Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spiritual Followership: Emerging Conceptualizations

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Spirituality and Fulfillment

Abstract

To truly understand spiritual followership, a broad appreciation of prerequisite theories of leadership and followership is necessary. Layer upon layer, spiritual followership emerges from the conceptual and empirical work that preceded it. Spiritual followership is not simply the “flip side” of spiritual leadership, but lays claim to its own unique assumptions. The authors construct a definition of spiritual followership and suggest why doing so has proven so challenging, hitherto. Spiritual followership functions as a process, most notably operating in its teaching and learning relationship with leadership. The spiritual follower is emancipated, empowered, and courageous. Despite espousing a number of positive and spiritual values, the spiritual follower is not romanticized as a perfect example of humanity, but one who struggles, as others do, in juggling loyalty with maintaining a work-life balance or resisting unethical and unwise leader decisions. He or she is nevertheless armed with certain approaches and beliefs, and a critical disposition to question, regardless of any imbalance of power in the leader-follower relationship. The chapter concludes that educational providers and workplaces would benefit from developing the skills, values, and perspectives of followership and, specifically, spiritual followership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agho A (2009) Perspectives of senior-level execution on effective followership and leadership. J Leadersh Org Stud 16(2):159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcorn D (1992) Dynamic followership: empowerment at work. Manag Q 33:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M, Blom M (2015) Less followership, less leadership? An inquiry into the basic but seemingly forgotten downsides of leadership. M@n@gment 18(3):266–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio B, Reichard R (2008) The rise of authentic followership. In: Riggio R, Chaleff I, Lipman-Blumen J (eds) The art of followership: how great followers create great leaders and organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 325–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio B, Walumbwa F, Weber T (2009) Leadership: current theories, research, and future directions. Annu Rev Psychol 60:421–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker S (2007) Followership: the theoretical foundation of a contemporary construct. J Leadersh Org Stud 14(1):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardos G (2013) Trials and tribulations. Politics as justice at the ICTY. World Affairs 176(3):15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass B (1985) Leadership and performance beyond expectations. The Free Press, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass M, Stogdill R (1990) Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: theory, research and managerial applications, 3rd edn. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Billot J, West D, Khong L, Skorobohacz C, Roxa T, Murray S, Gayle B (2013) Followership in higher education: academic teachers and their formal leaders. Teach Learn Inq 1(2):91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjugstad K, Thach E, Thompson K, Morris A (2006) A fresh look at followership: a model for matching followership and leadership styles. J Behav Appl Manag 7:304–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer A (2014) Leadership coaching and followership. An important equation. Springer Science and Business Media, Dordrecht, pp 89–104

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brower H, Schoorman F, Tan H (2000) A model of relational leadership: the integration of trust and leader-member exchange. Leadersh Q 11(2):227–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns J (1978) Leadership. Harper & Row Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson J, Tesluk P, Marrone J (2007) Shared leadership in teams: an investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Acad Manag J 55:1217–1234

    Google Scholar 

  • Carsten M, Uhl-Bien M (2013) Ethical followership: an examination of followership beliefs and crimes of obedience. J Leadersh Org Stud 20(1):49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsten M, Uhl-Bien M, West B, Patera J, McGregor R (2010) Exploring social constructions of followership: a qualitative study. Leadersh Q 21:543–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh G, Hanson B, Hanson K, Hinojos J (2004) Toward a spirituality for the contemporary organization : implications for work, family and society. In: Pava M, Primeaux P (eds) Spiritual intelligence at work: meaning, metaphor and morals: research in ethical issues in organizations, vol 5. Elsevier, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaleff I (1995) The courageous follower: standing up to and for our leaders. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaston J, Lips-Wiersma M (2015) When spirituality meets hierarchy: leader spirituality as a double-edged sword. J Manag Spritual Relig 12(2):111–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Yang C (2012) The impact of spiritual leadership on organizational citizenship behavior: a multi-sample analysis. J Bus Ethics 105(1):107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicero L, Pierro A, Van Knippenberg D (2010) Leadership and uncertainty: how role ambiguity affects the relationship between leader group prototypically and leadership effectiveness. Br J Manag 21(2):411–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson D (2006) Rethinking followership: a post-structuralist analysis of follower identities. Leadersh Q 17:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conzelmann J (2017) Employee perspectives: the lack of servant leadership in organizations. In: Davis CJ (ed) Servant leadership and followership, Palgrave studies in leadership and followership, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham., pp 155–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossman J (2010) Conceptualising spiritual leadership in secular organizational contexts and its relation to transformational, servant and environmental leadership. Leadersh Org Dev 31(7):596–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman J (2011) Environmental and spiritual leadership: tracing the synergies from an organizational perspective. J Bus Ethics 103(4):553–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman B, Crossman J (2011) Conceptualising followership: a review of the literature. Leadership 7:481–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman J, Doshi V (2015) When Not knowing is a virtue: a business ethics perspective. J Bus Ethics 131:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer D, Tyler T (2005) A matter of intragroup status: the importance of respect for the viability of groups. Res Manag Groups Teams 7:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dent E, Higgins M, Wharf D (2005) Spirituality and leadership: an empirical review of definitions, distractions, and embedded assumptions. Leadersh Q 16(5):625–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon R (2007) Respect. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Viewed 27 Jan 2009. http://plato.standford.edu/entries/respect/

  • Dixon G, Westbrook J (2003) Followers revealed. Eng Manag J 15:19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drenth P, Koopman P (1992) Duration and complexity in strategic decision-making. In: Heller FA (ed) Decision-making and leadership. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 58–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvir T, Avolio B, Shamir B (2002) Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: a field experiment. Acad Manag J 45:735–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle E, Lord R (1997) Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Acad Manag 40:988–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Epitropaki O, Sy T, Martin R, Tram-Quon S, Topakas A (2013) Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. Leadersh Q 24:858–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairholm G (1996) Spiritual leadership: fulfilling whole-self needs at work. Leadersh Org Dev J 17(5):11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairholm G (1997) Capturing the heart of leadership: spirituality and community in the new American workplace. Greenwood Publishing Group Incorporated Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry L (2003) Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadersh Q 14:693–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry L, Vitucci S, Cedillo M (2005) Spiritual leadership and army transformation: theory, measurement and establishing a baseline. Leadersh Q 16(5):835–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frye J, Kisselburgh L, Butts D (2007) Embracing spiritual followership. Commun Stud 58(3):243–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galvin B, Balkundi P, Waldman D (2010) Spreading the word: the role of surrogates in charismatic leadership processes. Acad Manag Rev 35(3):477–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons P (1992) Impacts of organizational evolution on leadership roles and behaviors. Hum Relat 45:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover S, Hannum K (2008) Learning respect: showing and earning respect is crucial for leaders. Leadersh Action 28(4):3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn M, Raffaelli R (2010) Uncovering mechanisms of theory development in an academic field: lessons from leadership research. Acad Manag Ann 4:359–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffee R, Jones G (2006) Why should anyone be lead by you: what it takes to be an authentic leader. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon L, Rees C, Ker J, Cleland J (2015) Dimensions, discourses and differences: trainees conceptualizing health care leadership and followership. Med Educ 49:1248–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graen G, Uhl-Bien M (1995) Relationship-based approach to leadership. Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadersh Q 6:219–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant A (2012) Leading with meaning: beneficiary contact, prosocial impact, and the performance effects of transformational leadership. Acad Manag J 55:458–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant A, Gino F, Hofmann D (2011) Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: the role of employee proactivity. Acad Manag J 54:528–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf R (1977/2002) Servant leadership: a journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf R (1991) Servant leadership: a journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam A, Reicher S, Millard K, McDonald R (2014) ‘Happy to be of service’: the Yale archive as a window into the engaged followership of participants in Milgram’s ‘obedience’ experiments. Br J Soc Psychol 54(1):55–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller F (1992) Decision-making and the utilization of competence. In: Heller FA (ed) Decision-making and leadership. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 71–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson D, Liden R, Glibkowski B, Chaudry A (2009) LMX differentiation: a multilevel review and examination of antecedents and outcomes. Leadersh Q 20(4):517–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez M (2008) Promoting stewardship behavior in organizations: a leadership model. J Bus Ethics 80:121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller N, Day D (2003) LMX and teamwork: the challenges and opportunities of diversity. In: Graen G (ed) Dealing with diversity. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, pp 25–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs K (2007) Follower propensity to commit crimes of obedience. J Leadersh Org Stud 14(1):69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg M (2008) Social identity processes and the empowerment of followers. In: Riggio R, Chaleff I, Lipman-Blumen J (eds) The art of followership: how great followers create great leaders and organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 267–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander E, Webb W (1955) Leadership, followership, and friendship: an analysis of peer nominations. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 50(2):163–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsfall C (2001) Team leaders make a difference in raising achievement. In: Horsfall C (ed) Leadership issues: raising achievement. Learning and Skills Development Agency, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell J, Costley D (2008) Understanding behaviours for effective leaderhsip. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, pp 25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J Costley D (2006) Understanding behaviors for effective leadership, 2nd edn., Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter S, Bedell-Avers K, Mumford M (2009) Impact of situational framing and complexity on charismatic, ideological and pragmatic leaders: investigation using a computer simulation. Leadersh Q 20(3):383–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaussi K, Stefanovich A, Devlin P (2008) Effective followership for creativity and innovation. In: Riggio R, Chaleff I, Lipman-Blumen J (eds) The art of followership: how great followers create great leaders and organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 291–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C (2007) Ethics in the workplace: tools and tactics for organizational transformation. Sage, Thousand Oaks/London/ New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones S (2014) Distributed leadership: a critical analysis. Leadership 10(2):129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junker N, van Dick R (2014) Implicit theories in organizational settings: a systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories. Leadersh Q 25:1154–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karadag E (2009) Spiritual leadership and organizational culture: a study of structural equation modelling educational sciences. Theory Pract 9(3):1391–1405

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman B (2008) Followership: how followers are creating change and changing leaders. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley R (1988) Praise of followers. Harv Bus Rev 66(6):142–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley R (1992) The power of followership. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley R (1998) Followership in a leadership world. In: Spears L (ed) Insights on leadership: service, stewardship, spirit and servant leadership. Wiley, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly R (2008) Rethinking followership. In: Riggio R, Chaleff I, Lipman-Blumen J (eds) The art of followership. Doubleday, New York, pp 5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoll M, Schyns B, Peterson L (2017) How the influence of unethical leaders on followers is affected by their implicit followership theories. J Leadersh Org Stud 24(4):450–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohles J, Bligh M, Carsten M (2012) A follower-centric approach to the vision integration process. Leadersh Q 23:476–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepine M, Zhang Y, Crawford E, Rich B (2016) Turning their pain to gain: charismatic leader influence on follower stress appraisal and performance. Acad Manag J 59:1036–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao Y, Yang Z, Wang M, Kwan H (2016) Work–family effects of LMX: the moderating role of work–home segmentation preferences. Leadersh Q 27:671–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman-Blumen J (2008) Following toxic leaders: in search of posthumous praise. In: Riggio R, Chaleff I, Lipman-Blumen J (eds) The art of followership: how great followers create great leaders and organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 181–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Litano M, Major D, Landers R, Streets V, Bass B (2016) A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between leader-member exchange and work-family experiences. Leadersh Q 27:802–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord R, Brown D, Harvey J, Hall R (2001) Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions. Leadersh Q 12:311–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroosis J (2008) Leadership: a partnership in reciprocal following. In: Riggio R, Chaleff I, Lipman-Blumen J (eds) The art of followership: how great followers create great leaders and organizations. Wiley, San Francisco, pp 17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra A, Smith B, Dixon A, Robertson B (2006) Distributed leadership in teams: the network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadersh Q 17:232–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meindl J (1995) The omance of leadership as a follower – centric theory: a social constructivist approach. Leadersh Q 6(3):329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murji S (2015) Taking followership education to the next level. J Leadersh Educ 14(3):168–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mushonga S, Torrance C (2008) Assessing the relationship between followership and the big five factor model of personality. Rev Bus Res 8:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Northouse P (2007) Leadership: theory and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Offerman L, Scuderi N (2007) Sharing leadership: who, what, when and why. In: Shamir B, Pillai R, Bligh M, Uhl-Bien M (eds) Follower-Centred perspectives on leadership. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Omilion-Hodges L, Baker C (2013) Contextualizing LMX within the workgroup: the effects of LMX and justice on relationship quality and resource sharing among peers. Leadersh Q 24:935–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker Follett M (1970) The teacher-student relation. Adm Sci Q 15(2):137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe B (2017) Followership and the samurai. J Leadersh Stud 10(3):54–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper M (2015) Followership, deity and leadership. J Theory Soc Behav 46(2):211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter E, Rosenbach W (2006) Followers as partners: the spirit of leadership. In: Rosenbach WE, Taylor RL (eds) Contemporary issues in leadership. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Reave L (2005) Spiritual values and practices related to leadership effectiveness. Leadersh Q 16(5):655–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggio R, Chaleff I, Lipman-Blumen J (2008) The art of followership: how great followers create great leaders and organizations. Wiley, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter B, Lord R (2007) The impact of previous leaders on the evaluation of new leaders: an alternative to prototype matching. J Appl Psychol 92:1683–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rost J (2008) Chapter 5. Followership: an outmoded concept. In: Riggio R, Chaleff I, Lipman-Blumen J (eds) The art of followership: how great followers create great leaders and organizations. Wiley, San Francisco, pp 53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider M, Somers M (2006) Organizations as complex adaptive systems: implications of complexity theory for leadership research. Leadersh Q 17:351–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim C, Castro S, Cogliser C (1999) Leader-member exchange (lmx) research: a comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. Leadersh Q 10(1):51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sendjaya S, Sarros J, Santora J (2008) Defining and measuring servant leadership behaviour in organizations. J Manag Stud 45(2):402–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir R (2004), Between self-regulation and the alien tort claims act: On the contested concept of corporate social resposibility, Law & Society Review, 38(4):635–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir B (2007) From passive recipients to active co-producers: follower’s roles in the leadership process. In: Shamir B, Bligh RPM, Uhl-Bien M (eds) Follower-centered perspectives on leadership. Information Age, Greenwich, pp ix–xxxix

    Google Scholar 

  • Shawn-Burke C, Sims D, Lazzara E, Salas E (2007) Trust in leadership: a multi-level review and integration. Leadersh Q 18(6):606–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikula J, Sikula A (2005) Spirituality and service learning. In: Hoppe S, Speck B (eds) Spirituality in higher education, new directions for teaching and learning, San Francisco, 104, Winter. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. pp 75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon AF (2006) Leadership and managing ambivalence. Consult Psychol J: Prac Res 58(2):91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spears L (ed) (1998) The power of servant leadership: essays by Robert K. Greenleaf. Berett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears R, Ellemers N, Doosje J (2005) Let me count the ways in which I respect thee: does competence compensate or compromise lack of liking from the group? Eur J Soc Psychol 35(2):263–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stech E (2008) A new leadership – Followership paradigm. In: Riggio R, Chaleff I, Lipman-Blumen J (eds) The art of followership: how great followers create great leaders and organizations. Wiley, San Francisco, pp 41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Steger J, Manners G, Zimmerer T (1982) Following the leader: how to link management style to subordinate personalities. Manag Rev 10:22–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbauer R, Renn W, Taylor R, Njoroge P (2014) Ethical leadership and the followers’ moral judgment: the role of the followers’ perceived accountability and self-leadership. J Bus Ethics 120:381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sy T (2010) What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 11(3):73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse H, Dasborough M, Ashkanasy N (2008) A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationship at work. Leadersh Q 19(4):195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien M (2006) Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadersh Q 17(6):654–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien M, Marion R (2009) Complexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: a meso model. Leadersh Q 20:631–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien M, Pillai R (2007) The romance of leadership and the social construction of followership. In: Shamir B, Pillai R, Bligh M, Uhl-Bien M (eds) Follower-centered perspectives’ on leadership. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, pp 187–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Knippenberg D, Sitkin S (2013) A critical assessment of charismatic transformational leadership research: back to the drawing board? Acad Manag Ann 7:1–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt M (2006) Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 10(4):354–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western S (2008) Leadership: a critical text. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wortman M (1982) Strategic management and changing leader-follower roles. J Appl Behav Sci 18:371–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl G (2006) Leadership in organizations. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaleznik A (1965) The dynamics of subordinacy. Harv Bus Rev 43:119–131

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International College of Management (ICMS), Sydney, Australia

    Joanna Elizabeth Crossman

  2. University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

    Joanna Elizabeth Crossman & Brian Crossman

Authors
  1. Joanna Elizabeth Crossman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian Crossman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna Elizabeth Crossman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Robertson School of Government, Regent University, Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA

    Gary E. Roberts

  2. International College of Management (ICMS), Sydney, Australia

    Joanna Elizabeth Crossman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Crossman, J.E., Crossman, B. (2018). Spiritual Followership: Emerging Conceptualizations. In: Roberts, G., Crossman, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Spirituality and Fulfillment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62163-0_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation