Advertisement

Exploring Space and Politics with Children: A Geosocial Methodological Approach to Studying Experiential Worlds

  • Kirsi Pauliina KallioEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

The chapter introduces a methodological approach that the author has developed for the empirical and analytical exploration of children’s geosocial worlds. It builds on a threefold conceptual baseline: political subjectivity as a human capacity, topological polis as a relational context of living, and the political referring to subjectively experienced and socially shared, contextually forming matters of importance. These three interrelated starting points provide the theoretical ground and its methodological framework for exploring the worlds where children lead their lives, from their perspectives and with them, through spatially embedded narrations that unveil situated and contextual truths. For empirical inquiry, I have operationalized the geosocial approach into three analytical layers, focusing on social, spatial, and political relationalities. The chapter describes the methodological approach, including a theoretical introduction and a thorough explanation of the geosocial analytical means, and empirical illustrations that inform a politicized notion of childhoodnature. It concludes with recommendations for ongoing methodological inquiry into children’s social and environmental worlds and further theorization of the geosocialities of childhoodnature, as limited by the empirical contexts informing this chapter.

Keywords

Geosocial Experienced space Topology Spatial methodologies Children Relational space Political subject 

References

  1. Ahlqvist, T. (2013). Engineering spatial fixes: Relational spatial practices, strategic-topological approach and the construction of a Finnish science-technology district. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 95(1), 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, H. (2005). The promise of politics. New York, NY: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  4. Baines, E. K. (2015). “Today, I want to speak out the truth”: Victim agency, responsibility, and transitional justice. International Political Sociology, 9(4), 316–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, C. (2012). Situating the geographies of injustice in democratic theory. Geoforum, 43(4), 677–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartos, A. E., & Wood, B. E. (2017). Ecological wellbeing, childhood and environmental change. In C. R. Ergler, R. Kearns, & K. Witten (Eds.), Children’s health and wellbeing in urban environments (pp. 234–246). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Benwell, M., & Hopkins, P. (Eds.). (2015). Children, young people and critical geopolitics. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  8. Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carneiro, A., Portugal, P., & Varejão, J. (2014). Catastrophic job destruction during the Portuguese economic crisis. Journal of Macroeconomics, 39, 444–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chernilo, D. (2017). The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(1), 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornell, D., & Murphy, S. (2002). Anti-racism, multiculturalism and the ethics of identification. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 28(4), 419–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa, C., Bakas, F. E., Breda, Z., Durão, M., Carvalho, I., & Caçador, S. (2017). Gender, flexibility and the ‘ideal tourism worker’. Annals of Tourism Research, 64, 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crossley, N. (2001). Citizenship, Intersubjectivity and the lifeworld. In N. Stevenson (Ed.), Culture and citizenship (pp. 33–47). London, England: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dikeç, M. (2013). Beginners and equals: Political subjectivity in Arendt and Rancière. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(1), 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ek, R. (2006). Giorgio Agamben and the Spatialities of the camp: An introduction. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 88(4), 363–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elwood, S., & Mitchell, K. (2012). Mapping children’s politics: Spatial stories, dialogic relations and political formation. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 94(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the college de France, 1975–1976. New York, NY: Picador.Google Scholar
  18. Habashi, J. (2017). Political socialization of youth: A Palestinian case study. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Häkli, J. (2017). The subject of citizenship – Can there be a posthuman civil society? Political Geography.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.08.006. [Early View].
  20. Häkli, J. (2018). Transcending scale? In G. H. Herb & D. H. Kaplan (Eds.), Scaling identities (pp. 271–282). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  21. Häkli, J., & Kallio, K. P. (2014a). Subject, action and polis: Theorizing political agency. Progress in Human Geography, 38(2), 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Häkli, J., & Kallio, K. P. (2014b). The global as a field: Children’s rights advocacy as a transnational practice. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(2), 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Häkli, J., & Kallio, K. P. (2016). Children’s rights advocacy as transnational citizenship. Global Networks, 16(3), 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Häkli, J., & Kallio, K. P. (2018a). Theorizing children’s political agency. In S. Aitken & T. Skelton (Eds.), Theories and concepts: Establishing geographies of children and young people (Geographies of children and young people, Vol. 1 of T. Skelton (Ed.)). Singapore, Singapore: Springer. [Accepted, in process].Google Scholar
  25. Häkli, J., & Kallio, K. P. (2018b). On becoming political: the political in subjectivity. Subjectivity, 11(1), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harris, A., & Wyn, J. (2010). Emerging forms of youth participation: Everyday and local perspectives. Special issue editorial. Young, 10, 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hiltunen, M. J., & Rehunen, A. (2014). Second home mobility in Finland: Patterns, practices and relations of leisure oriented mobile lifestyle. Fennia, 192(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  29. Hörschelmann, K., & Reich, E. (2017). Entangled (in)securities: Sketching the scope of geosocial approaches for understanding “webs of (in)security”. Geopolitics, 22(1), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. James, P. (2017). Alternative paradigms for sustainability: Decentring the human without becoming Posthuman. In K. Malone, T. Gray, & S. Truong (Eds.), Reimagining sustainability education in precarious times (pp. 29–44). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2550-1_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson, E., Morehouse, H., Dalby, S., Lehman, J., Nelson, S., Rowan, R., ... & Yusoff, K. (2014). After the Anthropocene: Politics and geographic inquiry for a new epoch. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, K. T. (1998). Scale as epistemology. Political Geography, 17(1), 25–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Joronen, M. (2016). Politics of being-related: On onto-topologies and ‘Coming Events’. Geografiska Annaler B: Human Geography, 98(2), 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kallio, K. P. (2008). The body as a battlefield: Approaching children’s politics. Geografiska Annaler B: Human Geography, 90(3), 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kallio, K. P. (2012). Desubjugating childhoods by listening to the child’s voice and the childhoods at play. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 11(1), 81–109.Google Scholar
  37. Kallio, K. P. (2014a). Rethinking spatial socialization as a dynamic and relational process of political becoming. Global Studies of Childhood, 4(3), 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kallio, K. P. (2014b). Intergenerational recognition as political practice. In R. Vanderbeck & N. Worth (Eds.), Intergenerational space (pp. 139–154). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Kallio, K. P. (2014c). Who is the subject of political action. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 13(3), 428–433.Google Scholar
  40. Kallio, K. P. (2016a). Living together in the topological home. Space and Culture, 19(4), 373–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kallio, K. P. (2016b). Becoming geopolitical in the everyday world. In M. Benwell & P. Hopkins (Eds.), Children, young people and critical geopolitics (pp. 169–186). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. Kallio, K. P. (2016c). Youthful political presence: Right, reality and practice of the child. In K. P. Kallio & S. Mills (Eds.), Politics, citizenship and rights (Geographies of children and young people, Vol. 7 of T. Skelton (Ed.), pp. 89–110). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kallio, K. P. (2017a). Shaping subjects in everyday encounters: Intergenerational recognition in intersubjective socialisation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(1), 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kallio, K. P. (2017b). Not in the same world: Topological youths, topographical policies. Geographical Review.  https://doi.org/10.1111/Gere.12266. [Early View].
  45. Kallio, K. P. (2017c). Disqualified knowledges and theory building. Society & Space Essays and Features [published Sept 12]. http://societyandspace.org/2017/09/12/disqualified-knowledges-and-theory-building/.
  46. Kallio, K. P. (2018). Citizen-subject formation as geo-socialisation: A methodological approach on ‘learning to be citizens’. Geografiska Annaler B: Human Geography, 99, 4.  https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2017.1390776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kallio, K. P. (forthcoming). Leading refugee lives together: Familial agency as a political capacity. Emotion, Space and Society [in process].Google Scholar
  48. Kallio, K. P., & Häkli, J. (2011a). Are there politics in childhood? Space and Polity, 15(1), 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kallio, K. P., & Häkli, J. (2011b). Tracing children’s politics. Political Geography, 30(2), 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kallio, K. P., & Häkli, J. (Eds.). (2015). The beginning of politics. London, England/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Kallio, K. P., & Häkli, J. (2017). Geosocial lives in topological polis: Mohamed Bouazizi as a political agent. Geopolitics, 22(1), 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kallio, K. P., Häkli, J., & Bäcklund, P. (2015). Lived citizenship as the locus of political agency in participatory policy. Citizenship Studies, 19(1), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kallio, K. P., & Mills, S. (2016). Politics, citizenship and rights (Geographies of children and young people, Vol. 7 of T. Skelton (Ed.)). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Kivisto, P., & La Vecchia-Mikkola, V. (2015). The integration of Iraqis in two European cities: Emotions and identity work. Emotion, Space and Society, 16, 90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Korkiamäki, R., & Kallio, K. P. (2017). Experiencing and practicing inclusion through friendship. Area [Early View 15 Jun 2017].Google Scholar
  56. Kulusjärvi, O. (2016). Resort-oriented tourism development and local tourism networks – A case study from northern Finland. Fennia, 194(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
  57. Lagström, H., Pösö, T., Rutanen, N., & Vehkalahti, K. (Eds.). (2010). Lasten ja Nuorten Tutkimuksen Etiikka. Helsinki, Finland: Nuorisotutkimusseura/Nuorisotutkimusverkosto.Google Scholar
  58. Leitner, H., Sheppard, E., & Sziarto, K. M. (2008). The spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(2), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lorimer, J. (2010). International conservation ‘volunteering’ and the geographies of global environmental citizenship. Political Geography, 29(6), 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Marston, S. A., Jones, J. P., & Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(4), 416–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Martin, L., & Secor, A. J. (2014). Towards a post-mathematical topology. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 420–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Massaro, V. A., & Williams, J. (2013). Feminist geopolitics. Geography Compass, 7(8), 567–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mezzadra, S., & Neilson, B. (2012). Between inclusion and exclusion: On the topology of global space and borders. Theory, Culture and Society, 29(4–5), 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Millei, Z. (Ed.). (2014). The cultural politics of childhood and nation: Space, mobility and a global world. Special issue, part 1. Global Studies of Childhood, 4(3), 137–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Millei, Z. (Ed.) (2015). The cultural politics of childhood and nation: Space, mobility and a global world. Special issue, Part 2. Global Studies of Childhood, 5(1), 1–111.Google Scholar
  66. Mitchell, K., & Elwood, S. (2013). Intergenerational mapping and the cultural politics of memory. Space & Polity 17(1), 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mitchell, K., & Kallio, K. P (2017). Introduction to the special issue on spaces of the geosocial: Exploring transnational topologies. Geopolitics, 22(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Moisio, S., & Paasi, A. (2013). From geopolitical to Geoeconomic? The changing political rationalities of state space. Geopolitics, 18(2), 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Noble, G. (2009). ‘Countless acts of recognition’: Young men, ethnicity and the messiness of identities in everyday life. Social and Cultural Geography, 10(8), 875–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Payne, P. G. (2016). What next? Post-critical materialisms in environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 47(2), 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Peña, I., & Ybarra, M. (2017). We Don’t need money, we need to be together: Forced transnationality in deportation afterlives. Geopolitics, 22(1), 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Prout, A. (2011). Taking a step away from modernity: Reconsidering the new sociology of childhood. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rekret, P. (2016). A critique of new materialism: Ethics and ontology. Subjectivity, 9(3), 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rinne, E., & Kallio, K. P. (2017). Nuorten Tilallisten Mielikuvien Lähteillä. Alue & Ympäristö, 46(1), 17–31.Google Scholar
  75. Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivity and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Saarinen, J. (Ed.) (2016). Special issue on tourism and development. Fennia, 194(1), 1–88.Google Scholar
  77. Sepp, V. (2012). Inoperative provinces, immobile regions and the geography of heterogeneous associations: The case of absent territorial border change in Estonia. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 94(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Simonsen, K. (2013). In quest of a new humanism: Embodiment, experience and phenomenology as critical geography. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sparke, M. (2017). Situated cyborg knowledge in not so borderless online global education: Mapping the geosocial landscape of a MOOC. Geopolitics, 22(1), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. van Ingen, M. (2016). Beyond the nature/culture divide? The contradictions of Rosi Braidotti’s the Posthuman. Journal of Critical Realism, 15(5), 530–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Väyrynen, T. (2014). Muted national memory: When the Hitler’s brides speak the truth. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 16(2), 218–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wood, B. (2017). Youth studies, citizenship and transitions: Towards a new research agenda. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(9), 1176–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wood, B., & Kallio, K. P. (forthcoming). Green citizenship: Towards spatial and lived perspectives. In S. Davoudi, H. Blanco, R. Cowell, & I. White (Eds.), Routledge companion to environmental planning and sustainability. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Space and Political Agency Research Group (SPARG), RELATE Centre of ExcellenceUniversity of TampereTampereFinland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Paul Hart
    • 1
  • Phillip Payne
    • 2
  1. 1.Science EducationUniversity of ReginaReginaCanada
  2. 2.Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations