Skip to main content

Investigations: Cybercrimes

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Security and Emergency Management
  • 98 Accesses

Definitions

Cybercrime investigation:

An investigation focused on crimes in which digital technologies were used in the commission of the criminal act.

Digital forensics:

A branch of forensic science focused on the scientific analysis of digital devices and their application to matters of legal significance.

Investigation:

To observe and study utilizing scientific inquiry, reasoning, and analytical methodologies with the goal of gaining knowledge and understanding about individuals and/or events.

Introduction

Cybercrime is broadly defined as the use of digital technologies in the commission of a crime. These digital technologies may include hardware (computers and peripherals, mobile phones, cameras, storage devices such as thumb drives and hard drives, office equipment such as copiers or scanners, servers, digital home assistants, smart appliances, personal wearable devices, gaming consoles, drones, and myriad devices with a digital component) and software as well as the Internet and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brown, C. (2015). Investigating and prosecuting cyber crime: Forensic dependencies and barriers to justice. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 9(1), 55–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, O., Brannon, S., & Song, T. (2008). Computer forensics: Digital forensic analysis methodology. United States Attorney’s Bulletin, 56(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. (2006). Editorial: The value of behavioral analysis on digital investigation. Digital Analysis, 3(2), 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Forest, P. (2005). Crime scene investigation. In L. Sullivan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of law enforcement. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Network of Forensic Science Institutes. (2015). Best practice manual for the forensic examination of digital technology (ENFSI-BPM-FIT-01).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodison, S., Davis, R., & Jackson, B. (2015). Digital evidence and the U.S. Criminal Justice System. RAND Corporation, Santa Moncia, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization. (2015a). Information technology—Security techniques—Guidance on assuring suitability and adequacy of incident investigative method (ISO Standard No. 27041:2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization. (2015b). Information technology—Security techniques—Incident investigation principles and processes (ISO Standard No. 27043:2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • INTERPOL. (2019). Global guidelines for digital forensic laboratories. INTERPOL Global Complex for Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, J., & Stalker, K. (2006). Forensic stylistics in an online world. International Review of Law Computers and Technology, 20(1&2), 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maras, M.-H. (2015). Computer forensics: Cybercriminals, laws and evidence. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maras, M.-H., & Miranda, M. D. (2017). Overlooking forensic evidence? A review of the 2014 international protocol on the documentation and investigation of sexual violence in conflict. Global Security: Health, Science and Policy, 2(1), 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcella, A., & Menendez, D. (2008). Cyber forensics: A field manual for collecting, examining and preserving evidence of computer crimes (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Auerbach Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margot, P. (2011). Forensic science on trial—What is the law of the land? Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 43(2–3), 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margot, P. (2017). Traceology, the bedrock of forensic science and its associated semantics. In Q. Rossy, et al. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of forensic intelligence and criminology. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, G. (2001). A road map for digital forensics research. First Digital Forensics Research Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, C. (2014). Idiographic digital profiling: Behavioral analysis based on digital forensics. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 9(1), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013). Comprehensive study on cybercrime—Draft. United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Casey, E., & Rose, C. (2010). Forensic analysis. In E. Casey (Ed.), Handbook of digital forensics and investigation. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G. (2020). Cybercrime investigators handbook. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maras, M-H. (2017). Cybercriminology. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle D. Miranda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Miranda, M.D. (2020). Investigations: Cybercrimes. In: Shapiro, L., Maras, MH. (eds) Encyclopedia of Security and Emergency Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69891-5_283-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69891-5_283-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69891-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69891-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics