Advertisement

Future Shock, Generational Change, and Shifting Eco-Social Identities: Forest School Practitioners’ Reasons to Train

  • Mel McCreeEmail author
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

Why do Forest School (FS) practitioners choose their vocations? What role do significant life experiences (SLE) play in their choices? This chapter investigates some of the reasons behind their choices, as described by an ethnography of FS trainees (2010–12) using qualitative interviews and observation. Arising from the study, a new conceptual model of eco-social identity is described, framing the ongoing construction of self as part of nature. Environmental and socio-cultural influences are explored, including both negative and positive experiences, drawing on SLE research. Identity formation based upon life experience had an impact upon the trainees’ choices and yielded some surprising similarities. Early childhood and adult experience in the wider natural world, role purpose, generational change, environmental loss, future shock, and a passion for pedagogy motivated the practitioners. The study contributes new insights into the impact of FS and similar training, the influence of socialization, environmental loss and degradation, future anticipation, ecological identity, and subjectivity in childhoodnature practice.

Keywords

Eco-social identity Early life experience Generational change Environmental loss Futures Forest School 

References

  1. Amsler, S., & Facer, K. (2017). Contesting anticipatory regimes in education: Exploring alternative educational orientations to the future. Futures, 94, 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, C., Knowles, Z., Richards, K., McCree, M., Sayer, J. & Ridgers N. (2015) Play and learning outdoors: engaging with the natural world using forest school in the UK. In T. Skelton, K. Nairn, & P. Kraftl (Eds.), Space, landscape, and environment, Vol. 2. T. Skelton (editor-in-chief), Geographies of children and young people. Springer SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  3. Barratt Hacking, E., Scott, W., & Barratt, R. (2007). Children’s research into their local environment: Stevenson’s gap, and possibilities for the curriculum. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bragg, E. A. (1996). Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self- theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ceaser, D. (2015). Significant life experiences and environmental justice: Positionality and the significance of negative social/environmental experiences. Environmental Education Research, 21(2), 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chawla, L. (1988) Significant life experiences revisited: a review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), pp 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: a review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. Environmental Education Research, 4, 369–382.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462980040402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chawla, L. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chawla, L. (2001). Significant life experiences revisited once again: Response to vol. 5(4) five critical commentaries on significant life experience research in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 7(4), 451–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chawla, L. (2006). Research methods to investigate significant life experiences: Review and recommendations. Environmental Education Research, 12(3–4), 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chawla, L. (2007). Childhood experiences associated with care for the natural world: A theoretical framework for empirical results. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(4), 144–170. [Online]. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.17.4.0144Google Scholar
  13. Chawla, L., & Derr, V. (2012). The development of conservation behaviors in childhood and youth. In S. Clayton (Ed.), Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp 527–555). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chawla, L., & Hart, R. A. (1995). The roots of environmental concern. The NAMTA Journal, 20(1), 148–157.Google Scholar
  15. Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–66). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (Eds.). (2003). Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Coote, A. (2015). People, planet, power: Towards a new social settlement. London: New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
  18. Cree, J., & McCree, M. (2013). A brief history of forest school, Part 2. Horizons, 62, 32–35.Google Scholar
  19. Crutzen, P. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415, 23.  https://doi.org/10.1038/415023aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dillon, J., Kelsey, E., & Duque-Aristizabal, A. (1999). Identity and culture: Theorising emergent environmentalism. Environmental Education Research, 5(4), 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fjørtoft, I. (2004). Landscape as playscape: The effects of natural environments on children’s play and motor development. Children, Youth and Environments, 14, 21–44.Google Scholar
  22. Forest School Institute for Outdoor Learning Special Interest Group (FS IOL SIG). (2012). Forest school ethos, principles and criteria [Online]. Retrieved from: http://www.forestschoolassociation.org/full-principles-and-criteria-for-good-practice/
  23. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  24. Furihata, S., Ishizaka, T., Hatakeyama, M., Hitsumoto, M., & Ito, S. (2007). Potentials and challenges of research on ‘significant life experiences’ in Japan. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(4), 207–226.Google Scholar
  25. Gill, T. (2011). Children and nature: A quasi-systematical review of the empirical evidence. London, Englian: Greater London Authority.Google Scholar
  26. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  27. Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  28. Gooch, M. (2003). A sense of place: Ecological identity as a driver for catchment volunteering. Australian Journal on Volunteering, 8(2), 23–33.Google Scholar
  29. Gough, A. (1999a). Recognising women in environmental education pedagogy and research: Toward an ecofeminist poststructuralist perspective. Environmental Education Research, 5(2), 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gough, A. (1999b). Kids don’t like wearing the same jeans as their Mums and Dads: So whose ‘life’ should be in significant life experiences research? Environmental Education Research, 5(4), 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gough, N. (2002). Ignorance in environmental education research. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gough, S. (1999). Significant life experiences (SLE) research: A view from somewhere. Environmental Education Research, 5(4), 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hand, G. (1997). The forest of forgetting. Northern Lights, 13(1), 11–13.Google Scholar
  34. Howell, R., & Allen, S. (2016). Significant life experiences, motivations and values of climate change educators. Environmental Education Research, 1–19. Virtual issue: Climate Change and Education.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1158242
  35. Hsu, S. J. (2009) Significant life experiences affect environmental action: a confirmation study in eastern Taiwan. Environmental Education Research, 15(4), 497–517.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903076973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ingold, T. (2008). Bindings against boundaries: Entanglements of life in an open world. Environment and Planning A, 40(8), 1796–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Kahn, P. H. (1997). Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis: Children’s affiliations with nature. Developmental Review, 17, 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kahn, P. H. (1999). The human relationship with nature: Development and culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kahn, P. H. (2002). Children’s affiliations with nature. In P. H. Kahn & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (Eds.). (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Keichtermans, G. (2005). Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 995–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kellert, R. S., & Wilson, E. O. (Eds.). (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kraftl, P. (2013). Geographies of alternative education: Diverse learning spaces for children and young people. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee, A., & Dunston, R. (2011). Practice, learning and change: Towards a re-theorisation of professional education. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(5), 483–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Li, D., & Chen, J. (2015). Significant life experiences on the formation of environmental action among Chinese college students. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 612–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Malone, K. (2008). Every experience matters: An evidence based research report on the role of learning outside the classroom for children’s whole development from birth to eighteen years. Report commissioned by Farming and Countryside Education for UK Department of Children, School and Families. Wollongong.Google Scholar
  49. Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In K. Mannheim (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London, England: RKP. (first published 1923).Google Scholar
  50. Maynard, T. (2007) Encounters with forest school and foucault: A risky business?’ Education 3–13, 35(4), 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McCree, M. (2012a) Conversation with Richard Irvine, private correspondence with author, 13 June 2012.Google Scholar
  52. McCree, M. (2012b) Conversation with Lily Horseman, private correspondence with author, 17 November 2012.Google Scholar
  53. McCree, M. (2013). Values, action and politics in forest school. Forest School Association National Conference. Derwent Hill Outdoor Education Centre, Keswick, October 2013. Unpublished keynote presentation.Google Scholar
  54. McCree, M. (2014) Practitioner experiences of forest school. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Gloucestershire, UK.Google Scholar
  55. McCree, M. (forthcoming). Making space for children, making visible hidden enclosures. Royal Geographical Society International Conference, Cardiff University, 29 August 2018. Presentation for post-conference publication.Google Scholar
  56. McCree, M., & Cree, J. (2017). Forest School: Core principles in changing times. In S. Waite (Ed.), Children learning outside the classroom – From birth to eleven (2nd ed., pp. 222–232). London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. McCree, M., Cutting, R., & Sherwin, D. (2018). The Hare and the Tortoise go to Forest School: Taking the scenic route to academic attainment via emotional wellbeing outdoors. Early Child Development and Care. Special Issue: Young Children’s Emotional Experiences.Google Scholar
  58. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994) (eds.) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded source book (2nd edn.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Murray, R. and O’Brien, L. (2005) Such enthusiasm – a joy to see: an evaluation of forest school in England. Forest Research for New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
  61. Palmer, J. (1993). Development of concern for the environment and formative experiences of educators. Journal of Environmental Education, 24(3), 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Payne, P. (1999). The significance of experience in SLE research. Environmental Education Research, 5(4), 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Proudman, B. (1995). Experiential education as emotionally engaged learning. In K. Warren, M. Sakoffs, & J. S. Hunt (Eds.), The theory of experiential education (3rd ed., pp. 240–247). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
  64. Sandilands, C. (1999). The good-natured feminist: Ecofeminism and the quest for democracy. Minneapolis, IN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sebba, R. (1991) The landscapes of childhood: the reflection of childhood’s environment in adult memories and in children’s attitudes. Environment and Behaviour, 23(4), pp 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shukaitis, S. (2013). Recomposing precarity: Notes on the laboured politics of class composition. Ephemera, 13(3). [Online]. Retrieved from: http://www.ephemerajournal.org/contribution/recomposing-precarity-notes-laboured-politics-class-composition
  67. Sivek, D. J. (2002). Environmental sensitivity among Wisconsin high school students. Environmental Education Research, 8(2), 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stake, R. (2005) Qualitative case studies. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 433–466.Google Scholar
  69. Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Carrier, S. J., Strnad, R. L., Bondell, H. D., Kirby-Hathaway, T., & Moore, S. E. (2014). Role of significant life experiences in building environmental knowledge and behavior among middle school students. Journal of Environmental Education, 45(3), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stevenson, R. (1987). Schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice. In I. Robottom (Ed.), Environmental education: Practice and possibility (pp 69–82). Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Sutton, P. W. (2004). Nature, environment and society. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  72. Sward, L. L. (1999). Significant life experiences affecting the environmental sensitivity of El Salvadoran environmental professionals. Environmental Education Research, 5(2), 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tanner, R. T. (1980). Significant life experiences: A new research area in environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 11(4), 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tanner, T. (1998). Choosing the right subjects in significant life experiences research. Environmental Education Research, 4(4), 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Taylor, A. (2017). Beyond stewardship: Common world pedagogies for the Anthropocene. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1448–1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Thomashow, M. (1995). Ecological identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  77. Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York, NY: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  78. Waite, S. (2007) Memories are made of this: some reflections on outdoor learning and recall. Education 3–13, 35(4), pp 333–347.Google Scholar
  79. Waite, S. (2010). Losing our way? The downward path for outdoor learning for children aged 2–11 years. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 10(2), 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Waite, S. (2011a) Teaching and learning outside the classroom: personal values, alternative pedagogies and standards. Education 3–13, 39(1), pp 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Waite, S. (2013). “Knowing your place in the world”: How place and culture support and obstruct educational aims. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Waite, S., Davis, B., & Brown, K. (2006). Forest school principles: ‘Why we do what we do’. Final report for funding body EYDCP (zero14plus). Exmouth, England: University of Plymouth.Google Scholar
  83. Ward Thompson, C., Aspinall, P., Bell, S., & Findlay, C. (2005). ‘It gets you away from everyday life’: Local woodlands and community use – What makes a difference? Landscape Research, 30(1), 109–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wells, N., & Lekies, K. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  85. Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education and Childhood, Faculty of ArtsCreative Industries & Education, University of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Debra Flanders Cushing
    • 1
  • Robert Barratt
    • 2
  • Elisabeth Barratt Hacking
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Design, Creative Industries FacultyQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.The Eden ProjectCornwallUK
  3. 3.Department of EducationUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations