Advertisement

Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysm: Incidental Wide-Neck Aneurysm, Incorporation of the PICA, and Treatment with a Single 3D Coil and a p64 Flow Diverter

  • Marta Aguilar Pérez
  • Muhammad AlMatter
  • Hans Henkes
Living reference work entry

Abstract

A medium-sized incidental aneurysm of the left vertebral artery and the posterior inferior cerebellar artery was treated by endovascular insertion of a single 3D coil and subsequent coverage with a p64 (phenox) flow diverter, using jailed catheter technique. Angiography after two weeks confirmed the obliteration of the aneurysm while the posterior inferior cerebellar artery remained patent. This case illustrates the benefit of partial coil occlusion, the phenomenon of transient (minor) in-stent stenosis, and the intended flow diverting effect with obliteration of the aneurysm without compromise of an adjacent side branch. Flow diversion, as a treatment modality for saccular sidewall aneurysms, is frequently technically easier than balloon- or stent-assisted coil occlusion. A potential issue after coil occlusion is the recurrent perfusion of the aneurysm due to coil compaction, secondary aneurysm growth, and coil migration into an intrasaccular thrombus. Once a saccular aneurysm has been completely occluded under the influence of an extrasaccular flow-diverting device, recurrence of this aneurysm is very unlikely. The combination of partial coil occlusion together with extrasaccular flow diversion is the main topic of this report.

Keywords

PICA Saccular aneurysm 3D coil Flow diversion p64 

References

  1. Aguilar Pérez M, Bhogal P, Henkes E, Ganslandt O, Bäzner H, Henkes H. In-stent stenosis after p64 flow diverter treatment. Clin Neuroradiol. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-017-0591-y.
  2. Heye S, Stracke CP, Nordmeyer H, Heddier M, Stauder M, Chapot R. Retrograde access to the posterior inferior cerebellar artery in balloon-assisted coiling of posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms. J NeuroInterv Surg. 2015;7:824–8.  https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Moshayedi H, Omofoye OA, Yap E, Oyekunle TO, Sasaki-Adams DM, Solander SY. Factors affecting the obliteration rate of intracranial aneurysms treated with a single pipeline embolization device. World Neurosurg. 2017;104:205–212. pii: S1878-8750(17)30619-8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Park MS, Nanaszko M, Sanborn MR, Moon K, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG. Re-treatment rates after treatment with the pipeline embolization device alone versus pipeline and coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg. 2016;125:137–44.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.JNS15582.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Turowski B, Macht S, Kulcsár Z, Hänggi D, Stummer W. Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology. 2011;53:37–41.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0676-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Aguilar Pérez
    • 1
  • Muhammad AlMatter
    • 1
  • Hans Henkes
    • 1
  1. 1.Neuroradiologische Klinik, NeurozentrumKlinikum StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations