Skip to main content

Classification: The Foundation and Essential Catalyst for Advancing Mental Health Globally

  • 62 Accesses

Abstract

Classification of mental health disorders is an essential foundation for ongoing efforts to increase coverage for, and to enhance, mental health care around the world. The process of classification standardizes common language for mental health that fosters global communication and information exchange among mental health practitioners, primary care clinicians, policy makers, service users, and health care systems. This chapter highlights the importance of classification in improving global mental health outcomes by illustrating the applicability of the most updated global classification system for mental health, the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Disorders (ICD-11), to each of the four objectives of the World Health Organization’s Mental Health Action Plan: 1) to provide comprehensive, integrated and responsive mental health and social care services in community-based settings; 2) to strengthen information systems, evidence and research for mental health; 3) to implement strategies for promotion and prevention in mental health; and 4) to strengthen effective leadership and governance for mental health. The information presented in this chapter suggests that the ICD-11 classification, through its emphasis on clinical utility and global applicability, will enhance the capacity of global health care systems to efficiently and cost-effectively identify and treat individuals with the greatest mental health needs, contributing to a reduction in the global mental health treatment gap.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Baxter AJ, Ferrari AJ, Erskine HE, Charlson FJ, Degenhardt L, Whiteford HA. The global burden of mental and substance use disorders: changes in estimating burden between GBD1990 and GBD2010. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2014;23(3):239.

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Canady VA. Patients want WHO descriptions to capture lived experience. Mental Health Week. 2019;29(27):5–6.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Clark LA, Cuthbert B, Lewis-Fernández R, Narrow WE, Reed GM. Three approaches to understanding and classifying mental disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017;18(2):72–145.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gureje O, Lewis-Fernandez R, Hall BJ, Reed GM. Systematic inclusion of culture-related information in ICD-11. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(3):357–8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gureje O, Lewis-Fernandez R, Hall BJ, Reed GM. Cultural considerations in the classification of mental disorders: why and how in ICD-11. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):1–2.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hackmann C, Green A, Notley C, Perkins A, Reed GM, Ridler J, Wilson J, Shakespeare T. Protocol for a qualitative study exploring perspectives on the INternational CLassification of Diseases (11th revision); using lived experience to improve mental health diagnosis in NHS England: INCLUDE study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e018399.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hackmann C, Balhara YP, Clayman K, Nemec PB, Notley C, Pike K, Reed GM, Sharan P, Rana MS, Silver J, Swarbrick M. Perspectives on ICD-11 to understand and improve mental health diagnosis using expertise by experience (INCLUDE study): an international qualitative study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(9):778–85.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • International Advisory Group for the Revision of ICD-10 Mental and Behavioural Disorders. A conceptual framework for the revision of the ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. World Psychiatry. 2011;10(2):86–92.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, Abbastabar H, Abd-Allah F, Abdela J, Abdelalim A, Abdollahpour I. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–858.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kakuma R, Minas H, Van Ginneken N, Dal Poz MR, Desiraju K, Morris JE, Saxena S, Scheffler RM. Human resources for mental health care: current situation and strategies for action. Lancet. 2011;378(9803):1654–63.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley JW, Reed GM, Roberts MC, Evans SC, Medina-Mora ME, Robles R, Rebello T, Sharan P, Gureje O, First MB, Andrews HF. Developing a science of clinical utility in diagnostic classification systems: field study strategies for ICD-11 mental and behavioral disorders. Am Psychol. 2016;71(1):3.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rebello TJ, Reed GM, Saxena S. Core considerations in the development of the world health organization's international classification of diseases, 11th revision. Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 2018;34(5):5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reed GM. Toward ICD-11: improving the clinical utility of WHO's international classification of mental disorders. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2010;41(6):457.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reed GM, Rebello TJ, Pike KM, Medina-Mora ME, Gureje O, Zhao M, et al. WHO's global clinical practice network for mental health. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015a;2(5):379–80.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reed GM, Rebello TJ, Pike KM, Medina-Mora ME, Gureje O, Zhao M, Dai Y, Roberts MC, Maruta T, Matsumoto C, Krasnov VN. WHO's global clinical practice network for mental health. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015b;2(5):379–80.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reed GM, First MB, Kogan CS, Hyman SE, Gureje O, Gaebel W, et al. Innovations and changes in the ICD-11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(1):3–19.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts MC, Reed GM, Medina-Mora ME, Keeley JW, Sharan P, Johnson DK, Mari JD, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Gureje O, Xiao Z, Maruta T. A global clinicians’ map of mental disorders to improve ICD-11: analysing meta-structure to enhance clinical utility. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012;24(6):578–90.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rose G. The strategy of preventive medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena S, Thornicroft G, Knapp M, Whiteford H. Resources for mental health: scarcity, inequity, and inefficiency. Lancet. 2007;370(9590):878–89.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Surís A, Holliday R, North CS. The evolution of the classification of psychiatric disorders. Behav Sci. 2016;6(1):5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vahia VN. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 5: a quick glance. Indian J Psychiatry. 2013;55(3):220.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wang PS, Berglund PA, Olfson M, Kessler RC. Delays in initial treatment contact after first onset of a mental disorder. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(2):393–416.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteford HA, Ferrari AJ, Degenhardt L, Feigin V, Vos T. The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the global burden of disease study 2010. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0116820.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. Mental health systems in selected low-and middle-income countries: a WHO-AIMS cross-national analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. Comprehensive mental health action plan 2013–2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Available at http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA66/A66_R8-en.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. mhGAP intervention guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings: mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization: The ICD-11 is here! https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/. 2018. Accessed 7 Jul 2019.

  • World Health Organization and Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. Social determinants of mental health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tahilia J. Rebello .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rebello, T.J., Polland, D.M., Heckelman, A.C., Magill, E., Reed, G.M., Pike, K.M. (2021). Classification: The Foundation and Essential Catalyst for Advancing Mental Health Globally. In: Okpaku, S.O. (eds) Innovations in Global Mental Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70134-9_111-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70134-9_111-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70134-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70134-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine