Abstract
Why do Forest School (FS) practitioners choose their vocations? What role do significant life experiences (SLE) play in their choices? This chapter investigates some of the reasons behind their choices, as described by an ethnography of FS trainees (2010–12) using qualitative interviews and observation. Arising from the study, a new conceptual model of eco-social identity is described, framing the ongoing construction of self as part of nature. Environmental and socio-cultural influences are explored, including both negative and positive experiences, drawing on SLE research. Identity formation based upon life experience had an impact upon the trainees’ choices and yielded some surprising similarities. Early childhood and adult experience in the wider natural world, role purpose, generational change, environmental loss, future shock, and a passion for pedagogy motivated the practitioners. The study contributes new insights into the impact of FS and similar training, the influence of socialization, environmental loss and degradation, future anticipation, ecological identity, and subjectivity in childhoodnature practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amsler, S., & Facer, K. (2017). Contesting anticipatory regimes in education: Exploring alternative educational orientations to the future. Futures, 94, 6–14.
Austin, C., Knowles, Z., Richards, K., McCree, M., Sayer, J. & Ridgers N. (2015) Play and learning outdoors: engaging with the natural world using forest school in the UK. In T. Skelton, K. Nairn, & P. Kraftl (Eds.), Space, landscape, and environment, Vol. 2. T. Skelton (editor-in-chief), Geographies of children and young people. Springer Singapore
Barratt Hacking, E., Scott, W., & Barratt, R. (2007). Children’s research into their local environment: Stevenson’s gap, and possibilities for the curriculum. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 225–244.
Bragg, E. A. (1996). Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self- theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 93–108.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ceaser, D. (2015). Significant life experiences and environmental justice: Positionality and the significance of negative social/environmental experiences. Environmental Education Research, 21(2), 205–220.
Chawla, L. (1988) Significant life experiences revisited: a review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), pp 11–21.
Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: a review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. Environmental Education Research, 4, 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462980040402
Chawla, L. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15–26.
Chawla, L. (2001). Significant life experiences revisited once again: Response to vol. 5(4) five critical commentaries on significant life experience research in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 7(4), 451–461.
Chawla, L. (2006). Research methods to investigate significant life experiences: Review and recommendations. Environmental Education Research, 12(3–4), 359–374.
Chawla, L. (2007). Childhood experiences associated with care for the natural world: A theoretical framework for empirical results. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(4), 144–170. [Online]. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.17.4.0144
Chawla, L., & Derr, V. (2012). The development of conservation behaviors in childhood and youth. In S. Clayton (Ed.), Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp 527–555). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Chawla, L., & Hart, R. A. (1995). The roots of environmental concern. The NAMTA Journal, 20(1), 148–157.
Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–66). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (Eds.). (2003). Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Coote, A. (2015). People, planet, power: Towards a new social settlement. London: New Economics Foundation.
Cree, J., & McCree, M. (2013). A brief history of forest school, Part 2. Horizons, 62, 32–35.
Crutzen, P. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415, 23. https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a
Dillon, J., Kelsey, E., & Duque-Aristizabal, A. (1999). Identity and culture: Theorising emergent environmentalism. Environmental Education Research, 5(4), 395–405.
Fjørtoft, I. (2004). Landscape as playscape: The effects of natural environments on children’s play and motor development. Children, Youth and Environments, 14, 21–44.
Forest School Institute for Outdoor Learning Special Interest Group (FS IOL SIG). (2012). Forest school ethos, principles and criteria [Online]. Retrieved from: http://www.forestschoolassociation.org/full-principles-and-criteria-for-good-practice/
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. York: Continuum.
Furihata, S., Ishizaka, T., Hatakeyama, M., Hitsumoto, M., & Ito, S. (2007). Potentials and challenges of research on ‘significant life experiences’ in Japan. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(4), 207–226.
Gill, T. (2011). Children and nature: A quasi-systematical review of the empirical evidence. London, Englian: Greater London Authority.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Gooch, M. (2003). A sense of place: Ecological identity as a driver for catchment volunteering. Australian Journal on Volunteering, 8(2), 23–33.
Gough, A. (1999a). Recognising women in environmental education pedagogy and research: Toward an ecofeminist poststructuralist perspective. Environmental Education Research, 5(2), 143–161.
Gough, A. (1999b). Kids don’t like wearing the same jeans as their Mums and Dads: So whose ‘life’ should be in significant life experiences research? Environmental Education Research, 5(4), 383–394.
Gough, N. (2002). Ignorance in environmental education research. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 19–29.
Gough, S. (1999). Significant life experiences (SLE) research: A view from somewhere. Environmental Education Research, 5(4), 353–363.
Hand, G. (1997). The forest of forgetting. Northern Lights, 13(1), 11–13.
Howell, R., & Allen, S. (2016). Significant life experiences, motivations and values of climate change educators. Environmental Education Research, 1–19. Virtual issue: Climate Change and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1158242
Hsu, S. J. (2009) Significant life experiences affect environmental action: a confirmation study in eastern Taiwan. Environmental Education Research, 15(4), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903076973
Ingold, T. (2008). Bindings against boundaries: Entanglements of life in an open world. Environment and Planning A, 40(8), 1796–1810.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London, England: Routledge.
Kahn, P. H. (1997). Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis: Children’s affiliations with nature. Developmental Review, 17, 1–61.
Kahn, P. H. (1999). The human relationship with nature: Development and culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kahn, P. H. (2002). Children’s affiliations with nature. In P. H. Kahn & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178–202.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (Eds.). (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Keichtermans, G. (2005). Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 995–1006.
Kellert, R. S., & Wilson, E. O. (Eds.). (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Kraftl, P. (2013). Geographies of alternative education: Diverse learning spaces for children and young people. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Lee, A., & Dunston, R. (2011). Practice, learning and change: Towards a re-theorisation of professional education. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(5), 483–494.
Li, D., & Chen, J. (2015). Significant life experiences on the formation of environmental action among Chinese college students. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 612–630.
Malone, K. (2008). Every experience matters: An evidence based research report on the role of learning outside the classroom for children’s whole development from birth to eighteen years. Report commissioned by Farming and Countryside Education for UK Department of Children, School and Families. Wollongong.
Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In K. Mannheim (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London, England: RKP. (first published 1923).
Maynard, T. (2007) Encounters with forest school and foucault: A risky business?’ Education 3–13, 35(4), 379–391.
McCree, M. (2012a) Conversation with Richard Irvine, private correspondence with author, 13 June 2012.
McCree, M. (2012b) Conversation with Lily Horseman, private correspondence with author, 17 November 2012.
McCree, M. (2013). Values, action and politics in forest school. Forest School Association National Conference. Derwent Hill Outdoor Education Centre, Keswick, October 2013. Unpublished keynote presentation.
McCree, M. (2014) Practitioner experiences of forest school. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Gloucestershire, UK.
McCree, M. (forthcoming). Making space for children, making visible hidden enclosures. Royal Geographical Society International Conference, Cardiff University, 29 August 2018. Presentation for post-conference publication.
McCree, M., & Cree, J. (2017). Forest School: Core principles in changing times. In S. Waite (Ed.), Children learning outside the classroom – From birth to eleven (2nd ed., pp. 222–232). London, England: Sage.
McCree, M., Cutting, R., & Sherwin, D. (2018). The Hare and the Tortoise go to Forest School: Taking the scenic route to academic attainment via emotional wellbeing outdoors. Early Child Development and Care. Special Issue: Young Children’s Emotional Experiences.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994) (eds.) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded source book (2nd edn.). London: Sage.
Murray, R. and O’Brien, L. (2005) Such enthusiasm – a joy to see: an evaluation of forest school in England. Forest Research for New Economics Foundation.
Palmer, J. (1993). Development of concern for the environment and formative experiences of educators. Journal of Environmental Education, 24(3), 26–30.
Payne, P. (1999). The significance of experience in SLE research. Environmental Education Research, 5(4), 365–381.
Proudman, B. (1995). Experiential education as emotionally engaged learning. In K. Warren, M. Sakoffs, & J. S. Hunt (Eds.), The theory of experiential education (3rd ed., pp. 240–247). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Sandilands, C. (1999). The good-natured feminist: Ecofeminism and the quest for democracy. Minneapolis, IN: University of Minnesota Press.
Sebba, R. (1991) The landscapes of childhood: the reflection of childhood’s environment in adult memories and in children’s attitudes. Environment and Behaviour, 23(4), pp 395–422.
Shukaitis, S. (2013). Recomposing precarity: Notes on the laboured politics of class composition. Ephemera, 13(3). [Online]. Retrieved from: http://www.ephemerajournal.org/contribution/recomposing-precarity-notes-laboured-politics-class-composition
Sivek, D. J. (2002). Environmental sensitivity among Wisconsin high school students. Environmental Education Research, 8(2), 155–170.
Stake, R. (2005) Qualitative case studies. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 433–466.
Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Carrier, S. J., Strnad, R. L., Bondell, H. D., Kirby-Hathaway, T., & Moore, S. E. (2014). Role of significant life experiences in building environmental knowledge and behavior among middle school students. Journal of Environmental Education, 45(3), 163–177.
Stevenson, R. (1987). Schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice. In I. Robottom (Ed.), Environmental education: Practice and possibility (pp 69–82). Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press.
Sutton, P. W. (2004). Nature, environment and society. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sward, L. L. (1999). Significant life experiences affecting the environmental sensitivity of El Salvadoran environmental professionals. Environmental Education Research, 5(2), 201–206.
Tanner, R. T. (1980). Significant life experiences: A new research area in environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 11(4), 20–24.
Tanner, T. (1998). Choosing the right subjects in significant life experiences research. Environmental Education Research, 4(4), 399–417.
Taylor, A. (2017). Beyond stewardship: Common world pedagogies for the Anthropocene. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1448–1461.
Thomashow, M. (1995). Ecological identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
Waite, S. (2007) Memories are made of this: some reflections on outdoor learning and recall. Education 3–13, 35(4), pp 333–347.
Waite, S. (2010). Losing our way? The downward path for outdoor learning for children aged 2–11 years. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 10(2), 111–126.
Waite, S. (2011a) Teaching and learning outside the classroom: personal values, alternative pedagogies and standards. Education 3–13, 39(1), pp 65–82.
Waite, S. (2013). “Knowing your place in the world”: How place and culture support and obstruct educational aims. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 413–433.
Waite, S., Davis, B., & Brown, K. (2006). Forest school principles: ‘Why we do what we do’. Final report for funding body EYDCP (zero14plus). Exmouth, England: University of Plymouth.
Ward Thompson, C., Aspinall, P., Bell, S., & Findlay, C. (2005). ‘It gets you away from everyday life’: Local woodlands and community use – What makes a difference? Landscape Research, 30(1), 109–146.
Wells, N., & Lekies, K. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1–23.
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
McCree, M. (2020). Future Shock, Generational Change, and Shifting Eco-social Identities: Forest School Practitioners’ Reasons to Train. In: Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A., Malone, K., Barratt Hacking, E. (eds) Research Handbook on Childhoodnature . Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67286-1_101
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67286-1_101
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67285-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67286-1
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education