Introduction and Definition
From our earliest ancestors through to modern societies, plants have always been of importance to people. They were and remain a crucial element of people’s diet, whether their subsistence strategies centered on hunting and gathering or agriculture. Plants also provided fuel, were the basis for most medicines, formed the source of many tools, and were instrumental in building shelter. Further, they were used in a wide range of ceremonies, illustrated in artwork, discussed in early writings, and helped identify and demarcate places of economic and spiritual importance. In short, with few exceptions, they were of fundamental significance to past peoples around the globe.
The study of the interaction and interrelationships between plants and past peoples falls within the realm of paleoethnobotany. More specifically, paleoethnobotany is the study of behavioral and ecological interactions between past peoples and plants, documented through the analysis of plant...
- Bryant, V.M., Jr., and R.G. Holloway. 1996. New frontiers in palynology: Archaeological palynology. In Palynology: Principles and applications, ed. J. Jansonius and D.C. McGregor, 913–917. Dallas: American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists.Google Scholar
- Dimbleby, G.W. 1985. The palynology of archaeological sites. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Fish, S.K. 1985. Prehistoric disturbance floras of the lower Sonoran Desert and their implications. In Late quaternary vegetation and climates of the American Southwest, ed. B.F. Jacobs, P.L. Fall, and O.K. Davis, 77–88. Houston: American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation.Google Scholar
- Fish, S.K. 1994. Archaeological palynology of gardens and fields. In The archaeology of garden and field, ed. N.F. Miller and K.L. Gleason, 44–69. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
- Ford, R. 1979. Paleoethnobotany in American archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 2: 285–336.Google Scholar
- Jones, V.H. 1941. The nature and status of ethnobotany. Chronica Botanica 6: 219–221.Google Scholar
- Renfrew, J.M. 1973. Palaeoethnobotany: The prehistoric food plants of the near East and Europe. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Stuart, G.S.L. 2007. Botanical analysis: Economic and spatial patterns. In Intensive testing for the san Xavier farm rehabilitation project, San Xavier District, Tohono O’odham nation, Pima County, Arizona, chapter 12: Material culture and special analyses, ed. L.M. Schilling and R.J. Stokes, 376–421. Tempe: Archaeological Consulting Services.Google Scholar
- Wright, P. 2010. Methodological issues in paleoethnobotany. In Paleoethnobotany: A consideration of issues, methods, and cases, ed. A.M. Vanderwarker and T.M. Peres, 37–64. New York: Springer.Google Scholar