Skip to main content

Introduction: Management Heterogeneity in Asia

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Management History
  • 112 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the concept of diversity as it applies to Asia. It argues that, throughout the twentieth century, Asia was best thought of as a mix of jurisdictions with little in common other than shared geography. In prosecuting its case, the chapter implicitly proposes, insofar as approaches to management and governance are concerned, a thesis of partial regional convergence in the digital-age era. However, the bulk of the chapter’s narrative is about distinct jurisdictions. As such, the work does not devote substantial analytic attention to convergence but rather gives a thumbnail sketch of the management blueprints of exemplar countries as a means of creating context for this volume’s other more focused chapters, the next of which does pertain to convergence. Another key objective is to introduce subsequent chapters in this volume that, following Chapter 2, address in detail management philosophy and practice in individual Asian countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For exposition purposes, these categories are somewhat cut-down in nature and thus exclude from consideration important countries on the edge of the region such as India – and Indian subcontinent countries such as Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka – and economically smaller countries within Asia – such as Malaysia, Myanmar (formerly Burma), Laos, the Philippines, and Vietnam.

  2. 2.

    As distinct from its national culture, which as noted, is the analytic preoccupation of institutionalists.

  3. 3.

    This term does not refer to use of the Internet.

  4. 4.

    Recall, that for most of the pro-war years, the Liberal Democratic government was aggressively pro-business in its orientation.

  5. 5.

    Indications are that unemployment is diminishing in spite of it being more difficult to dismiss employees. For example, in the immediate aftermath of the change, in January 2004, the nation’s official unemployment rate dipped below 5% for the first time in 3 years (Mizushima 2004, p. 6).

  6. 6.

    Since South Korea became a republic in 1948, its various administrations have been described in chronological order. Park Chung-hee was the third president since Federation and therefore led the third republic.

  7. 7.

    Although – according to Lee – 2016 – not necessarily – the views of individual union members.

  8. 8.

    As will be explained, during the Maoist era, unions in China did not fulfill the same role as those in the West.

  9. 9.

    Perhaps the word “administration” is more appropriate than “management” in the case of China.

  10. 10.

    Not, of course, literally because of DNA but nonetheless often inculcated over hundreds or thousands of years.

References

  • Abegglen JC (1959) The Japanese factory. Aspects of its social organisation. Free Press, Glenco

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki M (1987) The Japanese firm in transition. In: Yamamura K, Yasuba Y (eds) The political economy of Japan. Vol. 1: The domestic transformation. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki M (1988) Information incentives and bargaining in the Japanese Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bamber GJ, Davis EM (2001) In: Bamber GJ, Park F, Lee C, Ross PK, Broadbent K (eds) (2001) Employment relations in the Asia Pacific: changing approaches. Allen and Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamber G, Leggett C (2001) Changing employment relations in the Asia-Pacific region. Int J Manpow 22(4):300–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamber GJ, Lansbury RD, Wailes N, Wright C (2016) International and Comparative Employment Relations National Regulation, Global Changes Sixth Edition. Sage Books. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry M, Wilkinson A (2011) Research handbook of comparative employment relations. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benson J, Zhu Y (1999) Markets, firms and workers: the transformation of human resource management in Chinese state owned enterprises. Hum Resour Manag J 9(4):58–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs C (2005) Strikes and lockouts in the antipodes: neo-liberal convergence in Australia and New Zealand. N Z J Employ Relat 30(3)18–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan CKC (2010) The challenge of labour in China. Strikes and the changing regime in global factories. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang-Hee L (2006) In: Hall R (ed) Industrial relations: a current review. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin D (2005) The encroaching federal industrial relations system. http://www.australianreview.net/digest/2005/09/chin.html

  • Cooke FL (2016) Employment relations in China. In: Bamber J, Lansbury R, Wailes N, Wright C (eds) International and comparative employment relations, 6th edn. Allen and Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming WE (2000) The new economics for industry, government, education, 2nd edn. MIT Centre for Advanced Educational Services, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Drakeley S (2005) The history of Indonesia. Greenwood, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford M (2013) Violent Industrial Protest in Indonesia: Cultural Phenomenon or Legacy of an Authoritarian Past?. In: Gall G. (eds) New Forms and Expressions of Conflict at Work 171–189. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhart B (2008) Cross-cultural managerial research. Assumptions, evidence, and suggested directions. Int J Cross-cult Manag 8(3):259–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon A (1985) The evolution of labor relations in Japan: heavy industry. 1853–1955. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gould AM (2010) Americanisation of Australian Workplaces. Labor History, 51(3):363–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould A (2014) Les relations d’emploi et le marché du travail: similarité apparaissant dans six pays asiatiques (Employment relations and labor markets: emerging similarity in six Asian countries). In: Thwaites JD (ed) La Mondialisation: origines, développement et effets. Les Presses de l’Université Laval, Québec

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory D, Johnson R, Pratt G, Watts MJ, Whatmore S (2009) Asian miracle: the tigers. The Dictionary of human geography, 5th edn. Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanami T (2004) The changing labor market, industrial relations and labor policy. Japan Labor Rev 1(1):10–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1980/2003) Cultures consequences, 1st edn/2nd edn. Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkster I (2001) Japanese Industrialization – Historical and Cultural Perspectives. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • http://faostat.fao.org/faostat/help-copyright/copyright-e.htm

  • http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=7925064

  • Jackson T (2002) International management of people across cultures: valuing people differently. Hum Resour Manag 41(4):45–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaoki K (1991) Shigoto no keizaigaku (the economics of work). Toyo Keizai, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaoki K (1995) The economics of work in Japan. LTCB International Library Foundation, Tokyo, English translation of Koike (1991b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaple D (1994) Dream of a red factory: the legacy of high Stalinism in China. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz HC, Darbishire O (2000) Converging divergences: worldwide changes in employment relations. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman B (2011) Comparative employment relations: institutional and neo institutional theories. In: Barry, Wilkinson (eds) Research handbook of comparative employment relations. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller B, Kirsch A (2016) Employment relations in Germany. In: Bamber J, Lansbury R, Wailes N, Wright C (eds) International and comparative employment relations, 6th edn. Allen and Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Korea International Labor Foundation 2006: https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/koilaf-korea-international-labour-foundation

  • Labor Force Survey (2002) Japanese Ministry of Public Management, home affairs, posts and telecommunications. Report on the Special Survey of the Labor Force

    Google Scholar 

  • Labor Statistics Team, South Korea Ministry of Labor (2006) Korea Labor Rev 2(9), July–Aug

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee BH (2016) Employment relations in South Korea. In: Bamber J, Lansbury R, Wailes N, Wright C (eds) International and comparative employment relations, 6th edn. Allen and Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Martyn T (2005) Industrial relations: reform or vandalism? www.jss.org.au/documents/IRCritique2.pdf

  • Ng SH, Warner M (1998) China’s trade unions and management. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikkei Asian review. https://asia.nikkei.com/ Accessed on 16 January, 2020

  • Park F, Park YB (2000) In: Bamber GJ, Park F, Lee C, Ross PK, Broadbent K (eds) Employment relations in the Asia Pacific: changing approaches. Allen and Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik D (1997) The paradoxes of the successful state. Eur Econ Rev 41(3/4):411–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz A (1997) Indonesia after Suharto. Foreign Affairs 76, July/August

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwarno S, Elliott J (2000) In: Bamber GJ, Park F, Lee C, Ross PK, Broadbent K (eds) Employment relations in the Asia Pacific: changing approaches. Allen and Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki H, Kubo K, Kazuya O (2016) Employment relations in Japan. In: Bamber J, Lansbury R, Wailes N, Wright C (eds) International and comparative employment relations, 6th edn. Allen and Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Tackney CT (2000) In: Bamber GJ, Park F, Lee C, Ross PK, Broadbent K (eds) Employment relations in the Asia Pacific: changing approaches. Allen and Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Takafusa N, Konosuke O (eds) (1999) Economic History of Japan 1914–1955 – A Dual Structure. Oxford University Press, Takafusa Nakamura

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelan KA (2014) Varieties of liberalisation and the new politics of social solidarity. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of State (2017) http://www.state.gov/Bureauofeastasiaandpacificaffairs

  • Yuan LQ (1990) Zhongguo Laodong Jingji Shi (The history of Chinese Labor Economy). Beijing Economic Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JG (2005) Institutional achievements and future prospects of collective bargaining in China. Unpublished paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y, Warner M (2000) In: Bamber G, Park F, Chanwon L, Ross P, Broadbent K (eds) Employment relations in Asia Pacific: changing approaches. Allen and Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony M. Gould .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Gould, A.M. (2020). Introduction: Management Heterogeneity in Asia. In: Muldoon, J., Gould, A., McMurray, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Management History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62348-1_112-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62348-1_112-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62348-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62348-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics