Paleoethnobotany

  • Glenn S. L. Stuart
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_2412-2

Introduction and Definition

From our earliest ancestors through to modern societies, plants have always been of importance to people. They were and remain a crucial element of people’s diet, whether their subsistence strategies centered on hunting and gathering or agriculture. Plants also provided fuel, were the basis for most medicines, formed the source of many tools, and were instrumental in building shelter. Further, they were used in a wide range of ceremonies, illustrated in artwork, discussed in early writings, and helped identify and demarcate places of economic and spiritual importance. In short, with few exceptions, they were of fundamental significance to past peoples around the globe.

The study of the interaction and interrelationships between plants and past peoples falls within the realm of paleoethnobotany. More specifically, paleoethnobotany is the study of behavioral and ecological interactions between past peoples and plants, documented through the analysis of plant...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Akeret, Ö., J.N. Haas, U. Leuzinger, and S. Jacomet. 1999. Plant macrofossils and pollen in goat/sheep faeces from the Neolithic lake-shore settlement Arbon Bleiche 3, Switzerland. The Holocene 9: 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bryant, V.M., Jr., and S.A. Hall. 1993. Archaeological palynology in the United States: A critique. American Antiquity 58: 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryant, V.M., Jr., and R.G. Holloway. 1996. New frontiers in palynology: Archaeological palynology. In Palynology: Principles and applications, ed. J. Jansonius and D.C. McGregor, 913–917. Dallas: American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists.Google Scholar
  4. Davidson, D.A., S. Carter, B. Boag, D. Long, R. Tipping, and A. Tyler. 1999. Analysis of pollen in soils: Processes of incorporation and redistribution of pollen in five soil profile types. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 31: 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dimbleby, G.W. 1985. The palynology of archaeological sites. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fish, S.K. 1985. Prehistoric disturbance floras of the lower Sonoran Desert and their implications. In Late quaternary vegetation and climates of the American Southwest, ed. B.F. Jacobs, P.L. Fall, and O.K. Davis, 77–88. Houston: American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Fish, S.K. 1994. Archaeological palynology of gardens and fields. In The archaeology of garden and field, ed. N.F. Miller and K.L. Gleason, 44–69. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ford, R. 1979. Paleoethnobotany in American archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 2: 285–336.Google Scholar
  9. Gaillard, M.J., H.J.B. Birks, U. Emanuelsson, and B. E. Berglund. 1992. Modern pollen\land-use relationships as an aid in the reconstruction of past land-uses and cultural landscapes: An example from south Sweden. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 1: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Helbaek, H. 1959. Domestication of food plants in the old world. Science 130: 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, V.H. 1941. The nature and status of ethnobotany. Chronica Botanica 6: 219–221.Google Scholar
  12. Kelso, G.K., S.A. Mrozowski, D. Currie, A.C. Edwards, M.R. Brown III, A.J. Horning, G.J. Brown, and J.R. Dandoy. 1995. Differential pollen preservation in a seventeenth- century refuse pit, Jamestown Island, Virginia. Historical Archaeology 29: 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Langlie, B.S., N.G. Mueller, R.N. Spengler, and G.J. Fritz. 2014. Agricultural origins from the ground up: Archaeological approaches to plant domestication. American Journal of Botany 101: 1601–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Magyari, E.K., J. Chapman, A.S. Fairbairn, M. Francis, and M.D. Guzman. 2012. Neolithic human impact on the landscapes of North-East Hungary inferred from pollen and settlement records. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 21: 279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Minnis, P.E. 1981. Seeds in archaeological sites: Sources and some interpretive problems. American Antiquity 46: 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pearsall, D.M. 2015. Paleoethnobotany: A handbook of procedures. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Renfrew, J.M. 1973. Palaeoethnobotany: The prehistoric food plants of the near East and Europe. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Stuart, G.S.L. 2007. Botanical analysis: Economic and spatial patterns. In Intensive testing for the san Xavier farm rehabilitation project, San Xavier District, Tohono O’odham nation, Pima County, Arizona, chapter 12: Material culture and special analyses, ed. L.M. Schilling and R.J. Stokes, 376–421. Tempe: Archaeological Consulting Services.Google Scholar
  19. VanDerwarker, A.M., D.N. Bardolph, K.M. Hoppa, H.B. Thakar, L.S. Martin, A.L. Jaqua, M.E. Biwer, and K.M. Gill. 2016. New world Paleoethnobotany in the new millennium (2000–2013). Journal of Archaeological Research 24: 125–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wright, P. 2010. Methodological issues in paleoethnobotany. In Paleoethnobotany: A consideration of issues, methods, and cases, ed. A.M. Vanderwarker and T.M. Peres, 37–64. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Archaeology & AnthropologyUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • E. Christian Wells
    • 1
  • Arleyn Simon
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.School of Human Evolution & Social ChangeArizona State UniversityTempeUSA