Skip to main content

Child Trafficking for Adoption Purposes: A Criminological Analysis of the Illegal Adoption Market

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave International Handbook of Human Trafficking

Abstract

Over the past decades, numerous reports have emerged suggesting that children from poor countries are being obtained illegally and transported transnationally in order to meet the high Western demand for adoptable healthy babies. This chapter identifies the structural components of the transnational illegal adoption market by applying the basic logic of the routine activity theory that has been developed by  Cohen and Felson. It explains that in the context of extreme inequality (“criminogenic asymmetries”) between the sending and the receiving countries, supply, demand, as well as weak public and private sector social control mechanisms have contributed to the nature and size of the illegal adoption market. The chapter outlines the main difference between conventional forms of human trafficking and child trafficking for adoption purposes and explains why the latter phenomenon is particularly difficult to detect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altstein H, Simon RJ (eds) (1991) Intercountry adoption: A multinational perspective. Greenwood, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boele-Woelki K, Curry-Sumner I, Schrama W, Vonk M (2011) Draagmoederschap en illegale opneming van kinderen. WODC, Ministerie van Veiligheid & Justitie, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad B (2007) Kinship Care: Providing Positive and Safe Care for Children Living Away from Home. Save the Children UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell N (2005) Is intercountry adoption linked with trafficking for exploitation? ISS/IRC Monthly Rev no. 11–12, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney KE, Rotabi KS (2015) Addicted to Orphans: How the Global Orphan Industrial Complex Jeopardizes Local Child Protection Systems. In: Harker C, Hörschelmann K, Tracey S (eds) Conflict, Violence and Peace. Springer, Singapore, p 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen LE, Felson M (1979) Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. Am Sociol Rev 44(4):588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Human Rights (2000). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography. UN Doc E/CN.4/2000/73/Add.2 (27 Jan 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens J (2002) The paradox of inter-country adoption: analysing Romania’s experience as a sending country. Int J Soc Welf 11(1):76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohle A (2008) Inside Story of an Adoption Scandal. Cumb L Rev 39:131–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher A (2003) The Decline of Domestic Adoption: Intercountry Adoption as a Response to Local Adoption Laws and Proposals to Foster Domestic Adoption. Cal Rev L & Women’s Stud 13(1):171–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes F, Boéchat H, Northcott F (2012) Investigating the Grey Zones of Intercountry Adoption. ISS/IRC, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin M (ed) (2010) Baby markets: Money and the new politics of creating families. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff EJ (2008) The lie we love. In: Foreign Policy. Available via DIALOG. http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/06/the-lie-we-love/. Accessed 13 Mar 2018.

  • Graff EJ (2010) Anatomy of an Adoption Crisis. In: Foreign Policy. Available via DIALOG. http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/09/12/anatomy-of-an-adoption-crisis/. Accesses 13 Mar 2018.

  • Graff EJ (2014) They Steal Babies, Don’t They? In: Pacific Standard. Available via DIALOG. https://psmag.com/news/they-steal-babies-dont-they-international-adoption-schuster-institute-95027. Accessed 13 Mar 2018.

  • Harrison A (ed) (2007) Globalization and Poverty. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HCCH (2012) Accreditation and Adoption Accredited Bodies: Guide to Good Practice No. 2, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelgaard S (1998). Cultural Determinants of Adoption Policy: A Colombian Case Study. Int J Law Pol Fam 12:202–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Högbacka R (2008) The quest for a child of one's own: Parents, markets and transnational adoption. J Comp Fam Stud 39(3):311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoksbergen RAC (1998) “Changes in Motivation for Adoption, Value Orientations and Behavior in Three Generations of Adoptive Parents.” Adopt Q 2(2):37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISS/IRC (2008) Exposing myths about the number of adoptable children and the need for more precision when defining who is adoptable”. Monthly Rev no. 10, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce K (ed) (2013) The child catchers: Rescue, trafficking, and the new gospel of adoption. Public Affairs, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball CE (2005) Barriers to the Successful Implementation of the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-Operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption. Denver J Int Law Pol 33(4):561–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • King S (2008) Challenging Monohumanism: An Argument for Changing the Way We Think About Intercountry Adoption. Mich State Int Law Rev 30:413.

    Google Scholar 

  • King S (2012) Owning Laura Silsby’s Shame: How the Haitian Child Trafficking Scheme Embodies the Western Disregard for the Integrity of Poor Families. Harv Hum Rts J 25:1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC, Bromley DG, Hicks RD, Mahoney JS (2008) Time Crime: The Transnational Organization of Art and Antiquities Theft. J Contemp Crim Justice 24(3):243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loibl E (2016) Crime in the Intercountry Adoption Industry: Towards a Broader Definition of Child Trafficking. In: Moerland R, Nelen H, Willems JCM (eds) Denialism and Human Rights. Intersentia, Cambridge, p 119–134.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marijnen S, Doomernik J (2015) Baby Migration. AEMI Journal 13:133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marre D, Briggs L (eds) (2009) International Adoption: Global Inequalities and the Circulation of Children. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskew T (2004) Child Trafficking and Intercountry Adoption: The Cambodian Experience. Cumb L Rev 35:619–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier PJ, Xiaole Z (2008) Sold into Adoption: The Hunan Baby Trafficking Scandal Exposes Vulnerabilities in the Chinese Adoptions to the United States. Cumb L Rev 39(1):87–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson KP (2006) Shopping for children in the international marketplace. In: Trenka JJ, Oparah JC, Shin SY (eds) Outsiders within: Writing on transracial adoption. South End Press, Cambridge, p 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passas N (1999) Globalization, Criminogenic Asymmetries and Economic Crime. Eur J L Reform 1(4):399–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passas N (2000) Global Anomie, Dysnomie, and Economic Crime: Hidden Consequences of Neoliberalism and Globalization in Russia and Around the World. Soc Justice 27(2):16–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post R (ed) (2007) Romania–for Export Only: The Untold Story of the Romanian ‘Orphans’. EuroComment Diffusion, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotabi KS, Bromfield NK (2012). The Decline in Intercountry Adoptions and New Practices of Global Surrogacy: Global Exploitation and Human Rights Concerns. Affilia 27(2):129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selman P (2016) The Rise and Fall of Intercountry Adoption in the 21st Century: Global Trends from 2001 to 2010. In: Gibbons JL, Rotabi KS (eds) Intercountry Adoption: Policies, Practices and Outcomes. Ashgate, Farnham, p 8–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selman P (2017) Key Tables for Intercountry Adoption: Receiving States and States of Origin 2004–2015. Available via DIALOG. https://assets.hcch.net/docs/a8fe9f19-23e6-40c2-855e-388e112bf1f5.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2018.

  • Smolin DM (2004) The Two Faces of Intercountry Adoption: The Significance of the Indian Adoption Scandals. Seton Hall Law Rev 35:403–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolin DM (2006) Child Laundering: How the Intercountry Adoption System Legitimizes and Incentivizes the Practices of Buying, Trafficking, Kidnapping, and Stealing Children. Wayne L Rev 52(1):113–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolin DM (2010) Child Laundering and the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption: The Future and Past of Intercountry Adoption. U Louisville L Rev 48:441–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolin DM (2011) The Missing Girls of China: Population, Policy, Culture, Gender, Abortion, Abandonment, and Adoption in East-Asian Perspective. Available via DIALOG. https://works.bepress.com/david_smolin/16/. Accessed 4 Jan 2018.

  • Stuy BH (2014) Open Secret: Cash and Coercion in China’s International Adoption Programm. Cumb L Rev 44(3):355–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank (2013) World Development Indicators, Washington DC. Available via DIALOG. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/WDI-2013-ebook.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2018.

  • Tribowski C, Loibl E (2017) Internationaler Adoptionskinderhandel und die Kontrollfunktionen von Landesjugendämtern: Kritik und Reformen in vier Thesen. Das Jugendamt 2(58).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (1998) Intercountry adoption. Florence: Innocenti Digest no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2016) The State of the World’s Children 2016: A fair chance for every child.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacker B (2000) Verbrechen und andere Kleinigkeiten, Der Fall “pro infante. action: kind in not e.v.” und seine Konsequenzen. Terre des hommes Deutschland, Osnabrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wereldkinderen, Against Child Trafficking (2009) Fruits of Ethiopia. Intercountry Adoption: The Rights of the Child, or the “Harvesting” of Children? A Study on Intercountry Adoption in Ethiopia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuttke G (1996) Ein Kind um jeden Preis? Eine Studie zum Adoptionskinderhandel. Terre des hommes Deutschland, Osnabrück.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elvira Loibl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Loibl, E. (2020). Child Trafficking for Adoption Purposes: A Criminological Analysis of the Illegal Adoption Market. In: Winterdyk, J., Jones, J. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Human Trafficking. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63058-8_97

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics