Skip to main content

Universal Basic Income and Equality of Opportunity

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Equality of Opportunity
  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

In an era of persistent growing inequality and poverty, protecting the philosophical aspirations of egalitarianism relevant to social welfare states and basic income is crucial for meeting the demands of distributive justice in society. Egalitarian measures such as basic income form part of distributive justice strategies and contribute to transformative change toward a fairer society grounded in equality of opportunity and social justice. Basic income strongly connects to equality of opportunity through ideals of freedom, collective solidarity, and fairness in distribution. The chapter provides an overview of basic income and connections to equality of opportunity. For transformation to be effective, a normative framework that establishes preconditions is required to ensure the success of implementation strategies. An inherent principle of basic income is freedom. Phillippe Van Parijs (The Blackwell’s companion to political philosophy. Blackwell, Oxford, 2007) has argued for libertarian freedom in basic income strategies to ensure nonconditional principles can be upheld. However, the philosophical and normative justifications can be at odds with basic income in terms of egalitarianism. In order to ensure distributive justice is grounded in egalitarian principles for true basic income and equality of opportunity, this chapter explores two distinct philosophical traditions of justice, that is, Rawls (A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971) and Fraser (Eur J Polit Theory 6:305–308, 2007). Van Parijs has considered Rawls in his detailing of freedom and equality of opportunity from a libertarian position; yet Rawls’ conception narrowly applies reciprocity and freedom in an individual’s pursuit of a good life. Alternatively, Fraser’s (New Left Law Rev 212: 68–93, 2001) notion of participation parity offers a relevant philosophy that can be applied alongside basic income and equality of opportunity dimensions as part of an overall strategy for socially just transformation of welfare states, social protection, and income security and ultimately toward a fairer society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson ES (1999) What’s the point of equality? Ethics 109:287–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson T (2015) Inequality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bidadanure JU (2019) The political theory of universal basic income. Annu Rev Polit Sci 22:481–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum S (2012) Basic income reconsidered: social justice, liberalism, and the demands of equality. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum S (2016) Basic income. Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum S (2021) Equality of opportunity and the precarization of labour markets. Eur J Polit Theory 20:187–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casassas D, Raventós D, Wark J (2010) The right to existence in developing countries: Basic income in East Timor. Basic Income Studies 5:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wispelaere J, Stirton L (2018) The case against participation income: political, not merely administrative. Polit Q 89:262–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N (1995) From redistribution to recognition: dilemmas of justice in a ‘post-socialist’ age. New Left Law Rev 212:68–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N (1997) Justice interruptus. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N (2001) Recognition without ethics. Theory Cult Soc 18:21–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N (2007) Identity, exclusion, and critique: a response to four critics. Eur J Polit Theory 6:305–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci A (1977) The conquest of the state. Translated by J. Mathews. In: Hoare Q (ed) Antonio Gramsci: selections from political writings 1910–1920. International Publishers, New York, pp 73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci A (1996) Prison notebooks, Volume II. Translated by J. Buttigieg. University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan B (2013) Efficiency and participation: the basic income approach. In: Widerquist K, Noguera JA, Vanderborght Y, DeWispelaere J (eds) Basic income: an anthology of contemporary research. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford, pp 230–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberlin SE (2009) Political science theory and disability. J Hum Behav in the Soc Env 19:26–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Mays J (2020) Basic income, disability pensions and the Australian political economy. Exploring the basic income guarantee. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32349-3_7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mays J, Torry M (2023) Social effects of basic income. In: Torry M (ed) The Palgrave international handbook of basic income. Exploring the basic income guarantee. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41001-7_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mays J, Marston G, Tomlinson J (2016) Neoliberal frontiers and economic insecurity: is basic income a solution? In: Mays J, Marston G, Tomlinson J (eds) Basic income in Australia and New Zealand: perspectives from the neoliberal frontier. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (1997) Justice and nature. Oxf J Leg Stud 17:303–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Muñoz C (2018) Participation income and the provision of socially valuable activities. Polit Q 89:268–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty T (2014) Capital in the twenty-first century (trans: Goldhammer A). Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge T (1989) Realizing Rawls. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge T (2004) Equal liberty for all? Midwest Stud Philos 28:266–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raventós D (2007) Basic income: the material conditions of freedom (trans: Wark J). Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (2001) Justice as fairness: a restatement. In: Kelly E (ed) Justice as fairness: a restatement. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schram SF (2018) Neoliberalizing the welfare state: Marketizing social policy/disciplining clients. In: Cahill D, Cooper M, Konings M, Primrose D (eds) The Sage Handbook of neoliberalism. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 308–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram S, Pavlovskaya M (2017) Introduction. In: Schram S, Pavlovskaya M (eds) Rethinking neoliberalism: resisting the disciplinary regime. Routledge, New York, pp xiii–xxvii

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Standing G (2002) Beyond the new paternalism: basic security as equality. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing G (2005) Why basic income is needed for a right to work. Rutgers J Law & Urban Policy 2:91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing G (2014) A precariat charter: from denizens to citizens. Bloomsbury, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J (2013) The price of inequality. Penguin, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson J (2006) The self made man: Admiring his creator: Basic Income beats targetted welfare. New Comm Quart 4:52–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson J (2016) Australian basic income: efficiency and equity. In: Mays J, Marston G, Tomlinson J (eds) Basic income in Australia and New Zealand: perspectives from the neoliberal frontier. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 54–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Torry M (2016) Citizen’s basic income: is it feasible? In: Reynolds B, Healy S (eds) Basic income: radical utopia or practical solution? Social Justice Ireland, Dublin, pp 31–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs P (1992) Competing justifications of basic income. In: Van Parijs P (ed) Arguing for basic income. Verso, London, pp 3–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs P (2005) Basic income: a simple and powerful idea for the twenty-first century. In: Ackerman B, Alstott A, Van Parijs P (eds) Redesigning distribution: basic income and stakeholder grants as alternative cornerstones for a more egalitarian capitalism. Verso, London, pp 7–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs P (2007) International distributive justice. In: Goodin RE, Pettit P, Pogge T (eds) The Blackwell’s companion to political philosophy, vol II. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 638–652

    Google Scholar 

  • White A (2013) Introduction: a state-in-society agenda. In: White A (ed) The everyday life of the state: a state-in-society approach. University of Washington, Seattle, pp 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Widerquist K (2013) Independence, propertylessness and basic income. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Widerquist K, Vanderborght Y, Noguera J, De Wispeleare J (2013) Introduction. In: Widerquist K, Vanderborght Y, Noguera J, De Wispeleare J (eds) Basic income: An anthology of contemporary research. Wiley Blackwell, Malden, xi–xxiv

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson R, Pickett K (2009) The spirit level: why more equal societies almost always do better. Allen Lane, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright EA (2006) Two redistributive proposals – universal basic income and stakeholder grants. Focus 24:5–7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenni Mays .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Crown

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mays, J. (2024). Universal Basic Income and Equality of Opportunity. In: Sardoč, M. (eds) Handbook of Equality of Opportunity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52269-2_67-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52269-2_67-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52269-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52269-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics