Advertisement

Artists as Emplaced Pedagogues: How Does Thinking About Children’s Nature Relations Influence Pedagogy?

  • Elsa LeeEmail author
  • Nicola Walshe
  • Ruth Sapsed
  • Joanna Holland
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore some of the work of an arts and well-being charity in the UK called Cambridge Curiosity and Imagination (CCI), a group of artists, educators, parents, and researchers with an interest in how the arts can transform lives. CCI projects aim to open up spaces for creativity, actively engaging with people of all ages and backgrounds. Much of their work involves connecting children to the outdoors. We describe and discuss how the artist pedagogues working with CCI perceive and articulate the positionality of the children they work with in relation to nonhuman nature and the significance of the imagination in this regard. We then reflect on what this positionality means for posthuman perspectives on the stewardship approach, arguing that humans being both a part of and apart from nature have important consequences for our capacity to steward the Earth. These artists and children work together in spaces with meaning for children; as such, their work fits with the theoretical framework of pedagogies of place. We explore how the artists conceive of “place” in their work with children and how this influences the way they situate children in relation to both human and nonhuman nature, highlighting the data on the role of imagination in this relation. The chapter emerges from ongoing exploratory case study research involving thematic analysis of data from a focus group discussion and individual interviews with the artist pedagogues, as well as archival material from the charity. In our discussion of the findings of our study, we reflect on the usefulness of the notion of childhoodnature in this context, showing how this charity’s work can contribute to its conceptualization and what it can contribute to current debates around the validity and usefulness of the stewardship approach.

Keywords

Place-responsive pedagogy Artists Stewardship Imagining 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This chapter emerges from a focus group discussion with Elena Arevalo Melville, Debbie Hall, Susanne Jasilek, Helen Stratford, Sally Todd, Caroline Wendling and Deb Wilenski. This group of artistic women shared their experiences of working with children at the intersection of nature and creativity with us, and so much of the text has been “written” by them. We are inspired by your work and grateful to you for sharing it with us. We would also like to thank David Whitley for his support and advice in undertaking this research.

References

  1. Alderson, P. (2001). Research by children. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4(2), 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardoin, N. M. (2006). Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of place: Lessons for environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 11, 112–126.Google Scholar
  3. Barratt Hacking, E., Scott, W., & Barratt, R. (2007). Children’s research into their local environment: Stevenson’s gap, and possibilities for the curriculum. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 225–244.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701284811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basso, K. (1996). Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the Western Apache. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bonnett, M. (2012). Environmental concern, moral education and our place in nature. The Journal of Moral Education, 41(3), 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christensen, P., & James, A. (2000). Research with children, perspectives and practices. New York, NY: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, D. A. G., & Mcphie, J. (2016). From places to paths: Learning for sustainability, teacher education and a philosophy of becoming. Environmental Education Research, 22(7), 1002–1024.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1057554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fettes, M., & Judson, G. (2010). Imagination and the cognitive tools of place-making. The Journal of Environmental Education, 42(2), 123–135.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2010.505967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gannon, S. (2015). Saving squawk? Animal and human entanglement at the edge of the lagoon. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 91–110.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1101752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garrard, G. (2010). Problems and prospects in ecocritical pedagogy. Environmental Education Research, 16(2), 233–245.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504621003624704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. Haraway, D. (2015). Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6, 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hart, R. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship (Vol. 4). Florence, Italy: UNCIEF, International Child Development Centre.Google Scholar
  15. Heise, U. (2008). Sense of place and sense of planet: The environmental imagination of the global. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Louv, R. (2005). Last Child in the Woods: Saving our children from nature deficit disorder. Workman Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  17. MacFarlane, R. (2015). Landmarks. Tintern, UK: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  18. MacKenzie, M., & Bieler, A. (2016). Critical education: Narration, place and the social and sociomaterial practice. New York, NY: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malone, K. (2013). “The future lies in our hands”: Children as researchers and environmental change agents in designing a child-friendly neighbourhood. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 18(3), 372–395.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.719020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Malone, K. (2015). Theorizing a child–dog encounter in the slums of La Paz using post-humanistic approaches in order to disrupt universalisms in current ‘child in nature’ debates. Children’s Geographies, 14(4), 390–407.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2015.1077369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mannion, G., Fenwick, A., & Lynch, J. (2013). Place-responsive pedagogy: Learning from teachers’ experiences of excursions in nature. Environmental Education Research, 19(6), 792–809.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.749980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller, L., & Pound, L. (2011). Taking a critical perspective. In L. Miller & L. Pound (Eds.), Theories and approaches to learning in the early years. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Rautio, P. (2013). Children who carry stones in their pockets: On autotelic material practices in everyday life. Children’s Geographies, 11(4), 394–408.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.812278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reid, A., Jensen, B. B., Nikel, J., & Simovska, V. (Eds.). (2008). Participation and learning: Perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, A. (2013). Reconfiguring the natures of childhood. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Taylor, A. (2017). Beyond stewardship: Common world pedagogies for the Anthropocene. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1448–1461.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1325452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thomashow, M. (2002). Bringing the biosphere home: Learning to perceive global environmental change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Whitehead, T. L. (2004). What is ethnography? Methodological, ontological and epistemological attributes. Ethnographically informed community and cultural assessment research systems (EICCARS) working paper series. Retrieved from http://www.cusag.umd.edu/documents/workingpapers/epiontattrib.pdf
  29. Whitley, D. (2013). Learning with Disney: Children’s animation and the politics of innocence. Journal of Educational Media, Memory, and Society, 5(2), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yin, R. K. (1993). Case study research: Design and methods. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elsa Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nicola Walshe
    • 2
  • Ruth Sapsed
    • 3
  • Joanna Holland
    • 3
  1. 1.Independent ResearcherCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Anglia Ruskin UniversityCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Cambridge Curiosity and ImaginationCambridgeUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Bob Stevenson
    • 1
  • Gregory Mannion
    • 2
  • Snowy Evans
    • 3
  1. 1.The Cairns Institute and College of Arts, Society and EducationJames Cook UniversityCairnsAustralia
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK
  3. 3.College of Arts, Society & EducationJames Cook UniversityCairnsAustralia

Personalised recommendations