Advertisement

CineMusicking: Ecological Ethnographic Film as Critical Pedagogy

  • Michael B. MacDonaldEmail author
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

CineMusicking, a portmanteau of Cinéma vérité and Musicking, is an ecological approach to digital ethnographic filmmaking for music research and teaching in critical youth studies. The methods of CineMusicking were developed as a way of undertaking research about ecologically embedded lived personal experience. This method makes use of Gregory Bateson’s work on ecology as it was developed in ethnomusicology by Christopher Small and, in a separate development, biosemiotics. The goal of this method is to explore the coupling and subsequent formation of individual consciousness and culture within a semiosphere-biosphere matrix, what I call the matrix that embeds.

I will show through discussion of the production of three of my original ethnographic films Megamorphesis, Letters to Attawapiskat, and Pimachihowan, that ecological ethnographic films made with youth can co-create an ecological aesthetic education with the potential to be deeply transformative for themselves, their schools, community, and environment.

Keywords

CineMusicking Cinéma vérité Musicking Biosemiotics Critical pedagogy 

References

  1. Adorno, T. W. (1984). Aesthetic theory (C. Lenhardt Trans. & G. Adorno & R. Tiedmann Ed.). Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original edition, 1970).Google Scholar
  2. Adorno, T. W. (1991). In J. M. Bernstein (Ed.), The culture industry: Selected essays on a mass culture. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Adorno, T. W., Benjamin, W., Bloch, E., Brecht, B., & Lukacs, G. (1977). Aesthetics and politics. New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Barbieri, M. (2008). Introduction to biosemiotics: The new biological synthesis. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York, NY: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  7. Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. (1978). Toward a theory of schizophrenia. In M. M. Berger (Ed.), Beyond the double bind: Communication and family systems, theories, and techniques with schizophrenics. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel, Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Bateson, M. C. (1972). Our own metaphor: A personal account of a conference on the effects of conscious purpose on human adaptation. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  9. Benjamin, W. (1968). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace & World.Google Scholar
  10. Brier, S. (2008). Cybersemiotics: Why information is not enough. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  11. Charlton, N. G. (2008). Understanding gregory bateson: Mind, beauty, and the sacred earth. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  12. Deloria, V. (1969/1988). Custer died for your sins. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fackenheim, E. (1961). Metaphysics and historicity. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Foster, J. B., York, R., & Clark, B. (2011). The ecological rift: Capitalism’s war on the earth. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  15. Freire, P. (1974/2013). Education for critical consciousness. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  16. Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  17. Freire, P. (2001). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. New York, NY: Roman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  19. Guattari, F., & Rolnik, S. (2008). Molecular revolution in Brazil. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  20. Harries-Jones, P. (1995). A recursive vision: Ecological understanding and Gregory Bateson. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  21. Heider, K. G. (2006). Ethnographic film. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). Biosemiotics: An examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. London, England: University of Scranton Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lazzarato, M. (2011). The making of the indebted man. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  24. Lazzarato, M. (2014). Signs and machines: Capitalism and the production of subjectivity. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  25. Lazzarato, M. (2015). Governing by Debt. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  26. Luhmann, N. (1989). Ecological communication. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Luhmann, N. (1996). Social systems. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Luhmann, N. (2000). Art as a social system. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Luhmann, N. (2009). Self-organization and autopoiesis. In B. Clarke & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Emergence and embodiment: New essays on second-order systems theory (pp. 143–156). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacDonald, M. B. (2016a). Remix and LifeHack in HipHop: Towards a critical pedagogy of music. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. MacDonald, M. B. (2016b). Cipher 5 as method. In S. Steinberg & A. Ibrahim (Eds.), Critically researching youth. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  32. Marazzi, C. (2008). Capital and language: From the new economy to the war economy. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  33. Marazzi, C. (2011a). The violence of financial capitalism. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  34. Marazzi, C. (2011b). Capital and affects: The politics of the language economy. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  35. Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston MA: Shambhala Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sartre, J. P. (1963). The problem of Method. London, England: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
  37. Sartre, J. P. (2007). Existentialism is a humanism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Shudak, N. J., & Avoseh, M. B. M. (2015). Freirean-based critical pedagogy: The challenges of limit-situations and critical transitivity. Creative Education, 6(March), 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Small, C. (1998). Musicking. Wesleyan, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Snow, C. P. (1998). The two cultures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockstrom, J., Cornell, S., Fetzer, I., Bennet, E., … Sorlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 736–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Turino, T. (1999). Signs of imagination, identiy, and experiene: a peircian semiotic theory for music. Ethnomusicology, 43, 2 (Spring-Summer), 221–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Von Foerster, H. (2003). Understanding understanding: Essays on the cybernetics and cognition. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Von Foerster, H. (2014). The beginning of heaven and earth has no name: Seven days with second-order cybernetics. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Yakir, D. (1978). Cine-trance: The vision of Jean Rouch. Film Quarterly, Spring, 31, 2–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Fine Arts and CommunicationsMacEwan UniversityEdmontonCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • David Rousell
    • 1
  • Dilafruz Williams
    • 2
  1. 1.Manchester Metropolian UniversityManchesterUK
  2. 2.Portland State UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations