Advertisement

TOND to TOND

Self-Similarity of Persian TOND Patterns, Through the Logic of the X-Tiles
  • Jean-Marc CasteraEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Abstract

Looking at the heritage of traditional Persian pentagonal patterns (patterns made from tiles derived from the pentagon), one can suppose that the artists, very early on, have set targets for their creation. One is the search for self-similarity; another is the search for methods of connection between the two main families of patterns. It is strange and intriguing that the historic artists did not fully achieve these targets.

This paper, following a previous publication (Castera, Nexus Netw J 18:223, 2016), proposes solutions and new developments.

There are no Penrose patterns in that story; only binary tiling and the X-Tiles.

Keywords

Persian pentagonal patterns Multilevel patterns X-Tiles Self-similarity Binary tiling 

References

  1. Bonner J (2017) Islamic geometric patterns. Their historical development and traditional methods of construction. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Castera JM (1996) Arabesques: Art Décoratif au Maroc, ACR Edition, Paris (English edition in 1999)Google Scholar
  3. Castera JM (2011) Flying patterns. In: Proceedings of the ISAMA/Bridges, Coimbra. Can be downloaded from Bridge’s web site, or from http://castera.net/entrelacs/public/articles/Flying_Patterns.pdf
  4. Castera JM (2016) Persian variations. Nexus Netw J 18:223.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-015-0281-5CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Castera JM, Jolis H (1991) Géométrie douce. Atelier 6½, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Cromwell PR (2009) The search for quasi-periodicity in Islamic 5-fold ornament. Math Intell 31(1):36–56MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee AJ (1987) Islamic star patterns. In: Grabar O (ed) Muqarnas IV: an annual on Islamic art and architecture. E.J. Brill, Leiden, pp 182–197Google Scholar
  8. Makovicky E (1992) 800-year old pentagonal tiling from Maragha, Iran, and the new varieties of aperiodic tiling it inspired. In: Hargittai I (ed) Fivefold symmetry. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 67–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mofid H, Raieszadeh M (1995) Revival of the forgotten arts: principles of the traditional architecture in Iran according to Hossein Lorzadeh. Mola Publications, Tehran. (In Persian)Google Scholar
  10. Necipogglu G (1995) The Topkapi scroll: geometry and ornament in Islamic architecture. Getty Center Publication, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  11. Pelletier M (2013) Zellij Qusicrystals – A Gallery, Les tracés de l’Arabesque géométrique. Académie des Arts Traditionnels, CasablancaGoogle Scholar
  12. Shaarbaf A (1982) Ghirih and karbandi, vol 1. The National Organization for Protection of Iran’s Antiquities, TehranGoogle Scholar
  13. I strongly recommend also the reading of every publication from Antony Lee, Peter Cromwell (available on https://girih.wordpress.com/), Emil Makovicky and Craig Kaplan
  14. With a special mention to the recent brilliant work of the French mathematician Armand Jaspar, available on line: http://patterns-islamiques.fr/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ArtistParisFrance

Section editors and affiliations

  • Bharath Sriraman
    • 1
  • Kyeong-Hwa Lee
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesThe University of MontanaMissoulaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics Education, College of EducationSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations