Abstract
Organizational cognitive neuroscience is a rapidly developing field of research aimed at the neuroscientific study of human behavior in organizations. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a brief overview of the field and to elaborate on the role magnetoencephalography can play within this new area of research given its inherent advantages of noninvasively measuring macroscopic brain dynamics. Moreover, this chapter aims at elucidating some of the broader conceptual challenges as well as ethical considerations that have been raised by recent neuroscience-based approaches to the study of economically relevant behaviors; as such considerations will be relevant to neuroscientists as well as management scholars alike.
References
Alai M (2018) The underdetermination of theories and scientific realism. Axiomathes 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-018-9384-4
Ariely D, Berns GS (2010) Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:284–292
Bagozzi RP, Lee N (2019) Philosophical foundations of neuroscience in organizational research: functional and nonfunctional approaches. Organ Res Methods 22:299–331
Bass BM (1985) Leadership: good, better, best. Organ Dyn 13(3):26–40
Bastardoz N, van Vugt M (2019) The nature of followership: evolutionary analysis and review. Leadersh Q 30:81–95
Becker WJ, Cropanzano R, Sanfey AG (2011) Organizational neuroscience: taking organizational theory inside the neural black box. J Manag 37(4):933–961
Birnberg JG, Ganguly AR (2012) Is neuroaccounting waiting in the wings? An essay. Acc Organ Soc 37:1–13
Bompas A, Sumner P, Muthumumaraswamy SD, Singh KD, Gilchrist ID (2015) The contribution of pre-stimulus neural oscillatory activity to spontaneous response time variability. NeuroImage 107:34–45
Boyatzis RE, Rochford K, Jack AI (2014) Antagonistic neural networks underlying differentiated leadership roles. Front Hum Neurosci 8(114):1–15
Braeutigam S (2007) Endogenous context for choice making: a magnetoencephalographic study. In: International congress series, vol 1300. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 703–706
Braeutigam S (2012) Neural systems supporting and affecting economically relevant behavior. Neurosci Neuroecon 1:11–23
Braeutigam S, Rose SPR, Swithenby SJ, Ambler T (2004) The distributed neuronal systems supporting choice-making in real-life situations: differences between men and women when choosing groceries detected using magnetoencephalography. Eur J Neurosci 20:293–302
Braeutigam S, Lee N, Senior C (2017) A role for endogenous brain states in organizational research: moving toward a dynamic view of cognitive processes. Organ Res Methods 22:332–353
Breiter HC, Block M, Blood AJ, Calder B, Chamberlain L, Lee N, Livengood S, Mulhern FJ, Raman K, Schultz D, Stern DB (2015) Redefining neuromarketing as an integrated science of influence. Front Hum Neurosci 12(1073):1–7
Brown SBRE, Ridderinkhof KR (2009) Aging and the neuroeconomics of decision making: a review. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 9:365–379
Butler MJ, Lee N, Senior C (2017) Critical essay: organizational cognitive neuroscience drives theoretical progress, or: the curious case of the straw man murder. Hum Relat 70:1171–1190
Camerer CF (2008) Neuroeconomics: opening the grey box. Neuron 60:416–419
Case SS, Oetama-Paul AJ (2015) Brain biology and gendered discourse. Appl Psychol 64:338–378
Coy P (2006) The secret to Google’s success. Business Week 17 (URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2006-03-05/the-secret-to-googles-success)
da Silva FL (2013) EEG and MEG: relevance to neuroscience. Neuron 80:1112–1128
Dhar R, Simonson I (2003) The effect of forced choice on choice. J Mark Res 40:146–160
Fisher CE, Chin L, Klitzman R (2010) Defining neuromarketing: practices and professional challenges. Harv Rev Psychiatry 18:230–237
Gallo C (2006) How to run a meeting like Google. Business Week 27 (URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2006-09-26/how-to-run-a-meeting-like-google)
Halpern DF (2012) Sex differences in cognitive abilities, 4th edn. Psychology Press, New York
Hannah S, Schaubroeck JM, Peng AC (2015) Transforming followers’ value internalization and role self-efficacy: dual processes promoting performance and peer norm-enforcement. J Appl Psychol 101:252–266
Harrison GW (2008) Neuroeconomics: a critical reconsideration. Econ Philos 24:303–344
Hasler G (2012) Can the neuroeconomics revolution revolutionize psychiatry? Neurosci Behav Rev 36:64–78
Hebb DO (1949) The Organization of Behavior. Wiley, New York.
Hedgcock WM, Crowe DA, Leuthold AC, Georgopoulos AP (2010) A magnetoencephalography study of choice bias. Exp Brain Res 202:121–127
Heifetz RA (2007) Leadership, authority, and women: a man’s challenge. In: Kellerman B, Rhode DL (eds) Women and leadership: the state of play and strategies for change. Wiley, San Francisco, pp 311–328
Javor A, Koller M, Lee N, Chamberlain L, Ransmayr G (2013) Neuromarketing and consumer neuroscience: contributions to neurology. BMC Neurol 13:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-13
Jeong-Kang MJ, Rangel A, Camus M, Camerer CF (2011) Hypothetical and real choice differentially activate common valuation areas. J Neurosci 31:461–468
Kagan J (2017) Five constraints on predicting behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Knill DC, Pouget A (2004) The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci 27:712–719
Kok P, Mostert P, de Lange FP (2017) Prior expectations induce prestimulus sensory templates. PNAS 114:10473–10478
Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2011) Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related potential. Annu Rev Psychol 62:621–647
Laudan L, Leplin J (1991) Empirical equivalence and underdetermination. J Philos 88:449–472
Lee N, Senior C, Butler M (2012a) The domain of organizational cognitive neuroscience: theoretical and empirical challenges. J Manag 38:921–931
Lee N, Senior C, Butler M (2012b) Leadership research and cognitive neuroscience: the state of this union. Leadersh Q 2:213–218
Lee N, Chamberlain L, Brandes L (2018) Welcome to the jungle! The neuromarketing literature through the eyes of a newcomer. Eur J Mark 52:4–38
Lewin K, Lippitt R, White RK (1939) Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates”. J Soc Psychol 10:269–299
Murphy ER, Illes J, Reiner PB (2008) Neuroethics of neuromarketing. J Consum Behav 7:293–302
Olteanu MDB (2015) Neuroethics and responsibility in conducting neuromarketing research. Neuroethics 8:191–202
Poldrack RA (2011) Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: from reverse inference to large-scale decoding. Neuron 72:692–697
Proskovec AL, Wiesman AI, Wilson TW (2019) The strength of alpha and gamma oscillations predicts behavioral switch costs. NeuroImage 188:274–281
Qian C, Di X (2011) Phase or amplitude? The relationship between ongoing and evoked neural activity. J Neurosci 31:10425–10426
Senior C, Lee N, Butler M (2011) Organizational cognitive neuroscience. Organ Sci 22:804–815
Sherrington CS (1906) The integrative action of the nervous system. Yale University Press, New Haven
Sporns O (2011) Networks in the brain. MIT Press, Cambridge MA
Symmonds M, Moran RJ, Wright ND, Bossaerts P, Barnes G, Dolan RJ (2013) The chronometry of risk processing in the human cortex. Front Neurosci 7(146):1–11
Vanston JE, Strother L (2017) Sex differences in the human visual system. J Neurosci Res 95:617–625
Venturella I, Gatti L, Vanutelli ME, Balconi M (2017) When brains dialogue by synchronized or unsynchronized languages. Hyperscanning applications to neuromanagement. Neuropsychol Trends 21:35–51
Waldman DA, Wang D, Fenters V (2016) The added value of neuroscience methods in organizational research. Organ Res Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116642013
Wu J, Balliet D, van Lange PA (2016) Reputation management: why and how gossip enhances generosity. Evol Hum Behav 37:193–201
Yang C-Y, Lin C-P (2017) Magnetoencephalography study of different relationships among low- and high-frequency-band neural activities during the induction of peaceful and fearful audiovisual modalities among males and females. J Neurosci Res 95:176–188
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Braeutigam, S., Lee, N., Senior, C. (2019). Organizational Cognitive Neuroscience: A New Frontier for Magnetoencephalography. In: Supek, S., Aine, C. (eds) Magnetoencephalography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62657-4_35-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62657-4_35-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62657-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62657-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering