Encyclopedia of Big Data Technologies

Living Edition
| Editors: Sherif Sakr, Albert Zomaya

Big Data Analysis for Social Good

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63962-8_277-1

Abstract

The promise of analyzing big data for improving social good and overall social welfare is great. Much of the work to date has focused on place-based data or de-identified data. However, there are significant challenges around accessing and using data that contains sensitive or confidential information that is needed to address health, social problems, disabilities, violence, and other of society’s biggest social challenges. This chapter addresses both the opportunities and the challenges and what analysts of big data working with social institutions must consider.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Card D, Chetty R, Feldstein M, Saez E (2010) Expanding access to administrative data for research in the United States. NSF SBE 2020 White PaperGoogle Scholar
  2. Coulton CJ, Goerge R, Putnam-Hornstein E, de Haan B (2015). Harnessing big data for social good: A grand challenge for social work. American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare, Paper No. 11.Google Scholar
  3. Foster I (2018) Research infrastructure for the safe analysis of sensitive data. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 675(1):102–120.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217742610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goerge RM (2018) Barriers to accessing state data and approaches to addressing them. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 675(1).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217741257
  5. Hindman M (2015) Building better models: prediction, replication, and machine learning in the social sciences. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 659(May):48–62.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215570279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hurley D (2018) Can an algorithm tell when kids are in danger? Times, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Japec L, Kreuter F, Berg M, Biemer P, Decker P, Lampe C (2015) AAPOR report on big dataGoogle Scholar
  8. Liebman JB (2018) Using data to more rapidly address difficult U.S. social problems. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 675(1):166–181.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217745812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Petrila J (2018) Turning the law into a tool rather than a barrier to the use of administrative data for evidence-based policy. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 675(1):67–82.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217741088 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Policy-Making, Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking. 2017. The promise of evidence-based policymaking. Washington, DC: Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking. Available from https://www.cep.gov/content/dam/cep/report/cep-final-report.pdf (accessed 14 October 2017).
  11. Sandvig C, Hamilton K, Karahalios K, Langbort C (2016) Automation, algorithms, and politics | when the algorithm itself is a racist: diagnosing ethical harm in the basic components of software. Int J Commun 10(0):19Google Scholar
  12. Wang C, Cen M-H, Schifano E, Jing W, Yan J (2016) Statistical methods and computing for Big Data. Stat Interface 9(4):399–414.  https://doi.org/10.4310/SII.2016.v9.n4.a1 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chapin Hall at the University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Domenico Talia
  • Paolo Trunfio
    • 1
  1. 1.DIMESUniversity of CalabriaRendeItaly