Abstract
In this chapter, we compare the Nyaya school of logic, one of the six major schools of Hindu philosophy to Aristotelian logic. In particular, we compare the intent, nature, and structure of syllogisms in Nyaya to that in Western mathematical logic to highlight differences in premises and conclusions. In doing so, we draw on the foundational writings and commentaries on Nyaya methodology from both Hindu and Buddhist sources, as well as the major sources of Aristotelian logic. We explore the possibility of Nyaya methodology being influenced by Aristotelian logic before arguing that the Nyaya system developed on its own trajectory. Some modern implications of Nyaya methodology are given.
Keywords
Indian philosophy Hindu philosophy Mathematical logic Nyaya logic Aristotelian logic Syllogisms Milinda Law of contrapositive Buddhist logicReferences
- Aristotle. (350 BC) Prior analytics (trans: Jenkinson AJ). Massachusetts Institution of Technology, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Aristotle. (350 BC) Posterior anlytics (trans: Jenkinson AJ). Massachusetts Institution of Technology, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Aristotle. (350 BC) Physics (trans: Hardie RP and Gaye RK). Massachusetts Institution of Technology, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Chakrabarti KK (1989) Contraposition in European and Indian logic. Int Philos Q 29(2):121–127. Issue No. 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dasgupta S (1922) A history of Indian philosophy, volume I. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Davies J (1881) Hindu philosophy: the Sankhya Karika of Iswara Krishna. Trubner & Co., Ludgate Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Fathi K (2013) Logic in Buddhism. In: Runehov ALC, Oviedo L (eds) Encyclopedia of sciences and religions. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Ganeri J (1996) The hindu syllogism: nineteenth-century perceptions of Indian logical thought. Philos East West 46(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ganeri J (2001) Philosophy in classical India. Routledge, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Ganeri J (2004) Indian logic. In: Handbook of the history of logic volume 1. Elsevier North Holland, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Ghose, A (1970) Singular propositions and Aristotle’s conception of logic. Indian Inst Manag: 327–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gokhale, PP (1993) Vadanyaya of Dharmakirti: the logic of debate. Motilal Banarsidass, DelhiGoogle Scholar
- Hiriyanna M (1932) Outlines of Indian philosophy. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
- Kattsoff LO (1947) A philosophy of mathematics. The Iowa State College Press, AmeszbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Keith A (1921) Indian logic and atomism. Greenwood Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- King R (1999) Indian philosophy: an introduction to Hindu and Buddhist thought. Georgetown Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Lukasiewicz J (1955) Aristotle’s syllogistic. Oxford University Press, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Matilal BK (1968) Gangesa on the concept of universal property. Philosophy East and West 18(3):151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 10th edn. (1993) Merriam-Webster, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
- Moravcsik J (2004) Logic before Aristotle: development or birth? In: Handbook of the history of logic volume 1. Elsevier North Holland, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Nicholson, H (2009) The shift from agonistic to non-agonistic debate in early Nyaya. Springer Sci: 75–95Google Scholar
- Phillips SH (1995) Classical Indian metaphysics. Open Court, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Raju PT (1952) Intuition as a philosophical method in India. Philosophy East West 2(3):187–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Raju PT (1971) The philosophical traditions of India. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
- Russell B (1945) A history of western philosophy. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Scharf PM (1996) The denotation of generic terms in ancient Indian philosophy: Grammar, Nyāya, and Mīmāṃsā. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series,86(3):i-x+1–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shaw JL (1982) From the Nyaya to Frege-Russell. Stud Logica 41(2/3, Proceedings of the 1981 annual conference of the Australasian Association of Symbolic Logic):283–291MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Simonson S (1946) The categories of proof in India logic. Philos Phenomenol Res 6(3):400–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stcherbatsky T (1962) Buddhist logic: volume 2. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Vidyabhusana MMSC (1918) Influence of Aristotle on the development of the syllogism in Indian logic. J R Asiat Soc Great Britain Ireland: 469–488Google Scholar