Encyclopedia of Sexuality and Gender

Living Edition
| Editors: Amy D. Lykins

Juvenile Sexual Offending

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59531-3_30-1
  • 122 Downloads

Synonyms

Definition

Juveniles who sexually offend (JWSO) are youth who have committed a chargeable sexual offense. In developmental terms, JWSO are believed to be mature enough to be held responsible for their actions (i.e., they have reached an age where they are no longer considered children), but they are not held accountable to the same extent as adults (Barbaree & Marshall, 2006). The exact acts that constitute sexual offenses and ages at which offenders are considered juveniles (versus children or adults) vary within and across national contexts.

Introduction

Although juveniles have committed sexual offenses throughout history, contemporary society has been marked by an elevated interest in, and fear of, JWSO. In an analysis of books published since the early 1900s and digitized by Google Books, Harris and Socia (2016) found that usage of the term “juvenile sex offender” exhibited two small...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. (2017). Practice guidelines for the assessment, treatment, and intervention with adolescents who have engaged in sexually abusive behavior. Beaverton, OR: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (2006). An introduction to the juvenile sex offender: Terms, concepts, and definitions. In H. E. Barbaree & W. L. Marshall (Eds.), The Juvenile sex offender (2nd ed., pp. 1–18). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, J. V., & Hicks, S. J. (2003). Juvenile sexual offenders: Characteristics, interventions, and policy issues. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 397–410.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07321.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Caldwell, M. F. (2010). Study characteristics and recidivism base rates in juvenile sex offender recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 197–212.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X08330016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Caldwell, M. F., & Dickinson, C. (2009). Sex offender registration and recidivism risk in juvenile sexual offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(6), 941–956.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaffin, M. (2008). Our minds are made up – don’t confuse us with the facts: Commentary on policies concerning children with sexual behavior problems and juvenile sex offenders. Child Maltreatment, 13, 110–121.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559508314510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaffin, M., & Bonner, B. (1998). Don’t shoot, we’re your children: Have we gone too far in our treatment of adolescent sexual abusers and children with sexual behavior problems? Child Maltreatment, 3, 314–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dwyer, R. G., & Letourneau, E. J. (2011). Juveniles who sexually offend: Recommending a treatment program and level of care. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 20, 413–429.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2011.03.007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Finkelhor, D., Ormrod, R., & Chaffin, M. (2009). Juveniles who commit sexual offenses against minors. OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin, 1–12.Google Scholar
  10. Hanson, R. K., Gordon, A., Harris, A. J. R., Marques, J. K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V. L., et al. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris, A. J., & Socia, K. M. (2016). What’s in a name? Evaluating the effects of the “sex offender” label on public opinions and beliefs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28, 660–678.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214564391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris, A. J., Walfield, S. M., Shields, R. T., & Letourneau, E. J. (2016). Collateral consequences of juvenile sex offender registration and notification: Results from a survey of treatment providers. Sexual Abuse, 28, 770–790.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1079063215574004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kettrey, H. H., & Lipsey, M. W. (2018). The effects of specialized treatment on the recidivism of juvenile sex offenders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14(3), 361–387.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim, B., Benekos, P. J., & Merlo, A. V. (2016). Sex offender recidivism revisited: Review of recent meta-analyses on the effects of sex offender treatment. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 17, 105–117.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1524838014566719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Letourneau, E. J., Bandyopadhyay, D., Armstrong, K. S., & Sinha, D. (2010). Do sex offender registration and notification requirements deter juvenile sex crimes? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 553–569.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0093854810363562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Letourneau, E. J., Bandyopadhyay, D., Sinha, D., & Armstrong, K. S. (2009). The influence of sex offender registration on juvenile sexual recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 136–153.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0887403408327917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Letourneau, E. J., Harris, A. J., Shields, R. T., Walfield, S. M., Ruzicka, A. E., Buckman, C., et al. (2018). Effects of juvenile sex offender registration on adolescent well-being: An empirical examination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(1), 105.  https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Letourneau, E. J., & Miner, M. H. (2005). Juvenile sex offenders: A case against the legal and clinical status quo. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 293–312.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11194-005-5059-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lösel, F., & Schmucker, M. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 117–146.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-004-6466-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G. F., Burchard, B. L., Zeoli, S., & Ellerby, L. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American Survey. Brandon, VT: The Safer Society Press.Google Scholar
  21. Miner, M., Borduin, C., Prescott, D., Bovensmann, H., Schepker, R., Du Bois, R., et al. (2006). Standards of care for juvenile sexual offenders of the International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders. Sexual Offender Treatment, 1(3), 1–7.Google Scholar
  22. National Adolescent Perpetrator Network. (1993). Revised report from the National Task Force on Juvenile Sexual Offending. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 44, 1–115.Google Scholar
  23. Pullman, L., & Seto, M. C. (2012). Assessment and treatment of adolescent sexual offenders: Implications of recent research on generalist versus specialist explanations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36, 203–209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reitzel, L. R., & Carbonell, J. L. (2006). The effectiveness of sexual offender treatment for juveniles as measured by recidivism: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse, 18, 401–421.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F107906320601800407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Salerno, J. M., Najdowski, C. J., Stevenson, M. C., Wiley, T. R., Bottoms, B. L., Vaca Jr., R., et al. (2010). Psychological mechanisms underlying support for juvenile sex offender registry laws: Prototypes, moral outrage, and perceived threat. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(1), 58–83.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sandler, J. C., Letourneau, E. J., Vandiver, D. M., Shields, R. T., & Chaffin, M. (2017). Juvenile sexual crime reporting rates are not influenced by juvenile sex offender registration policies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23, 131–140.  https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seto, M. C., & Lalumiere, M. L. (2010). What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 526–575.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Walker, D. F., McGovern, S. K., Poey, E. L., & Otis, K. E. (2004). Treatment effectiveness for male adolescent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis and review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13, 281–293.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J070v13n03_14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Winokur, M. A., Rozen, D., Batchelder, K., & Valentine, D. (2006). Juvenile sexual offender treatment: A systematic review of evidence-based research. Fort Collins, CO: Social Work Research Center, Colorado State University.Google Scholar
  30. Winterdyk, J. (2002). Juvenile justice systems: International perspectives (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clemson UniversityClemsonUSA