Skip to main content

Cross-Sector Partnerships as a Source of Business Legitimacy in the Sustainable Development Goals Era

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Business Legitimacy
  • 187 Accesses

Abstract

This article explores cross-sector partnerships as a source of business legitimacy in a time where the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) arguably are a leading agenda for social, economic, and environmental development. In the SDGs and their accompanying “2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” partnerships are emphasized as an essential tool for implementing sustainable development, and more and more business firms are consequently engaging in partnerships with government and civil society actors to contribute to the SDGs. In the research literature, partnerships have mainly been studied separately from their institutional context. However, it is the overall argument of this article that the institutional context of partnerships has played an important role in shaping the idea of the legitimate partnership today. This article incorporates the institutional context of partnerships in the assessment of their legitimacy by looking at three aspects: partnerships as a form of extended stakeholder management, partnerships as a means for corporate social responsibility (CSR) implementation in the globalized and Anthropocene era, and partnerships as a result of institutionalization and legitimation in the UN system. Finally, the article presents some current challenges to the legitimacy of partnerships and provides some concluding remarks on how these challenges should be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bäckstrand K (2012) Are partnerships for sustainable development democratic and legitimate? In: Pattberg P, Biermann F, Chan S, Mert A (eds) Public-private partnerships for sustainable development: emergence, influence and legitimacy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 165–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand K, Kylsäter M (2014) Old wine in new bottles? The legitimation and delegitimation of UN public-private partnerships for sustainable development from the Johannesburg summit to the Rio+20 summit. Globalizations 11(3):331–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendell J (2000) Introduction. In: Bendell J (ed) Terms for endearment: business, NGOs and sustainable development. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann F, Chan S, Mert A, Pattberg P (2012) The overall effects of partnerships for sustainable development: more smoke than fire? In: Pattberg P, Biermann F, Chan S, Mert A (eds) Public-private partnerships for sustainable development: emergence, influence and legitimacy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 69–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield M (2012) Business and development: making sense of business as a development agent. Corp Gov 12(4):414–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland GH (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. Oxford. Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf

  • Carroll AB (2016) Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. Int J Corp Soc Responsib 1(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper N, French D (2018) SDG 17: partnerships for the goals – cooperation within the context of a voluntary framework. In: French D, Kotzé LJ (eds) Sustainable development goals: law, theory and implementation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 271–303

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse DL, Suchman MC (2008) Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin K (eds) The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage, London, pp 49–77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse DL, Bundy J, Plunkett Tost L, Suchman MC (2017) Organizational legitimacy: six key questions. In: The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage, London, pp 27–52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Googins SA, Rochlin BK (2000) Creating the partnership society: understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. Bus Soc Rev 105(1):127–144. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.ez.library.latrobe.edu.au/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=2916645&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grolin J (1998) Corporate legitimacy in risk society: the case of Brent Spar. Bus Strateg Environ 7(4):213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herlin H (2015) Better safe than sorry: nonprofit organizational legitimacy and cross-sector partnerships. Bus Soc 54(6):822–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höllerer MA, Walgenbach P, Drori GS (2017) The consequences of globalization for organizations and institutions. In: The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage, London, pp 214–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström S, Kjærbeck S (2013) Introduktion: Legitimitet under forandring. In: Holmström S, Kjærbeck S (eds) Legitimitet under forandring: Virksomheden i samfundet. Samfundslitteratur, Frederiksberg, pp 9–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk A (2014) Partnerships as panacea for addressing global problems? On rationale, context, actors, impact and limitations. In: Seitanidi MM, Crane A (eds) Social partnerships and responsible business: a research handbook. Routledge, New York, pp 15–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk A, van Tulder R, Kostwinder E (2008) Business and partnerships for development. Eur Manag J 26(4):262–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten D, Crane A (2005) Corporate citizenship: toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Acad Manag Rev 30(1):166–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mert A (2014) Hybrid governance mechanisms as political instruments: the case of sustainability partnerships. Int Environ Agreements 14(3):225–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 83(2):340–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW, Scott R (1983) Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In: Meyer JW, Scott R (eds) Organizational environments: ritual and rationality. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 199–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon J, Murphy L, Gond J-P (2017) Historical perspectives on corporate social responsibility. In: Rasche A, Morsing M, Moon J (eds) Corporate social responsibility: strategy, communication, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell P (2000) Globalisation and the new politics of sustainable development. In: Bendell J (ed) Terms for endearment: business, NGOs and sustainable development. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattberg P, Biermann F, Chan S, Mert A (2012) Public-private partnerships for sustainable development: emergence, influence, and legitimacy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pogge T, Sengupta M (2015) The sustainable development goals: a plan for building a better world? J Glob Ethics 11(1):56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Kramer MR (2011) Creating shared value. Harv Bus Rev 89(1–2):62–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers C (2000) Making it legit: new ways of generating corporate legitimacy in a globalising world. In: Bendell J (ed) Terms for endearment: business, NGOs and sustainable development. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, pp 40–48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs JD (2015) The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schäferhoff M, Campe S, Kaan C (2009) Transnational public-private partnerships in international relations: making sense of concepts, research frameworks, and results. Int Stud Rev 11(3):451–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer AG, Palazzo G (2011) The new political role of business in a globalized world: a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. J Manag Stud 48(4):899–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheyvens R, Banks G, Hughes E (2016) The private sector and the SDGs: the need to move beyond business as usual. Sustain Dev 24(March):371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi MM (2010) The politics of partnerships: a critical examination of nonprofit-business partnerships. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi MM, Crane A (2009) Implementing CSR through partnerships: understanding the selection, design and institutionalisation of nonprofit-business partnerships. J Bus Ethics 85(Supplement 2):413–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi MM, Crane A (2014) Social partnerships and responsible business: what, why and how? In: Social partnerships and responsible business: a research handbook. Routledge, New York, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Selsky JW, Parker B (2005) Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: challenges to theory and practice. J Manag 31(6):849–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):571–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDESA (2015) Partnerships for the sustainable development goals: a legacy review towards realizing the 2030 agenda. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdinaction/publication/partnerships-a-legacy-review

  • United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/70/1

  • United Nations (2019) Sustainable development goals knowledge platform. Retrieved 14 Mar 2019, from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/

  • United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (2018) Sustainable development performance indicators. Retrieved 26 Mar 2019, from http://www.unrisd.org/unrisd/website/projects.nsf/(httpProjects)/B2A0A8A40BE9308CC12583350053ACDF?OpenDocument

  • van Tulder R, Seitanidi MM, Crane A, Brammer S (2016) Enhancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships: four impact loops for channeling partnership studies. J Bus Ethics 135:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vurro C, Dacin MT, Perrini F (2010) Institutional antecedents of partnering for social change: how institutional logics shape cross-sector social partnerships. J Bus Ethics 94:39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell S (2000) Complementary resources: the win-win rationale for partnership with NGOs. In: Bendell J (ed) Terms for endearment: business, NGOs and sustainable development. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, pp 193–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1978) Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaziji M, Doh JP (2009) NGOs and corporations: conflict and collaboration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oda Hustad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hustad, O. (2019). Cross-Sector Partnerships as a Source of Business Legitimacy in the Sustainable Development Goals Era. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_65-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_65-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics