Skip to main content

Kantian Moral Philosophy, Universality, and Business Legitimacy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 189 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter business legitimacy is understood as a minimum notion of moral rightness in business. It is argued that from the standpoint of a Kantian moral theory, it can never be justified to pursue profit maximization irrespective of the rights of the affected people. Sustainably functioning national economies are of special importance for the protection of the rights of people. According to Kantian moral theory, the universal rights of persons must be effectively protected by territorially limited states. This makes all business strategies and models illegitimate which endanger the sustainable functioning of a national economy or prevents or retards its development. In order to provide the necessary normative background for these and other determinations of business legitimacy and illegitimacy, this chapter first outlines Kant’s moral theory in some detail. It is shown that Kant develops the understanding of a moral norm in contrast to the basic characteristics of conditional norms. The unconditional norms of morality are based on the absolute value of persons which derives from their ability to act for ends different from the end of their own happiness. While Kant’s moral theory is dignity-based, Kantian moral theories are usually rights-based. They interpret the dignity of persons mainly in terms of their rights. A market economy is both relevant for the protection of the moral rights of persons and involves certain dangers to them. A guiding question of the chapter is how this tension should be dealt with from the perspective of Kantian moral theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Appelbaum E, Batt R (2014) Private equity at work. When wall street manages main street. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson AB (2015) Inequality. What can be done? Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholtz AK, Caroll AB (2012) Business and society. Ethics and stakeholder management, 8th edn. Cengage Learning, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway EM, Oreskes N (2011) Merchants of doubt. How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues form tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Díez-de-Castro E, Peris-Ortiz M, Díez-Martín F (2018) Criteria for evaluating the organizational legitimacy: a typology for legitimacy jungle. In: Díez-de-Castro E, Peris-Ortiz M (eds) Organizational legitimacy. Challenges and opportunities for businesses and institutions. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth A (1978) Reason and morality. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth A (1982) Human rights. Essays on justification and applications. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth A (1996) The community of rights. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Homann K, Blome-Drees F (1992) Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuttner R (2018) Can democracy survive global capitalism? W.W. Norton, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin FS (2006) The next great globalization. How disadvantaged nations can harness their financial system to get rich. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin FS (2009) Why we shouldn’t turn our backs on financial globalization. IMF Staff Pap 56(1):139–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik D, Subramanian A (2009) Why did financial globalization disappoint? IMF Staff Pap 56(1):112–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer A (2016) Why we can’t afford the rich. Policy Press, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer P (1972) Famine, affluence, and morality. Philos Public Aff 1:229–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing G (2017) The corruption of capitalism. Why rentiers thrive and work does not pay. Biteback Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Steigleder K (1999) Grundlegung der normativen Ethik. Der Ansatz von Alan Gewirth. Alber Verlag, Freiburg, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Steigleder K (2002) Kants Moralphilosophie. Die Selbstbezüglichkeit reiner praktischer Vernunft. Metzler Verlag, Stuttgart, Weimar

    Google Scholar 

  • Steigleder K (2016a) Climate risks, climate economics, and the foundations of rights-based risk ethics. J Human Rights 15(2):251–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steigleder K (2016b) Weltwirtschaft und Finanzmärkte. In Goppel A, Mieth C, Neuhäuser C (eds) Handbuch Gerechtigkeit. Metzler Verlag, Stuttgart, Weimar, pp 472–477

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steigleder K (2018) On the rightful imposition of otherwise impermissible risks. Ethical Perspectives 25:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (2013) The price of inequality. Penguin, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JJ (1986) Rights, restitution, and risks. Essays in moral theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil D (2014) The fissured workplace. Why work became so bad for so many and what can be done to improve it. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Martin. 2018. Why so little has changed since the financial crisis. Financial Times. 4 Sept 2018

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Steigleder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Steigleder, K. (2019). Kantian Moral Philosophy, Universality, and Business Legitimacy. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_52-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_52-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics