Advertisement

Posthuman Theory and Practice in Early Years Learning

  • Margaret SomervilleEmail author
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

This childhood/nature chapter was provoked by curiosity about the rise of posthuman theorizing in early years learning research and practice. Set in the context of the Anthropocene as the age of human entanglement in the fate of the planet, it takes the view that the primary task of this time is to develop new understandings of the human and new concepts of thought (Colebrook, Extinction: framing the end of the species. Open Humanities Press, 2010). Early childhood has led the field of education in the development and application of posthuman theorizing in response to this imperative, prompting the explorations of the chapter. A review of the literature in this field resulted in the identification of three distinct areas of posthuman theoretical activity: new materialism, child-animal relations, and Indigenous-nonindigenous intersections. The third category Indigenous-nonindigenous intersections which draws primarily on Indigenous theorizing was so divergent from the others, and so complex, as to be considered outside the scope of this chapter. In gathering the various papers together to make sense of the literature in each of new materialism and child-animal relations, different modes of analysis were called for. New materialism in early childhood education and practice is considered using a genealogical generational analysis following the work of Van der Tuin (Generational feminism: new materialist introduction to a generative approach. Lexington Books, London, 2014), while child-animal relations prompted an analytical approach involving Haraway’s bag lady method following Taylor, Blaise, and Giugni (Discourse Stud Cult Polit Educ 34(1):48–62, 2013). A particularly interesting and curious finding was that “life” emerged as a major theme from new materialism and “death” from child-animal relations in keeping with the paradoxical nature of the Anthropocene.

Keywords

Posthuman New materialism Child-animal relations Early childhood Anthropocene 

References

  1. Atkinson, K. (2015). Wasps-bees-mushrooms-children: Reimagining multispecies relations in early childhood pedagogies. Canadian Children, 40(2), 67–79.Google Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter. A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Colebrook, C. (Ed.). (2010). Extinction: Framing the end of the species. Open Humanities Press, London. (online series, published by OHP/JISC jointly) http://livingbooksaboutlife.org/pdfs/bookarchive/Extinction.pdf.
  5. Collard, R. C., Dempsey, J., & Sundberg, J. (2015). A manifesto for abundant futures. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(2), 322–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (Tomlinson, H. and Burchell, G. Trans.) New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1991)Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense, (M. Lester, Ed.) New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Duhn, I. (2015). Making agency matter: Rethinking infant and toddler agency in educational discourse. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(6), 920–931.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.918535.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. [1971] (1977). Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, (ed). Donald F. Bouchard, 139–64. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (p.160).Google Scholar
  10. Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2006). A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ginn, F., Beisel, U., and Barua, M. (2014). Flourishing with awkward creatures: togetherness, vulnerability, killing. Environmental Humanities, 4(1):113–123  https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3614953.
  12. Giugni, M. (2011). ‘Becoming worldly with’: An encounter with the early years learning framework. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(1), 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hackett, A., Pahl, K., & Pool, S. (2017). In amongst the glitter and the squashed blueberries: Crafting a collaborative lens for children’s literacy pedagogy in a community setting. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 12(1), 58–73.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2017.1283994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haraway, D. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  15. Haraway, D. (2004). Cyborgs to Companion Species: Reconfiguring kinship in technoscience. In D. Haraway, (Ed.) The Haraway Reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Haraway, D. (2012). Awash in urine: DES and Premarin® in multispecies response-ability. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 40(1 & 2): 301–316.  https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2012.0005.
  18. Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.500628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis group.Google Scholar
  21. Lorimer, J. (2015). Wildlife in the Anthropocene: Conservation after nature. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malaguzzi, L. (1998). History, ideas and basic philosophy. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. E. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach–advanced reflections (2nd ed., pp. 49–99). Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  23. Malone, K. (2016). Reconsidering children’s encounters with nature and place using posthumanism. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1), 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Massey, D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Nxumalo, F. (2017). Stories for living on a damaged planet: Environmental education in a preschool classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X17715499.
  26. Nxumalo, F., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2017). ‘Staying with the trouble’ in child-insect-educator common worlds. Environmental Education Research, 23, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1325447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Probyn, E. (1996). Outside Belongings. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Rautio, P. (2013). Children who carry stones in their pockets: On autotelic material practices in everyday life. Children’s Geographies, 11(4), 394–408.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.812278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rautio, P. (2014). Mingling and imitating in producing spaces for knowing and being: Insights from a Finnish study of child-matter intra-action. Childhood, 21(4), 461–474.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568213496653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rautio, P. (2017). Thinking about life and species lines with Pietari and Otto (and garlic breath). TRACE: Finnish Journal for Human-Animal Studies, Vol. 3: 94–102.Google Scholar
  32. Rautio, P., & Winston, J. (2015). Things and children in play – Improvisation with language and matter. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(1), 15–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.830.Google Scholar
  33. Rose, D.B., & Robin, L. (2004). The environmental humanities in action: An Invitation. Australian Humanities Review, April 2004, Issue 31–32 http://australianhumanitiesreview.org/2004/04/01/the-ecological-humanities-in-action-aninvitation/.
  34. Rose, D., & van Dooren, T. (2017). Encountering a More-than-human World: Ethos and the Arts of Witness. In U. Heise, J. Cristensen and M. Niemann (eds.) Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities, pp.120–128. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Somerville, M. (2015). Emergent literacies in ‘The land of do anything you want’ (Chapter 6). In M. Somerville & M. Green (Eds.), Children, place and sustainability. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Somerville, M., & Green, M. (2015). Children, place and sustainability. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Somerville, M., & Williams, C. (2015). Sustainability education in early childhood: An updated review of research in the field. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 16(2), 102–117.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949115585658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Springgay, S. (2014). Anarchiving: Propositions in movement for qualitative research. Paper presentation. Brisbane: Annual Association for Research in Education.Google Scholar
  39. Stewart, K. (2010). Atmospheric attunements. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(3), 445–453.  https://doi.org/10.1068/d9109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taylor, A., Blaise, M., & Giugni, M. (2013). Haraway’s “bag lady story-telling”: Relocating childhood and learning within a ‘post-human landscape’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(1), 48–62.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2012.698863.Google Scholar
  41. Taylor, A., & Giugni, M. (2012). Common worlds: Reconceptualising inclusion in early childhood communities. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 108–120.  https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2012.13.2.108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture, Society, 23(4), 507–529.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1039050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2017). Kids, raccoons, and roos: Awkward encounters and mixed affects. Children’s Geographies, 15(2), 131–145.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1199849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylor, A., & Richardson, C. (2005). Queering home corner. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(2), 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tesar, M., & Arndt, S. (2016). Vibrancy of childhood things: Power, philosophy, and political ecology of matter. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 193–200.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616636144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tsing, A. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Van der Tuin, I. (2014). Generational feminism: New materialist introduction to a generative approach. London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  48. Van Dooren, T. (2010). Pain of extinction: the death of a vulture. Cultural Studies Review, 16(2): 271–289. http://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v16i2.1702.Google Scholar
  49. Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Steffen, W., & Crutzen, P. (2010). The new world of the Anthropocene. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 2228–2231.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es903118j.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Sydney UniversityPenrithAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Karen Malone
    • 1
  • Iris Duhn
    • 2
  • Marek Tesar
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Educational ResearchWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Education, Peninsula CampusMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations