Advertisement

Rats, Death, and Anthropocene Relations in Urban Canadian Childhoods

  • Narda NelsonEmail author
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

In the Euro-Western intellectual, or minority world, tradition death is often framed as something to avoid in the creation of “optimal” childhoods. Foregrounding a West Coast Canadian early childhood center’s unexpected encounter with a dying rat, this chapter looks at the role ethical frameworks play in shaping uneasy more-than-human engagements to challenge taken-for-granted assumptions about animal death in urban early childhoods and grapple with the limits of ethical engagement. In it, understandings of childhood and nature are situated within the schism of romanticized narratives and challenges of a so-called new Anthropocene era, to reconfigure encounters at the intersection of life and death as generative in their ability to destabilize the precepts of a humancentric worldview that orders urban spaces and relations in particular ways. Using a hybrid multispecies ethnographic and common worlding approach, this chapter explores possibilities for cultivating new modes of attention to promote expansive approaches to thinking and doing in early learning pedagogy and practice. How might we resist shoring up colonial and other universalizing narratives when death emerges through everyday encounter? What stories help us matter differently as we continue to world with others in this time of rapid change? This chapter proposes tending to multispecies relations, including those considered uncomfortable, as deeply entangled and consequential to open up new possibilities for ethical responses to living and dying together in these troubling times.

Keywords

Early childhood Death Responsibility Ethics Anthropocene Rats 

References

  1. Baynes-Rock, M. (2013). Life and death in the multispecies commons. Social Science Information, 52(2), 210–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belcourt, B. (2015). Animal bodies, colonial subjects: (Re)locating animality in decolonial thought. Societies, 5, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler, J. (2010). Frames of war: When is life grievable? London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Collard, R., Dempsey, J., & Sundberg, J. (2015). A manifesto for abundant futures. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(2), 322–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Common World Childhoods Research Collective. (2017). Children’s relations with place, with materials, and with other species. Retrieved from http://commonworlds.net/research/
  6. Davis, H., & Todd, Z. (2017). On the importance of a date, or decolonizing the Anthropocene. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 16(4), 761–780.Google Scholar
  7. Dirzo, R., Young, H. S., Galetti, M., Ceballos, G., Isaac, N. J. B., & Collen, B. (2014). Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science, 345(6195), 401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fawcett, L. (2014). Kinship imaginaries: Children’s stories of wild friendships, fear, and freedom. In G. Marvin & S. McHugh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human-animal studies (pp. 259–274). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Gelonesi, J. (2014). Philosopher Undine discusses sex, flies and fairy tales. The Philosopher’s Zone @ ABC Podcast. Podcast retrieved from [ABC Audiofile]. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/philosopherszone/sex2c-flies2c-and-fairytales/5519320
  10. Gibson, K., Rose, D. B., & Fincher, R. (Eds.). (2015). Manifesto for living in the Anthropocene. Brooklyn, NY: Punctum.Google Scholar
  11. Ginn, F., Beisel, U., & Barua, M. (2014). Flourishing with awkward creatures: Vulnerability, togetherness, killing. Environmental Humanities, 4(1), 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haberstroh, M. (2017). Bird rescue centre raises concerns about rat poison. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/birds-poison-1.4468165
  13. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  14. Haraway, D. (2012). Awash in urine: DES and Premarin in multispecies response-ability. Women’s Quarterly Journal, 40(1–2), 301–316.  https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2012.0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haraway, D. (2015). A curious practice. Angelaki, 20(2), 5–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2015.1039817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heise, U. K. (2016). Imagining extinction: The cultural meanings of endangered species. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. High, K. (2006). Embracing animal. Retrieved from http://kathyhigh.com/project-embracing-animal.html
  18. Hird, M. J. (2010). Coevolution, symbiosis and sociology. Ecological Economics, 69, 737–742.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holm, M. (2014). Rats! Black rats spreads to BC interior. Retrieved from http://www.farmwest.com/node/1356
  20. Jackson, Z. I. (2014). Animal: New directions in the theorization of race and posthumanism. Feminist Studies, 39(3), 669–685.Google Scholar
  21. Jorgensøn, K.A., & Sanders, D.L. (2017). Children’s encounters with death and decay in the ‘more than human world’. European Early Childhood Education Research Association (EECERA): Early Childhood Education Beyond the Crisis: Social Justice, Solidarity and Children’s Rights (conference presentation).Google Scholar
  22. Klinkenberg, B. (2017). E-Fauna BC: Electronic atlas of the fauna of British Columbia. Retrieved from http://ibis.geog.ubc.ca/biodiversity/efauna/AlienSpeciesinBritishColumbiaHistoricalRecords.html
  23. Malone, K., & Truong, S. (2017). Sustainability, education, and anthropocentric precarity. In K. Malone, S. Truong, & T. Gray (Eds.), Reimagining sustainability in precarious times (pp. 3–16). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McArthur, J. (2016). Who is acceptable to grieve? In M. DeMello (Ed.), Mourning animals: Rituals and practices surrounding animal death (pp. 201–204). East Lansing, MN: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
  25. McCue, D. (2015). Vancouver daycare teaches toddlers about Indian residential schools. CBC News [online]. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/aboriginal/vancouver-daycare-teaches-residential-schools-1.3243358
  26. Meehitiya, L., Sanders, D., & Hohenstein, J. (2017). Life, living and lifelessness in taxidermy. In Natural history dioramas: Traditional exhibits for current educational themes (Vol. 2). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Nelson, N., Coon, E., & Chadwick, A. (2015). Engaging with the messiness of place in early childhood education and art therapy: Exploring animal relations, traditional hide and Drum. Canadian Children, 40(2), 43–56.Google Scholar
  28. Nxumalo, F. (2015). Forest stories: Restorying encounters with “natural” places in early childhood education. In V. Pacini-Ketchabaw & A. Taylor (Eds.), Unsettling the colonial places and spaces of early childhood education (pp. 21–42). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Nxumalo, F. (2015). Unruly raccoons and troubled educators: Nature/culture divides in a childcare centre. Environmental Humanities, 7, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., Taylor, A., & Blaise, M. (2016). De-centring the human in multispecies ethnographies. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 149–167). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., Taylor, A., Blaise, M., & de Finney, S. (2014). Learning how to inherit in colonized and ecologically challenged lifeworlds: An introduction. Canadian Children, 40(2), 3–8.Google Scholar
  32. Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2015). Ecological thinking, material spirituality, and the poetics of infrastructure. In G. C. Bowker, S. Timmermans, A. E. Clarke, & E. Balka (Eds.), Boundary objects and beyond: Working with Leigh Star (pp. 1–16). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rautio, P., & Jokinen, P. (2016). Children’s relations to the more-than-human world beyond developmental views. In B. Evans, J. Horton, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Play and recreation, health and wellbeing (pp. 35–49). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rose, D. (2011). Flying foxes: Kin, keystone, kontaminant. Australian Humanities Review, 50, 119–136.Google Scholar
  36. Rose, D. (2013a). Dingo kinship. Wildlife Australia, 50, 33–35.Google Scholar
  37. Rose, D. (2013b). In the shadow of all this death. In J. Johnston & F. Probyn-Rapsey (Eds.), Animal death (pp. 1–20). Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rose, D.B., van Dooren, T., Chrulew, M., Cooke, S., Kearnes, M., & O’Gorman, E. (2012). Thinking through the environment, unsettling the environmental humanities. Environmental Humanities, 1(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Russell, J. (2016). I remember everything: Children, companion animals, and a relational pedagogy of remembrance. In M. DeMello (Ed.), Mourning animals: Rituals and practices surrounding animal death (pp. 81–90). East Lansing, MN: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sanders, D. L. (under review). Stories of the dead rabbit and the dissected mouse: Encounters between children and the more than human world in early childhood science education.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, L. T. (2014). Research through imperial eyes. In A. M. Jaggar (Ed.), Just methods: An interdisciplinary feminist reader (pp. 58–68). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Stengers, I. (2015). In catastrophic times: Resisting the coming barbarism. (A. Goffry, Trans.). Open Humanities Press in collaboration with Meson Press. Dordrecht: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  43. Sullivan, S. (2004). Rats: Observations on the history and habitat of the city’s most unwanted inhabitants. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  44. TallBear, K. (2015). Beyond life/not life: A feminist-Indigenous reading of cryopreservation, interspecies thinking, and the new materialisms. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iE-gaDG-kLQ
  45. Taylor, A. (2013). Reconfiguring the natures of childhoods. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor, A., & Giugni, M. (2012). Common worlds: Reconceptualising inclusion in early childhood communities. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 507–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2016). Kids, racoons, and roos: Awkward encounters and mixed affects. Children’s Geographies, 15(2), 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor, A. (2017). Beyond stewardship: Common world pedagogies for the Anthropocene. Environmental Education Review, 3(10), 1448–1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. The Vancouver Rat Project. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.vancouverratproject.com/vancouver_rat_project/home
  51. Tsing, A. (2012). Unruly edges: Mushrooms and companion species. Environmental Humanities, 1(1), 141–154.  https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3610012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van Dooren, T. (2014a). Flight ways: Life and loss at the edge of extinction. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  53. van Dooren, T. (2014b). Life at the edge of extinction: Spectral crows, haunted landscapes and the environmental humanities. Humanities Australia, 5, 8–22.Google Scholar
  54. van Dooren, T. (2015). Vulture stories: Narrative and conservation. In K. Gibson, D. B. Rose, & R. Fincher (Eds.), Manifesto for living in the Anthropocene (pp. 17–21). Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books.Google Scholar
  55. van Dooren, T., Kirksey, E., & Münster, U. (2016). Multispecies studies: Cultivating the arts of attentiveness. Environmental Humanities, 8(1), 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3527695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van Dooren, T., & Rose, D. (2012). Storied-places in a multispecies city. Humanimalia, 3(2), 1–27. Retrieved from http://www.depauw.edu/humanimalia/issue%2006/pdfs/van%20dooren%20rose.pdfGoogle Scholar
  57. von Uexküll, J. (1992). A stroll through the world of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. Semiotica, 89(4), 319–391.Google Scholar
  58. Watts, V. (2013). Indigenous place-thought and agency amongst humans and non humans (first woman and sky woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization, Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2(1), 20–34.Google Scholar
  59. Weir, J. K. (2015). Lives in connection. In K. Gibson, D. B. Rose, & R. Fincher (Eds.), Manifesto for living in the Anthropocene (pp. 17–21). Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Child and Youth CareUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Amy Cutter-Mackenzie
    • 1
  • Karen Malone
    • 2
  • Marianne Krasny
    • 3
  • Hilary Whitehouse
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Education, Gold Coast CampusSouthern Cross UniversityGold CoastAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Educational ResearchWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  4. 4.James Cook UniversityCairnsAustralia

Personalised recommendations