Oceans and Impasses of “Sustainable Development”

  • Will McConnell
Living reference work entry


One of the most powerful concepts to emerge in the multiple discursive practices that together form the conceptual and politico-pragmatic terrain of “sustainable development” is “environmental sustainability.” In the emerging discourse of environmental awareness, this concept reveals its polyvalence as a speech act largely through the absences of meaning. The history of the term as now understood has its foundations in the Brundtland Report (Our common future, 1987.; despite the strength of this document in founding a global awareness, the definitions offered therein have created a foundation for fundamentally opposed drives toward understanding environmental sustainability, largely due to the privileging of neoclassical economics in land-based models for sustainable development. From ocean-based perspectives, the privileging of land-based, economically-driven modeling of sustainable development produces weak forms of “environmental” sustainability even in the best examples of current analytic approaches; the central concern of the discourse of environmental sustainability currently is to disarticulate the current paradigm through the tensions inherent in the discursive fields across which sustainability discourse produces its hegemonic (economic) properties. Major drivers of environmental pressures on the ocean originate outside of ocean systems – on land. In its “unsettling” nature, however, its divergence from land-based temporalities and spatial properties, the ocean offers multiple points at which the discourse of (land-based) sustainability collapses within its own tensions to reveal horizons of representation that offer a glimpse into the full complexity, and excitement, of reenvisioning an entire discourse of the (contested) future.


Ecosystems Sustainable development Environmental sustainability Brundtland Report Neoclassical economics 


  1. Álvarez-Romero, J. G., Pressey, R. L., Ban, N. C., Vance-Borland, K., Willer, C., Klein, C. J., & Gaines S. D. (2011). Integrated Land-Sea Conservation Planning: The Missing Links. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42(1):381–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, S., & Eckerberg, K. (Eds.). (2010). In pursuit of sustainable development: New governance practices at the sub-national level in Europe. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, S., Kousis, M., Richardson, D., & Young, S. (2012). The politics of sustainable development: Theory, policy and practice within the EU (pp. 14–15). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bebbington, J. (2000). Sustainable development: A review of the international development, business and accounting literature. Aberdeen papers in accountancy, finance and management working paper 00–17.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, M. W. (2003). The sea around: conservation planning in marine regions. In C. Groves (Ed.), Drafting a conservation blueprint: A practitioner’s guide to planning for biodiversity (pp. 319–44). Washington, DC: Island.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, P. T., & Calderia, K. (2017). Greater future global warming inferred from Earth’s recent energy budget. Nature, 552, 45–50. Accessed 4 Jan 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brundtland Report. (1987). Our common future. Accessed 2 Aug 2017.
  8. Conley, J. (2018). With oceans under greatest threat ever, Trump administration urges even less protection for marine life. Common Dreams. Accessed 2 Jan 2018.
  9. Dryzek, J. S. (2005). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. European Commission. (2011). Final assessment of the 6th Environmental Action Programme shows little progress in environmental policy – but with shortfalls in implementation. European Commission 31 August 2011. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.
  12. State of the Oceans. (2011). European Union International Programme on the State of the Oceans. Accessed 4 Oct 2011.
  13. Exclusive Interview: EPA Chief Scott Pruitt goes one-on-one with News 3. Accessed 13 Feb 2018.
  14. First Global Integrated Marine Assessment (World Ocean Assessment I). Accessed 3 Dec 2017.
  15. Griffin, L. (2013). Governance for sustainability in the European union – A post-political project. In P. M. Barnes & T. C. Hoerber (Eds.), Sustainable development and governance in Europe (pp. 34–47). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hersher, R. (2017, November 29). Climate scientists watch their words, hoping to stave off funding cuts. NPR. Accessed 30 Nov 2017.
  17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). Accessed 4 Nov 2014.
  18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). History. Accessed 23 Nov 2017.
  19. Irfan, U. (2018). Scott Pruitt is slowly strangling the EPA. Vox. Accessed 3 Jan 2018. Accessed 30 Jan 2018.
  20. Jacobs, M. (1999). Sustainable development: A contested concept. In A. Dobson (Ed.), Fairness and futurity: Essays on environmental sustainability and social justice (pp. 21–45). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuhn, T. (1970). Structure of scientific revolutions. Enlarged (2nd ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lafferty, W. M. (1995). The implementation of sustainable development in the European Union. In: J. Lovenduski & J. Stanyer (Eds.), Contemporary political studies. Proceedings of the Political Studies Association (Vol. 1). Belfast: PSA.Google Scholar
  23. Milman, O. (2017, August 7). US federal department is censuring use of term ‘climate change’, emails reveal. The Guardian. Accessed 7 Aug 2017.
  24. Murphy, P. P. (2017). Climate change just broke a NOAA algorithm. CNN. Accessed 14 Dec2017.
  25. National Climate Assessment (NCA). (2014). Southwest: Threats to Agriculture. Accessed 7 May 2014.
  26. Ocean Conservancy and McKinsey Center for Business and Environment. (2017). Stemming the tide: Land-based strategies for a plastic-free ocean. Accessed 3 May 2017.
  27. O’Riordan, T. (1985). Environmental Issues. Progress in human geography 9(3):401–414. Accessed 4 Dec 2015.
  28. Pearce, D., Markandya, A., & Barbier E. B. (1989). Blueprint for a green economy. London, Earthscan.Google Scholar
  29. Pearce, D. (1992). Green economics. Environmental Values, 1(1), 3–13. Accessed 2 Jan 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pezzey, J. (1989). Economic analysis of sustainable growth and sustainable development. Environmental Department Working Paper No. 15. Washington D.C: World Bank.Google Scholar
  31. Pierson, D. (2017). California farms lead the way in almond production. Los Angeles Times. Accessed 2 Aug 2017.
  32. Revesz, R. L., & Howard, P. L., et al. (2014, April). Global Warming: Improve economic models of climate change. Nature. Accessed 4 Apr 2014.
  33. Shearer, C., & Ghio, N., et al. (2017). Boom and bust 2017: Tracking the global coal pipeline. CoalSwarm, Greenpeace USA, Sierra Club. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.
  34. Temple, J. (2017). Trump’s five biggest energy blunders in 2017. MIT Technology Review. Accessed 27 Dec 2017.
  35. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. (2017). Accessed 3 Aug 2017.
  36. Union of Concerned Scientists. (2017). The social cost of carbon underscores an obvious fact: climate change is costly. Accessed 28 Feb 2017.
  37. Wilbanks, T. J., & Fernandez, S. J. (Eds.). (2014). Climate change and infrastructure, urban systems, and vulnerabilities: Technical report for the US department of energy in support of the national climate assessment. Accessed 3 Jan 2015.Google Scholar
  38. World Economic Forum. (2016). The new plastics economy: Rethinking the future of plastics. Accessed 15 Jan 2016.
  39. Žižek, S. (1996). Love they symptom as thyself. Accessed 13 Sept 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Woodbury UniversityBurbankUSA

Personalised recommendations