Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to rethink “thought” in qualitative inquiry. We attend to possibilities that open up when we turn our attention to habits, ordinary affects, and methodological creations that are integral to the ways in which we think. The challenge of putting new materialism and post-humanism to work requires significant ontological and epistemological shifts. Nevertheless, it is only by shifting the ground on which specific knowledge claims are made that we can potentiate a different logic which in turn can alter both thinking and, importantly, early years practice. Thus this chapter will resolutely refute general ideas or models of what constitute familiar objects in early childhood settings, for example, “the cardboard box” or “the snowman” [sic]. Instead, such models, in situating them within a “zone of indeterminacy” (Massumi 1993, p. 99), are, as a consequence, freed from habitual assumptions – assumptions that, in our view, delimit the possibilities of what is possible. The chapter works with objects and processes, deliberately avoiding foregrounding the child, to leave the uncertainty and ambiguity of which things are in play, alive in the text. Through experimental methods the chapter will draw on two early years projects: 2-Curious (a program of continued professional development for early years practitioners in Manchester, UK) and Knotknowing Diversity in Early Childhood (a research project reexamining “multicultural education” in an early years setting in London, UK), as generative examples of the potential of the entanglements observed during ethnographic research that take matter and materiality as their starting place.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Biesta, G. (2007). Why “What Works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.
Bissell, D. (2012). Agitating the powers of habit: Towards a volatile politics of thought. Theory and Event, 15, 1. Accessed 09 Apr 17 at https://muse.jhu.edu/article/469326.
Blackman, L. (2012). Immaterial bodies affect, embodiment, mediation. London, England: Sage.
Braidotti, R. (2006). Transpositons: On nomadic ethics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Oxford: Polity Press.
Brennan, T. (2004). The transmission of affect. Ithaca, Greece: Cornell University Press.
Cannella, G. S., Pérez, M. S., & Lee, I. F. (Eds.). (2015). Critical examinations of quality in childhood education and care: Regulation, disqualification, and erasure. New York, NY: Peter Lang. https://www.peterlang.com/view/product/31229?format=EPUB.
Cannella, G. S., & Soto, L. D. (2010). Childhoods: A handbook (rethinking childhood). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Clough, P. T. (2007). Introduction. In P. T. Clough (Ed.), The affective turn. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999/2013). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Languages of evaluation. London, England: Routledge.
Dahlberg, G., & Moss, P. (2005). Ethics and politics of early childhood education (contesting Early Childhood). London: Routledge.
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G. (2013). Francis Bacon. London, England: Bloomsbury.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London, England: Continuum.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? London, England: Verso Books.
Department for Education. (2011). Supporting families in the foundation years. London, England: Crown Copyright.
Department for Education. (2015). 2-year-old early education entitlement: Local authority guide. London, England: Crown Copyright.
Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: Open University Press.
Guillaume, L., & Hughes, J. (2011). Deleuze and the body. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. London, England: Duke University Press.
Hickey-Moody, A. (2016). Manifesto: The rhizomatics of practice as research. In A. Hickey-Moody & T. Page (Eds.), Arts, pedagogy and cultural resistance: New materialisms (pp. 169–192). London, England: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Holmes, R., & Jones, L. (2016). Flickering, spilling and diffusing body/knowledge in the posthuman early years. In C. A. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 108–127). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave.
Hroch, P. (2015). Deleuze, Guattari, and environmental pedagogy and politics: Ritournelles for a planet-yet-to-come. In M. Carlin & J. Wallin (Eds.), Deleuze and Guattari, politics and education: For a people-yet-to-come. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
Kirby, V. (1997). Telling flesh: The substance of the corporeal. New York, NY/London, England: Routledge.
Knudsen, B. T., & Stage, C. (2015). Affective methodologies: Developing cultural research strategies for the study of affect. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lapworth, A. (2015). Habit, art, and the plasticity of the subject: The ontogenetic shock of the bioart encounter. Cultural Geographies, 22(1), 85–102.
Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London, England: Routledge.
MacLure, M. (2013). The wonder of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 228–232.
MacLure, M. (2015). ‘The New Materialisms’: Thorn in the flesh of critical qualitative inquiry? G.S. Cannella, M.S. Pérez, P.A. Pasque Critical qualitative inquiry: Foundations and futures. London, England: Routledge, 93–112. 2016.
Malone, K. (2016). Children’s place encounters: place-based participatory research to design a child-friendly and sustainable urban development. Geographies of Global Issues: Change and Threat, Springer 9789814585538.
Massumi, B. (1993). Politics of everyday fear. University of Minnesota Press.
Massumi, B. (1998). Event horizon. In J. Brouwer (Ed.), The art of the accident (pp. 154–168). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Dutch Architecture Institute/V2.
Massumi, B. (2002). A shock to thought: Expression after Deleuze and Guattari. London, England: Routledge.
Mitchell, R. (2010). Bioart and the vitality of media. Seattle, WA: Washington University Press.
Massumi, B. (2015). The politics of affect. London: Polity Press.
Moss, P. (2014). Transformative Change and Real Utopias in Early Childhood Education: A story of democracy, experimentation and potentiality (Contesting Early Childhood). London: Routledge.
Moss, P. (2016). Towards a holistic approach to early childhood education. In C. Dalli & A. Meade (Eds.), Research, policy and advocacy in the early years: Writings inspired by the achievements of Anne smith (pp. 109–120). Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER.
Olsson, L. M. (2009). Movement and experimentation in young children’s learning: Deleuze and Guattari in early childhood education. London, England: Routledge.
Olsson, L. M., Dahlberg, G., & Theorell, E. (2015). Displacing identity – placing aesthetics: Early childhood literacy in a globalized world. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(5), 717–738.
Rancière, J. (2001). Ten theses on politics. Theory & Event, 5(3.) Accessed on 13 Nov at http://www.after1968.org/app/webroot/uploads/RanciereTHESESONPOLITICS.pdf.
Ravaisson, F. (2008). Of habit (C. Carlisle & M. Sinclair, Trans.). London, England: Continuum.
Stengers, I. (2010). Cosmopolitics I. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. London, England: Duke University press.
Svirsky, M. (2015). BDS as a mediator. Literary and Cultural Studies, 41(2), 45–74.
Taylor, A. (2013). Reconfiguring the natures of childhood (Contesting Early Childhood). London: Routledge.
Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London, England: Routledge.
Wallin, J. (2013). Morphologies for a pedagogical life. In I. Semetsky & D. Masny (Eds.), Deleuze and education (pp. 196–214). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
Williams, J. (2013). Gilles Deleuze’s difference and repetition: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
Wood, B. (2014). Making sense of no body. Journal of Creative Technologies, (1). Accessed 15 Nov 2017, at https://ctechjournal.aut.ac.nz/paper/making-sense-body/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Holmes, R., Jones, L., Osgood, J. (2018). Mundane Habits, Ordinary Affects, and Methodological Creations. In: Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Malone, K., Barratt Hacking, E. (eds) Research Handbook on Childhoodnature . Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_20-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_20-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51949-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51949-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education