Skip to main content

Change, Institutional Theory, and Business Legitimacy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 204 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter brings together and discusses the implications of neo-institutional theories about organizational change as translation for the implementation of stakeholder management and the legitimate business organization. It suggests that – according to these theories – being a legitimate business organization is not something that the organization is but rather something that the organization does. First, the organization needs to institutionalize stakeholder management as the way the business organization organizes its management processes. Then it needs to negotiate and develop its identity as a socially constructed boundary object that is interpreted, theorized, and viewed as legitimate across stakeholders intersecting social worlds. Then as more and more humans and stakeholder groups become interested and mobilized, exercise their roles, and start acting on the basis of the assumption that the particular business organization as a boundary object is to be interpreted and viewed as legitimate, the legitimate business organization is becoming constructed as a social fact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Brundtland GH (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. The United Nations. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm

  • Brunsson N (1992) The organization of hypocrisy: talk, decisions and actions in organizations. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • By RT (2005) Organisational change management: a critical review. J Chang Manag 5(4):369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon M (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In: Law J (ed) Power, action and belief. A new sociology of knowledge? Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp 196–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon M, Latour B (1981) Unscrewing the big leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: Knorr-Cetina, Cicourel AV (eds) Advances in social theory and methodology. Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. Routledge & Kegan Poul, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska B, Joerges B (1996) Travels of ideas. In: Czarniawska B, Sevön G (eds) Translating organizational change. DeGruyter, Berlin, pp 13–48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse DL, Suchman M (2008) Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin K (eds) The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: win win win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manag Rev 36(2):90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (2010) Strategic management – a stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman E, McVea J (2001) A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In: Freeman RE, Harrison JS (eds) The Blackwell handbook of strategic management. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 189–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman E, Moutchnik A (2013) Stakeholder management and CSR: questions and answers. UmweltWirtschaftsForum 21:5–9. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-013-0266-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13 September

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91(3):481–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke D (1985) The political economies of associations. In: Braungart RG, Braungart MM (eds) Research in political sociology, vol 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 211–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1986) The powers of association. In: Law J (ed) Power, action and belief. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten D, Crane A (2005) Corporate citizenship: toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Acad Manag Rev 30(1):166–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 83(2):340–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW, Scott WR (1983) Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In: Meyer JW, Scott WR (eds) Organizational environments: ritual and rationality. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 199–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran JW, Brightman BK (2001) Leading organizational change. Career Dev Int 6(2):111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini D (2010) Medical innovation as a process of translation: a case from the field of telemedicine. Br J Manag 21:1011–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad Manag Rev 16(1):145–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peale NV, Blanchard K (1988) The power of ethical management. William Morrow and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendtorff JD (2005) Corporate governance and CSR in the view of business ethics and stakeholder management theory. In: Rendgorff JD (ed) Companies management and social responsibility: perspectives on corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. DJØF Publishing, Copenhagen, pp 15–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Røvik KA (1998) Modern Organisations – trends in the thinking about organisations at the millennium shift. Fakbokforlaget, Bergen (Norway)

    Google Scholar 

  • Røvik KA (2016) Knowledge transfer as translation: review and elements of an instrumental theory. Int J Manag Rev 18(3):290–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrempf-Stirling J, Palazzo G, Philips RA (2016) Historic corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 41(4):700–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Soc Stud Sci 19:387–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20:571–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tost LP (2011) An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Acad Manag Rev 36(4):686–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock SA, Bodwell C, Graves SB (2002) Responsibility: the new business imperative. Acad Manag Exec 16(2):132–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæraas A, Nielsen JA (2016) Translation theory ‘Translated’: three perspectives on translation in organizational research. Int J Manag Rev 18(3):236–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1978) Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Damm Scheuer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Scheuer, J.D. (2019). Change, Institutional Theory, and Business Legitimacy. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_13-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_13-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics