondeur, J., Van Keer, H., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy. Computers & Education, 51(1), 212–223. Scholar
  53. Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A., Prestridge, S., Albion, P., & Edirisinghe, S. (2016a). Responding to challenges in teacher professional development for ICT integration in education. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 110–120.Google Scholar
  54. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2016b). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–21.Google Scholar
  55. UNESCO. (2011). Transforming education: The power of ICT policies. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  56. Vanderlinde, R., Van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Using an online tool to support school-based ICT policy planning in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 434–447. Scholar
  57. Voogt, J., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Towards design-based approaches for ICT integration in African education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1–9.
  58. Wajcman, J. (2017). Automation: Is it really different this time? The British Journal of Sociology, 68(1), 119–127. Scholar
  59. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Teacher Education and Early ChildhoodUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  2. 2.Vrije Universiteit BrusselsBrusselsBelgium

Section editors and affiliations

  • Peter Albion
    • 1
  • Jo Tondeur
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Teacher Education and Early ChildhoodUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  2. 2.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations