Skip to main content

Nottingham Health Profile

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • 6 Accesses

Synonyms

NHP

Description

Designed to measure subjective health status (Hunt and McEwen 1980), the Nottingham health profile (NHP) contains 38 questions grouped into six domains: physical mobility (eight items), social isolation (five items), emotional reactions (nine items), pain (eight items), sleep (five items), and energy (three items). Each question is answered “yes” or “no” according to whether the symptom is present or absent “in general” (Hunt et al. 1980). Items in each domain are assigned a weight; the total score for each domain is 100 where a score of 0 indicates good subjective health status and 100 indicates poor subjective health status. The NHP total score is obtained by averaging the six domain scores.

Historical Background

The NHP was developed in response to the recognition in the late 1970s and early 1980s of the important role that the individual plays in prevention, self-care, and making health-care decisions (Hunt et al. 1980). As a result, an assessment was...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • Baro, E., Ferrer, M., Vazquez, O., Miralles, R., Pont, A., Esperanza, A., et al. (2006). Using the Nottingham health profile (NHP) among older adult in patients with varying cognitive function. Quality of Life Research, 15, 575–585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau-Chalot, F., Novella, J.-L., Jolly, D., Ankri, J., Guillemin, F., & Blanchard, F. (2002). Feasibility, acceptability and internal consistency reliability of the Nottingham health profile in dementia patients. Gerontology, 48, 220–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Busija, L., Pausenberger, E., Haines, T. P., Haymes, S., Buchbinder, R., & Osborne, R. H. (2011). Adult measures of general health and health-related quality of life. Arthritis Care & Research, 63, S383–S412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. M., & McEwen, J. (1980). The development of a subjective indicator. Society of Health & Illness, 2, 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. M., McKenna, S. P., McEwen, J., Backett, E. M., Williams, J., & Papp, E. (1980). A quantitative approach to perceived health status: A validation study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 34, 281–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. M., McKenna, S. P., McEwen, J., Williams, J., & Papp, E. (1981). The Nottingham health profile: Subjective health status and medical consultations. Social Science & Medicine, 15A, 221–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wann-Hansson, C., Klevsgard, R., & Hagell, P. (2008). Cross-diagnostic validity of the Nottingham health profile index of distress (NHPD). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 6, 47–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamara Bushnik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bushnik, T. (2018). Nottingham Health Profile. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1823

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics