Skip to main content

Organizational Cognitive Neuroscience: A New Frontier for Magnetoencephalography

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Magnetoencephalography

Abstract

Organizational cognitive neuroscience is a rapidly developing field of research aimed at the neuroscientific study of human behavior in organizations. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a brief overview of the field and to elaborate on the role magnetoencephalography can play within this new area of research given its inherent advantages of noninvasively measuring macroscopic brain dynamics. Moreover, this chapter aims at elucidating some of the broader conceptual challenges as well as ethical considerations that have been raised by recent neuroscience-based approaches to the study of economically relevant behaviors; as such considerations will be relevant to neuroscientists as well as management scholars alike.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alai M (2018) The underdetermination of theories and scientific realism. Axiomathes 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-018-9384-4

  • Ariely D, Berns GS (2010) Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:284–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Lee N (2019) Philosophical foundations of neuroscience in organizational research: functional and nonfunctional approaches. Organ Res Methods 22:299–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM (1985) Leadership: good, better, best. Organ Dyn 13(3):26–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastardoz N, van Vugt M (2019) The nature of followership: evolutionary analysis and review. Leadersh Q 30:81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker WJ, Cropanzano R, Sanfey AG (2011) Organizational neuroscience: taking organizational theory inside the neural black box. J Manag 37(4):933–961

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnberg JG, Ganguly AR (2012) Is neuroaccounting waiting in the wings? An essay. Acc Organ Soc 37:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bompas A, Sumner P, Muthumumaraswamy SD, Singh KD, Gilchrist ID (2015) The contribution of pre-stimulus neural oscillatory activity to spontaneous response time variability. NeuroImage 107:34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis RE, Rochford K, Jack AI (2014) Antagonistic neural networks underlying differentiated leadership roles. Front Hum Neurosci 8(114):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Braeutigam S (2007) Endogenous context for choice making: a magnetoencephalographic study. In: International congress series, vol 1300. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 703–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Braeutigam S (2012) Neural systems supporting and affecting economically relevant behavior. Neurosci Neuroecon 1:11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braeutigam S, Rose SPR, Swithenby SJ, Ambler T (2004) The distributed neuronal systems supporting choice-making in real-life situations: differences between men and women when choosing groceries detected using magnetoencephalography. Eur J Neurosci 20:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braeutigam S, Lee N, Senior C (2017) A role for endogenous brain states in organizational research: moving toward a dynamic view of cognitive processes. Organ Res Methods 22:332–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiter HC, Block M, Blood AJ, Calder B, Chamberlain L, Lee N, Livengood S, Mulhern FJ, Raman K, Schultz D, Stern DB (2015) Redefining neuromarketing as an integrated science of influence. Front Hum Neurosci 12(1073):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown SBRE, Ridderinkhof KR (2009) Aging and the neuroeconomics of decision making: a review. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 9:365–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler MJ, Lee N, Senior C (2017) Critical essay: organizational cognitive neuroscience drives theoretical progress, or: the curious case of the straw man murder. Hum Relat 70:1171–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer CF (2008) Neuroeconomics: opening the grey box. Neuron 60:416–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case SS, Oetama-Paul AJ (2015) Brain biology and gendered discourse. Appl Psychol 64:338–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coy P (2006) The secret to Google’s success. Business Week 17 (URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2006-03-05/the-secret-to-googles-success)

  • da Silva FL (2013) EEG and MEG: relevance to neuroscience. Neuron 80:1112–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar R, Simonson I (2003) The effect of forced choice on choice. J Mark Res 40:146–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher CE, Chin L, Klitzman R (2010) Defining neuromarketing: practices and professional challenges. Harv Rev Psychiatry 18:230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo C (2006) How to run a meeting like Google. Business Week 27 (URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2006-09-26/how-to-run-a-meeting-like-google)

  • Halpern DF (2012) Sex differences in cognitive abilities, 4th edn. Psychology Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah S, Schaubroeck JM, Peng AC (2015) Transforming followers’ value internalization and role self-efficacy: dual processes promoting performance and peer norm-enforcement. J Appl Psychol 101:252–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison GW (2008) Neuroeconomics: a critical reconsideration. Econ Philos 24:303–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasler G (2012) Can the neuroeconomics revolution revolutionize psychiatry? Neurosci Behav Rev 36:64–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebb DO (1949) The Organization of Behavior. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedgcock WM, Crowe DA, Leuthold AC, Georgopoulos AP (2010) A magnetoencephalography study of choice bias. Exp Brain Res 202:121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz RA (2007) Leadership, authority, and women: a man’s challenge. In: Kellerman B, Rhode DL (eds) Women and leadership: the state of play and strategies for change. Wiley, San Francisco, pp 311–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Javor A, Koller M, Lee N, Chamberlain L, Ransmayr G (2013) Neuromarketing and consumer neuroscience: contributions to neurology. BMC Neurol 13:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong-Kang MJ, Rangel A, Camus M, Camerer CF (2011) Hypothetical and real choice differentially activate common valuation areas. J Neurosci 31:461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan J (2017) Five constraints on predicting behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knill DC, Pouget A (2004) The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci 27:712–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok P, Mostert P, de Lange FP (2017) Prior expectations induce prestimulus sensory templates. PNAS 114:10473–10478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2011) Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related potential. Annu Rev Psychol 62:621–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudan L, Leplin J (1991) Empirical equivalence and underdetermination. J Philos 88:449–472

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee N, Senior C, Butler M (2012a) The domain of organizational cognitive neuroscience: theoretical and empirical challenges. J Manag 38:921–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee N, Senior C, Butler M (2012b) Leadership research and cognitive neuroscience: the state of this union. Leadersh Q 2:213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee N, Chamberlain L, Brandes L (2018) Welcome to the jungle! The neuromarketing literature through the eyes of a newcomer. Eur J Mark 52:4–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K, Lippitt R, White RK (1939) Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates”. J Soc Psychol 10:269–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy ER, Illes J, Reiner PB (2008) Neuroethics of neuromarketing. J Consum Behav 7:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olteanu MDB (2015) Neuroethics and responsibility in conducting neuromarketing research. Neuroethics 8:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack RA (2011) Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: from reverse inference to large-scale decoding. Neuron 72:692–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proskovec AL, Wiesman AI, Wilson TW (2019) The strength of alpha and gamma oscillations predicts behavioral switch costs. NeuroImage 188:274–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian C, Di X (2011) Phase or amplitude? The relationship between ongoing and evoked neural activity. J Neurosci 31:10425–10426

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Senior C, Lee N, Butler M (2011) Organizational cognitive neuroscience. Organ Sci 22:804–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrington CS (1906) The integrative action of the nervous system. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Sporns O (2011) Networks in the brain. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Symmonds M, Moran RJ, Wright ND, Bossaerts P, Barnes G, Dolan RJ (2013) The chronometry of risk processing in the human cortex. Front Neurosci 7(146):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanston JE, Strother L (2017) Sex differences in the human visual system. J Neurosci Res 95:617–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venturella I, Gatti L, Vanutelli ME, Balconi M (2017) When brains dialogue by synchronized or unsynchronized languages. Hyperscanning applications to neuromanagement. Neuropsychol Trends 21:35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman DA, Wang D, Fenters V (2016) The added value of neuroscience methods in organizational research. Organ Res Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116642013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Balliet D, van Lange PA (2016) Reputation management: why and how gossip enhances generosity. Evol Hum Behav 37:193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C-Y, Lin C-P (2017) Magnetoencephalography study of different relationships among low- and high-frequency-band neural activities during the induction of peaceful and fearful audiovisual modalities among males and females. J Neurosci Res 95:176–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Braeutigam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Braeutigam, S., Lee, N., Senior, C. (2019). Organizational Cognitive Neuroscience: A New Frontier for Magnetoencephalography. In: Supek, S., Aine, C. (eds) Magnetoencephalography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62657-4_35-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62657-4_35-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62657-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62657-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics