Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Business Legitimacy, Agricultural Biodiversity, and Environmental Ethics: Insights from Sustainable Bakeries

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Business Legitimacy

  • 153 Accesses

Abstract

The relationship between biodiversity and ethics is complex and concerns the broader environmental ethics. In the agricultural industry, these issues are fundamental and, in the context of agro-biodiversity, bread production activity plays a primary role. Artisanal bread and its derivatives represent basic food products and a short supply chain, with only one intermediate step between the producer of the raw material (flour) and the consumer, represented by bakery. Furthermore, bakery industry is characterized by different needs, motivations, evaluations, and ethical/moral values, as well as philosophical considerations towards nature, of producers and consumers. Through a multiple case study on four specific companies of the interesting and relevant natural and sustainable bakery industry, our aim is to understand what are the motivations and ethical-moral drives behind specific ideological and operational choices that have an impact on nature and its biodiversity. It is also intended to investigate how the different ethical-philosophical approaches to nature lead to economic and management choices that are also very distant from each other and have different impacts on the protection and promotion of agricultural biodiversity. This study has allowed to place the positions and choices of some entrepreneurs and artisans in the different ethical approaches to nature and therefore to biodiversity. It was also possible to highlight how the different behaviors of consumers and producers arise from the ethical conceptions through which they look at reality and the consequences of their choices on production and sales activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler R, Mansi M, Pandey R, Stringer C (2017) United Nations decade on biodiversity: a study of the reporting practices of the Australian mining industry. Account Audit Account J 30(8):1711–1745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antognoni F, Mandrioli R, Bordoni A, Di Nunzio M, Viadel B, Gallego E, Villalba MP, Tomás-Cobos L, Taneyo Saa DL, Gianotti A (2017) Integrated evaluation of the potential health benefits of einkorn-based breads. Nutrients 9(11):1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arzani A, Ashraf M (2017) Cultivated ancient wheats (Triticum spp.): a potential source of health-beneficial food products. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 16(3):477–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brian GN (1984) Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism. Environ Ethics 6(2):131–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butkus M (2015) All health is local: biodiversity, ethics, and human health. Ethics Policy Environ 18(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB (2002) The pragmatic power and promise of theoretical and environmental ethics: forging a new discourse. Environ Values 11:3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge English Dictionary (2019) https://dictionary.cambridge.org/

  • Cuckston T (2013) Bringing tropical forest biodiversity conservation into financial accounting calculation. Account Audit Account J 26(5):688–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuckston T (2017) Ecology-centred accounting for biodiversity in the production of a blanket bog. Account Audit Account J 30(7):1537–1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • des Jardins JR (1997) Environmental ethics, 2nd edn. Wadsworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Devall B, Sessions G (1985) Deep ecology. Gibbs M. Smith, Layton

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinu M, Whittaker A, Pagliai G, Benedettelli S, Sofi F (2018) Ancient wheat species and human health: biochemical and clinical implications. J Nutr Biochem 52:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engels JMM, Dempewolf H, Henson-Apollonio V (2011) Ethical considerations in agro-biodiversity research, collecting, and use. J Agric Environ Ethics 24:107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feger C, Mermet L (2017) A blueprint towards accounting for the management of ecosystems. Account Audit Account J 30(7):1511–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira C (2017) The contested instruments of a new governance regime: accounting for nature and building markets for biodiversity offsets. Account Audit Account J 30(7):1568–1590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaia S, Jones JM (2017) UK local councils reporting of biodiversity values: a stakeholder perspective. Account Audit Account J 30(7):1614–1638

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom B, Freeman MC (2013) Biodiversity valuation and the discount rate problem. Account Audit Account J 26(5):715–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton LR (ed) (1993) Ethics, religion, and biodiversity: relations between conservation and cultural values. The White Horse Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins W (2003) Biodiversity and salvation: Thomistic roots for environmental ethics. J Relig 83(3):401–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MJ, Solomon JF (2013) Problematising accounting for biodiversity. Account Audit Account J 26(5):668–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1963) Duties to animals and spirits. Harper Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Laine M, Vinnari E (2017) The transformative potential of counter accounts: a case study of animal rights activism. Account Audit Account J 30(7):1481–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanka SV, Khadaroo I, Böhm S (2017) Agroecology accounting: biodiversity and sustainable livelihoods from the margins. Account Audit Account J 30(7):1592–1613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Coeur D, Baudry J, Burel F, Thenail C (2002) Why and how we should study field boundary biodiversity in an agrarian landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1949) A sand county almanac and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall EJP, Moonen AC (2002) Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews F (2016) From biodiversity-based conservation to an ethic of bio-proportionality. Biol Conserv 200:140–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan C, Hughes A, Bek D (2014) Futures, ethics and the politics of expectation in biodiversity conservation: a case study of South African sustainable wildflower harvesting. Geoforum 52:206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minteer BA, Collins JP (2005) Ecological ethics: building a new tool kit for ecologists and biodiversity managers. Conserv Biol 19:1803–1812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naess A (1973) The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry 16(1–4):95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namkoong G (1991) Biodiversity – issues in genetics, forestry and ethics. For Chron 68(4):438–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negri V (2005) Agro-biodiversity conservation in Europe: ethical issues. J Agric Environ Ethics 18:3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson MP (2002) Introduction to environmental ethics. In: The Biodiversity Project (ed) Ethics for a small plane: a communications handbook on the ethical and theological reasons for protecting biodiversity. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (1984) Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism. Environ Ethics 6:131–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (2000) Biodiversity and environmental values: in search of a universal earth ethic. Biodivers Conserv 9:1029–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti M (2001) Biodiversity in agroecosystems and bioindicators of environmental health. In: Shiyomi M, Koizumi H (eds) Structure and function in agroecosystems design and management. Advances in agroecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 11–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimmel G, Jonäll K (2013) Biodiversity reporting in Sweden: corporate disclosure and preparers’ views. Account Audit Account J 26(5):746–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolston H III (1988) Environmental ethics: duties to and values in the natural world. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston H III (1994) Value in nature and the nature of value. In: Attfield R, Belsey A (eds) Philosophy and the natural environment, Royal Institute of Philosophy Suppl. 36. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Russell S, Milne MJ, Dey C (2017) Accounts of nature and the nature of accounts. Account Audit Account J 30(7):1426–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russow L-M (2002) Environment. Case study: Marie the envinronmentalist. In: Comstock G (ed) Life science ethics. Iowa State Press, Ames, pp 93–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer A (1923) Civilization and ethics. A. & C. Black, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui J (2013) Mainstreaming biodiversity accounting: potential implications for a developing economy. Account Audit Account J 26(5):779–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Abhilash PC (2018) Agricultural biodiversity for sustainable food production. J Clean Prod 172:1368–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spash CL, Urama K, Burton R, Kenyon W, Shannon P, Hill G (2009) Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: economics, ethics and social psychology. Ecol Econ 68:955–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan S, Hannis M (2017) Mathematics maybe, but not money. Account Audit Account J 30(7):1459–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PW (1981) The ethics of respect for nature. Environ Ethics 3:197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PW (1986) Respect for nature: a theory of environmental ethics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas VG, Kevan PG (1993) Basic principles of agroecology and sustainable agriculture. J Agric Environ Ethics, 6(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10/crzprc

  • Tilman D (1999) Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:5995–6000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (2000) Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity. Nature 405:208–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias M (ed) (1985) Deep ecology. An anthology. Avant Books, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomalin E (2009) Biodiversity and Biodivinity: The Limits to Religious Environmentalism.Great Britain, Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  • Tregidga H (2013) Biodiversity offsetting: Problematisation of an emerging governance regime. Account Audit Account J 26(5):806–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2011) Ethics and biodiversity. Ethics and Climate Change in Asia and the Pacific (ECCAP) Project, Working Group 16 report. UNESCO Bangkok – Regional Unit for Social and Human Sciences in Asia and the Pacific

    Google Scholar 

  • van Liempd D, Busch J (2013) Biodiversity reporting in Denmark. Account Audit Account J 26(5):833–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2017) Case study research and applications: design and methods, 6th edn. Sage, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economic and Social Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Piacenza, Italy

    Riccardo Torelli

  2. Department of Economics and Management, University of Parma, Parma, Italy

    Federica Balluchi

Authors
  1. Riccardo Torelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Federica Balluchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Torelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark

    Jacob Dahl Rendtorff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Torelli, R., Balluchi, F. (2020). Business Legitimacy, Agricultural Biodiversity, and Environmental Ethics: Insights from Sustainable Bakeries. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_119-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_119-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation