Abstract
Computing power continues to grow at an enormous rate. Simultaneously, more and better data is increasingly available and Machine Learning methods have seen significant breakthroughs in the recent past. All this pushes further the boundary of what machines can do. Nowadays increasingly complex tasks are automatable at a precision which seemed infeasible only few years ago. The examples range from voice and image recognition, playing Go, to self-driving vehicles. Machines are able to perform more and more manual and also cognitive tasks that previously only humans could do. As a result of these developments, some argue that large shares of jobs – e.g., about half of the US workforce – are “at risk of automation,” spurring public fears of massive job-losses and technological unemployment.
This chapter discusses how new digital technologies might affect the labor market in the near future. First, the chapter discusses estimates of automation potentials, showing that many estimates are severely upward biased because they ignore that workers in seemingly automatable occupations already take over hard-to-automate tasks. Secondly, it highlights that these numbers only refer to what theoretically could be automated and that this must not be equated with job-losses or employment effects – a mistake that is done often in the public debate. Thirdly, the chapter develops scenarios on how digitalization is likely to affect the German labor market in the next 5 years and derives implications for policy makers on how to shape the future of work. Germany is an interesting case to study, as it is a developed country at the technological frontier. In particular, the main challenge will not be the number, but the structure of jobs and the corresponding need for supply side adjustments to meet the shift in demand both within and between occupations and sectors.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Notes
- 1.
See Acemoglu and Restrepo (2018c) for a discussion of automation when workers have different skills.
References
Acemoglu D (1998) Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality. Q J Econ 113(4):1055–1089
Acemoglu D, Autor D (2011) Skills, tasks and technologies: implications for employment and earnings. In: Card D, Ashenfelter O (eds) Handbook of labor economics. Elsevier, San Diego, Amsterdam, Chapter 12, pp 1043–1171
Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2017) Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets, NBER Working Paper 23285
Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018a) The race between man and machine: implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. Am Econ Rev 108(6):1488–1542
Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018b) Modeling automation. American economic review: papers & proceedings, forthcoming
Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018c) Low-skill and high-skill automation. J Hum Cap 12(2):204–232
Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2019) Automation and new tasks: the implications of the task content of production for labor demand. J Econ Perspect 33(2):3–30
Arnold D, Butschek S, Steffes S, Müller D (2016) “Monitor Digitalisierung am Arbeitsplatz. Aktuelle Ergebnisse einer Betriebs- und Beschäftigtenbefragung”, Publikation Nr. A875, Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales, https://www.bmas.de/DE/Service/Medien/Publikationen/a875-monitor-digitalisierung-am-arbeitsplatz.html
Arntz M, Gregory T, Zierahn U (2016) The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: a comparative analysis, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 189
Arntz M, Gregory T, Zierahn U (2017) Revisiting the risk of automation. Econ Lett 159:157–160
Arntz M, Gregory T, Zierahn U (2018) Digitalisierung und die Zukunft der Arbeit: Makroökonomische Auswirkungen auf Beschäftigung, Arbeitslosigkeit und Löhne von morgen. Bundesministerium für Forschung und Entwicklung (BMBF), Mannheim
Arntz M, Genz S, Gregory T, Janser M, Lehmer F, Matthes B, Zierahn U (2019a) Technology and jobs in the fourth industrial revolution – firm-level evidence. MIMEO
Arntz M, Gregory T, Zierahn U (2019b) Automation, employment, and wages: is this time different? MIMEO
Autor DH, Dorn D (2013) The growth of low skill service jobs and the polarization of the U.S. labor market. Am Econ Rev 103:1553–1597
Autor DH (2015) Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. J Econ Perspect 29(3):3–30
Autor DH, Levy F, Murnane RJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. Q J Econ 118(4):1279–1333
Autor DH, Handel MJ (2013) Putting tasks to the test: human capital, job tasks, and wages. J Labor Econ 31(2):S59–S96
Bessen J (2015) Toil and technology. Finance Dev 2015(March):16–19
Bessen J, Goos M, Salomons A, van den Berge W (2019) Automatic reaction – what happens to workers at firms that automat? Law & economics series paper no. 19-2. Boston University
Bloom N, Jones CI, Van Reenen J, Webb M (2017) Are ideas getting harder to find? NBER working paper no. 23782
Bonnefon JF, Shariff A, Rahwan I (2016) The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles, Science 352(6293):1573–1576
Bowles J (2014) The computerisation of European jobs. Bruegel Blog, 17 July 2014
Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence. Q J Econ 117(1):339–376
Brynjolfsson E, McAffee A (2016) The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. Norton, New York
Brynjolfsson E, Mitchell T (2017) What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science 358(6379):1530–1534
Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C (2017) Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: a clash of expectations and statistics. NBER working paper 24001
Cortes M (2016) Where have the middle-wage workers gone? A study of polarization using panel data. J Labor Econ 34(1):63–105
Cortes M, Salvatori A (2019) Delving into the demand side: changes in workplace specialization and job polarization. Labour Econ 57:164–176
Cowen T (2011) The great stagnation: how America ate all the low-hanging fruit of modern history, got sick, and will (eventually) feel better. Dutton, New York
Dauth W, Findeisen S, Südekum J, Wößner N (2017) German robots – the impact of industrial robots on workers. IAB discussion paper 30/2017
Dengler K, Matthes B (2018) The impacts of digital transformation on the labour market: substitution potentials of occupations in Germany. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 137:304–316
Feldmann H (2013) Technological unemployment in industrial countries. J Evol Econ 23:1099–1126
Frey CB, Osborne MA (2017) The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 114:254–280
Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT Press
Gordon RJ (2014) The demise of US economic growth: restatement, rebuttal, and reflections. NBER working paper no. 19895
Gordon RJ (2015) Secular stagnation: a supply-side view. Am Econ Rev 105(5):54–59
Graetz G, Michaels G (2018) Robots at work. Rev Econ Stat 100(5):753–768
Gregory T, Salomons A, Zierahn U (2018) Racing with or against the machine? Evidence from Europe. CESifo working paper no. 7247
Janssen S, Mohrenweiser J (2018) The shelf life of incumbent workers during accelerating technological change: evidence from a training regulation reform. IZA discussion paper no. 11312
Jovanovic B, Rousseau PL (2005) General purpose technologies. In: Aghion P, Durlauf SN (eds) Handbook of economic growth, vol 1B. Chapter 18. Elsevier, Amsterdan, San Diego
Mokyr J (2014) Secular stagnation? Not in your life. In: Teulings C, Baldwin R (eds) Secular stagnation: facts, causes and cures. CEPR Press, pp 83–89
Mokyr J, Vickers C, Ziebarth NL (2015) The history of technological anxiety and the future of economic growth: is this time different? J Econ Perspect 29(3):31–50
Nedelkoska L, Quintini G (2018) Automation, skills use and training. OECD social, employment and migration working papers no. 202
Nordhaus WD (2007) Two centuries of productivity growth in computing. J Econ Hist 67(1):128–159
Pajarinen M, Rouvinen P (2014) Computerization threatens one third of finnish employment. ETLA-brief 22, 13 Jan 2014. ISSN 2323 2463
Pianta M (2009) Innovation and employment. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson R (eds) The oxford handbook of innovation. Online publication, Chapter 21. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0021
Pouliakas K (2018) Determinants of automation rist in the EU labour market: a skills-needs approach. IZA discussion paper no. 11829
Pratt GA (2015) Is a Cambrian explosion coming for robotics? J Econ Perspect 29(3):51–60
PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC) (2018) Will robots really steal our jobs? An international analysis of the potential long term impact of automation. https://www.pwc.co.uk/economic-services/assets/international-impact-of-automation-feb-2018.pdf
Rifkin J (1995) he end of work: the decline of the global labor force and the dawn of the post-market era. Putnam Publishing Group
Solow R (1987) We’d better watch out. New York Times Book Review, 12 July 1987, 36
Spitz-Oener A (2006) Technical change, job tasks, and rising educational demands: looking outside the wage structure. J Labor Econ 24(2):235–270
Thierer AD, Hagemann R (2015) Removing roadblocks to intelligent vehicles and driverless cars. Wake Forest J Law Policy 5(2):339–391
Vivarelli M (2007) Innovation and employment: a survey. IZA discussion paper no. 2621
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Arntz, M., Gregory, T., Zierahn, U. (2020). Digitization and the Future of Work: Macroeconomic Consequences. In: Zimmermann, K. (eds) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_11-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_11-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences