Encyclopedia of Signaling Molecules

2018 Edition
| Editors: Sangdun Choi

TRAIL Receptor 1/2 (Death Receptor 4/5, DR4/5)

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67199-4_544

Synonyms

Historical Background

The tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL, Apo2L) identified in the middle of 1990s (Pitti et al. 1996; Wiley et al. 1995) was given its name due to its ability of inducing apoptosis and its high homology to other TNF member ligands. Then, its first receptor, death receptor 4 (DR4, TRAIL-R1), was identified by searching an EST database for sequences related to the TNF receptor-1 (TNFR1) death domain (DD) (Pan et al. 1997b). Thereafter, by virtue of its sequence homology to the DR4 DD, death receptor 5 (DR5, TRAIL-R2) was also cloned independently by two groups (MacFarlane et al. 1997; Walczak et al. 1997). Both DR4 and DR5 are belonging to members of the TNF receptor superfamily (TNFRSF). However, unlikely with TNFRSF receptors containing the intracellular DD, such as TNFR1 and CD95, DR4 and DR5 are capable of transmitting tumor cell-selective apoptosis signaling upon activation by ligation with the cognate ligand of TRAIL (Ashkenazi 2008; Johnstone et al. 2008). DR4 and DR5 share a sequence identity of 58%, and their fucntions are largely redundant. However, recent studies with the receptor-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and TRAIL mutants have shown that some tumor cells undergo apoptotic cell death through signaling by either pro-apoptotic DR4 or DR5, but not both (Sung et al. 2009).

The two additional membrane receptors, decoy receptor 1 (DcR1/TRAIL-R3/TNFRSF10C/TRID) and decoy receptor 2 (DcR2/TRAIL-R4/TNFRSF10D/TRUNDD), were also identified by sequence homology search with the extracellular domain of DR4 and DR5 (MacFarlane et al. 1997; Marsters et al. 1997; Pan et al. 1997a). DcR1 completely lacks the intracellular DD and is anchored to the membrane via a glycophosphatidyl inositol (GPI) tail, whereas DcR2 is a type I transmembrane protein, but contains a truncated DD (Marsters et al. 1997). Due to the lack of functional DD, the two decoy receptors are not capable of inducing apoptosis. However, they may protect cells against TRAIL-mediated apoptosis by competing with DR4 and DR5 for binding to the ligand (Ashkenazi 2008; Johnstone et al. 2008). In addition to these four cell-surface expressed receptors, a soluble receptor called osteoprotegerin (OPG) was identified to bind to TRAIL with low affinity (Emery et al. 1998).

Structural Features of DR4 and DR5

DR4 and DR5 are single pass type I membrane proteins. The primary structural features of DR4 (468 residues) and DR5 (440 residues) include a secretion signal, three cysteine-rich domains (CRDs) in the extracellular regions, a transmembrane domain and a death domain in the intracellular regions (Fig. 1). CRD, present from 1 to 6 in all TNFSF receptors in the extracellular regions, is defined by six highly conserved cysteines that form three intrachain disulfide bridges. Both DR4 and DR5 have one partial CRD1 with only one cysteine bond and two complete CRDs, CRD2 and CRD3, with the three cysteine bonds (Cha et al. 2000). Interestingly, DR5 can be expressed in two alternatively spliced isoforms, DR5A/TRICK2A (short) and DR5B/TRICK2B (long): the short isoform of DR5A lacks 29 amino acids by missing the extracellular residues between 185 and 213 of the canonical long isoform of DR5B (Screaton et al. 1997). However, DR5A and DR5B have not shown any functional differences among each other. Secondary structural analysis of the extracellular domain of DR4 and DR5 showed ∼15% ß-sheet and ∼85% unordered secondary structure.
TRAIL Receptor 1/2 (Death Receptor 4/5, DR4/5), Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the primary structure of membrane-bound TRAIL receptors, DR4, DR5, DcR1, and DcR2 proteins. The secretion signal sequence (SS), cysteine-rich domain (CRD), transmembrane domain (TM) and intracellular death domain (DD) were highlighted in box. Numbers designate amino acids based on the following NCBI reference sequence: DR4 (NP_003835), DR5 (NP_003833), DcR1 (NP_003832), and DcR2 (NP_003831)

Like the other four TNFRSF receptors containing the DD, the intracellular part of DR4 and DR5 contains an ∼80 amino acid long, conserved domain called the DD (MacFarlane et al. 1997; Pan et al. 1997b; Walczak et al. 1997). This structural motif is essential for interaction with a key adaptor protein that is required for transmission of the death signal. Determination of the solution structure of the intracellular DDs of Fas, FADD, and TNFR1 DD by NMR spectroscopy has shown that the DD shares a common secondary structural feature, consisting of six anti-parallel amphipathic a-helices packed into a globular structure, despite of low sequence homology below 30% (Fig. 2). Thus the DDs of DR4 and DR5 share less than 30% identity with those of other TNFRSF receptors (Fig. 2), which may be responsible for their different specificity in intracellar signaling through distinct protein–protein interactions. However, the DD of DR4 shares ∼63% identity with that of DR5 (Fig. 2), indicative of their redundant functions.
TRAIL Receptor 1/2 (Death Receptor 4/5, DR4/5), Fig. 2

Sequence alignment (a) and sequence homology in percentage (b) of the intracellular death domain (DD) of the six TNFRSF receptors. The following NCBI reference sequence was used in the analysis: DR4 (NP_003835), DR5 (NP_003833), TNFR1 (NP_001056), Fas (CD95) (NP_000034), DR3 (NP_003781), DR6 (NP_055267). The multiple sequence alignment form and results found in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot

The extracellular domain DR5 protein forms a compact 3:3 complex with TRAIL, where TRAIL forms a central homotrimer around which three DR5 molecules snuggled into long crevices between pairs of monomers of the homotrimeric ligand (Cha et al. 2000). There has been no report yet about tertiary structures of DR4 alone or in complex with TRAIL.

Cell and Tissue Expression of DR4 and DR5

Cellular surface expression of DR4 and DR5 has been reported for a broad spectrum of cancer lines and/or primary tumor cells isolated from tissues, including lung, blood, skin, bone, breast, ovary, thyroid, and the brain (Fox et al. 2010; Johnstone et al. 2008). Weak, but detectable DR4 and/or DR5 expression has been identified by flow cytometry on the surface of normal cell types, including hepatocytes, keratinocytes, astrocytes, and osteoblasts (Fox et al. 2010; Johnstone et al. 2008). Noticeably, however, there has been no definite correlation between expression levels of DR4 and/or DR5 at both the mRNA and protein level, and the susceptibility to apoptosis by the agonist treatments (Ashkenazi 2008; Fox et al. 2010; Johnstone et al. 2008). Although most tumor cells co-express DR4 and DR5 to some degree, DR5 is expressed more widely by both tumor cells and normal tissue than DR4 (Johnstone et al. 2008). A specific physiological role for either DR4 or DR5 has yet to be defined, although the existence of two death receptors for the same ligand might suggest an essential role in tissue homeostasis.

DR4- and DR5-Mediated Signaling

TRAIL has been highlighted as a tumor selective molecule that transmits death signal via ligation to the pro-apoptotic receptors, DR4 and DR5 (Ashkenazi et al. 1999). When stimulated by either TRAIL or agonistic mAbs, DR4 and/or DR5 can mediate apoptotic cell death in most of TRAIL-sensitive cancer cells dominantly through the sequential activation of caspases (Fig. 3; Ashkenazi 2008; Johnstone et al. 2008). Depending on the external stimuli and specific cell types, however, DR4 and/or DR5 can also transduce multiple cellular signaling pathways in a caspase-dependent or caspase-independent manner, involved in cell survival, differentiation, and death (Figs. 3 and 4; Pennarun et al. 2010).
TRAIL Receptor 1/2 (Death Receptor 4/5, DR4/5), Fig. 3

The major signaling pathways of DR4 and DR5. DR4 and DR5 upon activation by the cognate ligand TRAIL multimerize and undergo some conformational change to activate their intracellular death domain to form the primary signaling complex DISC by recruiting FADD and caspase-8 and/or -10. The secondary signaling complex II can be formed, the components of which vary depending on the specific conditions, as described in detail in the text. The primary and secondary signaling complex mainly activate the initiator caspases, caspase-8 and/or -10, which subsequently activate the effector caspases, such as caspase-3, -6, and -7 via the extrinsic and intrinsic pathway, leading to the typical apoptosis. Beside activating caspases, TRAIL may stimulate intracellular kinase cascades such as NF-κB, JNK, p38 MAPK, and PKB/Akt pathways, the final outcomes of which vary depending on the cellular context and specific conditions

TRAIL Receptor 1/2 (Death Receptor 4/5, DR4/5), Fig. 4

A noncanonical signaling of DR5 triggered by the agonistic antibodies. Recent studies with anti-DR5 agonistic antibodies have shown that the intracellular domain of DR5 has more potential to provide a platform for the formation of multiprotein signaling complexes, which initiating JNK-activation dependent apoptosis and autophagy. For example, mouse anti-DR5 AD5-10 mAb induced apoptotic cell death in Jurkat cells via ROS generation, sustained JNK activation, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and Endo G release from mitochondria to the cytosol. A human anti-DR5 scFv, HW1, activated JNK via forming a signaling complex composed of TRADD and TRAF2 at the intracellular domain of DR5 and sequentially upregulated Beclin-1 expression and induced the phosphorylation of Bcl-2 and p53, leading to DR5-mediated autophagic cell death

Caspase-Dependent Apoptosis Signaling

Binding of trimeric or multimeric TRAIL to the pro-apoptotic receptors results in the receptor clustering to activate the intracellular DD and recruit Fas-associated death domain (FADD) and then the initiator caspases, caspase-8 and/or -10, similarly to what occurs when Fas (CD95) is activated (reviewed in Gonzalvez and Ashkenazi (2010)). This primary signaling complex, consisting of ligand, receptor, FADD, and apical caspase(s), is called the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) (Gonzalvez and Ashkenazi 2010). Activated caspase-8/10 by the DISC formation triggers the extrinsic pathway by directly activating the downstream effector caspases, such as caspase-3, -6, and -7, which in turn cleave many cellular substrates to exert apoptosis (Fig. 3). The extrinsic pathway can be amplified by cross-talk with the intrinsic pathway, the link of which is Bid cleavage by activated caspase-8 (Ashkenazi 2008; Johnstone et al. 2008). Cleaved Bid (tBid) induces oligomerisation of pro-apoptotic Bax and/or Bak, leading to the release of cytochrome c and Smac/Diablo from mitochondria into cytoplasm and activation of caspase-9 (Ashkenazi 2008; Johnstone et al. 2008). The mitochondrial pathway eventually activates the effector caspases to execute apoptotic cell death. In some cells (designated Type I cells), caspase-8 activation is sufficient to activate the effector caspases to execute apoptosis via the extrinsic pathway, whereas, in other cells (designated Type II cells), amplification of the extrinsic pathway through the intrinsic (mitochondrial) pathway is needed to commit the cells to apoptotic cell death (Pennarun et al. 2010; Sung et al. 2009).

Activation of the initiator caspase-8/10 at DISC can be inhibited, subsequently decreasing the apoptosis signaling through the extrinsic and/or intrinsic pathways. The anti-apoptotic protein of cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) can also be recruited to the DISC to replace caspase-8, forming inactive DISC to inhibit the following downstream signaling. Furthermore, DcR1 and DcR2 might form ineffective DISC via heteromeric complex formation with DR4 and/DR5, leading to blocking the following apoptosis signaling (Fox et al. 2010; Pennarun et al. 2010).

In addition to the cognate ligand of recombinant TRAIL, a number of agonistic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been developed by targeting DR4 or DR5, which also induce cell death in various types of tumors in vitro and in vivo (reviewed in Ashkenazi 2008; Fox et al. 2010; Johnstone et al. 2008). More recently, alternative protein scaffold based on human Kringle domain (Lee et al. 2010) and peptides (Pavet et al. 2010) isolated against DR4 or DR5 have been reported to specifically bind to activate DR4 and/or DR5, leading to tumor cell-selective apoptotic cell death. Some of them are now under various phases of clinical trials (Fox et al. 2010; Johnstone et al. 2008). The cell death mechanism of most agonistic mAbs against DR4 or DR5 has been reported to be similar to that of TRAIL, inducing caspase-dependent apoptotic cell death through forming the canonical DISC in the intracellular domain of DR4 and/or DR5 (Ashkenazi 2008).

The receptor-specific agonistic mAb studies demonstrated that, while various solid tumors were more sensitive to DR5-mediated apoptosis than DR4-induced apoptosis, primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells underwent apoptotic cell death almost exclusively through DR4, not DR5 (MacFarlane et al. 2005), indicative of distinct functions of DR4 and DR5 depending on the specific type.

Kinase Activation Signaling

In addition to caspase activation by forming the canonical DISC, TRAIL stimulation of DR4 and/or DR5 can activate several kinase pathways, including nuclear factor (NF)-κB (NF-κB), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), either by forming a secondary signaling complex in the downstream of DISC or by forming different signaling complex at the intracellular domain (Gonzalvez and Ashkenazi 2010; Pennarun et al. 2010).

Mühlenbeck et al. (2000) showed that TRAIL stimulation can lead to JNK activation, which occurs in a cell type-specific manner. TRAIL-induced JNK activation was dependent on caspase activation in HeLa cells, whereas it was not in Kym-1 cells, indicative of the two independent pathways leading to JNK activation. Further, JNK activation was independent of FADD in HeLa cells, suggesting another adaptor molecule to DR4/DR5 might be involved in the JNK activation. The group also showed that DR4 and DR5 have different capabilities for stimulating the JNK pathway: DR4 can signal NF-κB activation and apoptosis, whereas DR5 can signal NF-κB activation, apoptosis, and JNK activation (Muhlenbeck et al. 2000). However, detailed studies to analyze the molecular components involved in the signaling pathway had not been done.

Lin et al. (2000) had shown that RIP1 was essential for TRAIL-induced NF-κB and JNK activation, but not required for the apoptosis. Askenazi group (Varfolomeev et al. 2005) had shown in detail that TRAIL stimulation in HT1080 human fibrosarcoma cells leads to activations of kinase pathways by promoting the association of a secondary signaling complex II at the downstream of the primary DISC assembly (Fig. 3). The signaling complex II retained the DISC components FADD and caspase-8, but recruited several additional factors, such as Receptor interacting protein 1 (RIP1), TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2), and I-κB kinase subunit gamma (IKKγ/NEMO). TRAIL stimulation of JNK and p38 further depended on receptor interacting protein 1 (RIP1) and TRAF2, whereas the inhibitor of κB kinase (IKK) activation required IKKγ/NEMO. More recently, Jin and El-Deiry (2006) showed that TRAIL can induce formation of a complex II containing FADD, RIP, IKKα, and caspase-8 and -10, leading to activation of caspase-8. Thus they showed that TRADD and caspase-10 can be recruited to the signaling complex II.

Secchiero et al. (2003) also showed that TRAIL could activate the protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1//2 (ERK1/2), without NF-κB, p38 and JNK activations in primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and aortic endothelial cells, thereby promoting the cell survival. However, the detailed molecular mechanisms are not completely understood.

Ohtsuka et al. (2003) also reported that, using agonistic anti-DR4 2E12 and anti-DR5 TRA-8 mAbs, both DR4 and DR5 have a capability to activate JNK and p38, which was mediated by MAPK kinase 4 (MKK4). The JNK/p38 signaling activated the mitochondrial apoptosis pathways, leading to caspase-dependent apoptotic cell death of breast MDA-MB-231 cell lines. However, they did not examine the signaling complex recruited to each receptor after mAb stimulation. Sah et al. (2003) reported that JNK activation is required for sensitization of prostate PC3 cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by translation inhibitors in cells that are otherwise TRAIL-resistant.

Zheng group (Chen et al. 2009) showed that, while TRAIL induces only caspase-dependent cell death, an anti-DR5 agonistic mAb, AD5-10, induces both caspase-dependent and caspase-independent cell death in Jurkat cells. AD5-10-mediated stimulation of DR5 generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, which subsequently evoked sustained activation of JNK, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and release of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) and endonuclease G (Endo G) from mitochondria into the cytosol and then nucleus in Jurkat cells (Fig. 4; Chen et al. 2009). Immunoprecipitation experiments showed that AD5-10 induced assembly of DISCs containing DR5, FADD, caspase-8, and RIP in wild-type Jurkat cells. Moreover, a dominant-negative form of JNK enhanced NF-κB activation, suppressed caspase-8 recruitment in DISCs. However, how DR5 stimulation by AD5-10 induced ROS accumulation and how JNK activation impairs the function of mitochondria remain to be investigated.

Caspase-Independent Autophagy Signaling

Autophagic cell death has been involved in physiological cell death during development and reported in cancer cells treated with chemicals or irradiation. TRAIL also can induce caspase-independent autophagic cell death in normal epithelial cells and the breast cancer cell line MCF-10A (Mills et al. 2004), implicating that DR4 and/or DR5 are involved in the autophagic cell death as well as apoptosis. Park et al. (2007) recently reported that an agonistic antibody, single chain variable fragment (scFv) HW1, which specifically binds to DR5, triggered autophagic cell death of cancer cells dominantly through JNK pathway in a caspase-independent manner (Fig. 4). Analysis of the signaling complex induced by HW1 binding to DR5 exhibits the recruitment of TNF receptor (TNFR)-associated death domain (TRADD) and TRAF2 to the receptor, but not FADD, caspase-8, or RIP, which is distinct from the canonical DISC induced by TRAIL. Analyses of upstream kinase(s) for JNK activation upon HW1 binding to DR5 revealed that JNK activation was most likely mediated by TRAF2-MKK4/MKK7-dependent signaling cascade (Park et al. 2009). DR5-stimulated JNK activation by HW1 resulted in upregulation of Beclin-1 expression, Bcl-2 phosphorylation, and p53 phosphorylation, suggesting that these pro-autophagic signaling pathways are involved in the autophagic cell death (Park et al. 2009). The DR5-mediated autophagy signaling sensitized both TRAIL-sensitive and TRAIL-resistant tumor cells with much less cytotoxicity on normal cells (Park et al. 2007, 2009), providing a new strategy for the elimination of cancer cells through the nonapoptotic cell death.

Resistance to DR4- and DR5-Mediated Apoptotic Cell Death Signaling

Many highly malignant tumor cells (>50%) even expressing DR4 and/or DR5 remain resistant to TRAIL-induced and/or anti-DR4/DR5 agonistic mAb-mediated apoptosis, the underlying mechanism of which has been poorly understood and varies with the cellular context (Ashkenazi 2008; Fox et al. 2010; Johnstone et al. 2008). Potential resistance mechanisms are numerous and include loss/mutation of death receptors, overexpression of decoy receptors, overexpression of cellular FLICE inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), absence of proper O-glycosylation in the receptors, and/or complex downstream regulation of the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways (Gonzalvez and Ashkenazi 2010).

Summary

The agonists against DR4 and/or DR5, including recombinant TRAIL and mAbs, have demonstrated anti-cancer activities both as monotherapy and in combination with anti-cancer agents in preclinical and clinical studies with no apparent systemic toxicity (Ashkenazi 2008; Fox et al. 2010; Johnstone et al. 2008). All of the receptor agonists in clinic have been reported to induce tumor cell death through the caspase-dependent apoptosis (Ashkenazi 2008; Johnstone et al. 2008). Depending on the external stimuli and specific cell types, however, DR4 and/or DR5 can also transduce multiple cellular signaling pathways in a caspase-dependent or caspase-independent manner, including JNK, p38, and NF-?B signaling. These distinct signaling can exert ROS-mediated apoptosis or autophagic cell death, although the components of which remain largely undefined. Recent clinical data of TRAIL and agonistic mAbs have shown much less tumor killing activities in patients than those observed in preclinical studies. Accordingly, deep understanding of the diverse molecular signaling mechanisms mediated by DR4 and/or DR5 and their cross-talks leading to a final outcome of the stimulation will be essential to design next-generation agonists targeting DR4 and/or DR5.

References

  1. Ashkenazi A. Directing cancer cells to self-destruct with pro-apoptotic receptor agonists. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7(12):1001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashkenazi A, Pai RC, Fong S, Leung S, Lawrence DA, Marsters SA, et al. Safety and antitumor activity of recombinant soluble Apo2 ligand. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:155–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cha SS, Sung BJ, Kim YA, Song YL, Kim HJ, Kim S, et al. Crystal structure of TRAIL-DR5 complex identifies a critical role of the unique frame insertion in conferring recognition specificity. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:31171–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen C, Liu Y, Zheng D. An agonistic monoclonal antibody against DR5 induces ROS production, sustained JNK activation and Endo G release in Jurkat leukemia cells. Cell Res. 2009;19:984–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Emery JG, McDonnell P, Burke MB, Deen KC, Lyn S, Silverman C, et al. Osteoprotegerin is a receptor for the cytotoxic ligand TRAIL. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:14363–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fox NL, Humphreys R, Luster TA, Klein J, Gallant G. Tumor Necrosis Factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) Receptor-1 and Receptor-2 agonists for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10:1–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gonzalvez F, Ashkenazi A. New insights into apoptosis signaling by Apo2L/TRAIL. Oncogene. 2010;29:4752–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jin Z, El-Deiry WS. Distinct signaling pathways in TRAIL- versus tumor necrosis factor-induced apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:8136–48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnstone RW, Frew AJ, Smyth MJ. The TRAIL apoptotic pathway in cancer onset, progression and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:782–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee CH, Park KJ, Sung ES, Kim A, Choi JD, Kim JS, et al. Engineering of a human kringle domain into agonistic and antagonistic binding proteins functioning in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:9567–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin Y, Devin A, Cook A, Keane MM, Kelliher M, Lipkowitz S, et al. The death domain kinase RIP is essential for TRAIL (Apo2L)-induced activation of IkappaB kinase and c-Jun N-terminal kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:6638–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. MacFarlane M, Ahmad M, Srinivasula SM, Fernandes-Alnemri T, Cohen GM, Alnemri ES. Identification and molecular cloning of two novel receptors for the cytotoxic ligand TRAIL. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:25417–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. MacFarlane M, Kohlhaas SL, Sutcliffe MJ, Dyer MJ, Cohen GM. TRAIL receptor-selective mutants signal to apoptosis via TRAIL-R1 in primary lymphoid malignancies. Cancer Res. 2005;65:11265–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marsters SA, Sheridan JP, Pitti RM, Huang A, Skubatch M, Baldwin D, et al. A novel receptor for Apo2L/TRAIL contains a truncated death domain. Curr Biol. 1997;7:1003–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mills KR, Reginato M, Debnath J, Queenan B, Brugge JS. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is required for induction of autophagy during lumen formation in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:3438–43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Muhlenbeck F, Schneider P, Bodmer JL, Schwenzer R, Hauser A, Schubert G, et al. The tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptors TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 have distinct cross-linking requirements for initiation of apoptosis and are non-redundant in JNK activation. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:32208–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pan G, Ni J, Wei YF, Yu G, Gentz R, Dixit VM. An antagonist decoy receptor and a death domain-containing receptor for TRAIL. Science. 1997a;277:815–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pan G, O’Rourke K, Chinnaiyan AM, Gentz R, Ebner R, Ni J, et al. The receptor for the cytotoxic ligand TRAIL. Science. 1997b;276:111–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Park KJ, Lee SH, Kim TI, Lee HW, Lee CH, Kim EH, et al. A human scFv antibody against TRAIL receptor 2 induces autophagic cell death in both TRAIL-sensitive and TRAIL-resistant cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:7327–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Park KJ, Lee SH, Lee CH, Jang JY, Chung J, Kwon MH, et al. Upregulation of Beclin-1 expression and phosphorylation of Bcl-2 and p53 are involved in the JNK-mediated autophagic cell death. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;382:726–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pavet V, Beyrath J, Pardin C, Morizot A, Lechner MC, Briand JP, et al. Multivalent DR5 peptides activate the TRAIL death pathway and exert tumoricidal activity. Cancer Res. 2010;70:1101–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pennarun B, Meijer A, de Vries EG, Kleibeuker JH, Kruyt F, de Jong S. Playing the DISC: turning on TRAIL death receptor-mediated apoptosis in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1805:123–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pitti RM, Marsters SA, Ruppert S, Donahue CJ, Moore A, Ashkenazi A. Induction of apoptosis by Apo-2 ligand, a new member of the tumor necrosis factor cytokine family. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:12687–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sah NK, Munshi A, Kurland JF, McDonnell TJ, Su B, Meyn RE. Translation inhibitors sensitize prostate cancer cells to apoptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) by activating c-Jun N-terminal kinase. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:20593–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Screaton GR, Mongkolsapaya J, Xu XN, Cowper AE, McMichael AJ, Bell JI. TRICK2, a new alternatively spliced receptor that transduces the cytotoxic signal from TRAIL. Curr Biol. 1997;7:693–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Secchiero P, Gonelli A, Carnevale E, Milani D, Pandolfi A, Zella D, et al. TRAIL promotes the survival and proliferation of primary human vascular endothelial cells by activating the Akt and ERK pathways. Circulation. 2003;107:2250–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sung ES, Park KJ, Lee SH, Jang YS, Park SK, Park YH, et al. A novel agonistic antibody to human death receptor 4 induces apoptotic cell death in various tumor cells without cytotoxicity in hepatocytes. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:2276–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Varfolomeev E, Maecker H, Sharp D, Lawrence D, Renz M, Vucic D, et al. Molecular determinants of kinase pathway activation by Apo2 ligand/tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:40599–608.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walczak H, Degli-Esposti MA, Johnson RS, Smolak PJ, Waugh JY, Boiani N, et al. TRAIL-R2: a novel apoptosis-mediating receptor for TRAIL. EMBO J. 1997;16:5386–97.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wiley SR, Schooley K, Smolak PJ, Din WS, Huang CP, Nicholl JK, et al. Identification and characterization of a new member of the TNF family that induces apoptosis. Immunity. 1995;3:673–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular Science and TechnologyAjou UniversityYeongtong-Gu, SuwonKorea