Advertisement

Unearthing Withling(s): Children, Tweezers, and Worms and the Emergence of Joy and Suffering in a Kindergarten Yard

  • Tuure Tammi
  • Pauliina Rautio
  • Riitta-Marja Leinonen
  • Riikka Hohti
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

While there have been several attempts to account for relationships between humans and nonhuman animals in the social sciences and humanities, the discipline of education has, until recently, steered clear from the so-called animal turn. Drawing on post-anthropocentric theorizations, we introduce a concept of withling(s) and develop it empirically in the context of early years education. In particular, we zoom into one practice of science education at a kindergarten in order to consider what kind of child-animal relations are and might become invoked. Our concept of withling(s) is not an a priori positive relatings, as during the dance between earthworms, pupils, teachers, and technologies, both joy and suffering are invoked simultaneously.

Keywords

Withlings Child-animal relations Early years education Multispecies ethnography Worms 

References

  1. Affifi, R. (2011). What Weston’s spider and my shorebirds might mean for Bateson’s mind: Some educational wanderings in interspecies curricula. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 16, 46–58.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, P., & Simmons, L. (2007). Bestiary: An introduction. In L. Simmons & P. Armstrong (Eds.), Knowing animals (pp. 1–24). Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Birke, L., Bryld, M., & Lykke, N. (2004). Animal performances. An exploration of intersections between feminist science studies and studies of human/animal relationships. Feminist Theory, 5(2), 162–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braidotti, R. (2006). The ethics of becoming imperceptible. In C. Boundas (Ed.), Deleuze and philosophy (pp. 133–159). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buller, H. (2014). Animal geographies II: Methods. Progress in Human Geography, 39(3), 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  9. DeMello, M. (2012). Animals and society: An introduction to human-animal studies. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Despret, V. (2004). The body we care for: Figures of anthropo-zoo-genesis. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fawcett, L. (2002). Children’s wild animal stories: Questioning inter-species bonds. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 7(2), 125–139.Google Scholar
  12. Fudge, E. (2002). Animal. London, England: Reaktion.Google Scholar
  13. Gannon, S. (2015). Saving squawk? Animal and human entanglement at the edge of the lagoon. Environmental Education Research.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1101752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto. Dogs, people and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  15. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hurn, S. (2012). Humans and other animals. Cross-cultural perspectives on human-animal interactions. London, England: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ingold, T. (1988). The animal in the study of humanity. In T. Ingold (Ed.), What is an animal? (pp. 84–99). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Ingold, T. (2006). Rethinking the animate, re-animating thought. Ethnos, 71(1), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ingold, T. (2013). Anthropology beyond humanity. Suomen Antropologi Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society, 38(3), 5–23.Google Scholar
  20. Irvine, L. (2004). If you tame me: Understanding our connection with animals. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Irvine, L. (2009). Filling the ark: Animal welfare in disasters. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kirksey, S. E., & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Latour, B. (2004) Politics of Nature. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lloro-Bidart, T. (2015). Neoliberal and disciplinary environmentality and ‘Sustainable Seafood’ consumption: storying environmentally responsible action, Environmental Education Research, 23:8, 1182–1199,  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1105198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lloro-Bidart, T. (2016). A feminist posthumanist political ecology of education for theorizing human-animal relations/relationships. Environmental Education Research, 23, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lorimer, J. (2007). Nonhuman charisma. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(5), 911–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malone, K. (2015). Theorizing a child–dog encounter in the slums of La Paz using post-humanistic approaches in order to disrupt universalisms in current ‘child in nature’ debates. Children’s Geographies, 14(4), 390–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maurstad, A., Davis, D., & Cowles, S. (2013). Co-being and intra-action in horse-human relationships: A multi-species ethnography of be(com)ing human and be(com)ing horse. Social Anthropology, 21(3), 322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Noske, B. (1997). Beyond boundaries. Humans and animals. Montreal, Canada: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
  30. Oakley, J., Watson, G. P. L., Russell, C. L., Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Fawcett, L., Kuhl, G., … Warkentin, T. (2010). Animal encounters in environmental education research: Responding to the ‘question of the animal’. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 15, 86–102.Google Scholar
  31. Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Nxumalo, F. (2015). Unruly raccoons and troubled educators: Nature/culture divides in a childcare Centre. Environmental Humanities, 7, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pedersen, H. (2010). Is ‘the Posthuman’ educable? On the convergence of educational philosophy, animal studies, and posthumanist theory. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(2), 237–250.Google Scholar
  33. Pickering, A. (2005). Asian eels and global warming: A posthumanist perspective on society and the environment. Ethics & The Environment, 10(2), 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rautio, P. (2014). Mingling and imitating in producing spaces for knowing and being: Insights from a Finnish study of child–matter intra-action. Childhood, 21(4), 461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rautio, P., Hohti, R., Leinonen, R., & Tammi, T. (2017). Reconfiguring urban environmental education with ‘shitgull’ and a ‘shop’. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1379–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rautio, P., & Jokinen, P. (2016). Children and snow piles: Children’s relations to the more-than-human world beyond developmental views. In T. Skelton, J. Horton & B. Evans (Eds.), Geographies of children and young people: Play, recreation, health and well being. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Russell, C. L., & Fawcett, L. (2013). Moving margins in environmental education research. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 369–374). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Shapiro, K. (2002). Editor’s introduction. The state of human-animal studies: Solid, at the margin! Society and Animals, 10(4), 331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Snaza, N., Appelbaum, P., Bayne, S., Carlson, D., Morris, M., Rotas, N., … Weaver, J. (2014). Toward a posthumanist education. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 39–55.Google Scholar
  40. Snaza, J., & Weaver, J. (2014). Posthumanism and Educational Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. (2015). Posthumanism and educational research. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Somerville, M., Woods, A., Rautio, P., Hackett, A., Duhn, I., Vladimirova, A., … Crinall, S. (2016). Emergent literacies for world-naming. A symposium held at AARE 2016, Melbourne, VIC.Google Scholar
  43. Spannring, R. (2015). I and animal thou. Perspectives for educational theory. Society and Animals, 23(6), 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spannring, R. (2017). Animals in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 63–74.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1188058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stengers, I. (2011). Cosmopolitics II (R. Bononno, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2017). Kids, raccoons, and roos: Awkward encounters and mixed affects. Children’s Geographies, 15(2), 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, N. (2012). Animals, mess, method: Post-humanism, sociology and animal studies. In L. Birke & J. Hockenhull (Eds.), Crossing boundaries. Investigating human-animal relationships (pp. 37–50). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
  48. Tipper, B. (2011). “A dog who I know quite well”, everyday relationships between children and animals. Children’s Geographies, 9(2), 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Warkentin, T. (2010). Interspecies etiquette: An ethics of paying attention to animals. Ethics & the Environment, 15(1), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Warkentin, T. (2011) Interspecies Etiquette in Place Ethical Affordances in Swim-With-Dolphins Programs. Ethics and the Environment, 16(1): 99–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilkie, R. (2015). Multispecies scholarship and encounters: Changing assumptions at the human- animal nexus. Sociology, 49(2), 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wolch, J., & Emel, J. (1998). Animal geographies: Place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderlands. London, England: Verso.Google Scholar
  53. Wolfe, C. (2003). Zoontologies. The question of the animal. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tuure Tammi
    • 1
  • Pauliina Rautio
    • 1
  • Riitta-Marja Leinonen
    • 1
  • Riikka Hohti
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Pauliina Rautio
    • 1
  • Tracy Young
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.Swinbourne UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations