Exergy and Life Cycle-Based Analysis

  • Niloufar Salehi
  • Morteza Mahmoudi
  • Alireza Bazargan
  • Gordon McKay
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history


The concept of exergy, defined as “the maximum useful work which can be extracted from a system as it reversibly comes into equilibrium with its environment,” can be used in various fields such as industrial ecology or environmental engineering, in order to use energy more efficiently and minimize harmful impacts on the environment.

Since the late 1990s, the applications of exergy analysis have been extended into the realm of resource and environmental analysis, for developing integrated analytical frameworks. Not only do the merits of this framework make it an interesting analytical tool for researchers, but also, exergy analysis can be used as a decision-making tool for policy makers for making sustainable choices.

For example, the impacts of resource depletion are an integral part of environmental analysis; yet a major challenge in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) is to come up with methods to quantify resource depletion. Due to the fact that exergy provides a natural basis for assessing the efficiency of resources use, it has been shown that exergoenvironmental analysis is a more appropriate instrument to quantify the environmental problem of natural resource depletion. Moreover, with the aid of exergetic LCA, the immediate estimation of the exergetic efficiency of processes is provided as well as the comparison of different environmental impacts of different options.

This chapter presents a summary of exergoenvironmental analysis, and further, it will discuss methods to apply exergoenvironmental analysis, namely, cumulative exergy consumption (CExC), exergetic life cycle analysis (ELCA), and cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment (CEENE). Finally, applications in improving resource efficiency and development of sustainable technologies and processes will be discussed.


  1. Bhat IK, Prakash R (2009) LCA of renewable energy for electricity generation systems – a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13:1067–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen B, Dai J, Sciubba E (2014) Ecological accounting for China based on extended exergy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 37:334–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Woess-gallasch S (2009) Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems : key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:434–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Curran MA (2012) Life cycle assessment handbook. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dewulf J et al (2008) Critical review exergy : its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology. Environ Sci Technol 42(7):2221–2232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewulf J et al (2016) Cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment ( CEENE ): a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment method for resource accounting. Environ Sci Technol 41:8477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dincer I, Rosen MA (2012) Exergy energy, environment and sustainable development, 1st edn. Elsevier Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Frangopoulos CA (2009) Exergy, energy systems analysis and optimization- vol I: exergy and thermodynamic analysis. EOLSS PublishersGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibs JW (1873) A method of geometrical representation of the thermodynamic properties of substance by means of surfaces. Trans Connect Acad Arts ScienceGoogle Scholar
  10. Guinee JB et al (2011) Life cycle assessment : past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):90–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirs GG (2002) The value of the exergetic life cycle assessment besides the LCA. Energy Convers Manag 43:1417–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huysman S, Schaubroeck T, Dewulf J (2015) Exergy and cumulative exergy use analysis. In: Dewulf J, De Meester S, Alvarenga R (eds) Sustainability assessment of renewables-based products: methods and case studies (illustrate). Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  13. Joint Research Centre-Institute for Environment and Sustainability (JRC-IES) (2010) ILCD handbook international reference life cycle data system. Publications Office, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  14. Matos S, Hall J (2007) Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain : the case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology. J Oper Manag 25:1083–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maxwell JC (1871) Theory of heat. Longman Green, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Meyer L, Tsatsaronis G, Buchgeister J, Schebek L (2009) Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluation of the environmental impact of energy conversion systems. Energy 34(1):75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morosuk T, Tsatsaronis G, Koroneos C (2016) Environmental impact reduction using exergy-based methods. J Clean Prod 118(x):118–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nielfa A, Cano R, Vinot M, Fernández E, Fdz-Polanco M (2015) Anaerobic digestion modeling of the main components of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Process Saf Environ Prot 94:180–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Novick D (1959) The federal budget as an indicator of government intentions and the implications of intentions. RAND Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  20. Rausand M, Kawauchi Y (1999) Life cycle cost (LCC) analysis in oil and chemical process industries. Toyo Engineering Corp, ChibaGoogle Scholar
  21. Rocco MV, Colombo E, Sciubba E (2014) Advances in exergy analysis: a novel assessment of the extended exergy accounting method. Appl Energy 113:1405–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scientific Application International Corporation (SAIC) (2006) Life cycle assessment: principles and practiceGoogle Scholar
  23. Sciubba E (2001) Beyond thermoeconomics ? The concept of extended exergy accounting and its application to the analysis and design of thermal systems. Exergy, Int J 1(2):68–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sciubba E (2011) A revised calculation of the econometric factors ˛ - and ˇ for the extended exergy accounting method. Ecol Model 222(4):1060–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sciubba E (2013) Can an environmental indicator valid both at the local and global scales be derived on a thermodynamic basis ? Ecol Indic 29:125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sciubba E, Wall G (2007) A brief commented history of exergy from the beginnings to 2004. Int J Thermodyn 10(1):1–26Google Scholar
  27. Sciubba E, Bastianoni S, Tiezzi E (2008) Exergy and extended exergy accounting of very large complex systems with an application to the province of Siena, Italy. J Environ Manag 86(2):372–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Serra L, Cuadra CT (2009) Structural theory of thermodynamics. In: Frangopoulos CA (ed) Exergy, energy system analysis and optimization, vol II, EOLSS Publications, pp 82–104Google Scholar
  29. Szargut JAN (1987) Analysis of cumulative exergy consumption. Int J Energy Res 11:541–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Szargut JAN, Morris DR (1987) Cumulative exergy consumption and cumulative degree of perfection of chemical processes. Int J Energy Res 11:245–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tiat PG (1868) Sketch of thermodynamic. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  32. Tsatsaronis G, Cziesla (2009) Strengths and limitation of exergy analysis. In Energy systems analysis and optimization, vol I: exergy and thermodynamic analysis. EOLSS PublishersGoogle Scholar
  33. Tuker A, Charter M, Ehrenfeld J, Lifset R, de Bruijn T (2004) Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards (Guinee JB ed). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  34. Valero A (1998) Thermoeconomics as a conceptual basis for energy-ecological analysis. Adv Energy Stud Energy Flows Ecol Econ:415–444Google Scholar
  35. Valero A, Lozano MA, Serra L (1994) CGAM problem : definition and conventional solution. Energy 19(3):279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolf M-A, Pant R, Chomkhamsri K, Sala S, Pennington D (2012) The International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook (online version). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niloufar Salehi
    • 1
  • Morteza Mahmoudi
    • 1
  • Alireza Bazargan
    • 2
  • Gordon McKay
    • 3
  1. 1.Energy Research InstituteSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringK.N. Toosi University of TechnologyTehranIran
  3. 3.Division of Sustainability, College of Science and EngineeringHamad Bin Khalifa UniversityDohaQatar

Section editors and affiliations

  • Chaudhery Mustansar Hussain
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and Environmental SciencesNew Jersey Institute of TechnologyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations