Digitization and the Future of Work: Macroeconomic Consequences

Living reference work entry


Computing power continues to grow at an enormous rate. Simultaneously, more and better data is increasingly available and Machine Learning methods have seen significant breakthroughs in the recent past. All this pushes further the boundary of what machines can do. Nowadays increasingly complex tasks are automatable at a precision which seemed infeasible only few years ago. The examples range from voice and image recognition, playing Go, to self-driving vehicles. Machines are able to perform more and more manual and also cognitive tasks that previously only humans could do. As a result of these developments, some argue that large shares of jobs – e.g., about half of the US workforce – are “at risk of automation,” spurring public fears of massive job-losses and technological unemployment.

This chapter discusses how new digital technologies might affect the labor market in the near future. First, the chapter discusses estimates of automation potentials, showing that many estimates are severely upward biased because they ignore that workers in seemingly automatable occupations already take over hard-to-automate tasks. Secondly, it highlights that these numbers only refer to what theoretically could be automated and that this must not be equated with job-losses or employment effects – a mistake that is done often in the public debate. Thirdly, the chapter develops scenarios on how digitalization is likely to affect the German labor market in the next 5 years and derives implications for policy makers on how to shape the future of work. Germany is an interesting case to study, as it is a developed country at the technological frontier. In particular, the main challenge will not be the number, but the structure of jobs and the corresponding need for supply side adjustments to meet the shift in demand both within and between occupations and sectors.


  1. Acemoglu D (1998) Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality. Q J Econ 113(4):1055–1089Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Autor D (2011) Skills, tasks and technologies: implications for employment and earnings. In: Card D, Ashenfelter O (eds) Handbook of labor economics. Elsevier, San Diego, Amsterdam, Chapter 12, pp 1043–1171Google Scholar
  3. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2017) Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets, NBER Working Paper 23285Google Scholar
  4. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018a) The race between man and machine: implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. Am Econ Rev 108(6):1488–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018b) Modeling automation. American economic review: papers & proceedings, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  6. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018c) Low-skill and high-skill automation. J Hum Cap 12(2):204–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2019) Automation and new tasks: the implications of the task content of production for labor demand. J Econ Perspect 33(2):3–30Google Scholar
  8. Arnold D, Butschek S, Steffes S, Müller D (2016) “Monitor Digitalisierung am Arbeitsplatz. Aktuelle Ergebnisse einer Betriebs- und Beschäftigtenbefragung”, Publikation Nr. A875, Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales,
  9. Arntz M, Gregory T, Zierahn U (2016) The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: a comparative analysis, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 189Google Scholar
  10. Arntz M, Gregory T, Zierahn U (2017) Revisiting the risk of automation. Econ Lett 159:157–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Arntz M, Gregory T, Zierahn U (2018) Digitalisierung und die Zukunft der Arbeit: Makroökonomische Auswirkungen auf Beschäftigung, Arbeitslosigkeit und Löhne von morgen. Bundesministerium für Forschung und Entwicklung (BMBF), MannheimGoogle Scholar
  12. Arntz M, Genz S, Gregory T, Janser M, Lehmer F, Matthes B, Zierahn U (2019a) Technology and jobs in the fourth industrial revolution – firm-level evidence. MIMEOGoogle Scholar
  13. Arntz M, Gregory T, Zierahn U (2019b) Automation, employment, and wages: is this time different? MIMEOGoogle Scholar
  14. Autor DH, Dorn D (2013) The growth of low skill service jobs and the polarization of the U.S. labor market. Am Econ Rev 103:1553–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Autor DH (2015) Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. J Econ Perspect 29(3):3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Autor DH, Levy F, Murnane RJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. Q J Econ 118(4):1279–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Autor DH, Handel MJ (2013) Putting tasks to the test: human capital, job tasks, and wages. J Labor Econ 31(2):S59–S96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bessen J (2015) Toil and technology. Finance Dev 2015(March):16–19Google Scholar
  19. Bessen J, Goos M, Salomons A, van den Berge W (2019) Automatic reaction – what happens to workers at firms that automat? Law & economics series paper no. 19-2. Boston UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. Bloom N, Jones CI, Van Reenen J, Webb M (2017) Are ideas getting harder to find? NBER working paper no. 23782Google Scholar
  21. Bonnefon JF, Shariff A, Rahwan I (2016) The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles, Science 352(6293):1573–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bowles J (2014) The computerisation of European jobs. Bruegel Blog, 17 July 2014Google Scholar
  23. Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence. Q J Econ 117(1):339–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Brynjolfsson E, McAffee A (2016) The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Brynjolfsson E, Mitchell T (2017) What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science 358(6379):1530–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C (2017) Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: a clash of expectations and statistics. NBER working paper 24001Google Scholar
  27. Cortes M (2016) Where have the middle-wage workers gone? A study of polarization using panel data. J Labor Econ 34(1):63–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cortes M, Salvatori A (2019) Delving into the demand side: changes in workplace specialization and job polarization. Labour Econ 57:164–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cowen T (2011) The great stagnation: how America ate all the low-hanging fruit of modern history, got sick, and will (eventually) feel better. Dutton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Dauth W, Findeisen S, Südekum J, Wößner N (2017) German robots – the impact of industrial robots on workers. IAB discussion paper 30/2017Google Scholar
  31. Dengler K, Matthes B (2018) The impacts of digital transformation on the labour market: substitution potentials of occupations in Germany. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 137:304–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Feldmann H (2013) Technological unemployment in industrial countries. J Evol Econ 23:1099–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frey CB, Osborne MA (2017) The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 114:254–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Gordon RJ (2014) The demise of US economic growth: restatement, rebuttal, and reflections. NBER working paper no. 19895Google Scholar
  36. Gordon RJ (2015) Secular stagnation: a supply-side view. Am Econ Rev 105(5):54–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Graetz G, Michaels G (2018) Robots at work. Rev Econ Stat 100(5):753–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gregory T, Salomons A, Zierahn U (2018) Racing with or against the machine? Evidence from Europe. CESifo working paper no. 7247Google Scholar
  39. Janssen S, Mohrenweiser J (2018) The shelf life of incumbent workers during accelerating technological change: evidence from a training regulation reform. IZA discussion paper no. 11312Google Scholar
  40. Jovanovic B, Rousseau PL (2005) General purpose technologies. In: Aghion P, Durlauf SN (eds) Handbook of economic growth, vol 1B. Chapter 18. Elsevier, Amsterdan, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  41. Mokyr J (2014) Secular stagnation? Not in your life. In: Teulings C, Baldwin R (eds) Secular stagnation: facts, causes and cures. CEPR Press, pp 83–89Google Scholar
  42. Mokyr J, Vickers C, Ziebarth NL (2015) The history of technological anxiety and the future of economic growth: is this time different? J Econ Perspect 29(3):31–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nedelkoska L, Quintini G (2018) Automation, skills use and training. OECD social, employment and migration working papers no. 202Google Scholar
  44. Nordhaus WD (2007) Two centuries of productivity growth in computing. J Econ Hist 67(1):128–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pajarinen M, Rouvinen P (2014) Computerization threatens one third of finnish employment. ETLA-brief 22, 13 Jan 2014. ISSN 2323 2463Google Scholar
  46. Pianta M (2009) Innovation and employment. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson R (eds) The oxford handbook of innovation. Online publication, Chapter 21. Scholar
  47. Pouliakas K (2018) Determinants of automation rist in the EU labour market: a skills-needs approach. IZA discussion paper no. 11829Google Scholar
  48. Pratt GA (2015) Is a Cambrian explosion coming for robotics? J Econ Perspect 29(3):51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC) (2018) Will robots really steal our jobs? An international analysis of the potential long term impact of automation.
  50. Rifkin J (1995) he end of work: the decline of the global labor force and the dawn of the post-market era. Putnam Publishing GroupGoogle Scholar
  51. Solow R (1987) We’d better watch out. New York Times Book Review, 12 July 1987, 36Google Scholar
  52. Spitz-Oener A (2006) Technical change, job tasks, and rising educational demands: looking outside the wage structure. J Labor Econ 24(2):235–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thierer AD, Hagemann R (2015) Removing roadblocks to intelligent vehicles and driverless cars. Wake Forest J Law Policy 5(2):339–391Google Scholar
  54. Vivarelli M (2007) Innovation and employment: a survey. IZA discussion paper no. 2621Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leibniz Centre for European Economic ResearchZEWMannheimGermany
  2. 2.University of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Labor EconomicsIZABonnGermany
  4. 4.CESifo Research NetworkMunichGermany
  5. 5.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtNetherlands

Section editors and affiliations

  • Marco Vivarelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economic PolicyUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations