Skip to main content

Aphasia Tests

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 62 Accesses

Synonyms

Aphasia assessment; Aphasia diagnosis; Aphasia evaluation

Description

Tests of aphasia are used to diagnose the type and severity of aphasia and related disorders and to plan intervention for the speech, language, and communication deficits demonstrated by persons who have aphasia following brain injury (PWA). Three types of aphasia tests are commonly used to assess language and communication abilities in PWA: screening tests, comprehensive aphasia batteries, and tests of specific linguistic or communicative function (Patterson 2008, 2015). In addition, assessment of aphasia and its impact on a person’s life includes testing cognitive abilities and related disorders (e.g., memory), testing executive functioning (e.g., attention and planning), observing a person in activities of daily communication (e.g., social functional communication or work-related communication), interviewing the person with aphasia and family members, assessing quality of communication life and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • Azur, C., Leger, A., Arbizu, C., Henry-Amar, F., Chomel-Guillame, S., & Samson, Y. (2013). The aphasia rapid test: An NIHSS-like aphasia test. Journal of Neurology, 260(8), 2110–2117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt, E. M., & Cherney, L. R. (2010). Communication confidence in persons with aphasia. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 17(3), 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines, K. A., Martin, K. W., & Heeringa, H. M. (1999). ALFA: Assessment of Language Related Functional Activities. Austin: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, A. L., Hamsher, K., Rey, G. J., & Sivan, A. B. (1994). Multilingual Aphasia Examination (MAE-3). Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc (PAR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. A. (2007). Aphasiology: Disorders and clinical practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, P. J., McNeil, M. R., Mikolic, J. M., Prieto, L., Hula, W. D., Lustig, A. P., Ross, K. B., Wambaugh, J. L., Gonzalez-Rothi, L. J., & Elman, R. J. (2004). The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provides valid and reliable score estimates of functioning and well-being in stroke survivors with and without communication disorders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57, 997–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frattali, C. M., Thompson, C. K., Holland, A. L., Wohl, C. B., & Ferketic, M. M. (1995). The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Functional Assessment of Communication Skills in Adults. Rockville: The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Weintraub, S. (2001a). Boston Naming Test (2nd ed.). Austin: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Baressi, B. (2001b). Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (3rd ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, H. (1926). Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilari, K., Byng, S., Lamping, D. L., & Smith, S. C. (2003). Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39): Evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity. Stroke, 34(8), 1944–1950.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. L., Frattali, C. M., & Fromm, D. (1999). Communicative Activities of Daily Living (2nd ed.). San Antonino: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hula, W. D., Doyle, P. J., Stone, C. A., Hula, S. N. A., Kellough, S., Wambaugh, J. L., Ross, K. B., Schumacher, J. G., & St. Jacque, A. (2015). The Aphasia Communication Outcome Measure (ACOM): Dimensionality, item bank calibration, and initial validation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, 906–919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia. London: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertesz, A. (2006). Western Aphasia Battery. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPointe, L. L., & Horner, J. (1998). Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia (RCBA-2). San Antonio: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, J., Pickard, L., Bester, S., Elbard, H., Finlayson, A., & Zoghaib, C. (1989). The Communicative Effectiveness Index: Development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, M. R., & Prescott, T. E. (1978). Revised Token Test. Austin: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J. P. (2008). Assessment of language disorders in adults. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (5th ed., pp. 64–160). Baltimore: Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J. P. (2015). Aphasia assessment. In A.M. Raymer & L. Gonzalez-Rothi (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of aphasia and language disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, D., Fratalli, C. M., Holland, A. L., Thompson, C. K., Caperton, C. J., & Slater, S. C. (2004). Quality of Communication Life Scale. Rockville: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prutting, C., & Kirchner, D. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J., Court, J., & Raven, J. C. (1995). Raven’s Progressive Matrices. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarno, M. T. (1969). The Functional Communication Profile. New York: Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York University Medical Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuell, H. (1965). Minnesota Test for Differential Diagnosis of Aphasia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreen, O., & Benton, A. L. (1977). Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia. Victoria: University of Victoria Neuropsychology Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreen, O., & Risser, A. H. (2003). Assessment of aphasia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms and commentary (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburn, K., Porter, G., & Howard, D. (2004). Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Hove: Psychology Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, D.C. & Culbertson, W. (1999). Quick Assessment for Aphasia. Oceanside CA: Academic Communication Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. M. (2009). Wechsler Memory Scale (4th ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet P. Patterson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA)

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

P. Patterson, J. (2018). Aphasia Tests. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_860

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics