Skip to main content

Digitization and the Future of Work: Macroeconomic Consequences

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics

Abstract

Computing power continues to grow at an enormous rate. Simultaneously, more and better data is increasingly available and Machine Learning methods have seen significant breakthroughs in the recent past. All this pushes further the boundary of what machines can do. Nowadays increasingly complex tasks are automatable at a precision which seemed infeasible only few years ago. The examples range from voice and image recognition, playing Go, to self-driving vehicles. Machines are able to perform more and more manual and also cognitive tasks that previously only humans could do. As a result of these developments, some argue that large shares of jobs – e.g., about half of the US workforce – are “at risk of automation,” spurring public fears of massive job-losses and technological unemployment.

This chapter discusses how new digital technologies might affect the labor market in the near future. First, the chapter discusses estimates of automation potentials, showing that many estimates are severely upward biased because they ignore that workers in seemingly automatable occupations already take over hard-to-automate tasks. Secondly, it highlights that these numbers only refer to what theoretically could be automated and that this must not be equated with job-losses or employment effects – a mistake that is done often in the public debate. Thirdly, the chapter develops scenarios on how digitalization is likely to affect the German labor market in the next 5 years and derives implications for policy makers on how to shape the future of work. Germany is an interesting case to study, as it is a developed country at the technological frontier. In particular, the main challenge will not be the number, but the structure of jobs and the corresponding need for supply side adjustments to meet the shift in demand both within and between occupations and sectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Acemoglu and Restrepo (2018c) for a discussion of automation when workers have different skills.

References

  • Acemoglu D (1998) Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality. Q J Econ 113(4):1055–1089

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Autor D (2011) Skills, tasks and technologies: implications for employment and earnings. In: Card D, Ashenfelter O (eds) Handbook of labor economics. Elsevier, San Diego, Amsterdam, Chapter 12, pp 1043–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2017) Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets, NBER Working Paper 23285

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018a) The race between man and machine: implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. Am Econ Rev 108(6):1488–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018b) Modeling automation. American economic review: papers & proceedings, forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018c) Low-skill and high-skill automation. J Hum Cap 12(2):204–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2019) Automation and new tasks: the implications of the task content of production for labor demand. J Econ Perspect 33(2):3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold D, Butschek S, Steffes S, Müller D (2016) “Monitor Digitalisierung am Arbeitsplatz. Aktuelle Ergebnisse einer Betriebs- und Beschäftigtenbefragung”, Publikation Nr. A875, Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales, https://www.bmas.de/DE/Service/Medien/Publikationen/a875-monitor-digitalisierung-am-arbeitsplatz.html

  • Arntz M, Gregory T, Zierahn U (2016) The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: a comparative analysis, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 189

    Google Scholar 

  • Arntz M, Gregory T, Zierahn U (2017) Revisiting the risk of automation. Econ Lett 159:157–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arntz M, Gregory T, Zierahn U (2018) Digitalisierung und die Zukunft der Arbeit: Makroökonomische Auswirkungen auf Beschäftigung, Arbeitslosigkeit und Löhne von morgen. Bundesministerium für Forschung und Entwicklung (BMBF), Mannheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Arntz M, Genz S, Gregory T, Janser M, Lehmer F, Matthes B, Zierahn U (2019a) Technology and jobs in the fourth industrial revolution – firm-level evidence. MIMEO

    Google Scholar 

  • Arntz M, Gregory T, Zierahn U (2019b) Automation, employment, and wages: is this time different? MIMEO

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor DH, Dorn D (2013) The growth of low skill service jobs and the polarization of the U.S. labor market. Am Econ Rev 103:1553–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor DH (2015) Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. J Econ Perspect 29(3):3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor DH, Levy F, Murnane RJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. Q J Econ 118(4):1279–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor DH, Handel MJ (2013) Putting tasks to the test: human capital, job tasks, and wages. J Labor Econ 31(2):S59–S96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessen J (2015) Toil and technology. Finance Dev 2015(March):16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessen J, Goos M, Salomons A, van den Berge W (2019) Automatic reaction – what happens to workers at firms that automat? Law & economics series paper no. 19-2. Boston University

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom N, Jones CI, Van Reenen J, Webb M (2017) Are ideas getting harder to find? NBER working paper no. 23782

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnefon JF, Shariff A, Rahwan I (2016) The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles, Science 352(6293):1573–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles J (2014) The computerisation of European jobs. Bruegel Blog, 17 July 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence. Q J Econ 117(1):339–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, McAffee A (2016) The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Mitchell T (2017) What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science 358(6379):1530–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C (2017) Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: a clash of expectations and statistics. NBER working paper 24001

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortes M (2016) Where have the middle-wage workers gone? A study of polarization using panel data. J Labor Econ 34(1):63–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes M, Salvatori A (2019) Delving into the demand side: changes in workplace specialization and job polarization. Labour Econ 57:164–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowen T (2011) The great stagnation: how America ate all the low-hanging fruit of modern history, got sick, and will (eventually) feel better. Dutton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauth W, Findeisen S, Südekum J, Wößner N (2017) German robots – the impact of industrial robots on workers. IAB discussion paper 30/2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Dengler K, Matthes B (2018) The impacts of digital transformation on the labour market: substitution potentials of occupations in Germany. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 137:304–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann H (2013) Technological unemployment in industrial countries. J Evol Econ 23:1099–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey CB, Osborne MA (2017) The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 114:254–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon RJ (2014) The demise of US economic growth: restatement, rebuttal, and reflections. NBER working paper no. 19895

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon RJ (2015) Secular stagnation: a supply-side view. Am Econ Rev 105(5):54–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graetz G, Michaels G (2018) Robots at work. Rev Econ Stat 100(5):753–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory T, Salomons A, Zierahn U (2018) Racing with or against the machine? Evidence from Europe. CESifo working paper no. 7247

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen S, Mohrenweiser J (2018) The shelf life of incumbent workers during accelerating technological change: evidence from a training regulation reform. IZA discussion paper no. 11312

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic B, Rousseau PL (2005) General purpose technologies. In: Aghion P, Durlauf SN (eds) Handbook of economic growth, vol 1B. Chapter 18. Elsevier, Amsterdan, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr J (2014) Secular stagnation? Not in your life. In: Teulings C, Baldwin R (eds) Secular stagnation: facts, causes and cures. CEPR Press, pp 83–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr J, Vickers C, Ziebarth NL (2015) The history of technological anxiety and the future of economic growth: is this time different? J Econ Perspect 29(3):31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedelkoska L, Quintini G (2018) Automation, skills use and training. OECD social, employment and migration working papers no. 202

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD (2007) Two centuries of productivity growth in computing. J Econ Hist 67(1):128–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajarinen M, Rouvinen P (2014) Computerization threatens one third of finnish employment. ETLA-brief 22, 13 Jan 2014. ISSN 2323 2463

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianta M (2009) Innovation and employment. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson R (eds) The oxford handbook of innovation. Online publication, Chapter 21. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0021

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouliakas K (2018) Determinants of automation rist in the EU labour market: a skills-needs approach. IZA discussion paper no. 11829

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt GA (2015) Is a Cambrian explosion coming for robotics? J Econ Perspect 29(3):51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC) (2018) Will robots really steal our jobs? An international analysis of the potential long term impact of automation. https://www.pwc.co.uk/economic-services/assets/international-impact-of-automation-feb-2018.pdf

  • Rifkin J (1995) he end of work: the decline of the global labor force and the dawn of the post-market era. Putnam Publishing Group

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow R (1987) We’d better watch out. New York Times Book Review, 12 July 1987, 36

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitz-Oener A (2006) Technical change, job tasks, and rising educational demands: looking outside the wage structure. J Labor Econ 24(2):235–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierer AD, Hagemann R (2015) Removing roadblocks to intelligent vehicles and driverless cars. Wake Forest J Law Policy 5(2):339–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivarelli M (2007) Innovation and employment: a survey. IZA discussion paper no. 2621

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Zierahn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Arntz, M., Gregory, T., Zierahn, U. (2020). Digitization and the Future of Work: Macroeconomic Consequences. In: Zimmermann, K. (eds) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_11-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_11-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics