Introduction
In undertaking a review of archaeological field training at Palestinian universities, the authors set out to examine an area that had not previously been studied in Palestine. The objective was to be able to optimize field training for producing future Palestinian archaeologists, while creating an archaeological framework for protecting and promoting archaeological heritage in the region. Archaeological sites form a significant part of the cultural heritage of Palestine and may not survive without measures for their protection. They are threatened by ongoing conflict, urban development, and looting. The results of this study will enable archaeology departments to seek funding and logistic support for field training courses and other projects with concrete information on their contribution to preservation of archaeological cultural heritage. The study examines the current summer field training courses and makes proposals for improving their effectiveness. The analytical...
References
Abu Alsaud, L., and A. Abu El Ezz. 2020. The Palestinian Tangible cultural heritage law of the year 2018. Majallat Minbar EltourathAl- Athari. Algeria: 1–25.
Aitchison, K. 2009. Discovering the archaeologists of Europe transitional report. Reading: Institute for Archaeologists.
Al-Houdalieh, S. 2009. Archaeology programmes at the Palestinian Universities: Reality and challenges. Archaeologies 5 (1): 161–183.
Al-Houdalieh, S. 2010. Archaeological heritage and related institutions in the Palestinian National Territories 16 years after signing the Oslo Accords. Present Pasts 2 (1): 31–53.
Brookers, S. 2008. Archaeology in the field: Enhancing the role of practical training and teaching. London: UCL Institute of Archaeology.
Chilton, E.S. 2010. Teaching heritage values through field schools: Cases studies from New England. In Applying Heritage Values in Contemproray Society, 147–157. Section 1. Teaching and Learning Heritage Values. PART II.
Cobb, H., and K. Croucher. 2012. Field schools, transferable skills and enhancing employability. In Global perspectives on archaeological field schools: Constructions of knowledge and experience, ed. H. Mytum, 25–40. New York: Springer.
Cobb, H., and K. Croucher. 2014. Assembling archaeological pedagogy: a theoretical framework for valuing pedagogy in archaeological interpretation and practice. Archaeological Dialogues 21 (2): 197–216.
Cobb, H., and K. Croucher. 2016. Personal, political, and pedagogic: Challenging the binary bind in archaeological pedagogy. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23 (3): 949–969.
Cobb, H., O. Harris, C. Jones, and P. Richardson, eds. 2012. Reconsidering fieldwork: Exploring on-site relationships between theory and practice, 1–14. New York: Springer.
Colley, S. 2012. Chapter 5. Archaeological field schools and fieldwork practice in an Australian Context. In Global perspectives on archaeological field schools, ed. H. Mytum, 61–81. Springer.
Colomer, L. 2014. Is archaeology a useful tool for peace making in the Palestine/Israel conflict?” What are you looking at?. Online Journal in Public Archaeology. 4: 41–50.
Croucher, K., H. Cobb, and A. Brennan. 2008. Investigating the role of fieldwork in teaching and learning archaeology. Lancaster: Carnegie Publishing.
De Landa, M. 2016. Assemblage theory, Series Speculative Realism. Edinburgh University Press. European Commission, 2016. https://tinyurl.com/2p8mcvrx
Everill, P., N. Finneran, and J. Flatman. 2015. Training and teaching in the historic environment. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice 6 (2): 93–97.
Hall, J., et al. 2005. Teaching archaeological excavation at the University of Queensland: Eight years inside TARDIS. Australian Archaeology 61 (1): 48–55.
Hamilakis, Y. 2004. Archaeology and the politics of pedagogy. World Archaeology 36 (2): 287–309.
Ingold, T. 2018. From network to meshwork: Becoming attuned to difference in trans disciplinary environmental research encounters. Environmental Science and Policy 89: 315–321.
May, S.K., M. Marshall, I.D. Sanz, and C. Smith 2018. Reflections on the pedagogy of archaeological field schools within indigenous community archaeology programmes in Australia. Public Archaeology 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2018.1483123.
Messenger, P.M., and S.J. Bender. 2019. History and approaches to heritage studies, Cultural Heritage Studies Series. 1st ed, 181–195. University Press of Florida.
Sayej, G. 2010. Palestinian archaeology: Knowledge, awareness and cultural heritage. Present Pasts 2(1): 58–71. http://doi.org/10.5334/pp.22
Sayej, G.J. 2014. Palestinian archaeology between political conflicts and peace process. What are you looking at? Online Journal in Public Archaeology 4: 37–41.
Smith, C., G. Jackson, J. Ralph, N. Brown, G. Guy Rankin, and Comunity, B. 2020. An engaged archaeology field school with a remote aboriginal community: Successes, failures, and challenges. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/20518196.2020.1804112.
Taha, H. 2015. Archaeological heritage in area C. This week in Palestine. Cornerstone for Statehood, 56–63. Issue 210.5. https://tinyurl.com/yxnt77kz
Willems, A., et al. 2018. Teaching archaeological heritage management. Towards a change in paradigms. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 20 (5–6): 297–318.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Alsaud, L.A., Salha, S., Affouneh, S., Shaqor, A., Issa, A.K. (2021). Archaeological Fieldwork Training in Palestinian Universities: A Review. In: Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_3558-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_3558-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51726-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51726-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference HistoryReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities