Meeting the Challenges of Globalization while Preserving Institutional Singularity: The Case of Quebec CEGEPs

Reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

Focusing on the case of Quebec general and vocational colleges (collèges d’enseignement general et professionnel – CEGEPs), this chapter will explore how colleges’ responses to global challenges may relate symbiotically with the nature of the higher education system in which they are embedded, and thus preserve their singularity in the global era. CEGEPs interact with organizations across borders and across spatial levels, but their capacity to preserve their singularity relies on institutional initiatives consistent with and supported by the local and provincial contexts. College-university transfer is not an issue in Quebec because it is embedded in the system. CEGEPs, however, need to respond to the growing knowledge intensiveness of the economy, and they do so by establishing DEC-BAC dual degrees with local universities and as well as by developing a coherent system of CCTTs that conducts locally relevant research. CEGEPs have also responded to the global devaluation of diplomas by engaging in international activities that are consistent with Quebec’s knowledge diplomacy, i.e., a province, a region, or a country using international education activities to outsource its values, communicate the relevance of its political agenda, and increase its attractiveness.

Keywords

CEGEP Quebec Globalization Academic drift College-university transfers Knowledge diplomacy Internationalization 

References

  1. Allal, Samir, and Louise Ménard. 2014. Favoriser la réussite et la perseverance des diplômés de formation professionnelle : le cas des collèges d’enseignement général et professionnel (Cégep) au Québec. Formation Emploi 127 (3): 49–70.Google Scholar
  2. Association of Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology of Ontario. 1999. A new charter for Ontario. http://cclp.mior.ca/Reference%20Shelf/PDF_OISE/Charter%20for%20Colleges.p df. Accessed 19 Nov 2014.
  3. ACCC - Association of Canadian Community Colleges. 2012. College and institute applied research – Incremental innovation for growth and prosperity: Applied research environmental scan 2010–11. Ottawa: ACCC.Google Scholar
  4. ACCC - Association of Canadian Community Colleges. 2010. Internationalize Canadian colleges and institutes: The first national report on mobility and international education. http://www.accc.ca/english/index.htm. Accessed 17 Aug 2016.
  5. Becher, Tony, and Maurice Kogan. 1992. Process and structure in higher education. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bégin-Caouette, Olivier. 2013. Think locally, act globally: Comparing urban, suburban and rural colleges’ internationalization: The case of CEGEPs. College Quarterly 16(4). http://collegequarterly.ca/2013-vol16-num04-fall/begin-caouette.html. Accessed 14 July 2016.
  7. Bégin-Caouette, Olivier. 2012. The internationalization of in-service teacher training in Québec cégeps and their foreign partners: An institutional perspective. Prospects 42: 41–63.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-012-9221-2.
  8. Bensouda, Reda, Guy Chiasson, Mohamed Lamine Dumbouya, and Aziza Outghate. 2013. Les cégeps et le monde de l'innovation: au carrefour des dynamiques régionales et sectorielles. La revue de l'innovation dans le secteur public 18 (2): 1–24.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, G. 1971. Community colleges in Canada. Toronto: Ryerson Press.Google Scholar
  10. CI - CEGEP International. 2011. Profil des activités internationales des cégeps 2010. Montreal: Cégep International. http://www.cegepinternational.qc.ca/fichiers/39291-Profil-des-activites-internationales-des-CÉGEPs-2010.PDF. Accessed 20 Oct 2011.
  11. CI - CEGEP International. 2008. Les cégeps, une présence active dans le monde. Montreal: CEGEP International.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, Burton R. 1983. The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, I.D., G. Moran, M.L. Skolnik, and D. Trick. 2009. Academic transformation: The forces reshaping higher education in Ontario. Kingston: Robert Sutherland Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, Ian D., David Trick, and Richard Van Loon. 2011. Academic reform: Policy options for improving the quality and cost-effectiveness of undergraduate education in Ontario. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Colleges Ontario. 2012. Empowering Ontario: Transforming higher education in the 21st century. http://www.collegesontario.org/policy-positions/position-papers/Empowering%20Ontario%20(2).pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2013.
  16. CSE - Conseil supérieur de l’éducation. 2015. Retracer les frontières des formations collégiales: Entre l’héritage et les possibles. www.cse.gouv.qc.ca/nouveaux_diplomes_collegial. Accessed 28 Aug 2016.
  17. Doern, Bruce. 2008. “polytechnics” in higher education systems: A comparative review and policy implications for Ontario. In Report for the higher education quality council of Ontario. Toronto: HECQO.Google Scholar
  18. Donald, Janet G. 1997. Higher education in Quebec: 1945–1995. In Higher education in Canada: Different systems, different perspectives, ed. G.A. Jones, 61–187. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Fédération des CEGEPs. 2014. Portrait des activités internationales des cégeps 2014. Montreal: Federation des CEGEPs. Retrieved from http://www.fedecegeps.qc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/FED0914_portrait_Ep8.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2014.
  20. Fédération des CEGEPs. 2013. Le BAC obligatoire pour les infirmières et les infirmiers: 73% des étudiants en Soins infirmiers sont contre. Perspectives Collégiales 8 (3): 1–2.Google Scholar
  21. FIQ - Fédération interprofessionnelle de la santé du Québec. 2013. L’expérience, l’expertise, ça compte aussi! FIQ Dossier spécial 5 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
  22. Fisher, Ronald. 2009. A framework for research at Canadian colleges. College Quaterly 12 (4): 1–30.Google Scholar
  23. Foy, Evelyne. 2008. L’internationalisation des cégeps. In Les cégeps : une grande aventure collective québécoise, ed. Lucie Héon, Denis Savard, and Thérèse Hamel, 275–290. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
  24. Gallagher, Paul, and John D. Dennison. 1995. Canada’s college systems: A study of diversity. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 19 (5): 381–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ivany, Ray. 2000. Economic development and a new millennium mandate for Canada’s community colleges. College Canada 5 (1): 10–13.Google Scholar
  26. KPMG-SECOR. 2014. La contribution économique des cégeps et des centres collégiaux de transfert de technologie. http://reseautranstech.qc.ca/info/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/KPMG-SECOR_La-contribution-%C3%A9conomique-des-c%C3%A9geps-et-des-CCTT_Version-fin-.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug 2016.
  27. Lavoie, E. 2008. Visite guidée d’une organisation originale. In Les cégeps : une grande aventure collective québécoise, ed. Lucie Héon, Denis Savard, and Thérèse Hamel, 195–217. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
  28. Levin, John S. 2001. Globalizing the community college. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neave, G. 2001. The European dimension in higher education: An extension into the modern use of analogues. In Higher education and the nation state: The international dimension of higher education, ed. Jeroen Huisman, Peter Maassen, and Guy Neave, 13–75. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  30. OIIQ - Ordre des infirmières et infirmiers du Québec. 2012. La relève infirmière du Québec: une profession, une formation. Mémoire adopté par le Conseil d’administration de l’Ordre des infirmières et infirmiers du Québec. Westmount: OIIQ.Google Scholar
  31. Ontario Department of Education.1967. Statement by the Minister in the Legislature – 21 May 1965. Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology Basic Documents, Toronto: Ontario Department of Education.Google Scholar
  32. Paquin, Stéphane. 2006. Les relations internationales du Québec depuis la Doctrine Gérin-Lajoie (1965–2005). Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
  33. Piattoni, Simona. 2009. Multi-level governance: A historical and conceptual analysis. European Integration 31 (2): 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Picard, France. 2015. Trajectory of indecision in college: An illustration of mixed methods research. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy 49 (3): 232–252.Google Scholar
  35. Piché, Sebastien, Jessica Pineault, and Lynn Lapostolle. 2008. L’Association pour la recherche au collégial : briser l’isolement des chercheuses et chercheurs de collèges. In Les Cégeps : Une Grande Aventure Collective Québécoise, ed. Lucie Héon, Denis Savard, and Thérèse Hamel, 387–398. Québec, Canada: Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
  36. Raby, Rosalind L., and Edward J. Valeau. 2007. Community college international education: Looking back to forecast the future. New Directions for Community Colleges 138: 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rocher, G. 2008. L’engendrement du cégep par la commission Parent. In Les cégeps: une grande aventure collective québécoise, ed. Lucie Héon, Denis Savard, and Thérèse Hamel, 9–16. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
  38. Rosenkrantz, Otte Arild. 2013. All in Good Time: The Evolving Role of Faculty in Ontario Colleges. Thesis submitted to LHAE, OISE. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  39. Sassen, Saskia. 2009. La globalisation. Une sociologie. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  40. Skolnik, Michael L. 2011. Re-conceptualizing the relationship between community colleges and universities using a conceptual framework drawn from the study of jurisdictional conflict between professions. Community College Review 39 (4): 352–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Skolnik, Michael.L. 2008. Community colleges and further education in Canada. In Global development of community colleges, technical colleges and further education programs, eds Paul A. Elsner, George R. Boggs, and Judith T. Irwin, 41–50. Washington, DC: Community College Press.Google Scholar
  42. Skolnik, Michael L. 2005. From the 1960s to the 2000s: Reflections on the difficulty of maintaining balance between the university’s economic and non-economic objectives in periods when its economic role is highly valued. In Creating knowledge, strengthening nations: The changing role of higher education, ed. Glen A. Jones, Patricia L. McCarney, and Michael L. Skolnik, 106–126. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  43. Trépanier, Michel, Marie P. Ippersiel, Yvon Martineau et Geneviève Szczepanik. 2003. Les CCTT et le soutien technologique aux entreprises. Analyse des pratiques de transfert et évaluation de l’impact des CCTT sur le développement des entreprises, INRS UCS. http://www.ucs.inrs.ca/sites/default/files/RAPPORTSYNTHESE_CCTT040109.pdf. Accessed on 17 Mar 2014.
  44. Trilokekar, Roopa D. 2009. International education as soft power? The contributions and challenges of Canadian foreign policy to the internationalization of higher education. International Higher Education 59: 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trottier, Claude, Jean Bernatchez, Donald Fisher, and Kjell Rubsenson. 2014. PSE policy in Quebec: A case study. In The development of postsecondary education systems in Canada: A comparison between British Columbia, Ontario, and Québec 1980–2010, ed. Donald Fisher, Kjell Rubenson, Theresa Shanahan, and Claude Trottier, 200–290. Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Van Vught, Frans. 2008. Mission diversity and reputation in higher education. Higher Education Policy 21: 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Williams, Keith. 2014. Towards Sustainable Performance Measurement Frameworks for Applied Research in Canadian Community Colleges and Institutes. College Quaterly, 17(4). Retrieved from http://collegequarterly.ca/2014-vol17-num04-fall/williams.html.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST)Université du Québec à Montréal (UQÀM)MontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations