Skip to main content

Artifact-Centric Process Mining

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Synonyms

Multi-instance process mining; Object-centric process mining

Definition

Artifact-centric process mining is an extension of classical process mining (van der Aalst 2016) that allows to analyze event data with more than one case identifier in its entirety. It allows to analyze the dynamic behavior of (business) processes that create, read, update, and delete multiple data objects that are related to each other in relationships with one-to-one, one-to-many, and many-to-many cardinalities. Such event data is typically stored in relational databases of, for example, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems (Lu et al. 2015). Artifact-centric process mining comprises artifact-centric process discovery, conformance checking, and enhancement. The outcomes of artifact-centric process mining can be used for documenting the actual data flow in an organization and for analyzing deviations in the data flow for performance and conformance analysis.

The input to artifact-centric process...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Buijs JCAM, van Dongen BF, van der Aalst WMP (2012) A genetic algorithm for discovering process trees. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvanese D, Montali M, Estañol M, Teniente E (2014) Verifiable UML artifact-centric business process models. In: CIKM

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo HAS (2017) Artifact-centric log extraction for cloud systems. Master’s thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • de Murillas EGL, van der Aalst WMP, Reijers HA (2015) Process mining on databases: unearthing historical data from redo logs. In: BPM

    Google Scholar 

  • de Murillas EGL, Reijers HA, van der Aalst WMP (2016) Connecting databases with process mining: a meta model and toolset. In: BMMDS/EMMSAD

    Google Scholar 

  • Estañol M, Queralt A, Sancho MR, Teniente E (2012) Artifact-centric business process models in UML. In: Business process management workshops

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahland D, de Leoni M, van Dongen BF, van der Aalst WMP (2011a) Behavioral conformance of artifact-centric process models. In: BIS

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fahland D, de Leoni M, van Dongen BF, van der Aalst WMP (2011b) Conformance checking of interacting processes with overlapping instances. In: BPM

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahland D, de Leoni M, van Dongen BF, van der Aalst WMP (2011c) Many-to-many: some observations on interactions in artifact choreographies. In: ZEUS

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariri BB, Calvanese D, Giacomo GD, Deutsch A, Montali M (2013) Verification of relational data-centric dynamic systems with external services. In: PODS

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull R, Damaggio E, Masellis RD, Fournier F, Gupta M, Heath FT, Hobson S, Linehan MH, Maradugu S, Nigam A, Sukaviriya N, Vaculín R (2011) Business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles: managing artifact interactions with conditions and events. In: DEBS

    Google Scholar 

  • Jans M (2017) From relational database to event log: decisions with quality impact. In: First international workshop on quality data for process analytics

    Google Scholar 

  • Leemans SJJ, Fahland D, van der Aalst WMP (2013) Discovering block-structured process models from event logs – a constructive approach. In: Petri nets

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CS, van Dongen BF, Assy N, van der Aalst WMP (2016) Component behavior discovery from software execution data. In: 2016 IEEE symposium series on computational intelligence (SSCI), pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann N (2011) Compliance by design for artifact-centric business processes. Inf Syst 38(4):606–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann N, Nyolt M (2011) Artifact-centric modeling using BPMN. In: ICSOC workshops

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Nagelkerke M, van de Wiel D, Fahland D (2015) Discovering interacting artifacts from ERP systems. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 8:861–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer A, Weske M (2013) Activity-centric and artifact-centric process model roundtrip. In: Business process management workshops

    Google Scholar 

  • Montali M, Calvanese D (2016) Soundness of data-aware, case-centric processes. Int J Softw Tools Technol Trans 18:535–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigam A, Caswell NS (2003) Business artifacts: an approach to operational specification. IBM Syst J 42:428–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooijen EHJ, van Dongen BF, Fahland D (2012) Automatic discovery of data-centric and artifact-centric processes. In: Business process management workshops. Lecture notes in business information processing, vol 132. Springer, pp 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36285-9_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • OMG (2016) Case management model and notation, version 1.1. http://www.omg.org/spec/CMMN/1.1

  • Popova V, Dumas M (2013) Discovering unbounded synchronization conditions in artifact-centric process models. In: Business process management workshops

    Google Scholar 

  • Popova V, Fahland D, Dumas M (2015) Artifact lifecycle discovery. Int J Coop Inf Syst 24:44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reijers HA, Vanderfeesten ITP, Plomp MGA, Gorp PV, Fahland D, van der Crommert WLM, Garcia HDD (2015) Evaluating data-centric process approaches: does the human factor factor in? Softw Syst Model 16:649–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • vanden Broucke SKLM, Weerdt JD (2017) Fodina: a robust and flexible heuristic process discovery technique. Decis Support Syst 100:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst WMP (2016) Process mining – data science in action, 2nd edn. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4

  • van der Aalst WMP, Barthelmess P, Ellis CA, Wainer J (2001) Proclets: a framework for lightweight interacting workflow processes. Int J Coop Inf Syst 10:443–481

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eck ML, Sidorova N, van der Aalst WMP (2016) Composite state machine miner: discovering and exploring multi-perspective processes. In: BPM

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eck ML, Sidorova N, van der Aalst WMP (2017) Guided interaction exploration in artifact-centric process models. In: 2017 IEEE 19th conference on business informatics (CBI), vol 1, pp 109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek HMW, Buijs JCAM, van Dongen BF, van der Aalst WMP (2010) Xes, xesame, and prom 6. In: CAiSE forum

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerdt JD, Backer MD, Vanthienen J, Baesens B (2012) A multi-dimensional quality assessment of state-of-the-art process discovery algorithms using real-life event logs. Inf Syst 37(7):654–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2012.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weijters AJMM, Ribeiro JTS (2011) Flexible heuristics miner (FHM). In: 2011 IEEE symposium on computational intelligence and data mining (CIDM), pp 310–317

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Fahland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Fahland, D. (2018). Artifact-Centric Process Mining. In: Sakr, S., Zomaya, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Big Data Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63962-8_93-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63962-8_93-1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63962-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63962-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MathematicsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics