Advertisement

Challenging the Anthropocentric Approach of Science Curricula: Ecological Systems Approaches to Enabling the Convergence of Sustainability, Science, and STEM Education

  • Marianne LoganEmail author
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

As we enter the Anthropocene, it is apparent that Earth has been severely impacted by human activities and the very systems that sustain life are challenged (Crutzen, 2002; Zalasiewicz et al., 2010). There is a call for increased awareness and action relating to degraded ecological systems particularly in the approach to the education of children and young people. Science curricula often promote anthropocentric/technocentric attitudes toward the environment. In fact STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education in minority countries such as Australia and the United States is seen to be driven by neoliberal values where government economic agendas cultivate individualistic and competitive behaviors (Carter, 2016, p 33). With this neoliberal “technical growthist” perspective predominating in science and STEM education (Smith & Watson, 2016, p 5), how can deep respect and understanding of the Earth’s systems be fostered within education? There have been calls for decades to shift thinking in science education from looking at components of the Earth’s environment separately, such as looking at humans as being apart from nature, to, instead, looking at the components “within the context of the whole” (Capra, 2007). The systems concept can be difficult to grasp, but the emphasis is always on the “wholeness” and the “harmonious integration of the various components” (Orr, 2014). In an ecological systems approach, humans are just one of numerous, interdependent, and diverse life-forms in an ecological system, and there is no separation of childhood and nature, as they are one. Such an alternative view has an impact on how science education is manifested. This chapter challenges an anthropocentric (or technocentric) approach to science curricula. Research into approaches in science and STEM education that are ecologically sustainable and holistic in nature and incorporate relevant socio-scientific issues is explored. A science education that offers young peoples’ knowledge, values, and firsthand experiences of ecological systems in their everyday lives and the incorporation of intercultural approaches to science education are promoted. Ecoliteracy, ecological literacy, and ecological thinking are examined in a science education context. Elements of the more recent posthumanist theoretical approach underpin this chapter which takes an ecological systems approach in contrast to Bronfenbrenner’s socioecological theory.

Keywords

Ecological systems Ecoliteracy Childhoodnature Science Young people 

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. S., & Elliott, D. (2010). An emerging decolonizing science education in Canada. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(4), 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Augare, H., Davíd-Chavez, D., Groenke, F., Plume-Weatherwax, M., Fight, L., Meier, G., … Wippert, R. (2017). A cross-case analysis of three Native Science Field Centers. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(2), 227–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Academy of Technology and Engineering (ATSE). (2016). Enhancing Australia’s prosperity through technology and innovation. In STELR innovative STEM teaching. ATSE. Retrieved from http://www.stelr.org.au
  5. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2017). The Australian Curriculum science. ACARA. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au
  6. Australian Education for Sustainability Alliance (AESA). (2014). Education for sustainability and the Australian Curriculum project: Final report for research phases 1 to 3. Melbourne, VIC: AESA.Google Scholar
  7. Batzri, O., Assaraf, O., Cohen, C., & Orion, N. (2015). Understanding the Earth systems: Expressions of dynamic and cyclic thinking among university students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 761–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouillion, L., & Gomez, L. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 878–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1974). The ecology of human development. Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, 2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. Reprinted in: Gauvain, M., & Cole, M. (Eds.). (1993). Readings on the development of children (2nd ed., pp. 37–43). New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
  12. Bybee, R., & McCrae, R. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30–35.Google Scholar
  14. Capra, F. (2007). Sustainable living, ecological literacy, and the breath of life. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 12(1), 9–18.Google Scholar
  15. Capra, F., & Luisi, P. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carter, L. (2016). Neoliberalism and STEM education. Journal for Activist Science and Technology Education, 7(1), 31–41.Google Scholar
  17. Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415(6867), 23–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cutter-Mackenzie, A. (2011). Teaching for environmental sustainability. In B. Hoepper & R. Gilbert (Eds.), Teaching society and environment (4th ed., pp. 348–363). South Melbourne, VIC: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  19. Daly, H. E. (1996). Beyond growth: The economics of sustainable development. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  20. Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (DECCW). (2010). Border Ranges Rainforest Biodiversity Management Plan. Sydney, NSW: Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water.Google Scholar
  21. Earth Charter Initiative (EOI). (2000). The Earth Charter. Retrieved from http://earthcharter.org/.
  22. Evagorou, M., Korfiatis, K., Nicolaou, C., & Constantinou, C. (2009). An investigation of the potential of interactive simulations for developing system thinking skills in elementary school: A case study with fifth-graders and sixth-graders. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 655–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fien, J., & Tilbury, D. (1996). Learning for a sustainable environment: An agenda for teacher education in Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  24. Gahan, K. (2017). Ways of seeing the Big Scrub past to present. In S. Baunach-Greenfields (Ed.), The Big Scrub Rainforest a journey through time (pp. 103–114). Lismore, NSW/Bangalow, NSW: Rous County Council/Big Scrub Landcare.Google Scholar
  25. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gondwe, M., & Longnecker, N. (2015). Scientific and cultural knowledge in intercultural science education: Student perceptions of common ground. Research in Science Education, 45(1), 117–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gordon, R. (2017). Guriabu… A very, very, long time ago. In S. Baunach-Greenfields (Ed.), The Big Scrub Rainforest a journey through time (pp. 25–30). Lismore, NSW/Bangalow, NSW: Rous County Council/Big Scrub Landcare.Google Scholar
  28. Gough, A. (2011). The Australian-ness of curriculum jigsaws: Where does environmental education fit? Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 27(01), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harden, G., McDonald, W., & Williams, J. (2006). Rainforest trees and shrubs: A field guide to their identification. Nambucca, NSW: Gwen Harden Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holland, R. (2017). The geological story – A muddy beginning. In S. Baunach-Greenfields (Ed.), The Big Scrub Rainforest a journey through time (pp. 31–37). Lismore, NSW/Bangalow, NSW: Rous County Council/Big Scrub Landcare.Google Scholar
  32. Hung, W. (2008). Enhancing systems-thinking skills with modelling. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1099–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kennelly, J., Taylor, N., & Serow, P. (2011). Education for sustainability and the Australian curriculum. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 27(2), 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knapp, D. (2000). The Thessaloniki Declaration: A wake-up call for environmental education? The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(3), 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Krishna, V. (2014). Changing social relations between science and society: Contemporary challenges. Science, Technology and Society, 19(2), 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lovelock, J. (2000). Gaia: A new look at life on earth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lowan-Trudeau, G. (2018). From reticence to resistance: Understanding educators’ engagement with indigenous environmental issues in Canada. Environmental Education Research.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1422114
  39. Malone, K. (2018). Children in the Anthropocene rethinking sustainability and child friendliness in cities. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Malone, K., & Somerville, M. (2015). Education for sustainable development report 2015 contribution of ESD to quality education in Australian schools. Sydney, NSW: Western Sydney University.Google Scholar
  41. McBride, B., Brewer, C. A., Berkowitz, A. R., & Borrie, W. T. (2013). Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy: What do we mean and how did we get here? Ecosphere, 4(5), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Office of Chief Scientist. (2016). Australia’s STEM workforce, science, technology engineering and mathematics. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth Government of Australia.Google Scholar
  43. Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  44. Orr, D. W. (2012). A sense of wonder for young minds. Berkeley California: Center for Ecoliteracy. Retrieved from https://www.ecoliteracy.org/article/sense-wonder-young-minds.
  45. Parkes, T., Delaney, M., Dunphy, M., Woodford, R., Bower, H., Bower, S., … Lymburner, S. (2012). Big Scrub: A cleared landscape in transition back to forest? Ecological Management and Restoration, 13(3), 212–223.  https://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Riess, W., & Mischo, C. (2010). Promoting systems thinking through biology lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 705–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rodriguez, C. C. (2016). Which values regarding nature and other species are we promoting in the Australian science curriculum? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(4), 999–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Selby, D., & Kagawa, F. (2010). Runaway climate change as challenge to the ‘closing circle’ of education for sustainable development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 4(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith, C., & Watson, J. (2016). STEM education and education for sustainability (EFS): Finding common ground for a flourishing future. Paper presented at the AARE Conference 2016, Melbourne, VIC.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, G. A., & Sobel, D. (2010). Place-and community-based education in schools (Sociocultural, political, and historical studies in education). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Steffen, W., Hughes, L., Alexander, D., & Rice, M. (2017). Cranking up the intensity: Climate change and extreme weather events. Sydney, NSW: Climate Council.Google Scholar
  52. Sterling, S. (2003). Whole systems thinking as a basis for paradigm change in education: Explorations in the context of sustainability. Thesis submitted by David Sterling for the Degree of Ph.D, University of Bath.Google Scholar
  53. Thiele, L. P. (2016). Sustainability (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  54. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). (1997). Declaration of Thessaloniki. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from https://www.iau-hesd.net/sites/default/files/documents/thessaloniki.pdf.
  55. Whitehouse, H. (2011). Talking up country: Language, natureculture and interculture in Australian environmental education research. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 27(1), 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Steffen, W., & Crutzen, P. (2010). The new world of the Anthropocene. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(7), 2228–2231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Marianne Logan
    • 1
  • Helen Widdop Quinton
    • 2
  1. 1.Southern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia
  2. 2.Victoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations